Would you say this is accurate?
>>24655051
A little exaggerated but it makes a solid point.
no this is how women rate people and they're wrong about basically everything
>>24655051
Post a picture of a girl you think is a 7/10 and I will tell you why she is not a 7/10
Does the tin-man have a sheet metal cock?
>>24655206
That 'NO PARKING' sign in the background is a solid 7.
This is my 7/10: average, but I'd still hit it.
>>24655269
It's not tall enough to be a 7, anon.
>>24655051
Is this what they consider themselves?
>>24655286
7 isn't average. 5 is average. 7 is above average but not model tier.
>>24655311
no, other people
I was triggered because people on /soc/ are telling a 6/10 that she's 8/10
http://i.4cdn.org/soc/1448938664961.jpg
>>24655206
This is a 7/10
>>24655286
This is a 8-9/10
Is this a thread about retards trying to objectify their taste in women in numbers? Taste is subjective, you morons, why do you think BBW is a thing on pornhub?
>>24655427
For the same reason there are videos and websites about illuminati lizard men.
Beauty is not subjective.
>>24655051
naw, to a woman they would both be 5's or the guy lower, woman think the 90thpercentil are the 50th, ie, they think 9's are average, that "normal decent guys make $200k and look like tv stars"
Where does this one land on the scale?
>>24655727
5/10, absolutely average
>>24655206
>>24655286
Well meme'd my friends
Both are clear 9+/10.
>>24655727
More like 3/10. You have shit taste in women if you think that she is a 5 out of ten.
>>24655826
You are an idiot if you don't know how averages work and skew scales like that.
I bet you're the kind of guy who rates all videogames between 8 and 10, with an 8 being worst thing ever and 10 being GOTYAY.
>>24655727
easy 3-4/10
>>24655727
3.5/10. Awful.
>>24655286
9/10
>>24655206
8/10
>>24655972
>>24655826
You guys rate like women. Just because she isn't hot doesn't mean she's ugly.
>>24656059
With the woman standard any girl who isnt horrible looking is a hot 9/10 u go grill
>>24655727
She's a 6 or a 7, those clothes are awful on her
>>24656197
I think she's unattractive, but in an unremarkable, average way. Like my mom was. She doesn't have anything terrible about her face. 4 or 5 imo, but I still say 5
its right. i saw this comment on facebook from a girl saying most guys are ugly and most girls are good looking
and all those charts where it shows that women find only 2 out of 10 guys to be average or something while it was 6 out of 10 for women. something like that
but women age like crap anyways so let them have higher standards who cares at the end of the day being a male wins
>itt: robots rate average cunts 8+/10
need a fag to start posting some pictures of men to see how they scale up
>>24656356
I think Gandy is the male 10 to compare everybody to
>>24655051
No shit go on tinder and notice all the landwhales and broken bitches demanding prince charming.
Women are hypergamous and hypocritical.
>>24656492
wrong maybe in 1875 this was the ideal male, actually mr. hudson is what today's man should aspire to be.
>>24656492
Strong Norwooding. He's a 7/10 in that pic.
>>24656566
>is what today's man should aspire to be
maybe, if you want to become some emasculated beta bitch boy
Otherwise, just lol if you think that is the the ideal male.
>>24656584
Gandy looks extremely masculine. Dolph looks like he had bad plastic surgery.
>>24655355
Is that supposed to be a 6/10?
That's barely a 5/10.
>mfw this thread easily proved you men can't fucking judge any less different than women
>>24656772
>Mfw this thread proved that you can't type the English language
>>24655727
cute and ugly at the same time
>>24656796
>mfw everything he typed was fine you're just a fucking autist
>>24656623
Nah, Dolph is DOM as fuck and would easily AMOG Gandy. Not saying that Gandy is bad looking, but aesthetics-wise, prime Dolph AMOGS any man currently in existence. He combines sheer masculinity while still being highly aesthetic like no other man does(a few come close though).
