So be honest with me, robots. Would you enter a relationship with a woman with tattoos, possibly done porn, piercing or two, thin but not fit, and financially stable?
>>24823055
Sure, it's what's on the inside that counts, right?
>>24823055
I'd enter into a relationship with anybody if they were qt, cuddled with me and were at least discrete about keking me :/Im so lonley
>possibly done porn
no thanks i don't want herpes
>>24823074
You mean cocks? She's had plenty.
>>24823055
>possibly done porn
Even more worrying than the fact that she's done porn is the fact that you aren't sure if she has or hasn't.
That's a red flag, bro.
If I'm supposed to assess your entire checklist here as one then I'll be honest and say no, I wouldn't enter a relationship with a woman like this. The tattoos and porn is what throws me off. Piercings (moderate) are acceptable, thin/non-fit is a non-issue, and financially stable is a good thing.
I've been too redpilled on women by this place. I wouldn't enter a relationship with anyone under any circumstances these days.
if she loves god
>>24823055
As long as she's not a junkie, sure.
The rest I'm not too concerned about. Some of the most promiscuous women I've been with have had literally NONE of the red flags r9k would use to signify degeneracy.
You faggots don't even have a clue.
Rough around the edges girls are best girls, to a certain extent.
>>24823055
You could have just said financially stable. I just want a sugar momma. Fuck the feels man. I'll work out all day everyday if my sugar momma wants a trophy husband.
I can deal with all those except the "possibly done porn" part, just because it leaves a huge mystery and the longer that's left out while still having some knowledge, the worse things get. I would rather she just admit it so it makes deciding easier.
