just saw this on the cias factbook.
age structure of the world
15-24 years: 16.34% (male 610,915,870/female 574,498,881)
>>24538365
most of them have decent chance of getting to fuck, they are normies anon.
I don't understand. What narrative does thus information influence?
pretty sure those extra males are in china and india, not here. first world countries are pretty much 50/50 ratio.
>>24538365
>15-24 years
What is the ratio for 24+? I have no interest in girls under 25 anyways.
>>24538926
>wanting a used up roastie who rode the chad cock carousel
>nearly 2016
shiggy el diggy, my friend
>>24538884
You're stupid.
There is 36,416,989 more men in the world than there is women.
That's 36,416,989 men with no gf and no hopes of gf.
When you are trying to get a gf you have to be better than then bottom 36,416,989 million men on earth just to have sex with the least attractive woman on earth.
>>24538915
'no'
natural birth ratio is 1.05 : 1.00
doesn't equalize till 30+
>>24538962
again, those extra men are mostly in china and india, not here.
>>24538962
You are even dumber if you think there is only 1 person per partner at any given time. You are literally implying that not a single female on earth is ever single.
>>24538969
Not him but no they are not. Too lazy to find it for you but there's more men than women between our age range in the US. Like the other guy says it will equalize (once the men kill themselves alone and forgotten).
>>24538969
Yeah but there is plenty of chinese and indian men getting good jobs who are more eligible than you.
Most of these men are statistically going to be chinese and indian but all a chinese or indian guy has to do is get a job and he's already better than any of the white NEETs.
None of this exempts YOU from being one of the 36.5 million men who gets to never have a wife.
All it takes is you competition having something slightly better than you and you will be rejected.
It can be super petty. "He's nice but I don't like his shirt", "that other guy has a nicer haircut though", a woman notices something like that and you are finished.
>>24538365
most of those are in china
>>24538962
You are so stupid it hurts me.
>>24538986
No stupid. It's about competition. Women are able to have high standards compared to men.
Men can't take their pick from 36.5 million desperate women who are willing to put up with flaws.
All it takes is that one guy in you competition being slightly better than you and she can pick him instead.
Women are allowed to be flawed and shitty people because of this. Because even if you aren't willing to put up with her bitchy personality or fatness one to the other 36 million men waiting in line will.
>>24539047
I don't know what country you live in but chinese people are fucking everywhere.
So many young chinese men come to the west to get an education then they become doctors and fuck pretty white girls they met in college.
>>24539100
>fucking pretty white girls
everyone fucks them except you right?
>>24539100
>So many young chinese men come to the west to get an education
Those are the ones rich enough to do that (they use their daddy's money usually)
There are still millions upon millions of poor Chinese men (and women) who will never ever set foot outside China
>>24539066
Nice dubs, but you're the stupid one. I'm not even that guy. Listen. He is describing a perfect state of affairs. What he's saying is, EVEN in a perfect world, there are still 36.4 million men without gf. Obviously, because this world is shit and I hate it, there are far more than 34.6 million men without gf.
>>24539066
No you are.
Let's say a fat girl decides she's interested in you.
She is thinking about being your gf.
Then she sees another guy 100% exactly like you. He has the same flawed body, personality and social skills. BUT that guy has a motorcycle.
Who do you think she will choose?
She'll choose the guy with that one thing more that you don't have.
So you can't even get the fatso even though you aren't really attracted to lazy loud mouth fat women and were only settling for her in the first place.
And that's another thing. Maybe you get her because she doesn't like motorcycles. But then one day you criticize her eating habits or ask her not to talk with a mouthful of food. She doesn't have to put up with that shit. She doesn't have to change for a man like you trying to oppress her with you misogynist values. She can dump you for a slightly more beta version of you who will let her walk all over him and eat all the groceries.
This is your life. You are the bottom 36,416,989 of men.
>>24539129
Yeah but even the chinese guy working at the grocery store packing shelves is more of candidate for sex than the jobless white guy living in his mothers house. The chinese guy has his own apartment and a sob story about growing up in rural china.
You have a story of squandered opportunity and failure.
>>24539199
you really have no understanding of the situation at all.
these are millions of dirt farmers who jumped internal boarders to live in tiny apartments with 20 other people to work 18/7 with the hope of saving enough cash to woo one of the few women back in their home province.
