Is it easier to be find love as a gay male than straight male?
It's how attractive you are * your standards
Sexuality won't find you a waifu on itself
>>24148622
Yes, women don't feel love.
Gay guys tend to be just as, if not even more shallow than women.
>>24148622
It's easier to find sex, but not love. Gay dudes can be just as bad as women in the long-term
>>24148622
>Straight male
Potential access to ~50% of the population.
>Gay male
Potential access to ~1% of the population.
Fuck no.
>>24148622
gay men are terrible anon
>>24148860
Close to 4% actually. That's 1 in 25 people, that's plenty.
>>24148622
Does it hurt anyone else's heart that such a pretty girl does nasty porn? It's none of my business but it does.
>>24148860
>>24149134
that 1% is 99% more likely to want to fuck you though
>>24149134
Not isn't. Straight people can at least hit on each other in real life. Gay guys can't just go up to any hot guy and try to flirt with them.
>>24149134
>can't succeed with 50% of the population
>better try with 4%, that oughta do it
>>24149621
>implying fucking means it easier to find love
It's easier to find HIV/AIDS, I'll say that.
>>24148622
Not love but I feel like it's easier to hook up for sex with guys than girls.
We communicate between ourselves easily if we want to fuck whereas we find it difficult to reach the same cohesion with the opposite gender, imo.
>>24148622
Sex- yes
Love- NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>24148622
robots will have trouble either way.
most of them refuse to get rid of their standards which are what truly hinders them.
>>24149668
>itssomething.jpg
>>24149632
They all go to gay bars and shit tho. Pretty filthy desu. >>24149621 speaketh the truth.
>>24148622
Most likely. There is a LOT less choice if you're gay. I believe they're more faithful.
>>24149798
Standards are what define us brother. Without them, we just become filthy, sub-human normie scum.
>>24149901
>They all go to gay bars and shit tho.
No, "they" don't. A minority of gay men are part of the club scene.
>>24149932
FAGGOT DETECTED. What makes you say they don't?
>>24149926
Depends on what you mean by "faithful". Most committed gay couples I know have threesomes sometimes so they're not purely monogamous.
>>24149964
>FAGGOT DETECTED
Yep. That's how I know. And even of the ones that go to clubs, most go to hang out with friends, not to find an anonymous fuck. We use Grindr for that.
>>24149926
Faggot reporting in, this is the opposite of true. Gay men are like the situation you would have if every single person was simultaneously Chad and Stacy, at once.
>Wants to fuck everything
>Can, because sex is so easy to get
>Therefore has no need to develop ties
>Just fucks and fucks and fucks
This is why Grindr is so successful (also because it can be hard to find gays "randomly"). Even "committed" gay couples usually fuck other people.
As a side note, lesbian couples are batshit insane like 90% of the time, and also the most likely of any coupling to have domestic violence issues
>>24150000
Then why is their such a comparatively high number of LGBT clubs?? Btw, kindly fuck off back to /lgbt/.
>>24149930
no. your personality is what defines you.
standards are inherently normalscum, thinking they deserve the best and holding their partners these high, arbitrary standards.
>>24149973
Good enoughh.
Yes. I work with a manlet sperglord with a tall twink bf. He would never find a woman to love him if he were straight
>>24150063
> why is their such a comparatively high number of LGBT clubs?
90% straight white girls, m8.
>fuck off back to /lgbt/.
Why? I'm not a tranny.
>>24150063
>OP asks a question about faggotry
>Faggots answer question
>hurr durr gb2/lgbt/ durr
lol u mad virgin?
>>24150067
>implying that robots actually have personality
kek. How is desiring a 7/10 qt virgin "normal"? Most normies I know prefer sluts covered in makeup.
>>24150057
Lesbians don't count they are a different species. So you guys are more degenerate then I thought. Too bad.
>>24150108
>LGBT
Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender
Think you need to do a little bit more research about your own stupid, politically correct acronyms.
>>24150130
Would rather be a KV than a fag. At least I can go to sleep at night knowing I haven't shat on all of my morals and standards just to get some shitty sex and STIs.
>>24150139
everyone has a personality even if it's basic or something you don't consider on par with others.
desiring a 7/10 qt is normal because she is normal. that's what normalfags get, not robots. robots keep normalfag standards and wonder why things never work out.
