Would you fug a girl with a penor?
>>25549692
If she looks like that pic and nobody ever knows, of course.
I would love to have a girl with a penor as gf
I mean, not gay and that, but I would enjoy people not having a hint about the whole thing if she is very passable and feminine that the only difference is just having a penor. Only if people doesn't find out.
>>25549692
As long she's not a feminist or otherwise crazy in a not-fun-way.
>implicating through the manner by which you spoke that a person with a """""""pen0r"""" is a girl
>>25549692
of course i would use a pennor, how else would i fug her?
>>25550068
that's not what "implicate" means you tard
also, mannerinwhich you spoke.
If you're gonna be tryhard, at least try hard.
>>25549692
Who is the girl in the op I want to fuck her
>>25550132
I'd like to interject your dispute with anon and say that it's controversial to argue proper prepositional usage in cases where the preposition is not literal. In this case, you aren't actually "in" a manner. You aren't "on" it either. Convention usually dictates the word to say but it cannot be taken as the correct one. For anything that it's worth, you could say "by" , "in", or "on" here and any would be technically valid. Preposition Confusion sucks.
das gay as fugg to be honestwith yousenpie
>>25549692
you have been muted no content
