So /r9k/, how many of you can do basic arithmetic?
>>24317123
I only do math with common core
Its 7
>>24317123
Fuck off. sage'd. A real mathematician wouldn't ever write a problem that way.
"/" <-- This means divide.
Is it 1?
>>24317189
No, it's 9
>>24317123
I can say with 100% certainty that it's 9 if you're educated and 1 if you didn't look at the problem enough and understand how it's trying to trick burgers
>>24317202
they teach PEMDAS in burger schools anon
>>24317123
Evaluate parentheses first, (1+2) = 3
When you have two operations with the same precedence it's common practice to evaluate left to right
6/2 = 3
3(3) = 9
Pce out fgts
PEMDAS
it's 1, it's totally 1
NIN9
I
N
9
>>24317262
shouldn't have done so much meth desu
makes writing hard
Niggers think it's 9, and they scoff at those who think it's 1, thinking they think PEMDAS = multiplication first
But in this case, you do the multiplication first over the division, NOT because of PEMDAS, but because 2(3) takes higher priority over 6/2.
Still counts as parantheses faggots
>>24317285
>not multiplying 2 inside the bracket before doing addition
Please tell me this shit is bait
its one you fucking keks
>>24317304
Lmao
whose retarded enough to think that this doesnt equal one?
>>24317285
Red has higher priority than Blue.
The correct answer is 1.
>>24317250
Not quite correct. Which is why this problem gets so much attention on 4chun.
The lack of * implies that 3(1+2) is all the same term, which would mean that (3*1)+(3*2) is a perfectly legal operation regardless of PEMDAS.
This problem intentionally brings up an ambiguity in how we perform order of operations, basically, it depends on what the author of the problem intended.
I would never assert myself as an authority in the subject. But I'm pretty bloody sure that you clear all parentheses before proceeding with anything else.
It's an invalid problem because the question is not stated clearly.
The answer is one. But the real answer here is that this question is poorly formatted.
>>24317373
I don't get why yuropoops don't understand that multiplication and division have the same priority
MUH PEMDAS HURRR
Fuck, it actually took me a while to solve it, and the worst part is I'm still studying maths. Am I useless? Failed abortion?
>mfw when having an identity crisis over some stupid math-shit in /r9k/
>>24317373
and why the fuck does it have a higher priority? 2(3) is the exact same as 2x3
>>24317309
parentheses first pal
>everyone saying 1
are you actually retarded? the answer is 9
>>24317123
Its 1
anyone who says anything else is wrong
>>24317417
The lack of a multiplication sign between the 2 and the parenthesis implies that "2(1+2)" is one term and thus should be completely simplified before moving on to any other part of the equation.
>>24317417
> 2(3) is the exact same as 2x3
wrong kiddo
>>24317457
no m8, that doesn't help, it depends just on how you type it down
the problem is it can be interpreted in two ways
>>24317495
how else would you type it down? the / is a division sign.
>>24317457
Almost Everyone here is still struggling with algebra
>>24317417
It's not actually. They lied to you in school.
You need to realize that we're arguing over convention at heart. This isn't the part of math that's irrifutibly true. Some dude just decided
"OK. PEMDAS. BECAUSE I'M TIRED OF HAVING TO DEAL WITH YOUR SHITTY CONVENTION. "
So. BY CONVENTION. Terms expressed with no multiplication sign are above multiplication/division in an expression.
1+2=3
6/2=3
3(3)=9
Are you all literally retarded?
>>24317516
Literally nobody uses division signs after grade 3
You write half your terms on top of the division line and the other half below the line. No left to right bullshit
>>24317534
>dividing before multiplying
I know you haven't reached high school yet, but fuck man
>>24317534
>>24317549
You're both retarded
>>24317534
You're wrong because you're a dumbass
>>24317549
You got the right answer for the wrong reasons
>>24317123
It's 1. Brackets first, making 2x3 which = 6. Then division/multiplication (same thing), which means then you get 6/6 = 1. Easy. You absolute spackers.
>>24317387
>>24317462
>implies one term
No, it absolutely doesn't.
The only reason people think of x(a+b) as one term is because it shows up often and the division symbol does not.
>>24317549
>he doesn't know MD are the same step
but if we distribute the 2 to the (1+2) first..
