Why the fuck do you fucking admire chad ideologies like capitalism, eugenics, and nazism?
Robots are the ones these ideologies vow to opress.
By supporting these things you support this disgusting animalistic normie consumerist society where nonmainstream activities are disregarded as
inferior and only the most abusive exploitative people are rewarded.
The right wing ruling class consists of sadistic alpha males, the people that abuse us and that we direct our hate against. The free market and
massive privatisation of the 21st century is the reason for the appearance of so many NEETs and wageslaves. The ruling class can exploit you and
deny you sustinence without consequence.
Under socialism NEETs would be able to find work much easier(not to mention have a bigger incentive due to bigger economic benefits for the
working class which they belong to).
As for wagekeks anticapitalist is the final rebellion against cuckholdry. You would share the ownership of the means of production you work in
and get practically all the profit your work equals, instead of most of it going to the bourgeois owner. From there with better income and
knowledge that youhave influence over the means of production you would become motivated to lead more productive lives for yourselves.
Also if we would make a socialist economy we would be able to pursue to work with what insterests us isntead of having to learn and work jobs we
hate because the free market only allows them.
instead of
>crappy education->NEET->wagecuck-> suicide
it would become
>better nonwagecuck-producing socialist education>lower position employee> higher position> fruitful nonexploited life with free time to pursue
your dream hobby, job, etc.
Socialism is the only ideology that can improve our lives for us robots.
It's a fundamental rebellion against the principle of the survival of the fittest which would install economic, as well as sexual
egalitarianism(for all genders, modern feminists are tools and enforcers of the normie social status quo).
Socialism and subsequently communism would enforce ethics and morality rather than "winner takes all" kind of thinking. Alpha males wouldn't be
the only sexually attractive male type and women would get the same responsibilities and jobs as men rather than being manipulative leeches who can
get whatever life they want by fucking right person.
Many of us having uncurable mental ilnesses(schizofrenia, anxiety) or conditions(aspergers(I have it), autism) is in the interests of alpha males
due to having less "competition". Instead of society finding ways to accept or cure people with these traits as fast as possible, the alpha males
manipulate it into rejecting, ostracizing, and leaving us to suffer. They try to make life for us as unbearable as possible by instilling fear,
disgust, and ridicule against us and labelling certain personalities unnatractive, therefore preventing us from having an equal chance to find a
partner or have a meaningful life. Females, due to their herd mentality and inability to truly question authority, are influenced by this alpha
enforced world view.
The alphas spread the myth of "free will" in order to give the impression that we don't actually have these mental conditions(disragarding
completely psychology and genetics, but who is interested enough to look into it, among normies) and we don't need acceptance from society, we only
need to decide to become "normal", although due to said lack of free will, we will always stay ourselves.
>Through a socialist society, we can destroy this set of beliefs and help prevent social rejection of many such people.
Of course one would need motivation and the ability for self sacrifice that many of us don't have right now, but isn't it worth fighting for a
better world for us and our children(in socialist system we would have a better chance of having them), no matter how long it takes?
>>25215311
>Robots are the ones these ideologies vow to opress.
stopped reading there. those ideals vow to eliminate robots, not oppress them. which is objectively a good thing. guys like me finally get sweet release and normies don't have to deal with us.
Anon you make a good case but I have a some questions.
What would happen to my Chinese cartoons under socialism?
Isn't creativity threatened under socialism?How come socialism has failed every time it has been attempted throughout history?
>>25215344
You're pathetic. A true robot dies on his own terms like a samurai.
>>25215311
>Literally can't get away from socialist propaganda
>even on /r9k/
Just burn them all desu.
>>25215371
Good goy. Back to /pol/ with you.
>>25215311
I make good money because I'm smart and autistic. Socialism erodes the only advantage I have over braindead Chads by giving women a free pass to settle with anyone.
