Why is this, /r9k/?
To clarify, with the bum scenario... The bum is essentially offering the service of "good feelz" to everyone who walks by.
bump agjagqeghqeghqeghqeh
>>25374155
took me a while to get what the point of the image was.
It's most likely because women aren't specifically involved in any of the other scenarios. When something is morally grey, and a man and woman are involved, people will ALWAYS side with the woman, without fail.
buying drugs is illegal
hiring a hitman is illegal
>>25374543
That was my point.
Women can't do wrong in the eyes of society because they're just innocent victims.
The person buying sex or buying a lapdance is in a position of economic power over the prostitute or stripper, not to mention the fact that a third party is often the one to profit from the services rendered (manager/club owner or a pimp, respectively).
I'm not interested in convincing you one way or the other, but I think the "common perception" at play is that sex workers are disadvantaged and only doing sex work due to a lack of other opportunities.
>>25374155
who cares what normies think? it pains me that my lesser robot underlings get buttpained by seeing these things
Cops taking bribes is more evil because they're throwing away their responsibility to uphold the law, which is the most vital part of society. Tobacco companies and drug dealers prey on addiction and getting people hooked, it's not the consumers' fault they buy more product when they're addicted to it. Employees taking below minimum wage are faultless because they're doing it to survive.
Everything else is the consumer being more evil as they are directly creating a need for evil, suppliers are just accomplices in this and thus less guilty.
Shit is scewed!
There should be 3 lists
Producer / Seller / Buyer
In this scenario people would have chosen the pimp an not john
