How come you autists browse this board 24/7 yet still don't interpret the concept of "Chad" properly:
"Chad" is not your typical likeable person that gets acceptance from people through niceness and well manners. That's just some above average normie with decency and values. Posts like these suggest otherwise >>>25254763 but in the end it's not surprising, if robots weren't autistic and unempathic enough to understand subtlety in nicknames and the respective social tropes they fit in, they wouldn't be socially awkward to begin with.
If you see an attractive guy, with a suit and a well paid job, nice car, who gets attraction from women, you won't be seeing "Chad", you'll just see a contemporary standard of an alpha male or successful person in general. Robots do not like to see it this way, because they think sensibility or intellectualism towards life will get them nowhere, when in reality most successful artists, painters, CEOs of big companies, and politicians of progressive 1st world countries wouldn't be there without those traits.
I'd say it's "all about looks" but with little research and some common sense, you can see examples of ugly people, or manlets that made it pretty far and pretty big in life. its more about insecurities than anything else
>>25261809
cont.
Chad is the jock who wears baseball caps backwards, is shit at school and usually bullies people, yet is still there because he is the head of the football team or some shit.
This standard of "douchebag" has been set for over 20 years in many high school sitcoms, teen-oriented movies, etc.
You could almost say "chad" is a phase, and like other phases, normies either grow out of them in order to become competent individuals of society, or they stay chad until they get kicked out of college and end up being truck drivers or drug dealers.
The only chance "chad" can get successful in life, is by being picked by the NFL (or any other sports league), or through social media attention.
pic related is at the edge of the "chad spectrum"
>gatsby
>intellectual
>>25261809
>I'd say it's "all about looks" but with little research and some common sense, you can see examples of ugly people, or manlets that made it pretty far and pretty big in life
Look up the stats. You can technically become a billionaire politician as a literal black midget. Doesn't mean it's probable.
Now fuck off with your bait.
>>25261840
eh, it's still a good story.
>>25261838
this misinterpretation of people by robots even covers interactions inside of this board, and that is probably because, out of the delusion that 4chan even comes close to the relevancy of mainstream sites such as reddit or twitter, there can be "normies" or "chads" on this website. perhaps /b/ in recent memory has become the only exception, considering the many "PICS YOU SHOULDN'T SHARE" threads over there. But that is also because it's the most popular place on this shithole, of course there are many outsiders.
the delusion of a subculture is strong in /r9k/, and it's based on the hypocracy that if you are not a virgin, it doesn't matter that if your sense of displacement towards society is bigger that some frogposter's, they'll still consider you a normalfag. same logic behind the "women can't be robots amirite guys :')" meme. Apparently, anyone who has the possibility of having sex can't possibly be a "true robot", even if that would imply lowering your standards to the point of lacking self respect. what's worse is the arrogance of this virgins who would "date any girl because they are truly desperate unlike dem roasties" but have never left their mother's basement nor met a REAL ugly or awkward girl in real life.
>>25262003
saying this would be a waste of time, considering most people don't take this site seriously, but there are people who unironically throw buzzwords at other anons here, or like to derail threads ignoring how the main purpose of /r9k/ is to chill and post greentext stories.
They've created this concept of "being a man in modern society" through "hard work" and "effort" yet they still have "le ebin good night wagecucks thread" open in another tab.
Yes, normal women are shallow whores, but normal women don't browse 4chan. Femanons only directly post their gender when a pertinent opinion on a "male topic" is needed. other times they'll just indirectly reveal it and unevitably trigger some buttmad virgins.
You have more in common with females, or other guys who browse this board than you think, of course, without counting all the intrinsic differences between masculinity and feminity that make this things very relative.
>>25262133
The normies really are hillarious. Their only retort is calling someone a virgin thinking it makes their points less true. Keep on norming.
>>25261809
If only it was actually like pic related...reading only made ne even more distant from normies who often are dumb as fuck and dislike most books
>>25262133
Why Me? type hit too close to home
>>25262165
it's not about being a virgin, it's about the way you deal with it (i'm a virgin too).
>>25262404
So how should I deal with it?
>>25262133
Judgemental here. "Digging deeper" literally doesn't mean anything. Just vague bullshit advice.
does someone have the picture of the sexodus?
>>25261809
>Cucktin
>>25261840
Seriously. I read that shit in high school.
>>25261838
>competent individuals of soceity
are tribal tattoos acceptable in the work industry?
>>25262133
All of your advice is bullshit you normalfaggot. Go back to retard land
>>25264114
Judgmental, I'm guessing. Possibly some Hypocrite too. Traits for someone as easily triggered as you.
>>25262133
You should create a thread with that pic and survey /r9k/.
>>25264216
>lol ur just judgemental and a hypocrite
nice assumptions faggot
Just so I wouldn't take your shitty advice like a cuckold?
You seem pretty pissy lmao
>>25262133
If I resemble "the enlightened" closest out of all them it means I'm autistic, doesn't it?
>>25261838
I'm gonna sit here and retort this shit because I legitimately think you have this all wrong. If we were to take your advice face value, we'd conclude that the high school jock, Chad,*probably* burns out and turns to basic work and drugs. That guys who make it in their careers are then set up for success in the social areas of their lives. That careers rank fosters social success. There's this men's life coach Jordan Harbinger, who worked in wallstreet alongside *those guys* that not only have made it but they abuse the economy for their quick bucks. Harbinger reported that none of those guys had game and besides turning to escorts, they'd be asking *him* how he does it, meaning how he has his way with woman. And those men are literally the richest you'll ever find, owning all the right suits and capable of buying all the right jewels. Clearly, your model of thinking breaks off here because it takes *something extra* besides breaking bank to be that alpha male that we've dubbed Chad, something that isn't just calling Chad the high school jock that burns out at 20.
And here's what it is - a blend of assertiveness and charisma. Charisma - it involves genes in part. If you're an ugly mother fucker, the best you can hope to be is a comedian but you'll never somehow use your charm to make your shit-tier genetics be attractive. The best you can hope for is that the laughter makes her judgement flair and get with you until she realllly fucking regrets it soon after when she realizes she isn't attracted to you. Assertiveness - something developed through childhood in part by overcoming yourself (as we have not) but also in part snuffed by high school bullies and the such that hold you back from developing. People on this bored have been abused and unable to develop confidence in themselves and now we have this collection of people that mostly aren't attractive or able to assert themselves (no charisma/no assertiveness) or at best, not assertive.
So fuck off.
You've been with the professors
And they've all liked your looks
With great lawyers you have
Discussed lepers and crooks
You've been through all of
F. Scott Fitzgerald's books
You're very well read
It's well known.
I dont browse this board 24/7, more like an hour a day at best and I already can tell that you dont have a clue what you are talking about and you might want to fuck off.
>>25262133
the NEET one always make me smile
>>25261809
What are some really ugly famous people? The only one I can suddenly remember is Stephen Hawking.
>>25261809
great gatsby is a fucking terrible book written by an incoherent drunk
>>25261840
this guy knows
>gatsby makes all the women drop their panties
That's funny.
