>w-w-women get discriminated against in hiring!
this holds no matter what gender the person doing the interview is
>>24685074
is this chart saying attractive women go to five interviews per hour?
>i figured out how to use microsoft excel: the post
>>24685074
only 1-2/10s who are probably unhealthy deformed fatties and don't get interviews for a reason.
2-10/10s already have more interviews then men.
So yeah, fuck off.
>>24685148
...and, if anyone's discriminated then it's the men for not getting the privileges average-attractive women get
Literally all a woman has to do in life to get on is not be fat. If she's managed to be such a lazy fuck that she can't even manage that would you hire her?
Fat men are frequently only that way because they're making themselves better at some trade they see as more important. Not always, but often enough for interviewers not to care.
>90% on average of 'first contact' listed on job adverts are female.
>When a male is listed as 'first contact', about 80% of the time there is also a female contact listed.
>>24685199
>Fat men are frequently only that way because they're making themselves better at some trade they see as more important.
y-yeah, thats why im fat
>>24685074
Citation for your graph, my droogie woog?