>>24150200
>Implying
Clearly you've never been there.
>>24150239
Mmmm, no, most normies I know have ugly 5 or 6 girls who wear waaay too much makeup and have fucked half a dozen guys in the last six months.
>everyone has a personality
True...but robots have such rudimentary, undeveloped ones they hardly count.
>>24150237
Fags have different morals than you. Get over it. They haven't shat on anything but the top's dick.
>>24150254
Never been where?
>>24150302
That's like saying pedophiles and rapists have different morals *to me. Not exactly a compelling argument.
>>24150301
a personality is always there and will count regardless if you think it's a worthy one or not.
those normalfags are in tune with how society works. they know that they're on that level and go for what they can get. they don't sit there and only desire 8 or 9's because they know they don't meet the standards of those girls.
>>24150357
You legitimately regard pedophiles, rapists, and gay people on the same exact level? Fucking a consensual adult of the same sex is just as horrifyingly wrong to you as raping a 5 year old?
>>24150173
Yes.
>>24150302
No, that's stupid. Moral relativism, like any relativism, is subjectivist garbage that leads to Tumblr irl. The correct answer is to either prove his moral system is shit, or else just admit you're being immoral and invite him to attempt to stop you (but he can't because gun rights, mufugger)
>>24150237
It's pretty good sex t.b.h. m8, and Subaru makes good cars so I don't know why you wouldn't want one
>>24150393
Ok, well, I'll leave the personality thing alone...but back to the standards, what happens when you're so ugly (Nature's work, not yours), that you can't even get shitty roasties? What then? Would rather be permavirgin than go after a girl I didn't find attractive.
Sex? Yes. Love? No. Faggots are worse than women.
>>24150400
My personal thoughts don't really matter. And lots of pedos don't "rape", they persuade children to fuck them who don't know any better. Anyway, homosexuality/pedophilia are both mental disorders, so the example still stands. Is it ok to let mentally ill people do whatever the fuck they want? Of course not.
>>24150475
that's the problem with most robots. they consider the average or a bit below average roasties to be the shitty ones. there are actually ones that are much worse off and would be on par with robots, but they're like you. they would rather lust after someone out of their league instead of getting with someone unattractive like themselves.
if that's your choice, that's fine, i can understand it. it's just ridiculous when people bitch about being alone yet they still cling to ridiculous standards.
>>24150565
>homosexuality/pedophilia are both mental disorders
Let's play out how this argument will go since i dont' actually want to do it.
>Homosexuality isn't a mental disorder.
>Yes it is. The only reason it was removed from the DSM was because of liberal political pressure
>Actually the pressure coincided with internal reevaluation of the definition of mental disorder
>I don't believe you. Jewish propaganda, etc.
>The reason why it was included to begin with was because it was believed that homosexuality was correlated with psychopathy, something that has now been entirely dismissed.
>HIV is proof of how destructive homosexuality is.
>The fact that gay men are less likely to wear condoms because they don't have to worry about pregnancy doesn't somehow make all gay men mentally ill.
So you can pick up from there. I assume you'll go with homosexual-pedophile correlations or some such nonsense?
>>24150447
STIs: Sexually Transmitted Infection(s)
How is getting your cock covered in shit OR getting your asshole stretched painfully good? This all being while you feel sick to your stomach knowing that what you are doing is both morally and physically wrong.
>>24150683
>This all being while you feel sick to your stomach knowing that what you are doing is both morally and physically wrong
>I have hangups about something so everyone else must too!
A lot of us faggots walk away from sex with clean dicks, clean immune systems, and a clean conscious. What does that make us?
>>24148622
don't tell me she's a he. wow
>>24149798
>their standards which are what truly hinders them
Stop spouting this bullshit. Robots do not approach supermodels, most of them do not approach anybody. Generally, they fail because they do not try. The actual robots have no friends and spend most of their time behind a computer screen. They feel like everybody would reject them because they have no life, and they don't have any social basis for approaching a woman. So they rot in their room doing nothing.
>>24150683
>STIs: Sexually Transmitted Infection(s)
I don't understand, is that some sort of newspeak for STDs? What the fuck is with Americans and their political correctness? Pic related is a real STI.
