Traditionalfags, would you be content with one woman for the rest of your life? Because that's what monogamy means.
If girls weren't sluts, the world would be boring as hell.
>>24862617
monogamy means everyone gets a partner in a society where there are 50 men for 50 women. this is the main reason /r9k/ supports monogamy because we're all lonely and >tfw no gf
>would you be content with one woman for the rest of your life?
Yes you fucking degenerate
>>24862639
How do you clear the genetic trash from gene pool?
You can Fuck several women before you find the one so it's not so bad.
not at all, the reason most people on here think all women are sluts at because they're virgins who don't realise how great sex is
I guarantee if they got any pussy (which they didn't pay for) their opinions on monogomy and virginity would change massively
>>24862617
As long as it's the one I'm with right now, I'm ok with it.
>>24862667
Yeah, but your "one" would've been fucked by segeral other guys.
>>24862667
>Fuck several women before you find the one
>fornication
degenerate scum itt tbqh
>would you be content with one woman for the rest of your life?
Yes. Not that it matters, of course
Women for procreation.
Trannies and shotas for pleasure.
Been with the same woman since I was 13, now 27. Sometimes I want to fuck someone else, but I am very happy with my situation.
No drama, great communication, very open and honest. I really could not deal being with someone new. I fucking hate how easily offended most women are. Face it, by the age of 22 or so - all the single women are just fucking crazy. The awesome down to earth qts are taken.
No human would be content with anything for life.
Yes. I absolutely would be if she was cool to be around, funny, and not a cunt. Why would I need another woman?
>>24862617
actually mortality rates were high as hell in the good ol days. I honestly think strict monogamy only existed because people didn't live long enough to really see it's downside
>>24862617
Yeah I would heavily prefer one woman desu.
That's kind of the point. I think it would be boring to fuck random women without forming a deeper bond, boring is subjective.
>>24863306
>it would be boring to fuck random women without forming a deeper bond
This is what betas actually believe.
>>24862617
>would you be content with one woman for the rest of your life
That would be my ideal relationship.
>>24862702
And her "one" fucked several other girls
well I'm not that motivated by sex, so I imagine I could deal with it. Maybe I couldn't though, I've never even been in a relationship
>>24862960
20 here, only been with my girlfriend and she's only been with me. Known each other since 1st grade.
Sometimes you find the keeper on the try.
>>24862617
I don't know what traditionalfag means, but that scenario is ideal. One partner for everyone, for life. No fucking around.
>>24863455
Nah that's what lots of guys believe. I'm pretty content with my girlfriend, I don't see why I would ruin a perfect relationship just for the sake of fucking more women.
>>24863267
That's only for young men and women in childbirth. It's artificially low because so many babies or infants died. Lots of people lived to 60. If you made it to mid-30s you were usually goo.
If you count the early modern period as "good ol days" then the rates weren't even that bad.
>>24863618
sounds boring, I like to bang a new slut at least once a month, being stuck with the same old hole would start to feel like masturbation after a while.
Absolutely
That's exactly what I want.
>>24863664
you only say that because other women don't want you. you have to hold on because you may not be able to find another
>>24863594
hope she will c-u-c-k you
REEEEEEEEEEE
>>24863618
Stds would disappear worldwide, rates for crimes of passion would fall significantly, accidental pregnancies wouldn't be such a hassle, one wouldn't have to worry about girls being suddenly not taken, ... Sounds like a good deal to me.
>>24863675
>That's only for young men and women in childbirth.
exactly
Young men(the only people who would really want something besides monogamy) died early enough that they didn't care. Also pregnant women needed someone to stay around. In a society where both problems are solved.
Also realize monogamy practically fell apart after wartime when there was a shortage of men. Just think about europe post WW2
>>24863723
Nope, not every girl wants me but I've actually had the opportunity to cheat with a decent looking girl.
I'm just not a piece of shit.
>>24863687
>imblying jerking off is boring
g8 b8
>Traditionalfags, would you be content with one woman for the rest of your life?