>>24655206
damn boy you crazy? she a solid 10 you twat
Women have higher standards for mens appearance. At the same time they can become romantically and sexually attracted to someone based off their personality.
>>24657007
this is underrated, as a failed normie girl surrounded by stacys and normies, i can vouch for this, especially latter part
>>24657062
You're full of shit, you dumb bitch
>>24656957
>Mfw we've got another ELL here
>>24657105
nah i ain't lil shit
>>24655206
I'd give her a 6/10 tbqh familia
>>24655727
ugly, but distinctly so
most uggos are just ugly, duvall looks like a fucking ayy lmao, like an uggo version of spacek
>>24657105
the roastie is right about it though,
the biggest liability Robots have isn't being fat, ugly, and poor, it's that they are genuinely terrible people with awful personalities.
>>24657147
Women are shallow as fuck. "Fembots" like this would claim a six pack is part of a good personality.
>>24657221
>awful personalities
sure thing roastie
>>24657007
Bro, you can have a shit tier, arrogant, conceited, cocky, asshole, douchebag personality, and hot women will still line up to suck your dick, if you're attractive.
>>24657301
you could also be a 6/10 and be boosted to 8/10 if you're charming and confident.
>>24657007
>He fell for the personality meme
hahahahahaha real life isn't a disney movie m8
>>24657284
no one wants to see your period smear roastie.
>>24657372
And nice looking guys get laid, even if they're beta losers? Wheres /r9k/s virgin wall of shame when you need it?
>>24655727
4-5/10
>>24655051
No, the guy on the left is a 9/10 while the girl is a 4 at best
>>24657242
you are literally exactly like everyone else on this board literally everyone on this board is exactly the same
but women are shallow as fuck, sometimes they're attracted to people that aren't attractive though, I see it all the time
Robots are basically women, they are unrealistically picky about mates, catty and backstabbing to their pears, radically over estimate their personal virtues, and expect to be taken care of by others.
probably stems in part from low testosterone in addition to shitty upbringing.
>>24655445
Beauty literally is subjective, though, as its based entirely on perception (which itself is subjective)
>>24655727
Shelly duvall is cute you vapid cunt.
>>24657335
No, that's not how it works. You're delusional if you think that a 6/10 can become an 8/10 just by personality alone.
"Personality" is really just an extension of looks. Good looking males get positive feedback from social interactions, which encourages them to socialize more, and as a result they develop "good personalities". Ugly males will get negative feedback from their social interactions, which makes them introverted and shy. An ugly male will be told "shut up, you're annoying" if he tries to socialize. Everything that comes out of an ugly male's mouth is either ignored or ridiculed. Of course an ugly male is going to develop a bad personality. And even if an ugly male were to magically get a good personality tomorrow, the negative feedback he would get just from being an ugly male who has the audacity to socialize would make his personality shitty again.
>>24657550
If anything, robots are unrealistically UNpicky, hyper inflating their ratings because they think they have a chance with 4/10 girls.
>>24657560
>Beauty literally is subjective
kek, get a load of this bluepilled incel
>>24657596
>this is what autistics actually believe
not that its their fault really, it's like trying to describe shadows and color to a blind man.
>>24657542
I think there's plenty of proof out there to show that the fun nice guys don't usually win. I once jokingly told some girl on okc that I'm a bad person and she messaged me back several times saying "you look like a very nice person". Halo effect.
You wouldn't even be receptive to a great personality if it came from somebody like eggman.
>>24655286
This girl is a 10/10 for me but pale brunettes are my type. Objectively she's at least an 8/10.
>>24657550
That's not how hormones work, it's not "either/or". You can have low test and low est, just as like you can have high test and high est.
this is why youre single: picky unrealistic superficial vain idiots!
How do you expect a beautiful person to settle down for your ugliness when you wouldnt do the same for another ugo?
Your only option is to date other ugly person. Theres no way out.
>>24657550
>picky about mates
every male does this, regardless of age, race, or nationality. Some are in denial about this, or ignore their thoughts. It's instinctual.