Getting your cock covered in shit is good if you like getting your cock covered in shit. Likewise, getting your asshole stretched painfully is good if you like getting your asshole stretched painfully. This is much the same as how destroying your liver and brain with alcohol is "good" if you like to drink, or inhaling 5000 carcinogens per minute is good if you like smoking or need to lose weight.
>Physically wrong
haha blow jobs are physically wrong
>Morally wrong
Kant didn't say anything about faggotry. If you're trying to claim some stupid book written by kikes in a desert 4000 years ago as the source of morality then you're too stupid to even be from /pol/ so I'm not going to bother responding to that.
>>24150679
Chew on some evidence, faggot, kindly provided by OTHER FAGGOTS. Gee, that must make you mad, knowing that your own kind can't even agree:
http://time.com/3733480/ben-carson-gay-choice-science/
http://www.livescience.com/50058-being-gay-not-a-choice.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-siebold/need-more-proof-being-gay_b_5805680.html?ir=Australia
I have more if you need them. If you don't want to read them, they basically say that being gay is not a choice and that most scientists agree that being gay results from genetic fuckups. Just like being a retard. Or a pedophile.
>>24150816
>most of them do not approach anybody
we're not talking about those people. if you're comfortable being alone and staying inside, that's fine. if you want to be with someone you have to go out and try though.
>they feel like everybody would reject them
a lot of people would, but there are also some people that wouldn't. if they don't want to try they can rot in their room like you say.
>>24150882
>Real STI
Implying words are simply signifiers. Fucking idiot. I'm Australian btw, so go fuck yourself. STIs is the medical terminology. STDs is outdated: http://www.healthdirect.gov.au/sexually-transmitted-infections-sti
>Blow jobs
Show me one faggot who exclusively gives/takes blowjobs and I'll show you a neo-Nazi who embraces Judaism.
>Morally wrong
What the fuck is your response about? I didn't even mention *Jews or Kant. So go fuck yourself, you filthy cock-eating fag.
>>24150882
STI is a more accurate medical term.
> The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended sexually transmitted infection as the preferred term since 1999.[9] Sexually transmitted infection is a broader term than sexually transmitted disease.[11] An infection is a colonization by a parasitic species, which may not cause any adverse effects. In a disease, the infection leads to impaired or abnormal function.
Basically, it includes people who are infected, but asymptomatic, where as "STD" doesn't.
>>24150898
>Fuckups
I'm not sure what your point is here. You're trying to argue that being gay is morally wrong, and your argument is that being gay is the result of genetics?
>Just like being a retard. Or a pedophile
Or a redhead. Or a person with green eyes. Or a person with a big dick.
>>24150983
>Show me one faggot who exclusively gives/takes blowjobs
I don't exclusively do so, but it's easily 95% and the anal I do rarely do is always with condoms.
>>24151015
I'm arguing that it's a malfunction. A problem. A mental illness. Et cetera. It's my PERSONAL OPINION that it's morally wrong, but what we're discussing here is that it's a mental illness (which you contradicted, so I guess that makes you wrong).
>Eyes, hair, dick
Implying physical conditions are the same as mental ones. FUCKING DUMB FAG.
>>24150983
>>24150994
I don't believe either of you. Please provide some real evidence, the WHO is run by Jews and I don't trust information from a government website if that government was so incompetent that they literally lost a war against fucking emus.
>Show me one faggot who exclusively gives/takes blowjobs and I'll show you a neo-Nazi who embraces Judaism.
Are you pretending to be retarded or what? The implication was that when a fag is giving or receiving a blowjob, they are on the same level as when anyone else is. Both are biologically "wrong" if you conveniently forget that getting your dick sucked feels good because the dick evolved to feel good when sucked.
Further, being a virgin is actually biologically and physically wrong. Your dick is supposed to be used, so if you aren't using it (you, being a virgin, are not), then you are on the same level as faggots. Consider suicide or at least get a whore so you're "physically right."
>What the fuck is your response about? I didn't even mention *Jews or Kant. So go fuck yourself, you filthy cock-eating fag.
I'm saying prove your morality, you fucking dumb inbred nigger. You can't just say "X is morally wrong," you need to justify it. You can't because what you actually mean is "I DON'T LIKE THING, THING BAD, BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE"
tl;dr You are 12 and a huge faggot
>>24151047
Then you'd know that giving a blowjob is definitely not pleasurable, by any means...and your sex life is even more fucked than mine if 95% of it is blowjobs. Not sure how often you have sex, but (assuming) it's once a day, you'd have actual sex 5 days out of every 100. That's 18 times a year, if you're having sexual relations every day. Kek.