>>24317611
you wouldn't do that because it's outside the parenthesis.
>>24317582
>>24317587
>>24317460
>>24317373
It's kind of scary to think the average person really is this stupid
I hope you're all Americans or something
>>24317582
>You got the right answer for the wrong reasons
Bullshit
it's 1, i did it right, the way it's supposed to be done,
fucking 3:30, you, me, playground.
Be there faggot
>>24317617
4+2 is the same as 2x3
>>24317629
Lol so explain your work nigger, let's see how smart you are yuropoor
>>24317629
I'm glad i don't live in a country dumb enough to think anything but 1 is right
>>24317548
exactly, that's what i was trying to say, you don't use "divisions", you use "fractions", most likely
>>24317637
Good point. I just don't like doing it because it seems really counter intuitive. I'd rather do everything in the parentheses first.
>>24317590
Yes it does. I'm a math major mate. Google it.
3(1+2) is all one term.
>>24317647
6/2 (1+2)
6/2 (3)
3 (3)
9
Multiplication has the same priority as division so you go from left to right
>>24317692
no
multiplication comes first nigger
>>24317548
>>24317656
I can't believe I had to draw this out for you people.
YOU HAVE TO DO IT FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. Even in fraction form it ends up as pic related you dumb fucks.
>>24317716
it's not 6/2, it's 6 (divisionsymbolthatnobodyeventherobotuses) 2 so it's not one term
you still got the write answer tho senpai
>>24317692
Wrong, you enormous fucking faggot
2(3) takes priority over 6/2 because it still counts as part of the parentheses. It's one term that you have to complete before moving on to division.
2(3) is not 2 x 3
>>24317716
See above
The correct way to write it would be
6
---
2(1+2)
>>24317654
I guess all those calculators are wrong, huh?
>>24317123
It's 1
Just rewrite the problem as a fraction and it'll all make sense.
Hmm would this still work
6/(2(1+2))
>>24317667
It is not a formal convention. Since the division symbol is never used, the issue does not come up.
>>24317716
that's not how the original problem is written tho
you dumb cock sucking 3rd world nigger
>>24317637
this is it, we do 2 + 1 out of insitinct first, but we don't really have to do it that way, we can do 2 x 1 + 2 x 2 all in one, thus the answer is 1
>>24317733
>>24317711
See
>>24317736
Also
>still part of the parentheses
How fucking stupid are you burgers
>>24317751
>>24317733
>he doesn't divide first
wow what c u c k
>>24317736
yes they are
but only because the user typed it in wrong
>>24317744
Agreed. Which is why people don't use the symbol. It feels ambiguous when you're writing formulas. So we just use the fucking horizontal bar.
>>24317766
Lol so I guess you're just going to ignore the three billion threads we've had on this exact same topic where some calculators will give you 1 and others will give you 9
>>24317629
I'm English. Unless the problem ultimately is 6/(2(1+2)) = 1, it has been written incorrectly. These are the laws of Maths, and it's common sense if you've ever taken Maths beyond adding up the price of frozen pizzas in Walmart.
>>24317766
>How fucking stupid are you burgers
nigger, it one
enjoy being killed by isis in whatever country you live in faggot
>>24317775
>he doesn't know simple math law
wow what a literal C U C K
>>24317716
now what nigga?
that's why you don't fucking write divisions with /
>>24317736
Not using parentheses properly you fucking pleb its reading it as 6/2*(2+1)
>>24317825
thank you paint god
can someone put this correctly into a calculator unlike>>24317736
I want this thread to end
>>24317797
Post yours giving 1 then
>>24317823
Yes anon, you don't know simple math laws
Thank you for acknowledging this
>>24317823
>>24317825
>some nigger asks me to use the division line in this comment >>24317548
>i oblige
>all these dumb fucks come out of their trailer parks to tell me I don't have the right answer even though all calculators say 9
did you guys even pass elementary school?
/ MEANS THE SAME THING AS THE DIVISION SIGN IN OP. Are you fuking serious m8s
>there are white people in this thread that honestly believe its 9
how does it feel being more retarded than niggers?
There are two possible answers because of the shitty divide sign. It could mean 2/3(1+2) which equals 9 or 2/(3(1+2)) which equals 1.
>>24317862
Are you legitimately trying to dispute the fact that 2(3) is not the same thing as 2 x 3?