>catty and backstabbing to their pears
Not sure why you would want to abuse a harmless fruit like that, senpai. But anyways, even Chads do this, not just robots.
>radically over estimate their personal virtues and expect to be taken care of by others.
Now you're just cherry picking and clumping all robots into one big pile.
In other words, your opinion is shit.
>>24657644
Kek, and you're some Chad who browses /r9k/? Nigger, please. It's 100% true and your denial is just your coping mechanism getting trigger.
>>24657662
But what if I'm not ugly?
>>24657644
You think that a "bad/autistic personality" is what's keeping these lonely robots virgins? God, you're deluded. Makes me wonder why you're on this website in the first place. hmmm
see:
>>24657301
>>24657622
>>24657622
But it is
Also I don't see how I'm blue pilled, or how that image is even remotely relevant
>>24657729
Even if he was trolling, he described me pretty well. I'd even go so far as to say that if his post didn't describe you, then you don't belong here
>>24658293
How are people still deluded enough to believe that beauty is subjective. Take a sample of 100,000 women and ask them who is more attractive out of Brad Pitt and Steve Buscemi and tell me again about how subjective beauty is,
I had a pic of myself like that up on the dating site but took it down because it's more than half a decade old by now and bitches don't deserve to see my muscles
>>24657184
Sissy Spacek was beauty personified you fucking tard.
>>24657550
False. I'm currently injecting 300mg of testosterone cypionate a week.
>>24655355
wouldn't give me an erection/10
>>24658354
There might be a consensus, but that doesn't make it objective. It's still merely the summation of many different subjective realities
>>24658293
>beauty is subjective
you a creationist kuk? cuz tabula rasa bullshit is completely incompatible with evolutionary theory
>>24658474
I don't even know what you're talking about now
>>24658400
>like an uggo version of spacek
you illiterate, faggot?
sevenoutaten?
>>24655206
9/10 easy.
>>24655286
A hard earned 5/10.
>>24655727
Hard earned 3/10.
>>24656284
0/10
>>24656492
4/10
>>24656616
Left is a 6/10 right is a 8/10
>>24658515
This is a ten in my book.
>>24658515
Hard earned 1/10. Likely a MtF.
>>24657596
Well said. Being ugly and constantly reminded of it has turned me into the emotional equivalent of a beaten puppy. I'm basically intimidated by women and some men, despite being big and ugly and full of rage enough to literally tear them limb from limb.
>>24658714
I urge you to commit suicide.
>>24658620
Epic baitman
>>24658494
you wouldn't you brainwashed kuk
>gender is a social construct!
>trannies were born the wrong gender!
kek
"beauty is subjective" is wholly incompatible with evolutionary theory, what's not to get lebbit cock gobbling kuk faggot?
no organism would survive without a robust means of genetic discrimination, why would humans be any different? are you a creationist? no? then fuck off with your feel good bullshit
sevenoutaten v2
>>24658496
Stop tryna show off your fancy way o' speechifying, faggit
>>24658515
4/10 max. Serious.
>>24658474
>cuz tabula rasa bullshit is completely incompatible with evolutionary theory
And why would that be?
>>24658879
I'd say six since she looks healthy.
>>24658734
Thanks, I probably will.
>>24658515
skull like a woman
neck like a rugby player
>>24658884
4chan is a cristian image-board, jude, we don't cotton to ur kind 'round here
>>24658806
>muh evolutionary theory
Keep tipping that fedora there son, but it looks like you've got a concussion
>>24658931
>implying it's not an atheist imageboard
1/10, provoked a response
>>24658652
this
>MPB-esque balding
>huge nose
>ugly teeth
>huge, thick neck
>long, narrow skull, VERY likely a man(mtf)
Into the trash it goes.
>>24658931
Christians are jews
>>24658515
Look at that fucking goofy whore, pretending to be interested in trains as an excuse to invade a male space. I hope her pussy gets infected with a colony of scorpions.
>>24655286
are you sure you know what the word "average" means?