>>24150916
Most of the people who whine about no gf do not try. Obviously they should try, but many die like this, often by suicide.
>>24151112
Why so aggressive?
Anyway, mental variation certainly doesn't constitute mental illness. Are geniuses mentally ill? They have genetic features that cause their brains to be wired in an abnormal way, but they're not mentally ill. Retards are because it's a legitimate problem that impedes their (or someone around them) ability to function day-to-day. That's what it takes to be a mental illness.
Can't wait to see your roundabout reasoning for how gays fit into this category.
>>24151190
>you'd know that giving a blowjob is definitely not pleasurable, by any means
Except
A. I'm also RECEIVING blowjobs.
and
B. I actually find pleasuring someone to be extremely erotic and the same way there are straight guys who are "generous lovers" who enjoy eating pussy, I enjoy giving head.
I'll receive a good blowjob (and trust me. Guys give good blowjobs) and enjoy it, but I get off just as much, if not more, by making my partner moan.
>>24151143
WEW AN ENRAGED FAGGOT. Love how you guys are so tough online when in reality you literally bend over when confronted by real men.
>Run by Jews
Ok, mate, I think you should fuck off back to /pol/.
>Australia = incompetent
Where are you from again, fag? America? The country that has to have wars to learn geography? The country that's trillions in debt? I could go on all day...
But if you insist on more evidence....there's a whole load of USA websites proving it:
http://cse.google.us/cse?cx=partner-pub-6870423499136152:7689928018&ie=UTF-8&q=sexually+transmitted+infection&sa=Search#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=sexually%20transmitted%20infection&gsc.page=1
>Implication
No, that's not the fucking implication. If you take it up the arse from a guy, that's fucking wrong. That's the point here, faggot. Don't try your sophistry on me.
>nigger
Nice. Sure shows how smart you are.
>Prove your morality
Ok. I happen to be Christian, but I also think going against what nature intended is morally wrong.
tl;dr You are a fucking idiot with no knowledge about anything except gay sex.
>>24151298
Well, each to their own, I guess. Put it this way: majority of people don't enjoy sucking dick (and I'm talking about straight grills here too).
>>24151339
>I happen to be Christian
you know, the only thing I didn't like about the robot coming back was that I couldn't post a quoted line with a simple and snarky "lol"
lol
>>24151224
that leads back to standards as the core problem. a lot of them grew up wanting qt girls and either got treated like shit by them or rejected because they weren't on the same level. it's not their fault for wanting a qt because we're always indoctrinated to treat beautiful people better and be attracted to them.
many of them let this forever shape their future. they still want a qt gf despite not being as good as her, so given their past experiences they don't try.
there's always going to be someone out there on a similar plane as you or lower. they just have to realize where they're at and work with it.
>>24151248
Well, actually, a lot of them DO suffer from mental illnesses - social anxiety, things of that nature. Most of them literally cannot function in the real world. So yes, they are mentally ill.
Your argument = nullified.
>>24151381
Oh I know that, but I'd argue that the majority of gay guys do enjoy sucking dick. If you have the genitals, you tend to appreciate them more, I find.
It's why lesbians spend so much time munching carpet.
>>24151381
>and I'm talking about straight grills here too
they're fucking girls, what do you expect? only another man can truly appreciate a man's body. straight chicks don't like sucking dick because their sexuality is based on leeching money.
>>24151339
your post was tl;dr and too mad 4 me, I didn't read it. Did the emu comment set you off or did a tarantula shit in your Foster's?
you are still a really mad and really stupid faggot, go get stingray'd Steve Virg-win the internet tuff guy.
>>24151385
Are you >>24151143? If so, that's not a particularly compelling response. Try again, bud.
>>24151444
K, well, I'll concede this point to you, since I have never sucked dick and try to avoid fraternizing with fags. Only going off straight xp here, so I guess you're right with regard to gays then.
>>24151473
you won't believe me, but i'm not, i'm just here to watch the shit storm.
out of curiosity, how pious would you say you are? do you go to church? do you read the bible? have you read it cover to cover? do you pray to god? etc etc
>>24151430
How does a correlation with other mental illness imply either causation or that the original mental condition is a mental illness itself?
