>>24672442
Don't be a kek. Just turn her down.

Don't do it you stupid cuk. Only betas get back together with grills.

>People using tracks as their photo backdrop

This bothers me to no end.

give us her nudes, then masturbate and forget her

Thanks for the advice, I'll tell her to fuck off.

>>24672493
>>24672465
this

if you go back with her and she's the one asking to data again then you're a literal kuck. Don't.

>>24672442
If you aren't an emotional idiot:
>>24672465
>>24672493

Otherwise just ask. If she truly wants to be with you she should have no issue saying who she has been in contact with. If she gets defensive or says no just walk away. Make it a one time offer. Meaning if she says no there is no going back no matter what she says or does.

>>24672442
Short guide on hacking any secure website user session:

Short answer: you can't.

Long answer:
if you have access to her computer for a short while, copy her cookie file, use it to check her stuff while on a network her device frequents to avoid facebook kicking you out/asking for confirmation on high sec level.

If you don't have her computer; get on the same wifi as her (crack WPA(2) handshake if needed, but that shit is hard yo). Run a MITM attack with SSLstrip and grab her session data.

If no computer access and no local network access, only solution is SE. That stuff takes time to learn (well, hacking generally takes time to learn, everything except for local computer access will be very hard).

And everything above works for face/insta/any other secure webpage.

>>24673163
Oh, and worth mentioning that OP is a creepy faggot, and that he is most likely too stupid to be able to do this shit.

>>24673163
this. Hacking from far away is almost completely impossible.

If you have access to 1 minute in her computer you could install a keylogger like https://keylogger.codeplex.com/

keep in mind it is highly illegal and you could get seriously fucked for it, but it works.

>>24673215
Would a key logger work if she has her password stored into her browser or her Facebook cookie (if that's the right term) is stored to remember her? Because then she would not need to input her password to log into face book or Instagram from her computer. and that's quite common

>>24673215
pfft, why even bother with a keylogger? he's not taking over her life and credit card, just creeping on her social life

>>24673305
nope, that's why you copy the cookie file, nobody types password anymore

>>24673305
it wouldn't, you would have to rely on facebook sometime logging her out or something. Otherwise if you have an extra minute you could quickly delete all her cookies so she's forced to log in.

>>24673306
Because that's the easiest way if you have no hacking experience, by far.

>>24673333
this also wouldn't work. Cookie files are highly encrypted and secured to your local account or Google account if using Chrome. To use cookies you would need to have access to her local system info and google account credentials.

Don't get back into a relationship with her you crazy fuck. Obviously there is NO trust and thereby your relationship is going to suck for every1. Just save up for an escort. You can trust they are getting paid to fuck you.

>>24672442
If you go digging, you're bound to find something you don't like. My suggestion? Don't fucking do it. You'll ruin yourself and she'll walk away just fine. It's almost as if some of you fucks want to stay here.

>>24673343
you serious bro?
how is installing some shit that will get instantly detected by any modern antivirus (incl windows) easy?
newbros can't FUD man

>>24673372
>highly encrypted
kek
>secured to local account
lel
only thing he needs is a tiny faggot brain and physical control of laptop for 60s

>>24673428
Let to guy dig if he wants to, people should be free to fuck up their own lives if they wish.