>>24539199
Oh. Nevermind. I'm >>24539156. I was defending you, but as it turns out, you've not taken advantage of the wider implications of the statistics you carelessly posted. Nice dubs though.
>>24539273
This is a correct view of the numbers.
>>24539273
And all it takes is one of those 'dirt farmers' having a better hair cut or abs than you and you're finished.
>>24539320
I see where you're coming from. You're looking at this in terms of sexual aftermath. You're not explicitly talking about keeping or even having a gf. The phenomenon you describe is akin to a ripple effect. To you, therefore, the remainder of men without gf will most likely stay without gf, as the "sexual aftermath" of any one chaderino is likely to substantially lower the chances of sexual entry for the less-fortunate men -- the "40 million," in your words. While this is an accurate view, it should have been explicitly stated. Your terms were not so clear. This is understandable however, as you are most likely a schizoaffective individual whose grasp on reality is slowly slipping away.
>>24539312
So you're saying that the guy who spent his youth slaving away on a farm in rural china and then subjected himself to people smuggling, worked a shitty minimum wage job for years just to scrounge up enough money to convince a girl to fuck him isn't better and more determined to get pussy than the fat loser who sits at home on the internet all day, living off his mother and complaining that women are all sluts because they won't fuck him as he saves up his allowance to finally buy that rubber sex doll made by the chinese guy's cousin back home?
Sure alot of chinese and indians are going to end up in the bottom 36 million. But all it takes is one of those guys to westernize themselves, get a good job, and work out and they will get the girl over the pampered flabby feminized white guy who is an expert at video games.
>>24539354
I'm arguing that the assumption that you are automatically a better choice of sexual partner, particularly long term or for breeding than a chinese or indian who grew up in poverty is false since many of those guys will bust their ass for pussy and most of the guys here won't even spend a little spare time lifting some weights or dressing well or shaving and getting a hair cut.
Women have more choice in men and they don't have to put up with your flaws. You have far less choice in women and you may have to settle for a woman who is a terrible person or opt out entirely if you are dissatisfied with the low quality of person in your range.
>>24539392
Although you assume sex is ultimately the end goal of any pursuit, your distinction between the fate of the Chinese two men is accurate. However, you are not accounting for all of the men in total who don't have gf. Here.
If there are 36.4 more men than women in the world, then ignoring polygamy for the purpose of simplicity, *at least* 36.4 million men do not have gf
If *at least* 36.4 million men do not have gf, then because there are 610 million men in the world in total, it is safe to assume that *not all* of those men have gf either
Therefore, *at least* 36.4 million men are without gf, but there are probably many, many more without gf
>>24539453
Obviously. That goes without saying.
Even if all women were in relationships with men and there was no gays at all a minimum of 36 million have no chance at gf unless they are getting keked and cheated on or sharing gf with a buddy.
>>24539453
>If there are 36.4 more men than women in the world, then ignoring polygamy for the purpose of simplicity, *at least* 36.4 million men do not have gf
>If *at least* 36.4 million men do not have gf, then because there are 610 million men in the world in total, it is safe to assume that *not all* of those men have gf either
>Therefore, *at least* 36.4 million men are without gf, but there are probably many, many more without gf
>610 million men in the world total
read a book u dunce
>>24539514
He meant 610 million men *ages 15-24* in the world total.
Can't any of you just assume implied information without getting mad it wasn't included?
Not doing so is some autistic behavior.
>>24539532
his whole post was basically implied information though. this thread is autistic not me. if you are in the bottom 6% of all males then maybe reproducing shouldn't be on ur mind anyway
>>24539587
That's not the point though.
Even if you are in the bottom 50% percent of men you will only have access to the bottom 33.6% of women.
This disproportionate ratio or men to women is why you see completely average guys with fat women and butterfaces.
>>24539508
Good. Now. That other guy, he was talking about distribution of men and women, and specifically men without gf. In his example, this was influenced by some marginal opportunity extended to a large amount of men, all at once. Because this serves to also isolate the men by shacking them up away from the women "back in their home province", it more than likely keeps these men from integrating into a foreign town they happen to wander across, and also does not guarantee any one of them will be able to woo a woman back home, either. As there are millions of dirt farmers in these conditions of no gf, the potential millions of betas back in the home province who are without gf have had their chances of gf raised quite a bit. Without changing the ratio of men to women, we have seen how the chances of gf are never hopeless for the at least 36.4 men without gf.
>>24539587
>>24539514
Fuck you.
