My ex gf told me she is "Polyamorous, bi and asexual"
She currently has TWO boyfriends and apparently they are totally fine with sharing her
Why are some women so twisted??
Tell that stupid fucking cunt that you can't be asexual and bisexual.
>>24755725
because her two boyfriends are enabling her to be like that. If these pussy nu-males put their foot down to their talking cunts they wouldn't be dealing with half of this feminism shit
>>24755725
>bi and asexual
>>24755725
Not only does she collect labels, but boyfriends too!
>>24755765
you can when you think both have no meaning other than "unique snowflake."
>>24755725
>unironically being any of those things
You dodged an extra special snowflake bullet there, bro.
>>24755725
>Why are some women so twisted??
Because they can be, it's female privilege senpai.
>>24755725
>Why are some women so twisted??
Female nature. Some women are really good at hiding it.
>>24755778
>because her two boyfriends are enabling her to be like that.
She isn't a one year old, she has her own agency. Fuck off with this shifting the burden of responsibility, you fucking knight.
>If these pussy nu-males put their foot down to their talking cunts they wouldn't be dealing with half of this feminism shit
Pretty fucking ironic, considering you are spewing out exactly the same shit feminists are: that women need men to change their actions.
Fuck off and die, cunt. You are part of the problem which enables feminism to work. You are the one completely disregarding the fact that this is her behaviour entirely. It is like saying that a business owner is enabling crime by opening a store in Detroit.
No, fuck you blue pilled faggot. You're ignoring the behavoural root of the problem and focusing on the political red herring. Even if feminism didn't exist something else would appear with a different name in the exact same fucking way: because of braindead lesser apes like you who think that it is the responsibility of a male to treat an adult female like an infant without any real responsibility.
>>24755725
>Asexual
Means you feel no sexual attraction to anything
>Bisexual
Means you feel sexual attraction to both men and women
Just be glad she's your ex.
>caring what other people label themselves
>>24755831
You are one retarded idiot. I'm not surprised you got dumped so some whore could get spitroasted every night. If you had even a shred of intelligence in your tiny brain you would understand my meaning; most women are little more than dogs mentally. They were brought up not needing to think for themselves or even simply introspect. They live in the short term and it should be no surprise that you got owned by something as stupid as a dog.
You are one sad faggot and I'm laughing at all the beta kekolds like yourself.
>>24755831
That's actually an interesting discussion (if it wouldn't be held at /r9k/, which literally is woman hating).
What I like is you pointing out how shifting responsibility here is like a political scheme, the male-blame game.
You use the term "blue pilled", but the "redpill theory" sure tends to emphasize women are like children. So go this and the request for their own agency together?
At the end, for me, the real question that's relevant is how you should act/adopt your behavior in that context you find yourself in.
>>24755912
>wants interesting discussions
>brings up "redpill theory"
why are you talking to your ex girlfriend
also, why are you here if you've ever had a girlfriend
>>24755725
>My ex gf told me she is "Polyamorous, bi and asexual"
Where do you guys find these poly chicks? I fuck like 10 women a year on average (last 10 years) and I would love dating someone who doesn't care if I fuck around.
I truly believe that exclusivity is unnecessarily for relationships. Only a robot would want to date a woman exclusively, chads can get laid anytime so it makes no sense.
>>24755926
I don't necessarily want to be associated with the angry kids on the redpill reddit (nor with American centric culture in general, central Europe reporting in), but it's an interesting idea with some legitimate output. And besides, what kind of discussion on /r9k/ could be interesting - here we find only food for the lulz and social commentary.
The Chad idea is interesting because there is some truth to it - I mean the different online dating behaviors don't lie and nature does fucked up stuff like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_effect
and viewed from the outside it's also interesting as counter-ideology to equalitarian politics.
It's tied to the PUA culture, and one must acknowledge the vast amount of single moms today and how internet memes like the redpill community replace father figures.
Sadly, apart from older academic text, the only source I know on the topic that's somewhat readable is
http://therationalmale.com/
>>24755831
No feminists say that a man is not allowed to change a womans action because that's patriarchy.
Of course they are faggots if they allow her to do that. There is no female nature. She's just being a bitch.
ITT: OP's first bait