If the government would just get the fuck out of my life, I'd go live on the land. Unfortunately you can't do that anywhere without paying a shit ton of taxes. I can't escape the grasp of you statist assholes. Just get out of my life you manipulative fuckwits.
>chad ideologies like nazism
A lot of the top ranking Nazi officials were social misfits and physically deformed weirdos.
>>25215388
>Unfortunately you can't do that anywhere without paying a shit ton of taxes
Move to the Yukon faggot. Or Alaska if you're an amerifat.
>>25215388
moron, if the world was that darwinist chads would just take your shit from you
free market a best
>>25215369
Well, socialism isn't actually a specific ideology.
In fact, you could talk about multiple socialisms.
The communist states we've had have been in the leninist tradition of totalitarian statism. Many european states are in the tradition of revisionist mixed economies.
In general, socialists choose an ideal and just outcome and hope they can come up with a way to achieve it.
Capitalists choose a starting point and hope it will lead to a just situation.
At this point I'm satisfied with criticizing the end results of capitalism in the hope that somewhere along the line these sorts of attitudes become more common and that will drive economically-minded smart people to develop something viable with the just end result in mind.
>>25215397
In his early years, Hitler claimed welfare and hung around men's hostels trying to start arguments about politics.
A true robot if nothing else.
>>25215407
>live in England
>the most cucked nation in Europe
>most CCTV in the world
>can't even legally sleep in a shed or own a plastic knife
>>25215369
>You're pathetic.
so robots are brave warriors or something now?
>>25215397
Nazism is a chad ideology. That doesn't mean it attracted chads. I'd say it attracted robots who dreamed they could become chads through their status in the nazi party.
Jesus christ you're retarded.
>>25215369
socialism didnt fail all the Scandinavian countrys are socialist and the're doing just fine
>>25215397
I contest one part of the image. Hitler was heroic in WW1.
>>25215421
One chad can produce one man's worth of labour per day
My brain can produce systems that replicate hundreds of men's labour a day
I am absolutely more valuable to any group I choose to have allegiance to. That is why I'm so well financially compensated.
Since circa 10,000 years ago, beta males have always been the most important human beings. We provided all advancements in technology, the greatest legacy of literature, art and philosophy. Chads have nothing but their spawn.
That said, women are stupid enough that they must be coerced into mating with us, for security and resources. Left to their own, without survival pressures, they'll choose the most degenerate and barbaric scum available.
>>25215514
Sweden's fucked but that's for other reasons.
>Chinese and north koreans made and still make cartoons.
That they don't conform to your bug eye nippshit style isn't my problem
>Isn't creativity threatened under socialism?
This is one of the biggest capitalist prpaganda tropes mainly using bad examples like the cultural revolution or pol pot which were actually antiintellectualist movements( socialism doesn't vow to destroy intellectuals, rather it was started by them to create a fairer more rational world)
>censorship=/=antiart and modern REAL(not SJW) socialist theory vows to be anticensorship.BTW capitalist governments also practice censorship but in a more indirect developed form(creating public stigma aginst certain viewpoints and the media corporations refusing to publish or present them, thus preventing such viewpoints from being actually distributed or know outside a small circle.
>How come socialism has failed every time it has been attempted throughout history?
>China: still somewhat socialist, but since the installment of capitalist policy there has been more harm done than good(western corporations exploit and abuse massive chunks of the population, pollution, living standards haven't improved, etc.)
>Vietnam:same story
>North korea: it's despotic monarchy and socialism has been erased from it's constitution since 1977
>Yugoslavia:successful, but wetsern agents fostered faschism and radical islam that, with western invasion, destroyed the country
>USSR: massively successful until the late years. From a backward feudalist absolute monarchy to a developed technologically advanced industrial superpower able to defeat an invasion that sought to erase the country and most of its population of the map. Lack of ownership of overseas colonies to exploit, western imposed economic isolation(lack of ability to get loans), fruitless funding of satellite nation, rigid government after hruschov, and western agent imposed coup destroyed it.
