Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
2015-12-24 08:32:46 Post No. 25213219
[Report]
Image search:
[Google]
Anonymous
2015-12-24 08:32:46
Post No. 25213219
[Report]
The one thing I have a hard time comprehending about SJWs and BLMs is that they believe in calling people out on their unscrupulous behavior.
Which is fine in theory. The thing I don't get is that they act all shocked and surprised when the person they're calling out decides to bite back and defend themselves. That when they're confront, somehow it's baffling they would challenge whoever is affront them?
I don't get that. How can you decide to call somebody out and NOT expect them fight back? How can you NOT expect an argument to happen? Or for them to feel the need restate and assert themselves? I mean, if you punch someone in the face, how is it not reasonable to expect to them to punch you back? When you confront and argue with someone, how is it unfeasible that they won't do the same in return?
They're entitled to stick up for themselves when someone picks a fight. You're not entitled to go around picking a fight with them and starting trouble. If I were to call people out, I would fully prepare myself for some kind shitstorm to take place as a result, and have to stand my ground and reassert my intent and stance from whatever shit is blown my way.