>>24317872
How many times does it need to be said that you wrote the equation wrong?
See
>>24317733
>>24317858
>burgers are too poor to even afford a calculator
>>24317889
the only possibility is 9
>>24317825
Nice work you showed senpai
This is 4th grade math. How are you guys getting anything but 1?
>>24317903
>a 1 fag calling anyone else stupid
>>24317862
tell you're 4th grade math teacher tomorrow I haven't seen her in a while, I need to beat her some more for creating a retard like you
>>24317872
you literally put it in the calculator wrong, >>24317548 was wrong faggot
>>24317875
>HUR DUR WHITE BOYS
You're right, its 1, but get the fuck off my board
>>24317791
Still, my previous statement stands. There is no formal rule which states x(a+b) is one unit. This is why a formalized system for evaluating expressions, such as mathematica, does not treat it in this way and returns the answer 9. See >>24317457
If it's not 1, the only other possible solution is 9.
There's a 50% chance that it is either 1 or 9. Therefore. The answers i +/- 1/2 x 1 = 9 (1/2)
>>24317736
Get a better calculator faggot
>>24317858
there you go, that's how it shoulda been written if you wanted to write horizontally for it to be 1
>>24317903
>>24317944
Show me one calculator entry that give you 1 as an answer you fucker, I dare you.
Until then everyone 1 fag is a retard
So when will I need to know this in real life. Besides on 4chorn
>>24317945
>There is no formal rule which states x(a+b) is one unit.
Uh yeah there is actually
>>24317123
6/9(1+2)
6/9(3)
3(3)
9
Showed my order and everything, what's my prize?
>>24317908
>burgers are too poor to even afford a calculator
I have one, I just don't have a camera :(
>the only possibility is 9
no, its 1
see>>24317961
>>24317947
PEMDAS senpai. You can't have "two answers"
>>24317944
No seriously how stupid are you
>>24317961
>a scientific calculator
>casio
Try getting a real calculator
Do they even sell actual calculators in ameriburger?
>>24317961
THIS IS ENTERED IN INCORRECTLY YOU DUMB FUCK, DO IT RIGHT WITHOUT FUCKING CHEATING
>>24317970
see>>24317961 or >>24317966
get wrecked
>>24317975
So you're saying mathematica is wrong? Sorry, but I trust Stephen Wolfram more than some random anon.
>>24317966
>intentionally changing the equation so you can be right
Wow
>not just using wolfram
9
;^)
>>24317966
Satanic dubs have spoken. Get wrecked putas
>>24317985
>No seriously how stupid are you
I'm pretty dumb, but I'm no match for you kek
>>24317997
see >>24317993
you're full of shit and you know it. >>24317966 is saying that the answer only gives one if it's modified with an extra bracket you illiterate buffoon.
Let's just all agree it's 5
9+(1/(2))=5
>>24318021
Yeah, you're pretty dumb. You can't even do basic arithmetic
>>24318044
fair enough
so, what's the next one bitches?
All of these people getting worked up over a math problem never written like that in real life situations.
Stay virgins.
Numbers aren't real. They don't exist. There is no answer.
The only answer is that you wasted time quantifying an imaginary value.
HERE IS THE POST TO END ALL POSTS.
RIGHT
HERE
IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THIS YOU ARE ACTUALLY RETARDED. EVEN HAS THE SAME DIVISION SIGN
Brackets first. 2(1+2) = 6.
6/6 = 1.
Was that so hard
It's seven you idiots.
6 / 2 + 4
3 + 4
7
>>24318032
NO
ITS ENTERED RIGHT
THE RIGHT FUCKING WAY
THE WAY IT IS IN THE OP
FUCKING KILL YOURSELF
>>24318059
come on dude
>>24318107
THIS IS ENTERED RIGHT AND SAYS 9 >>24318090
BTFO YOU STUPID FROGPOSTER
>>24318090
>>24318133
>google calculator
>>24317985
Do they have Smarties in the US!?
Didn't fucking think so.
>>24318147
>implying google calculator isn't capable of a basic operation
>IMPLYING IT ISNT THE ONLY ENTRY IN THIS THREAD THAT'S ACTUALLY INPUTTED CORRECTLY
When will you stupid 1 c u c ks admit defeat already?