>>25215514
But the GDP did not increase like that of the capitalist countries.
>>25215321
in short, 'we can't bring everyone up, so we will drag everyone down instead. we are champions of mediocrity'.
>>25215388
>>25215532
That's a fedortarian alright
>>25215563
But the GDP for those countries has gone up.
I admire Pol Pot
>>25215568
An increase in GDP is irrelevant when it mostly measures the increased super wealth at the top.
>>25215575
That's a stupid analogy.
We are merely shaping the world in favor of the 'robot' just like Chad did for his own kind before us.
Doesn't mean we are bringing it down at all. It's just different.
>>25215603
No it doesn't. It measures everyone and it's very important when discussing economics.
>in short, 'we can't bring everyone up, so we will drag everyone down instead. we are champions of mediocrity'.
Utter strawman. How is ensuring a better future for such people through finding a cure for their mental ilnesses, accepting them and not abusing or exploiting them, so they can live fruitful lives like the rest without such problems, bringing everyone down?
>>25215577
You can social shame me all you want. I don't really care for the opinions of a society filled with plebs. I'm quite happy chilling in my own house, getting takeout delivered to me daily, buying any new thing I desire and calling up the occasional 10/10 whore. Your move normie.
>>25215630
Yeah I know. You need to realize it measures the whole economy. It is a sum or a simple mean if it's per capita. It is perfectly possible that and increase in the GDP is mostly caused by an increase in the top.
Seems like your economical understanding is quite shallow.
In socialism you could live the same way, maybe without the hooker but with a wife due to alpha males not being worshipped like now.
>>25215311
Because if right-wing parties get elected in my pseudo-socialist country they'd cut me off NEETbux and finally let my suffering end without my own intervention.
>>25215311
Who would work for your life and give you money without you having to work if it weren't for money? You do what you want with money- whether it be selfish or stupid (generally mutually exclusive, really- be glad your mom cares about you for some reason)
also fuck taxes
>>25215311
What's the difference between Socialism, Communism, and Marxism?
And why are Communists and Marxists such cunts?
>>25215311
PIZDUI NA DVACH VASILIY I ZABERI SVOI EBUCHIE DUBLI SUKA BLYAD
>socialism is for robots!
>totes unlike national socialism!
O I'm laffin.
Neither of that is for robots. Capitalism is the only system, that ever allows you to escape society. Gommies just turn everything into a popularity contest, where the creeps end up shot in the back of the head, because people rat them out on made up bullshit.
In fucking capitalism you can go invest in mutual funds, retire early and do whatever you like, as long you gathered enough capital. In socialism you're a slave to the party gangsters till the day you die, unless you become a party higher up yourself, which means you're pretty much above the law as you and your buddies de facto own the people and the state. If you're average "worker" though, you have to say, do and look like they want or you get shipped to rape-work-die camps, bona fide human meat grinders located in some hellhole wasteland, where you'll die after 5 years of being worked to death on a minimum calorie diet as calculated by some doctor with the same outloook as OP's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolyma
marxism is a critique of capitalism without a specific counterideology
Socialism in short is a system where the state and means of production are controlled by the working class.
Communism is a utopian collective classless stateless society
>Not all socialists are marxist and not all marxists are socialists
>Not all socialists are communists and not all communists are socialist
>>25215789
They're all survival strategies for people less capable of earning good money. They steal from autists to take away the only thing we have over them.
>>25215789
Socialism precedes marx. It's a set of ideologies that want an ideal society. It is social as opposed to individualist. Thus the name.
Communism is marx's term for the post-capitalist economy. Now it's used mostly to refer to the leninist totalitarian statist tradition.
Marxism is based on marx's work obviously. It's a criticism of capitalism with the desire of a better system altogether as opposed to reforming capitalism.
>>25215369
Socialism has not failed every time it's been tried.
