FYI:
>Average height for male Americans: 5 feet 9.5 inches
>Standard deviation of height for male Americans: 2.8 inches
Let us define a manlet to be a man in the bottom 20% of male height.
Using a normal distribution curve, we can calculate the Z-score for the 20th-percentile to be -0.84
-0.84 * 2.8 = -2.352, or about -2.4
5 feet 9.5 - 2.4 inches = 5 feet 7.1
Therefore, 5 feet 7.1 inches is the OFFICIAL MANLET CUTOFF POINT if we accept the above definition of manlet as the bottom 20% of men
Furthermore:
>Average height for female Americans: 5 feet 4.0 inches
>Standard deviation of height for female Americans: 2.4 inches
Let us calculate what percentage of women a manlet at the cutoff point of 5 feet 7.1 is taller than.
5 feet 7.1 - 5 feet 4.0 = 3.1 inches
3.1 inches / female std. deviation of 2.4 inches = 1.29 (rounded to nearest hundredth)
Using a normal distribution curve, we can calculate the percentage for the Z-score of +1.29 to be 90.1%
This means that the manlet cutoff point of 5 feet 7.1 is also the height surpassed by 10% of women, nicely adding to our previous definition of manlet.
Therefore, I propose that we formally define manlet to be any man 5 feet 7 or below, for two reasons: he is shorter than 80% of men and 10% of women.
>Discuss
Sources:
>Normal distribution curve tool
http://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standard-normal-distribution-table.html
>Standard deviation stats
http://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/9730/what-is-the-standard-deviation-of-adult-human-heights-within-sexes
I don't know where you got the figure of the "bottom 20%". Is there a more statistically valid cutoff to indicate a low score? Maybe like "below 2 standard deviations"?
>>25141927
Let us define a manlet to be a man in the bottom 50% of male height. . .
Let's not forget about dicklets.
>>25141927
>Let us define a manlet to be a man in the bottom 20% of male height.
why though nigga, that's just arbitrary as hell
>>25141996
1 in 5 sounds like a reasonable percentage of the population to be called a manlet, though it is arbitrary.
>>25142045
.01 inch below average =/= short/manlet
Retard
Retard
>>25142063
Define dicklet pls.
>>25141927
>any man 5 feet 7 or below
OP confirmed 5'8"
>>25142116
less than 7 inches in length and cut
>>25142092
Clearly height is relative. 80% of the population can't be considerably "short" (and those that think it can are clinically retarded, sry). I just picked bottom 20% cuz it sounded reasonable.
>>25142116
Anything less than 7x5.5 is dicklet.
>>25142122
I'm 6'3, sry
>>25142137
Well fuck.
(This extra part of the message was included because the mods think my comment is not original)
>be 5'10.5"
>still feel short
why?
>>25142200
see >>25142063
google "jelqing"
>>25141927
>TFW 5'8"
Thank you, grandpa, for being one lanky motherfucker.
My dad's 5'6" and my mom is 5'7".
>>25142063
If I'm 6'3" does that make up for my
6x5 dick; or is it just worse cause it's on my body.
>>25142269
good job, son; you made it
As a 6'3 giant I am proud to call you a fellow man, nothing less
>>25142269
>>25142315
Fuck off niggers
We're manlets just like all of the 5' dwarfs. Even if the babby manlets hate us
>>25142063
faye reagan's boobs were better before she fucked them up. dem puffy nipples, mmmm
>>25142218
height, not dick size, bro. my dick's alright, I just feel short.
It's annoying, because I'm above the national statistical average.
maybe it's the region I'm in
>>25141927
WEW LE HARDEST TROLL ON 4CHAN,
All MENLETS ARE FULL MAD BESAUSE OF ME.
GUISE AM I COOL NOW LETS MAEK ROSE THREADS XXDDDD
cout 2x memearrows go fuck yourself and your boring shit,
there is not a single person who cares about your fuck.
the only thing why people post here is because of you embarrasing attempts to shitpost. you are a fucking loser even on r9k
>>25142307
6x5 on a guy your height looks like a 4x5 to women.
Your height is both a blessing and a curse in this instance.
>>25142150
>tfw 7x5 girthlet
>>25142552
>manlet detected
I guess you missed your nap today, huh little guy?
Let us define a manlet as a male who is not in a sexual relationship with a female.
Now you are all manlets, either in a physical or figurative sense. Good bye.
>>25142686
Fuck off with your shitty logic, manlet.
>>25142883
Are you suggesting that you're not a little man if you don't have a girlfriend?
99.5% of the world would disagree with you there buddy-boy.
>>25142931
I could get a gf right now if I lowered my standards enough. I could probably have a harem of fat whores and single moms at my sexual disposal if I were so inclined.
Not having a girlfriend doesn't make you a manlet, you fucking manlet. Being a subhuman piece of shit who can't even grow to an adult height makes you a manlet.
>>25142993
>Not having a girlfriend doesn't make you a manlet
Yes, it does, manlet.
>>25141927
Manlet starts at 5'8"
>>25142993
Denial is the first step of accepting your status as a manlet, little man.
>>25143022
>>25143086
Are you midget faggots trying to reverse meme ME?
Fuck off little boys. The grownups are having a discussion.
BACK to the kiddy table.
>>25142609
every fucking time since my first visit of 4chan i see thos crying loser making his manlet bait threats its so fucking annoying.
imagine the ugliest loser in schoon trying to date the head teacher an fail EVERYTIME but he trys again and again.
its simply dumb and annoying.
what the fuck happened to you in you life?
did some fucking dwarf stole your wife and fucks her everyday?
or is this just some kind of fetish?
either way you are a loser.
>>25143132
One thing that makes manlets so funny is their inability to get a girlfriend. You too, are unable to get a girlfriend. You said you can, but it's evident you can't since you don't have one. So you're a little man. Would your parents say you're manly? No? Then you're a manlet.
>>25143132
>grownups
>doesn't have a gf
top kek
>>25143221
>>25143194
I'm guessing you kiddos are about 15 or so, right?
I mean, only someone whose test levels haven't reached the age of maturity would think they need a woman to define himself as a man.
And you know which males have the lowest test of all?
M A N L E T S.
>>25141927
>5 feet 7.1
Is... is it with shoes or without shoes?
>>25143295
>this manlet trying so hard
>>25143132
she's 6'4".
meanwhile he's the president of France and is even in a sex scandal
>>25143295
Test levels are a myth constructed by manlets to disregard culture and create their own personal views on what it means to be manly. Such myth-creating results from being scrutinized by the rest of society for true unmanliness.
I'm curious what shoe size you manlets are. Like could you wear women's shoes if you wanted?
There's a lot of people I've seen onbodybuildingforums who manage to be like, 5 inches taller than their dad. Is it possible? Is there such a thing called "genetic potential"?
I want to know if I can make it.
>>25143295
That picture has to be shopped. If she's tall for a girl at 6', he's no more that 4' tall, which is midget status, but with totally normal proportions somehow
>>25143517
>That picture has to be shopped
no fucking shit
>>25143047
>average height is 6'1"
Yes this is believable and not b8
>tfw 6' and dont have to care about manlet or lanklet bvllshit
Feels good :>