For instance, I have none of the correlated issues. How does it possibly stand that I'm mentally ill if I don't have any of the qualities your'e implying my supposed mental illness has?
>>24151473
>not a particularly compelling response
says the pol poster
>>24151458
HAHAHA, nice try bud, thing is about Aussies is that we're chilled as fuck most of the time. I'm a lot angrier than most of my countrymen, and your pitiful attempts to insult me have failed to provoke rage.
But I like how you dismissed my arguments with
>too mad 4 me
because you know you're wrong, and you have no response. GOOD WORK MATE YOU SURE SHOWED ME.
who here /gayanddon'tgiveashitwhy/?
>>24151525
I don't go to church because when I was younger my school held church services, and since I've left I've just never really gotten into it. Also, I believe in rationalizing things by analyzing the source material, keeping in mind contextualization and abrogation, and find that a lot of priests tend to indoctrinate people. The only time I would go to a pastor/priest is if I was really confused about something. And yes I've read the Bible, also read bits of the Qur'an. Yes I pray, not regularly, just if I'm particularly grateful for something or need help. Answer your questions?
>>24151555
How am I a /pol/ poster?
>>24151572
>all caps
Wow, mad and you believe a dead kike on a stick is going to get mad over people putting dicks in bums while doing nothing about mudslimes raping and beheading other people who believe in the dead stick kike
top kek m8, are these the 10/10 "aussie bants" I keep hearing about? or are you too busy getting fucked by a Maori or whatever you people do
>>24151552
Look: I'll make it real simple for ya.
Previously posted links prove (as much as can be proven at the present time) that homosexuality is caused by genetic fuckups.
>Fuckups = not functioning in a normal manner
>Mental illness = not functioning in a normal manner
Therefore
>Homosexuality = mental illness
Happy?
>>24151721
not functioning in a normal manner =/= mental illness
>>24151697
That's like saying cops should ignore theft because people are getting murdered. Pretty circular argument desu.
>Maori
>Australian
Pick one mate.
>>24151751
What would you define it as then m8?
>>24151721
Not him, but are you implying white people are "genetic fuckups?" Blue eyes, blonde hair and white skin were all genetic mutations. Those genes don't function in the correct manner. And yet, white people (and Asians) consistently outscore the stupid black people whose genes are functioning in the "normal" manner. So, by analogy, you are saying gays are Aryans.
>>24148622
In my experience yes. I've had a lot of guys interested in me. And not so many women.
Could just be my personality though.
>>24151791
We already discussed this earlier.
Physical fuckups =/= mental fuckups.
>>24151783
something that harms the person.
you don't have to follow society like a sheep, but when you are hurting yourself then its a problem.
and before you reply, not having children is not hurting yourself.
>>24151721
No, because abnormal doesn't imply mental illness by any standard other than the one you're arbitrarily defining. If you want to make the statement "Under my personal definition of the word "mental illness", I think gays are mentally ill", that's fine. But it's not true under any clinical definition of the term. Things evolve by "fuckups". No, I'm not implying homosexuality is a next part of evolution. It's self-selecting against it, in fact. But none of that implies mental illness.
>>24151791
Every piece of genetic code was at one point a genetic mutation. Life evolves through genetic mutation.
Holy shit, read a book
>>24151754
No, it's like saying "Police should spend more time on jaywalking. Fucking jaywalkers ruin everything. Man, jaywalking is morally wrong, and the cops will get you if you don't stop it!" while the entire state police force is engaged in a gang war shootout downtown.
To be honest I just quit replying because I see no point in arguing logic with someone who believes the earth is 3000 years old and a Jew is literally going to come back to life to give him eternal life because he didn't wear two different types of fabric on the same day (but if you did wear two types of fabric on the same day, a different Jew will burn you for eternity - spooky!)
Also I'm pretty sure Australia is a province of New Zealand and there are definitely Maori there so fuck off, you've been providing shit information for the entire thread. I won't let you troll me again.
>>24151816
And anon referred to IQ.
>>24151845
honestly i think homosexuality is the future, once we come up with artificial wombs why keep women around?
>>24151855
That was the exact point of the post you just replied to, yes. Congratulations on your 3/10 reading comprehension, my friend.
>>24151816
Consciousness is a "mental fuckup." Other animals aren't sentient.