I live in Australia and while we have a lot of privatisation, we also have higher taxes and more social support than 90% of Americans.
This is technically socialism.
Simpletons believe that just because McDonald's is in China it's not a communist country. They even make a joke about it in an episode of The Simpsons where they visit China and Homer asks 'Why am I seeing rudimentary free markets?'
Communism and anarchy can potentially be the exact same thing. There's at least one tribe in the Amazon basin where the ONLY taboo that exists is against coercion. Yet the way things work out they live in a state of primal communism.
A lot of countries are socialist, or communist, and still allow for a lot of free trade. In fact some socialist economies have MORE free trade than America. What the government does is an after-the-fact tax on the rich to allow redistribution, so freedom exists without massive inequality.
One thing failed, and that was a communist union of states. It wasn't even really communism that failed, it was an extension of fascism, it was the idea that people who don't need to be employed should be employed anyway.Americans are fed more propaganda than the Chinese[/spoilers] - An Australian who has visited America, and teaches English to Chinese students online.
>>25215873
Ey, fellow Ausbot.
>>25215898
Merry Christmas.
I'm done masturbating to Carols by Candlelight so now I'm funposting.
>2015
>still thinking anarchy can't work
pfft
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Revolution
Socialism is just as dumb as scientology.
>baaawww social Darwinism
It's called realty kid, get used to it.
>>25215848
>Gommies just turn everything into a popularity contest, where the creeps end up shot in the back of the head, because people rat them out on made up bullshit.
This applies to all totalitarian states, including capitalist ones. I'm not totalitarian and niether is my type of socialism. Also isn't today's capitalist society somewhat like you description, albeit less extreme/ Instead of a bullet in the back, you become an outcast who is abused and ridiculed, whithout any chance to improve his life.
>as long you gathered enough capital
IF. not everyone has the oppurtunity or luck to do this especially the working class whose profit is only enough for sustinence.
>n socialism you're a slave to the party gangsters till the day you die, unless you become a party higher up yourself, which means you're pretty much above the law as you and your buddies de facto own the people and the state.
In capitalism you're a slave to the oligarchic gangsters till the day you die, unless you're born into them or are lucky enough to become one, which means you're pretty much above the law as you and your buddies de facto own the people and the state.
I like socialism in concept, but voting socialist means letting pakis in, so it's a no go for me.
>>25215920
>social darwinism = reality
Paris Hilton
The Kardashians.
>>25215311
Nazism and fascism and other conservative ideologies of the sort wouldn't let you develop in the first place. There's a much lower percentage of robots in those societies as people get forced to improve and so on in like the Hitler youth or whatever.
Now I'm not too sure about this but in the US conservatives give a lot more money to charities and are more likely to help out in soup kitchens.
>>25215514
>Scandinavian countrys are socialist
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
what if i dont wanna work
>>25215855
>>25215848
>>25215675
Why are so many butthurt normies spamming every socialist thread in r9k with their repeatedly discredited cliched bullshit that the alpha male ruling class establishment propogates?
>has a boner for socialism
>bashes Nazism
>doesn't realize that it's literal socialism but nationalistic
wew
>>25215912
>IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE PART OF OUR AUTHORITARIAN COMMUNE YOU'RE NOT AN ANARCHIST
Left anarchism is just statism
I bet you're dumb enough to listen to noam Chomsky you fat faggot.
>>25215944
What does this have to do with anything?
The problem isn't capitalism its individualism. Collectivism would fix it
>>25216014
> Economically, social Darwinists argue that the strong should see their wealth and power increase while the weak should see their wealth and power decrease.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism
That's clearly not the reality if the richest members of society are people like Paris Hilton.
>>25215995
And I bet you are a fedora neckbeard listening to stefanbot Molyneux
>>25215311
>Nazism and fascism and other conservative ideologies of the sort wouldn't let you develop in the first place. There's a much lower percentage of robots in those societies as people get forced to improve and so on in like the Hitler youth or whatever.