>>24658965
libtard, a living God also precludes beauty as a subjective quality.
>>24657007
>they can become romantically and sexually attracted to someone based off their personality.
Are you fucking retarded or trolling?
>>24659039
Not even. They literally worship some dead kike on a stick. Jews really have them by the balls. I wonder who could be behind those books called the "bible" and "old testament".
Anyone?
>>24658515
5.5/10
Drinking like a pleb
Would not bang
>>24659138
nice try, shlomo
>>24659137
Neither, I'm correct
>>24659197
Jesus was a Jew. Your point is moot. Christianity was invented by Jews to destroy the Roman Empire. Christianity is a top-tier good goy religion.
>>24659353
nigger, God's holy jizz cleansed Mary's filthy jew-hole of it's kikery
lrn2religion faggot
>>24659465
Now you're just shitposting. Thanks for proving my point, stupid goy.
>>24655051
yes. It is so true and we both men and women have this bias. Now I always imagine a womans face without hair and makeup - basically as a man - to determine her true genetic beauty. And guess what women are no prettier than men - it's just that youth, makeup and long hair kinda blind our judgement. It's always interesting to compare a brother and sister. There you can see how usually society considers the sister to be much more beautiful. So there is a bias, yes.
>>24659553
>sunday school 101 is now shitposting
>>24659353
>Christianity was invented by Jews to destroy the Roman Empire.
So Christianity is degenerate? Now I've literally heard everything
>>24659730
>So Christianity is degenerate?
Yes, you can stop tipping your Christ-fedora now.
It's degenerate, but obviously nowhere near as degenerate as the people afflicted by it.
>>24659561
My ex once asked me if I thought her younger brother would be rated higher physically than her and I happened to think he would be. I said something like "he's more attractive than I am" to soften the blow but I ain't gonna lie and say she is a better. He was a lucky little cunt.
>>24655727
She was chosen for a lead role in one of the greatest movies of all time due to her unique looks.
Attractive, not really, but I wouldn't say she's repulsive. Give her nice clothes and makeup and she's probably decent looking
>>24657335
>mfw I so insecure that I lose points
>>24657301
Guy on the left doesn't even look that great imo.
>>24657221
This guy is a literal aspie. Yet he has a girlfriend and respect from all his peers. Care to guess why?
https://youtu.be/6mMLSFVuZQE
Rating makes no sense. Its skewed. Basically youd rate anything that youd bang with a 7 or 8 and anything you would not with a 3-4.
>>24657550
Yep. Robots are literally ball-lacking genetically underequipped sub-males. And still, they whine.
Even niggers have more self-reflection than your average robot.
>>24660644
Not really. Just because you're attracted to somebody, it doesn't mean they're beautiful.
>>24660680
I think, if this girl was really sweet and charming, I would be pretty attracted to her.
Otherwise she's like a 5/6.
>>24660697
>charming
Women are never charming imho
>>24655051
Well I use 5/10 as the baseline for average as should everyone. So my no fuck zone is below 4. Roasties put average around 3 and have their no fuck zone be 6.
Its harder to be a 7/10 male than it is to be a 7/10 female.
>>24657644
>literally no argument against the post
>tries to disagree with it anyway
it's funny when normies try to have opinions
>>24660874
Next he'll pretend he was just successfully baiting. Let's nip that in the bud asap.
>>24657644
See, there are people with your personality who've gotten laid, which disproves the entire 'personality' hypothesis right there
>>24660870
it's harder to be a 10/10 male than a 1/10 female.
>>24660944
You know that's not true. Fuck off.
>>24660949
Yeah, he's going a little overboard there.
Although it is easier to be a 2/10 female than an 8/10 male.
>>24661016
Disagree.
If you are way above average as a man, you're fine.
8/10 men have marginally better lives than 5/10 women.
6/10 men on the other hand have a lot less opportunities than 4/10 women.
>>24661036
well let's agree that 7/10 men have worse lives than 3/10 women
