>>24876712

how about we delete this thread instead and ban you

>>24876712
Dude, if you think a thread is violating the rules, REPORT THEM.

Most of them aren't even trolling, m8.

>>24876773

Sorry anon, all of them are absolutely trolling, you're just used to a shitposting culture where routine trolling is treated as okay

>>24876783
The wagekek threads are just banter and a new maymay. It's normal that it gets posted a lot.

The fit vs. r9k thread - I don't see much of a problem here. More or less, it is true.

The why don't you have a gf can go, yeah.

Mommy thread isn't really trolling because - what kind of reaction is he getting? It's not kekposting or something that upsets people.

The one with the assfucking - well, who can say that it's trolling and not genuine?

The rest is deleted already.

I wasn't expecting all those shitty troll threads to get banned, thanks mods

>8. Complaining about 4chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban.

Please read these two pages:

http://www.4chan.org/rules
http://www.4chan.org/faq#report

SOMEONE POST THE WEBMS OF HER

>>24877076

If the mods are more interested in banning people for saying something about trolling on r9k than they are in banning trolling on r9k then oh well, that's a risk I'm willing to take if it slightly slows this board's shitspiral.

>getting mad at wagekek threads
how pathetic do you have to be