>just received a call from my ISP
>they're shutting down my connection in a couple of days because of "suspicious" activity
oh fug, i dindu nuffin
>>24923459
you gotta run
the van has already been sent out
>>24923459
What did you do? You're among friends, let it out before you disappear.
>>24924762
Fbi gtfo
>>24923459
Magnet your harddrives DESTROY ALL EVIDENCE BURN THE HOUSE, the LAN VAN is coming.
>>24924762
I don't know bro, apparently there has been "suspicious" things going on but I don't know what ;__;
>>24923459
Anonymous claimed this post was a joke.
>>24924867
you been on infinity chan friend? Buying droogs from sketchy websites?
Destroy your computer and leave the country senpai, you really don't want to end up on some prison block getting in touch with your feminine side.
>>24923459
Destroy your hard drive as soon as possible. Do you want to go door to door telling everyone you are a sex offender after spending five years in prison getting raped?
>>24923459
Come on. What was "suspicious? "
And people are right. Someone was being a Bro from your ISP and warning you. Format, delete, and destroy everything and THEN magnet the drives.
> maybe pack a suitcase to run too.
Have you been doing naughty things op?
>>24924950
He's been slurping that delicious Cheese Pizza.
Another man down..
>>24923459
dban it
dban it all
leave the feds nothing
You downloaded THAT through a torrent, didn't you?
isn't it illegal for ISPs to look at what you do?
>>24925152
Of course not. Why would it be?
>>24925152
Someone's getting worried. :^) I've frankly stopped caring what I google at this point. I'm white. They're not going to arrest me based on simple search history kek.
>>24925152
They're encouraged to report anything illegal. But if you go to jail, they lose a customer so they don't.
>>24923459
>>24924762
OP you're pretty much fucked anyway, just give us a hint.
>>24925401
It's probably really depraved and/or embarrassing.
I always wondered what the trials for those convicted of the really sick stuff are like. Are the parents there supporting them? Do they go through all the evidence one piece at a time?
>>24925452
zoophillia?
>>24925495
I don't know why he wouldn't just say if that was it.
Only thing I can iamgine being this spooked over would be pizza.
>>24925495
Just having zoophilia porn isn't illegal in most western countries. It's probably pedo shit or drawn pedo shit.
>>24925401
>>24925452
>>24925495
>>24925507
>>24925512
It has to be cheese pizza. ISPs don't care about pirating or zoo.
>>24925452
It would be interesting. Especially in child abuse cases where video or audio needs to be presented to the court. How much hatred must boil through those present?
>>24923459
Dude the party van is coming for you you gotta destroy your hard drive.
>all these faggots and their magnents
No take it out of your pc and fucking smash it to bits with a hammer and then throw the bits into a fire
Thats the only way to be sure
You have to literally pulverize it
Destroy it
Other than that sit back and chill with no evidence they cant do shit
After they leave buy a new hard drive and then pop it into your pc and carry on
guy with glowstick around his neck is op
op dindu nuffin, looking at pictures of kids fucking is the cleanest, best pleasure.
>DBAN 32 pass
>melt down all components
>prepare for prison
>>24925537
Exactly. I'd guess 3d pedo shit. The drawn stuff is illegal in a lot of the west, but pretty lightly enforced, if at all. It's usually used as an additional charge when they have the real deal. Sounds like OP likes to eat fresh.
>>24925593
don't you mean 35 pass nigger?
>>24925607
been a while since I've dban'd, gutmann right?
>>24925578
Where did you get this photo? Kek
>>24925638
off some /k/ommando
>>24925637
yes that would be the one
It may be over kill but i'd
>dban that shit
>open hard drive
>get platters
>get bolt cutters
>cut them up into as small pieces as you can
>bury them
>>24925638
>>24925668
Seeing dead Muslims makes my day a little bit brighter.
>>24925593
>>24925607
>>24925637
>>24925669
>gutmann
>35 passes
lol bunch of FUD shit.
ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>>>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>>>>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>>>>>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
RUN WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
>>24925706
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutmann_method
In the time since this paper was published, some people have treated the 35-pass overwrite technique described in it more as a kind of voodoo incantation to banish evil spirits than the result of a technical analysis of drive encoding techniques. As a result, they advocate applying the voodoo to PRML and EPRML drives even though it will have no more effect than a simple scrubbing with random data. In fact performing the full 35-pass overwrite is pointless for any drive since it targets a blend of scenarios involving all types of (normally-used) encoding technology, which covers everything back to 30+-year-old MFM methods (if you don't understand that statement, re-read the paper). If you're using a drive which uses encoding technology X, you only need to perform the passes specific to X, and you never need to perform all 35 passes. For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a few passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do. As the paper says, "A good scrubbing with random data will do about as well as can be expected". This was true in 1996, and is still true now.
-Peter Gutmann, Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory, University of Auckland Department of Computer Science.
>>24925557
>>24925729
Seriously all you niggers and wanting "muh data wipes"
DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE WHAT THE FEDS CAN DO TO RETRIEVE DATA
LITERALLY PHYSICALLY DESTROY THE FUCKING HARD DRIVE SO NO MACHINE IN THE WORLD COULD GET ANYTHING OFF IT
SMASH IT INTO BITS AND BURN THE CRUMBS
DO IT OR YOUR FUCKED
>>24925729
Uh okay? Recommending gutman or 35 passes today is still FUD.
Even the NIST Guidelines for Media Sanitization state that one overwrite is adequate to protect form laboratory attack on any hardrive made since 2001 and over 15GB, and they're being conservative.
>>24925753
This
Going ape is the only way to prevent hard drive data retrieval.
>>24925831
There's no way the standards the American government provides to the public can be trusted. They're probably trying to kill you into a false sense of security.
>>24925929
> kill you into a false sense of security.
Probably trying to make us rape down our guard aswell.
>>24925929
It's what they use too. DoD use to have 3 pass but got rid of that and NIST stated that one is enough. Not they basically have if you really want to be gone destroy the drive. Doing more passes is just redundant and waste of time.
Independent research into it has yielded similar things. With modern drive density even using a electron microscope or whatever you're not getting more than a couple bits.
None of this applies to ssd of course.
>>24926015
Sorry for not proof reading my imageboard posts sempai