>>24151855
That's what the person you're replying to was saying, fag.
>>24151886
>expecting me to read the whole thread
I got better things to do
>>24151836
But most mental illnesses don't actually harm the person. They just prevent them from functioning normally.
Take social anxiety (just one example, I have more if you need them). By themselves, these people are fine. It's only around others that they get distressed.
Or
Psychopaths (who simply feel no empathy)
Or
Asperger's (again, doesn't hurt them, just prevents them from functionally normally)
and so on.
Homosexuality prevents people from functioning normally. So...my point remains.
>>24151877
They have a lot of political power. Would take an autocratic regime to stop them,
>>24151906
it doesn't stop them from functioning normally, not having children is very normal now
>>24151868
>Saying Creationists = Christians
Ok mate. Fucking retard.
>Equating rabbinic law with Christians
Again, you need some basic education.
>Australia is a province of NZ
O-kay...um...I think you just destroyed your own argument there. That, or you're a troll.
>>24151886
That's been scientifically disproved, so I suggest you do some reading before you come up with things that people were saying during the medieval era.
>>24151945
anon, you have been brainwashed by your parents.
can't you see that?
>>24151906
All of those but homosexuality hinder people from having fulfilling, emotionally healthy lives.
And there are a significant (and increasing) number of people who insist that Aspergers isn't actually harmful enough and so it SHOULDN'T be considered a mental illness.
The line is necessarily arbitrary and fuzzy, but it's very apparent that on the spectrum of "able to live a healthy human existence", depressed, anxious people are a lot further from "the median human being" than homosexuality is.
>>24151930
By normal, I meant having sexual relations in the natural male/female gender binary. Which IS normal. You can't argue against that.
>>24151403
Most of the girls I've approached weren't super hot attractive. I've only ask out 2 very attractive women but I've realized it was stupid to think a girl higher my league would ever go for me. Other than that, just average chicks but still no interest. The worst woman I ever fell in love with had no ass or tits and had zits on her face. She still had a qt face and she was weird in a good way which I luked until she turned into a miserable cunt.
>they still want a qt gf despite not being as good as her, so given their past experiences they don't try.
Asking women out does more damage than good. The only win is you get gf, but such small odds if you're a robot. Not only you get treated like shit by the rejecter, you could get beat up, get fired, have people look at you like you're a creep or loser. But there's nothing there for young males to motivate them to ask out more women. Instead, just feminist propaganda on how men are violent sexist dogs.
>there's always going to be someone out there on a similar plane as you or lower. they just have to realize where they're at and work with it.
Wow! A place where women want robots? Why didn't we think of that before? !
>>24151997
And not necessary to be a fulfilled, emotionally healthy adult.
>>24151970
You're right, I should have specified "self-aware" :^)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_test
>>24152013
>asking a woman out does more damage than good
usually, yes, but if you want a gf you have to do it. if you want to avoid the risks you have to be content with no gf.
>you could get beat up or fired
these two are easily avoidable if you don't cold approach women or do it in the workplace
>a place where women want robots
no. there just happen to be other fucked up and undesirable people in life. they're looking for a partner too but it's up to robots if they want to pursue them.
it's easier to find a partner, not love.
>>24148622
absolutely, gay males are by far the fucks who get the most sex out of all orientations
>>24151945
>Australia being a province of New Zealand is unreasonable, but the New Testament is historical truth
KEK
E
K
You're the fucking troll m8, nobody is this stupid. You must be 15 years old.
Do you think the Old Testament is part of the Word of God? If yes, why are you disregarding the historical chronicle it puts forward? If no, why do you believe anything it says?
But moving on from that, do you believe the New Testament is literal? If no, how are you a Christian? Do I really have to find you the passages saying you need to believe it or go to hell? Jesus was a middle-aged schizophrenic Jew who convinced some retards he was, "like, super magic brrrroooooooooooooo"
>date with girl
Mexican stand off
YOU: just give me the pussy and nobody gets hurt.
HER: tell me that you like me and I might give you pussy or hurt your feelings.
>Date with boy
HIM: Okay, so can we talk a little before we have sex? It feels wierd just having sex at once?
YOU: Sure, let's go get something to eat together.
>Result girl:
GIRL: You didn't intuitively do everything right, allow me to go bad mouth you to my female friends.
>Result boy:
Did you bring lube and condoms?