>Now I'm not too sure about this but in the US conservatives g
Hello, comrade!
Aussie AnSoc here, where my SAlli and MAC bros at?? No SAlt allowed
>>25215958
>There's a much lower percentage of robots in those societies as people get forced to improve and so on in like the Hitler youth or whatever.
Socialism also forces people to improve through the responsibility to work in developing the nation,but unlike nazism, for real. During nazism the vast majority of robots and wageslaves remained such and were exploited in the same way, and only massive propaganda blaming the jews(partially to blame but not completely) and others for the nazi government's blunders(in 1937 due to massive military spending germany was almost bankrupt, that's why they decided to invade europe, to steal other nation's wealth), as well as distributing the wealth taken from the jews prevented the dissent of said working class.
>>25216079
Dunno what happened to that quote there.
Anyhow, also hello to my ASF comrades. Shout-out to Perth and Melb and whatever you Sydney guys call yourself
>>25215977
>discredited
What? I do have tons of money and socialism does erode the edge I have over Chad. Nothing is disproved, you're just fucking delusional to justify your ideological position.
>>25215985
literally acting like u cracked some sort of code. wew lad.
lets break this down 4 u:
Nazi's are fascists and far right. Fascism is a really fucked up form of socialism that still uses parts of capitalism. just a reminder: just because u support socialism doesn't mean u have to supports every implementation of socialism that's ever happened.
>>25216083
Yes Germany sent a billion peace treaties going back to prewar borders and even paying reparations because they were going bankrupt
>>25215618
>in favor
There are always power creeps, life is one big power struggle and you're fucking retarded to think otherwise. Stop being naive, please.
>inb4 pol tier shit about ad hominems
>>25216083
How did Nazism not work in developing the nation? People were literally forced to pave roads and so on. The massive propaganda against Jews was because of the fact that they controlled so many institutions, lost Germany the first world war and then tried to instigate a communist nation through a civil war in 1918.
>>25215311
kill yourself faggot and stop making those threads
>>25215985
>>25216145
Let me expand on this comrade anon.
The Sturmabteilung, the SA, the Brownshirts, represented the common volk. They were the muscle and the real streetfighting power of the NSDAP.
After Hitler came to power, the began demanding actual Socialist policies. The Night of the Long Knives ensued, were the Nazi higher-ups arrested SA leaders on trumped-up charges, dissolved the SA, and created the SS to take over the elite guard role.
The Nazis capitulated to the existed capitalist and noble classes, and their SA mass base was forced to suck capitalist cock. National Socialism is socialism in theory, but in practice every brownshirt got sold out just as hard as every other prole.
The boss class never makes compromise. They must be fought and overthrown, or else they will rule us. No war but the class war.
>>25215928
>I'm not totalitarian and niether is my type of socialism.
pie i the sky
The constant rape of personal property requires totalitarianism and totalitarianism will be implemented if a revolution ever takes place. You won't even mind, since it's just detail to you types. And not that you'd have any say in it either.
>Also isn't today's capitalist society somewhat like you description, albeit less extreme/ Instead of a bullet in the back, you become an outcast who is abused and ridiculed, whithout any chance to improve his life.
You're such a deluded asshole. Ostracism will neve end and isn't a function of any system, asshole. You try to compare that - which your magic socshit doesn't even cure - with millions of people, that got executed for wrongthink, asshole. Get it, asshole?
>IF. not everyone has the oppurtunity or luck to do this especially the working class whose profit is only enough for sustinence.
99% of employed people in developed economies can. You're just too financially illiterate to grasp compound interest and budget spendings.
>In capitalism you're a slave to the oligarchic gangsters till the day you die,
Nope. There's no comparison between the control exerted by even a local party functionary or a similar figure ordered to exert control over your community or workplace and a handful of super rich. And you know it.