Yes, profligate. Now into the oven you go.
>>24862665
>Being this stupid
When has any species ever consciously directed their own evolution? 'Genetic trash' is abundant in every human, but, luckily, they're for the most part recessive.
You do realize that it's not the fault of the child, but the fault of the parents for reproducing, right? That everyone who is inferior, is inferior because they come from chattel that is doomed to die off in the next century, maximum.
Monogamy was never about the relationship, or about the benefit of those two individuals. It was about creating a partnership that was best for the economy. If most men and women are paired off and busy making familes, and growing food, or later, working to produce other material goods, then they'll be too busy to band together and cause any real change against the system.
I'm not saying I disagree with the system. But think of it like when your teachers in school would tell you to do group projects. You'd suddenly become so wrapped up in getting your partners to pull their weight that you wouldn't think whether a group project was fair, or would accurately show your efforts, or whether the teacher was making the right decision when grouping you. Especially if you got to 'pick' your own group.
>>24862617
everyone doesn't have to adhere to monogamy, there have been whorehouses since men invented currency. besides, not every woman is fit for marriage or even as a girlfriend.
the same women who are strippers, camwhores, pornstars, and the like wouldn't have gotten a partner in the past but now they're all partnered up because it's empowering or whatever bullshit the left is pushing.
>>24862680
I am a non-virgin robot and you're full of shit, sex without love is not that great, only slightly better than mastubation.
Yes, degenerate scum. That's the whole idea.
>>24864284
Though to amend this, I think outright polygamy and polyamory can in some cases be acceptable as well. I don't give a fuck who's part of your family structure, you simply need to have a strong family structure who can raise the children probably without imploding into divorce and leaving the children fucked.
>>24862617
I only want one girlfriend for my entire life. Marriage is too dangerous. Plus I plan to take transhumanism's immortality. So 1,000,000 years is different to 70. But I will only accept a girl who only wants me. Sluts not welcome. I will not be someone's second choice. Theres nothing wrong with them being sluts, but I don't want them.
At best I will sleep around after my dream is shattered. But that can't happen if I never get the dream to begin with, and I'm not skipping idealism for realism.
>>24862617
yes i would
esdfgsdfg
>>24864333
yes, single mothers are singlehandedly bringing down society. a strong family unit needs to be reintroduced into society, we can't go on like this.
>>24864424
It's not the single mothers faults really. And I don't think you can blame it on the divorce courts or anything. I don't know where blame lies. All I know is that it's all fucked.
>>24864469
it is the single mother's fault, women are more likely to beat and abuse children, a single mother doesn't have a man in her life to hold her back when she loses her shit, they're making their kids into broken pieces of shit like them.
>>24862617
Personally, I'm completely fine with monogamy. I've tried fucking around with no emotional connection whatsoever, its meh. I mean the physical act of sex feels good, even great, but there are plenty of things that feel good which require far less effort to get. Sex with someone you actually care about is just better. So yeah, once I find that "one woman", I will be perfectly happy to keep it that way.
>>24862617
GET OUT NORMIE
E
T
O
U
T
N
O
R
M
I
E
seriously, one woman for your whole life would be best. The only acceptable thing should be relationships to see if you really are compatible, and if you find out you are, just stay together forever.
>>24864389
You will be forever alone. So you are saying if a woman was in a relationship, and had sex, and at some point that relationship ended, all before she EVER met you or even knew you existed, you would not even consider her? Even if she was absolutely everything you could ever ask for in a significant other?
>>24864646
thats right. i want a soul mate. all the degenerates who are possible partners just want as much sex as possible. so im forever alone except for sexbots.
>>24862617
>If girls weren't sluts, the world would be boring as hell.
>only has this one route to get his jollies from
>>24864870
Soul mates don't exist. So woman, or man, is a perfect angel. Love and relationships take constant work, sacrifice, and compromise to build and maintain. That shit about fairy tale endings and "happily ever after" doesn't exist.
