>blood alone moves the wheels of history
What did he mean when he said this?
>>25348440
Power is power, all else is empty whining.
>>25348464
Knowledge is power.
>>25348440
Policy only has substance and bearing when there is muscle behind it to back it. That being said perhaps the concept of blood could be more accurately represented with "blood and muscle" as economic sanctions have seen relative success in modern politics (but Russia has shattered NATO/EU confidence in sanctions so it's a swing and a miss I suppose).
>>25348487
If you implement plans based on the knowledge, yes. Plans drenched in human blood.
>>25348440
Same shit Bismark meant with his "blood and iron" speech, realpolitik.
He means the only way for the world to progress is diversity and the killing of racist white shitlords
No army no place in history
we never going to become imperialists or fascists again are we?
...
how come fascist leaders said all this stuff and then got BTFO? you'd think they'd be able to back it up
>>25348656
Germany and Italy had to fight America, Britain, and Russia. If Germany & Britain or Germany & Russia went 1v1, Germany would win.
>>25348710
I get that but shouldn't they have taken that into account and planned around it so that they could be the strongest?
>>25348743
Yeah, they probably should've waited longer
Is Mussolini the most robotic statesman ever?
>>25348710
Wow, it's almost like anti-social losers who pick fights get BTFO by people who can make friends.
>>25348743
Mussolini warned Hitler, but he didn't listen.