>which means you're pretty much above the law as you and your buddies de facto own the people and the state.
In an facade democracy oligarchy private interests can collude with the government or influence it. In your glorified state capitalism - yes, that's what you want to bring about, irregardless of your declarations, you goon - the party has direct control. They don't have to circumvent anything, they are no less masters, than feudal lords. The whole society becomes a folwark filled with their peasants.
Relativising everything. You must be a moron if that's how you want to convince people to your nightmarish ideas
>>25216196
>People were literally forced to pave roads and so on.
One of the few good things doesn't justify the other bad stuff.
>Germany lost the war due to it's retarded spring offensive in 1918 and the anglo-american conspiracy to sink the lusitania in order to force the US into the war, not due to some caballic shilling shlomos stealing the aryan's shekels.
The 1918 uprising was a rebeliion against the exploitative aristocrats and bourgeoisie who sent millions of their countrymen to die for their own ruling class interests.
>>25216248
The Jews promised the British who thought about surrendering that they'll bring the US into the war if they promise them the holy land senpai. Despite being treated the best in Germany out of all countries at that time.
>>25216236
>The constant rape of personal property requires totalitarianism and totalitarianism will be implemented if a revolution ever takes place. You won't even mind, since it's just detail to you types. And not that you'd have any say in it either.
You uneducated retard, socialism never vowed to take personal, but PRIVATE property, eg. the means of production which is currently held by an extreme minority. With socialism the vast majority of the population, both lower and middle class, actually GETS more power due to the majority of the profit not being hoarded by the ruling class oligarchy for their own selfish detrimental ineterests.
>You're such a deluded asshole. Ostracism will neve end and isn't a function of any system, asshole. You try to compare that - which your magic socshit doesn't even cure - with millions of people, that got executed for wrongthink, asshole. Get it, asshole?
My point was that capitalism os no better at respecting or registering opposing opinions
>with millions of people
this muh millions meme again. The deaths in socialist governments(even those not caused by the state policy) have been exponentially less than those caused by capitalist rule and imperialism.
>You must be a moron if that's how you want to convince people to your nightmarish ideas
The only nightmarish idea here is you to be born.
>>25216059
The is how it really ends. Muh OC. Get fucked you Marxist shills
>>25216214
>The Nazis capitulated to the existed capitalist and noble classes
Pure fiction. You couldn't even own a business in nazi germany, unless the party allowed it. Even the biggest industrialists could have all their possessions stripped from them on a moment's notice.
The nazis werent simply dumb enough to transfer all business from people who knew how to run them to bureaucrats.
Their ideology allowed it, because it assumed solidarity between the classes within the in-group instead of universal class warfare and total elimination of enterprenours. There was no compromise made, they achieved full control over their society.
>>25216382
Whoops. I guess I put in too much work making an image for a dying thread. At least I have it for next time that piece of shit comic is posted.
>>25216366
>With socialism the vast majority of the population, both lower and middle class, actually GETS more power
Middle class gets destroyed, nobody gets anything. The party owns everything.
>My point was that capitalism os no better at respecting or registering opposing opinions
How is it no better? You actually think murdering people who don't think like you is no worse than what we have now. Figures, a socfaggot afterall.
Capitalism doesn't deal with opinions at all. It's a system that you either employ or you don't. It doesn't demand believers.
>this muh millions meme again. The deaths in socialist governments(even those not caused by the state policy) have been exponentially less than those caused by capitalist rule and imperialism.
No point in trying to dissociate imperialism from your faggot ideology, buddy. Your red friends were imperialists if there ever was any.
And actually, if you don't put feudalism, capitalism, etc. into one bag and take the model that emerged in the west in recent centuries, then yeah no. Communism still wins at killing millions, even while being lot less common and resilient. You're just that murderous.
>The only nightmarish idea here is you to be born.
Can't shoot me in the back of the head just yet!
Must be so sad for you, goon.