You sure as fuck aren't perfect, so stop expecting any woman to be.
Of course I would you flaming faggot. I'm sick of these degenerate hedonists.
>>24864973
let me put it this way. I'm not wasting my first love experience unless its as someone elses first love, because its not fair that other people got that while I have to settle and be settled for.
I already know the flaws in my idealogy and that my chances are astronomically low.
>>24864973
>You sure as fuck aren't perfect, so stop expecting any woman to be.
Fucking roastie getting toastie
>>24863483
Mindkeks (80% of r9k) will see everything as them being the kek, no matter what it is. It is because deep down, they want to be keks, so they fabricate feelings of being keked based on situations with 3% resemblance to being keked.
>>24864973
>>24865112
to further explain, its not about perfect its about ideal. I'm npt abandoning idealism for realism early. If that means I never reach the ideal, then at least I never gave up hope.
>If girls weren't sluts, the world would be boring as hell.
Get a fucking hobby you vapid degenerate.
>>24865179
What the fuck are you trying to say? This board just boggles the mind sometimes.
>>24865112
So go find a fat unloved bitch and stop playing the victim. You said it yourself, you know your ideology is flawed. You are just clinging to it because it feels safer than putting yourself out there and risking rejection. Only problem is that with that frame of mind you have zero chance, not a low chance, and you will go through life absolutely miserable and bitter until you change it.
>>24865112
>What It's not fair.
Holy shit. Grow up.
>>24865265
see >>24865215
Again it's about ideal. I don't cry no gf on this board. I'm not settling or being settled for I want someone who I want, AND who wants me immediately, and only. The closest real experience is being a mutual first love. I'm not giving up hope on perfection and I'd rather have a 0% chance than give up.
>>24865326
No you. How the fuck do I mature in a relationship sense when I've never had one. Why is it necessary for me to be settled for by a slut. why do I HAVE to accept realism, as opposed to sticking to my flawed ideology.
>>24865352
>immediately
Love at first sight doesn't exist either. You are not the center of the universe. You can not honestly expect any woman who has a pulse to go through life waiting to magically meet you and fall hopelessly in love. If you are already out of high school the chances of you finding a pristine delicate flower of a virgin are slim to none, unless you suddenly become a god-fearing man and start trolling churches, and even then its iffy.
And the problem with girls who have never been in a relationship is they have no fucking clue what they want or how to act. Basically still a child, regardless of age.
>>24865407
Because your idea of what constitutes a slut is fucking ridiculous. I've seen sluts. First duty station when I was in the military, I watched the barracks sluts work their way across entire floors, going to a new room each night and not emerging until morning looking more and more haggard each time.
Just because a woman has had sex before does not make her a slut. If she only ever had sex in serious relationships, but they didn't work out, how is she a slut? More than that, how is she settling? The relationships didn't work, so she moved the fuck on, as she should. If she somehow manages to fall for your deranged ass, because it works for her, she isn't settling. She found what she wanted.
>>24865446
Hey I've never been in a relationship, did you forget? This is what I want cause I have no realistic expectations. I know my chances keep getting lower, like I said I'm content to be alone forever. doesn't mean I'm compromising my ideals.
And like I said the closest real experience to love at first sight is as each other's firsts.
>>24862617
>would you be content with one woman for the rest of your life?
Yes, that's exactly what I want.
>the world would be boring as hell
This is the kind of mentality that is killing us as a whole.
>>24862617
whos this semen demen? need it for my research
>>24865529
Fuck it, I'm done. Bro, I honestly feel sorry for you. Hope you grow out of this shit someday. We are social animals, no one should go through all of life alone.
>>24865508
The point is, as I've said, I want to be someone's first. maybe once My dream is shattered, I'll accept your arguments that sound completely true. But again, I am content to be alone if I can't have the ideal, so theres absolutely no reason that I have to give up that dream even of I'm being irrational by rejecting girls if I'm not their firsts.
