File: antonioni_lanotte.jpg (88 KB, 800x485) Image search: [Google]

88 KB, 800x485

i guess i should say that i'm not really a robot. i've had relationships, but i do generally agree with the /r9k/ philosophy regarding women. i'm 25 and do want to have kids eventually, but i don't really care for getting married. women are incredibly vapid, for the most part. i know we all wish to find some super special girl that we can claim to be different from the rest. some of you seem to prioritize purity but in my experience women who are 'pure' or whatever are also incredibly boring and are the definition of a woman existing solely for reproduction. they care more about your paternal instincts and how well you can take care of them. if you do get into a relationship like this you will grow to hate it. now the other type of woman is one that has interests outside of reproduction, but the thing is that these women are the opposite of pure. they have lives outside of the feminine and have thus most likely taken quite a few loads by the time you come along. these relationships, in my experience, are much more fun and passionate yet they tend to end in misery. perhaps it is just me, but it seems these women will most likely break your heart in some way. they exist for themselves and unless you are in fact a biologically pre-disposed to be a beta, you should know that this is not the type of women you want to start a family with. if you want to have kids, you should look for a woman who is capable of being somewhat motherly. now i guess one could argue that there is an inbetween somewhere between those two types of women, but ask any chad and they will disagree. women largely fall into one or the other of those types.

cont 1/2