Imagine sexbots becoming a reality. Woman would go crazy to stop this because they would lose most of their power over men.
When you look at current Social Justice culture that wants to stop video games and movies with lewd content, I'd imagine they would try even harder to stop sex robots because they would be a "disgusting wrong representation of woman" or something.
You know they will make shit up just to gain that power back.
tl;dr: Even if sex robots become a reality, woman will stop you from having them.
They won't be able to stop it.
Besides why can't women have male sexbots? Is it just not as satisfying to them?
>>25103852
vibrators senpai
>>25103852
Male sexbots don't give them attention and money.
>>25103768
it's okay, even if they somehow blanket ban sexbots, we will still have VR
>>25104050
They already shat their pants over summer lesson.
>>25103852
>Is it just not as satisfying to them?
It will, once those sexbots have stolen our jobs.
> Pic related is our future
>>25104189
> "So I just type "omg that's why you're a virgin"?
> "Yes. According to my database, it will make you win the debate with that jobless neckbeard"
>>25104022
so... male sexbot atm?
>>25103768
Hey roastie whores, I know you're lurking.
How does it feel knowing that in the near future you will lose pretty much all over your power over us.
You will be replaced with something far more superior.
Nobody will put up with your bullshit.
It's a glorious future.
>>25103768
Just do it. They can't stop it.
What are they going to do?
You seem to think women have some magic power to control reality by screaming, but if a sexbot is made, a sexbot will exist.
The war on drugs didn't work and neither will the war on sexbots.
>>25103768
Sexbots won't be banned, because it's way too hard to define what the hell a sexbot is and because nobody apart from feminists gives a shit. Politicians who are not Obama or Hillary won't even talk about this since the very concept of a sexbot makes most normies heads implode. This is seriously a fringe issue.
Besides, unless you're living in commie Britain or some other freedom-less shithole, a ban wouldn't pass anyway.
>>25103768
Sexbots wont be banned because there will be too much money to make from it.
Money is what makes laws pass, why would anyone pass a law that will lose money if theres no money to be made from blocking the law?
Thank you capitalism
>>25104418
>what is prohibition
>what is gun control
>what is ban of cannabis
>>25103768
as a man, you aren't allowed to be happy when women aren't
>>25104305
>You seem to think women have some magic power to control reality by screaming
>>25103768
i hope they make ones like EDI
bet one dollar that Japan will make it first
>>25104593
Evan knows what's up.
>>25104559
>>25104593
I petition that we rename "women" to "The Ruiners"
The Ruiners must be stopped
>>25104593
The game still exists and you can still import it, faggot.
Just like prostitution and booze have existed at all times and places despite attempts to regulate it.
>>25104559
>we are making decisions that we consider to be the most profitable in the current cultural climate, as the market changes and a more diverse public play games
NO! MUH TIDDIES! CAPITALISM IS EVIL!!!
>>25104559
>as a man, you aren't allowed to be happy when women aren't
Fuck em' then.
>>25104288
>you will be "replaced" with a really expensive fleshlight
>replaced
Can you replace something that you don't have?
>>25103768
The demand is so high that it cannot be stopped
>tfw science perfects the ultimate artificial vagina that never roasts
>>25104559
>>25104593
I respect your right to want to play these games, and I think that these companies are making the wrong decision... But you're still the worst kind of plebs for wanting to play this weeb garbage.
Okay, okay, so if women do try to get Sexbots taken away, can't we call them out on it?
I mean, if they're trying to get them taken away because they disapprove of how we use them, isn't that sexist?
I mean some girls use fucking bananas as dildos, but we don't complain about that.
Everyone has the right to use their belongings as they please and if we try to restrict them just because it's "distasteful to the opposite sex" isn't that sexist?
>>25106935
No, they'll pull the same shit they do with things like >>25104559
Even though the girls in the games may seem sexist to women, no one seems to mind when it comes to people like Ryu or Kratos, even though they're all beefed up and sexist to men
>>25106935
>Call women out on something
Oh, why didn't we think of doing that? Shit. We should probably do that now due to all the bullshit they're already pulling!
Oh wait, that doesn't ever work.
Women ruin everything
Seriously, if they don't like it then it can't be allowed, Jesus fucking Christ
They're caniving cunts though
they call it 'robotic ethics'
>>25104593
After fuckloads of support, playasia said they'd do a western release. You don't pay attention, do you?