>>24318090
I'll agree with it simply because it's an irrelevant form of math. If a calculator says it's right, fuck it it's 9.
>>24318133
why the fuck do you believe calculators as if they were oracles? most of the time when writing in calculators, you have to put extra brackets so you get what's correct
calculators are dumb as fuck if you don't direct them properly, they're just a tool
>>24318147
There's also the post with the graphing calculator senpai
How many sides does a circle have?
>>24318168
We cant admit defeat because we are right
>>24318189
>There's also the post with the graphing calculator senpai
imputed wrong
>>24318191
infinite
boooom
mind=blown
>>24317123
Observe this image.
>>24318189
It depends if it's (6/2)*(2+1) or 6/(2(2+1))
>>24318186
you know what else is just a tool? your mombecause she gets me off and stuff with her v-vagina
>>24318213
anything can be infinite if you really think about it.
>>24318212
How dumb are you?
No, seriously
>>24318223
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87D4SZ2tyC8
>>24318241
if You cannot figure out that its 1 you're a fucking moron
I really can't tell if everyone in this thread are all in on baiting me or /r9k/ user are really this retarded
people getting 9 or 6 just never knew that a number next to parenthesis means multiply that number to the value of the parenthesis.
it's 1
Okay I think I got this.
6/2(1+2)
First step would be to solve the brackets.
Hence, 6/2(3).
Now that the brackets are solved, we can write it as 6/2*3.
Working from left to right, 6/2*3 = 3*3 = 9.
NINE.
>>24317123
So is it 9 or 1?
>>24317123
In: 6/2(1+2), you're really missing an operator.
Lets assume the missing operator is multiplication, so the expression really is: 6/2x(1+2)
Parenthesis has the highest order of precedence, turning 6/2x(1+2) into 6/2x3
Division and Multiplication rank with equal order of precedence.
and acc. to your own reference: >>Divide and Multiply rank equally (and go left to right).
so proceeding left-to-right: 6/2x3 becomes 3x3 becomes 9.
Case closed, faggots.
its 1, have you goys even had a math class?
>>24317123
man you just know whoever wrote "you should be able to solve this" was drooling over his keyboard
>>24318282
IT'S
NINEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
REEEEEEEEEEEE FUCKING NIIIIIIIIINE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
its 1, you do the () first. Have you goys had math cass?
>>24318294
...have you read the thread bro?
>people using calculators instead of using actual rules of math
DYEM?
>>24318326
FOR THE LAST GOD DAMN TIME
THAT IS NOT HOW YOU ENTER IT INTO A CALCULATOR
>>24318347
More like people using the rules of math and getting 9.
The dumbfucks saying 1 are demanding extra proof and we're trying to give it to them.
>MFW 1 FAGS WILL NEVER LEARN
>>24318294
6
-
2(1+2)
6
- < evaluate brackets
2(3)
6
- < go left to right
6
1 < finish division
>>24318309
he is not missing anything that is the proper notation.
>>24318294
>Now that the brackets are solved, we can write it as 6/2*3.
but that's fucking wrong. 2(3) and 2*3 are NOT the same thing.
>>24318358
THAT IS THE WAY IT IS WRITTEN SO THAT IS THE WAY IT IS ENTERED YOU DISGUSTING LOATHSOME SUBHUMAN FILTH
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-RE-RE
REEEEEEEEEEEE
>>24318302
It's seven. You distribute the 2 to the two numbers in the parenthesis and then it's elementary math.
>>24318380
wtf dude, we've given you all the proof needed, you guys just won't fucking listen
gtfo
>>24317123
Here I wrote it better for you faggots.
>>24318422
thats not how it's written tho nt
>>24317154
Are you fucking kidding me? I fucking failed Algebra 2 in high school and somehow passed through my previous math classes just bullshitting things. AND YOU GET FUCKING 7?
Kill yourself. No one should ever surpass my mathematics downs.
CAN WE JUST FUCKING DECIDE ALREADY.
WHICH
IS
IT
????????
>>24318435
The way it is written is incorrect and whoever was the author deliberately wrote it incorrectly to leave it ambiguous enough to troll people who are shitty at math.
>>24318380
>kentposter
why do I suddenly feel like niners are just rusemen?