>>24862617
Of course, what the fuck is wrong with you? You care about pussy that much? Monogamy is about truly caring for the other person.
>>24862617
Yes I would be, provided that they had less sexual experience than me. It's not just a random thing, and it doesn't really have anything to do with the previous partners graphs. It's simply because I don't want any form of commitment with someone who views or has viewed sex casually.
I think sex is meant to mean something. The other person must share this view. I've been in two relationships, one for 6 months, and one for 1 and a half years.
The first girl I thought I loved, she had quite a high number, and I really didn't like it. The thought made me feel sick almost.
The second gf I had I really did love. The only time she'd ever had sex was when she was raped before I met her, and one 5 months after, while paraleticly drunk was 'taken advantage' of but I believed the story.
I adored her. I wouldve been content with her for the rest of my life. Which answers your question.
>>24865598
I never wanted to be convinced. You aren't going to convince me.
My ideals never even brought into question whether anybody else wanted me, which by my being forever alone they don't. So as far as I know, It's everyone including myself's fault that I'm forever alone.
>>24865652
Nope, your fault only and no one else. No one owes you or anyone else jack shit.
>>24865652
Stick to your guns. You're not alone with this.
>>24865508
Mentally sound get out GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>24862617
Yes.
Why is that so difficult?
>>24865685
I get that my standards alone give me a .0000000001% chance. I'm just saying no girl wants me anyways so its a moot point.
>>24865699
thanks anon
>>24862617
>If girls weren't sluts, the world would be boring as hell
So you mean to tell me... that all of the wild promiscuity that's going on behind closed doors, involving women and men other than myself, is a progentive source of some type of metric "fun" that ethereally oozes it's way to me somehow, when I didn't have the sex to create that fun; but I'm passively experiencing increased fun in my life through extension of the world which is more fun because of that sex?
Is that right?
>>24865407
You grow in a relationship by BEING in a relationship. Some people are good at relationships from the start, some people go through a half dozen marriages and never know what the fuck they're doing. Your problem is that you've got this mistaken idea in your head about people, including yourself as a set inherent value. That's wrong, and it makes all your other ideas flawed and doomed to fail.
When two people come together, they do, to a certain extent carry their baggage with them. Everyone does. But that doesn't mean a person is defined by their past, their family, their wealth, etc, etc, What matters most is how you treat each other, and how you treat yourself first of all. You mentioned "Wasting" your first "love experience" That would probably be better than never having one at all, that's the real waste. Your entire outlooks based on your feelings of inadequacy and jealousy of other people for having lived.
Stop it. Think higher of yourself, and you might think higher of others as well.
>>24865636
What went wrong with the second chick?
>>24866041
She had a roastie
>>24865720
This is the question men have been trying to answers for years, desu.
>>24865985
I'm not even really jealous anymore.
I don't even understand how to get into a relationship.
I can't even recognize if girls are attracted to me at all when they talk to me.
As far as I know you need experience to get experience.
So again, I'm waiting for that "first love" and I still want to be her "first love" too, despite being late.
I know everyone's advice towards me is probably correct but I'm not seitching to realism unless my idealism is shattered naturally. Otherwise I don't even know how I'm supposed to accept your advice.
Again. I don't want to be convinced and you won't convince me. I'm sticking to my guns, even if that means continuing to be alone.
>>24862617
>Good women are boring.
>Sluts are exciting.
This has to be bait.
2/10 for making me reply.
>>24866041
I treated her badly. I was paranoid when there was nothing to be paranoid about. I pushed my luck too much.
She literally worshiped the ground I walked on.
Here's what ended it though. She was going to go drinking with her brother, so I was a bit worried, due to what happened to her, but then she got angry and said she didn't need my permission, I didn't mean it that way though. But basically her mum grabbed the phone off her and was angry. She kept talking and talking and I remember she said why are you being like that and I said 'cos of what happened' it just slipped out.
Then she went into a panic, so I told her. She didn't know.
>>24862617
Yes,but for sure I will cheat