Eugenics are in favor of robots. It would kill us off, therefore giving us what we all desire.
>>25216571
>Middle class gets destroyed, nobody gets anything. The party owns everything.
>You actually think murdering people who don't think like you is no worse than what we have now. Figures, a socfaggot afterall.
Stupid retarded strawmans. I never said those things
>>25216804
Just go on reducing your posts to monosylabels now, pleb gommie babby. Great way to avoid arguing points, while still pretending to have something to say.
>if socshits had their way this kind of early comer party enthusiast would be granted power over people.
I can smell that rooty tooty point and shooty attitude from a mile away.
>>25215514
>>25215514
Funny, every buss I take from uni in am neighbour town has about 15-25 non Swedish/English speaking foreigners with "foreigner tickets"(as I call them, they're basically free tickets for foreigners).
And this is in the North...
>NEETS belonging to working class
you're getting lost in your own beliefs, typical leftist lel
>>25215311
>forgetting that in every alleged Socialist or Communist regime ever the average schlub was literally a poorly paid wage slave to the state whilst corrup upper echelon officials grew fat off their poverty and labour
the government will always rape you, and the politicians look out for themselves
>>25215912
yeah but the reds never had a go-gurt, literally why the wall fell btw
>>25215912
that wasn't a very successful revolution m8
>anarchists foolishly select communist side
>realize too late that these faggots are the same, if not even worse than the fascists
>end up with nothing
>>25217358
This
Capitalism: claim welfare from wage cucks
NatSoc: become Chad or die trying
Communism: work in turnip field for no pay
Just fuck off you socialist fags
I agree, I can't imagine being a nationalist because some Chads happen to share a haplogroup with me.
>>25215311
>The free market
Market is not free.
>Under socialism NEETs would be able to find work much easier (not to mention have a bigger incentive due to bigger economic benefits for the working class which they belong to).
When corporate taxes are increased, businesses become less profitable. Businesses then hire less people, cut benefits and overtime. It effects the working class the most.
>and get practically all the profit your work equals
Nope.
The rest of your post is incoherent.
>>25217440
So you'd rather be forced to work, only get what you strictly need and have any surplus value go to people who "need" it ie normies who reproduce and have families to support
>from each according to his own, to each according to his need
>>25215920
>It's called reality kid
We as humans due to our brains are able to shift our social reality to make a world a better place, but becouse of lazy accepting faggots like you we can't, becouse rather than putting the hard work it's easier to say "It's just reality bro"
>>25215369
>What would happen to my Chinese cartoons under socialism?
Have you ever heard the term, "Enemy of the people"?
>>25215311
I like that you tried to use paragraph breaks. You'll get it right next time
>>25215598
he is the edgy mans ideologue
>>25215547
Sweden's the only Scandinavian country i knew about, before internet.
>>25215311
OP don't waste your time on these retards. They have failed so hard in life they're totally deluded that chad ideology is the only system that can work out and any other alternative it's just HURR TOTALITARISM MUH FREE MARKET I WILL KEEP SUCKING MY CHAD WAGEBOSS'S DICK BUT BECAUSE I WANT TO.
It's been proven that lefties are more social and outgoing than righties. If anything, socialism/communism is the ideology of the normie, and like this anon said >>25216140
the free market allows for the proper allocation of resources, meaning chad's dumbfuck behavior at least won't get him the money he wants, but in communism, it will.
Either OP is a normie shill or is just a fucking retarded robot.
>>25217412
Welfare is state program and not part of capitalism, but its really unsustainable. Plus the amount of wealth it destroys by handing over power to the government is huge. The average person could probably raise a family on a McDonald's job if regulations had just stayed the same from the 1920s. But I wouldn't expect leftist fucktards to be able to think that far into the future. MONEY MONEY I WANT MONEY NOW!!!
>>25216059
>image
Could potentially be a breach of contract if all the man offers is a "ride in the boat."