>>24318454
yeah, we should all leave this bait here, desu
>>24318422
are you in gr 2?
THATS NOT AN ACCURATE WAY TO SOLVE EQUATIONS ANYMORE
>>24318422
you don't divide the whole rest of the equation into the first number, you babynig
>>24318393
bulshit. it is 6/2 * (1+2)/1 = 18/2
>>24318447
9 YOU FUCKING RETARDS
YOU'RE NOT SMARTER THAN A CALCULATOR
>>24318326
>thinks calculator is good
>can 't even write on two lines
>>24318492
>>24318478
>equations, what are they? how do they work?
Parenthesized operations first
Then exponents
Then multiplication or division
Then addition or subtraction
AND
Where two items have the same ranking, you work LEFT TO RIGHT
( 6 ) / ( 2 * ( 1 + 2 ) )
( 6 ) / ( 2 * ( 3 ) )
( 6 ) / ( 6 )
1
OR
( 6 / 2 ) * ( 1 + 2 )
( 3 ) * ( 3 )
9
The question is written poorly, and can therefore be read in 2 different ways.
The end.
>>24318435
Yes it is. The divide sign is a line with a dot on top and one below, signifying that you put the bit before above the line and the bit after below it.
>>24318539
That photo is the comfiest shit I've ever seen
>>24318505
>anything below a graphing calc
>good
>>24318502
>LE CALCULATOR IS RIGHT
AN IDIOT WITH A SMART TOOL DOES NOT MAKE THE IDIOT SMART
LEARN HOW TO USE IT FIRST YOU FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING FAGGOT
>>24318539
this
fuck this troll thread to piss faggots off, this is the answer, and if they don't like it, fuck 'em, i'm outta here REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>24318454
there's nothing wrong about it
there's always a few retards like you and >>24318539 saying "hurr the expression is intentionally ambiguous we are all right LOL" when really >>24318528 that rule of thumb exists exactly for the purpose of eliminating any ambiguity you FUCKING IMBECILES REEEEEEE
>>24318571
Seriously is this american education?
How do you people function with such shitty schooling?
>>24318594
no m8, what this guy >>24318549 just said is the way to solve the 'ambiguity'
>>24318601
Seriously is this english education?
How do you people function with such shitty everything?
/sci/ here
it's -1/12
>>24317123
>using the primary school division sign
>>24318629
thanks /sci/, knew we could count on you
666666666666666666666666666666666
Die robot, die!
>>24317412
I'm blue collar and I did that shit mentally in 2 seconds
>>24318393
It's 6/2(1+2). Not 6/[(2(1+2)]
>>24318629
somebody give this man a medal
>>24318643
/thread
(Some text for the robot)
It's 9. Did you need help with your homework?
>>24318715
not knowing what
>implied
means
it's written the way it is so you can be easily confused.
FUCK MAKE IT STOP
Any answer you give people will say is wrong
That's the joke
>>24317123
Let's see what wolframalpha says.
So I think informally people know that you'd do the parenthesis first because when you are doing higher level math people aren't going to put another fucking layer of parenthesis around the 2 and the back end of the other end parenthesis. But formally, I don't think parenthesis get priority outside of itself while multiplying.
This is like the plane on treadmill bullshit. Arguing to prove how smart you are will get you nowhere
The post to end all post
>>24318761
You put it in wrong faggot. Should be 6/[3(2+1)]
>>24318761
>let's see what this decryption key translates this text to...
>" ASDNF NF NAFSBUASBFBU FASUFSUASD AHSD HFSFM KMK MKANS WM"
>that's can't possibly be right, I think you used the decryption key wro-
>SHUT UP THE DECRYPTION KEY IS RIGHT NO MATTER HOW I USE IT
Just out of interest, has anybody in this thread actually changed their mind between 1 and 9?
>>24318803
it is not what OPs picture says
>>24318868
I've been 1 since the beginning because I was taught basic math at a young age.
>>24318871
It's implied with the primary school divide sign
>>24318912
Says who?
>>24318806
I just wanted to show what wolframalpha has to say on the issue.
You probably take this a little bit to serious, if you get mad.
>>24318953
>You probably take this a little bit to serious, if you get mad.
I am pretty mad when people don't use facts of math properly.
kind of like how groups use false statistics to make claims about things that aren't true.
people can't be seriously so stupid to think that basic stuff like this can have 2 results.
