What do you think when you see this pic, robots?
>>24629090
I think she's photoshopped to look like a literal sex doll.
Looks like an advertisement for something but I can't tell what the product is or who the audience is supposed to be.
When is evil genius going to finish chapter 342
holy fuck, they're almost three days late with no word on the matter
how come the koreans can get that shit translated in half a day, but it takes the gaijin NEETS a week?
>>24629090
>>24629110
this 2bhfam, I think this bitch should lay off the airbrush
>>24629110
this
there is nothing real about that pic
>>24629090
She's pretty nice, and I would fuck her. But I wouldn't love her and the second she opened her mouth I would probably become impotent.
>>24629090
okay so I understand your implication. You're telling us (the vague, amorphous, "collective" /r9k/) that we're not high-value material on the dating market. When people do that their point veers in one of two directions, one being "you're shit, beggars can't be choosers, you should lower your standards" and the other being "you're shit, you best be improving yourself if you want attractive girls". The latter then usually goes on to say that once you get these attractive girls after years of hard work, that you should then not have anything to do with them because it's more pure and virtuous to have done all this shit for yourself instead of to attract women. Which I find rather daft, to say the least.
so which lane is it, OP? I can tell you further what I think of your post's message if you tell me which of those reactions you're trying to provoke.
>>24629231
underrated post
these kind of posts are the sole reason i come here 2bh
>>24629090
It could mean she only sleeps with men who are 'high value', it could also mean that since women are allowed to have high standards for men - the standards that most men will never realistically reach - then men should be allowed to do the same thing.
>>24629354
I don't think you understand how to use the term "underrated post" perhaps lurk more you giant fag?
she is gross looking tbqh
>>24629231
The whole issue with attractiveness in the first place is it's 70% genetics. A guy can't work out and become tall and fill out his jaw, a woman can't lose weight and magically have that definitive hour glass shape and big boobies.
And as others pointed out, this image is HEAVILY edited in post production. Not just air brushing, but cosmetic surgery like enhancing boobs and but and curves, so it's not even a reliable presentation of a high quality girl. Come to think of it, most women are routinely guilty of taking photos of themselves that make them look better than they objectively are, and they think that this alone makes them entitled to attractive men who work out, are socially gregarious and overall maintain ultra high value.
>>24629394
literally this
underrated post t.b.h
>>24629090
too much airbrushing
She's weirdly smooth. And she's obviously shopped to all hell.
So I guess I think it's gross and inhuman.
>>24629468
men are insanely less picky about physical features than women
and that's where I think your argument is really weak
here at r9k, we have gfd threads, tall girl threads, chubby girl threads. almost every type of girl is considered attractive here, there are almost no defining ugly features because everyone has different tastes here
now, look at places like cgl, lolcow, and tumblr, which are the female equivalent of here
there are 2 types of guys they want, and none other
they want
>tall, skinny feminine guy, most likely asian
or
>tall beefcake guy, most likely male
see, the difference here is that women have a much more narrow and society based standards than men when it comes to dating
and it can be seen by the pics floating around where they say something like 70% of men are below average attractiveness
>inb4 "how are other guys getting laid then?"
women have pressure put on them to settle down with a guy, and so they pick the least ugly guy they can find, and hold on until they can find a less ugly guy to move onto, because, let's be real, none of them actually meet their insanely high standards except movie stars or players
>>24629777
What gets me is that the qualifier is always being tall.
>It literally doesn't matter what else he is, as long as he is tall, or taller than me by enough
This is how virtually every woman seems to think. It's just...odd.
>>24629777
>tall beefcake guy, most likely male
You meant 'most likely white', right?
>women have pressure put on them to settle down with a guy, and so they pick the least ugly guy they can find, and hold on until they can find a less ugly guy to move onto, because, let's be real, none of them actually meet their insanely high standards except movie stars or players
Biological pressure, of course. Society encourages them to go full spinster, which is why so many of them are miserable from cognitive dissonance nowadays.
>>24630674
>>You meant 'most likely white', right?
or he was taking a swipe at the twinky Asian guys by implying that they aren't really male.
on that subject when are we going to get (straight, guy-on-girl) porn with said twinky asian dudes in it? Both western porn and JAV have this awful tendency to pair beautiful girls with guys that look like beat-up dump trucks.
>>24629090>tfw no gf to do sex with