>>24319056
It's 1, but the ambiguity of the question means I can sympathise with the 9fags.
>>24318151
They do. They're called smarties. Google it.
guys I'm just gonna set this here for you to to discuss ok
>>24319121
it is not ambiguous at all. only possibility for it to be 1 is in modular arithmetic or in case you forget about left to right rule.
>>24319258
Oh shit Wolfram Alpha! What an original idea, I can't belive nobody has done this yet!
>>24319302
nothing about this thread is original, not even your reply to the inevitable wolfram alpha. stop being yourself it's not working out for you.
>>24319302
you can try any programing language or math software and you are going to get the same result. why? because unlike you their creators have clue about basic rules.
It's 1.
t. STEM master race.
If you truly believe it is 1, I am almost certain you're an inbred.
6
-
2(1+2)
:^)
we need more opinions so we can vote on who is more right rather than using logic and actual mathematics.
>>24317123
It's 9, right?
3 + 3!
That is, three plus three factorial. Apparently, I wasn't as clever and original as I thought.
>>24317736
thats a fancy Ti-84
>>24317253
I used pemdas and got 9.
(1+2)= (3)
6/2= 3
3(3)= 9
6/2(1+2)= 9
>>24320830
you used pemdas wrong, idiot
>>24317123
this board is retarded
its 9
I thought you had to eliminate parenthesis as entirely as possible before touching anything else
The answer to the problem is 1
literally fucking 1
>>24320907
You do
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/6
1
6/2-(1+2)
PEDMAS
6/2(3)
3(3)
9
>>24320981
Getting rid of the bracket comes before doing the division
>>24320981
6/2(3) = 6/2*3
multiplication first
>>24320341
no, its a bullshit expression of a problem designed to confuse people
>>24321023
>>24321012
Read it from left to right. Division and multiplication are evaluated in the same precedence. Enter it in on a calculator the answer is 9 regardless.
>>24321063
a calculator is a tool
if you use a saw to pound a nail, you're using it wrong
>ITT: I don't know how to divide
IT'S 1 YOU STUPID FUCKERS, LEARN HOW TO DIVIDE
>>24321193
Its 9 you dumbfuck.
a/b(1+b)
a/b * 1/(1+b)
6/2 * 1/(1+2)
3*(1+2)
3*3
9
See it now guys?
>>24317975
Fucking RETARD confirmed
Is it 1 guys? I never finished highschool and when you guys say the answer is 9 I really feel like a piece of shit for being so dumb
Whew wee all dese smart boys in ere, woo. Sure did no mathemamatics in my town woo wee you boys sure a smart.
>>24321286
See
>>24321255
Google it the answer is indeed 9.
>>24321063
The 2 is attached to the number in the bracket, not separate from the bracket
>>24321286
Congratulations. A high school drop out is smarter than most of this board. Embarrassing
>>24321318
I did it algebraically and its still 9
>>24321255
If I made a mistake before it does not matter, Google it.
>there can't be a multipliction operation in the denominator
sure is retarded in here
The question is a bait
>>24321453
The bottom one if the brackets where different it would be the top one.
>>24318912
>It's implied with the primary school divide sign
Post a fucking textbook saying the divide sign implies a [ ], and make sure the source is fucking visible.
>>24321057
Nothing confusing about reading what's written, all the retards reading implied shit and whatever have their heads up their asses.
>>24321255
Made a mistake meant
(a/b) * (1+b)
(6/2)*(1+2)
3*3
9
Easy
>>24321570
youre supposed to write expressions in a less shit tier way so it doesnt turn into a nigger tier blue/white dress situation
>>24317180
>-7=19
top kek mang
>>24322907
the answer to the equation is 5.1, fyi
Multiplication and division are interchangeable. In this case, you would do the one that came first. The answer is 9
i want literally anyone in this thread to show me any formal axiom or rule that states and/or proves that multiplication and/or division must be done left to right, from any book. do it, right now. I bet you can't.
protip: you can't, and the question actually IS ambiguous.
>>24317201
>>24317202
>>24317250
>>24317256
>>24317309
>>24317457
>>24317534
>>24317692
>>24317945
>>24317976
>>24318009
>>24318090
>>24318176robot you fucking shit434534536