It is so much easier, boys are cool and bro tier. Just get a good uke that looks cute and knows how to take care of business and you'll have a good time.
Look at cute boy avatar pic. He wonders why you allow girls to crush you like a but when there is so much happiness just over the other side of the fence. Why? WHY????
>>24151997
its normal if you want children i guess, but most people don't want children.
and the number that do want children is dropping.
>>24152291
When boys see what kind of whores women are, and what kind of person and what kind of life you have to lead in order to even have sex with them, it makes even completely straight people look longingly at the loving relationships of uke and seme heteronormative traditional young gay love.
>>24152374
uke spammer pls
you are weird
>>24152388
What is wierd with having an identity based around sexual heteronormative roles in a relationship. It is a source of pride, a feeling of being important. Look at what they've done to the fathers, no wonder no one wants to be in a relationship anymore. Do you want to be as stupid as Homer Simpson, or Peter Griffin? Is that what you identify as? Or would you rather want to identify as a cute pretty innocent good uke, or a handsome strong respectable seme?
>>24152495
>heteronormative
red flag
>>24152058
Not true. As one who is bereft of such, I can positively testify that lacking this makes you really fucked up.
>>24152551
Why, heteronormative is a word used by SJW yes. But they want to absolve the gender roles. I'm saying hell no, we need more of them. Even put them in gay relationships! Traditional relationships work. We need cute boys to get fucked in the ass constantly and live as king of the top. Our base is under attack, it is time to set up a small base on some other part of the map just in case. And I'm gonna plant my fat flag right in some unspoiled pink uke boipussy!
>being gay
>the current year
>>24152644
>being straight
>2015
go back to bed grandpa
>>24152557
That's because you're programmed to need females. A gay man is not. They'd be as fucked up as you are if they were bereft male companionship.
>>24152206
I never said the New Testament was historical truth. For the record, it was you who started this stupid religious discussion. I'll respond to each of your comments point by point.
>15 years old
Wrong.
>Old Testament is part of the Word of God
I'm not disregarding its historical chronicle; it's generally acknowledged that the majority of what occurred (I'm talking about the history part, too, not the miracles, etc) is actual history. Where am I disregarding this? Please show and tell.
>New Testament literal
The majority of it IS quite literal. There are certain parts that are allegorical, but most of us also read it keeping contextualisation and maqasid (means: higher purpose, don't know the English for it, sorry) in mind.
But why are these questions relevant? You have clearly shown that you're a /pol/ faggot with 0 knowledge about the topic (except that you get fucked by guys with STIs).
>ywn have a submissive robot bf to train and mold into your submissive chastity crossdressing slave
>ywn condition him to salivate at the smell of your cock
>ywn condition him to refer to himself as a female to further his emasculation
>ywn condition him to achieve orgasm solely via prostate
>ywn enjoy the view as he cleans your living room in a skimpy maid outfit, his little cage peeking out of his ruffles when he twirls and his buttcheeks being revealed when he bends over
>ywn interrupt him mid-cleaning by pushing him down on all fours and roughly taking his ass
Finding a submissive robot bf is definitely harder than finding a gf.
>>24152669
Oh yeah you like that current year don't you
>>24152773
so uh what country are you in anon?
>>24151143
>the WHO is run by Jews
4chan.org
>>24152880
The US
Do you have any interest in being my slave?
>>24152773
If you lived in south carolina and could pay for hormones, i would do this
>>24152929
Why whoremoans? Don't get me wrong, I find the idea hot, but why would YOU, the sub, like them?
>>24148860
>all 50% of that 50% hate you
>3% of the 4% like you
Being gay still has better odds for robots. I'm like a little bit gay and I've tried so hard to go fully gay but my overpowering interest in women puts an end to it every time. I'd give my right arm to not be straight anymore.
>>24152927
yes, shame i'm in aus ;_;
>>24152773
>Finding a submissive robot bf is definitely harder than finding a gf.
>already two replies wanting this
reeee
>>24152960
he wants to transition i guess and for you to pay for it
>>24152999
I recognize that cage+bodysuit
>>24153089
know the source?
>>24153010
1 from Oz and 1 gold digger. The Oz one is really cute though. If that's actually him in the pics it would be worth it to import him.
The real problem is getting them to commit to actually coming to live with me.
>>24153137
Unfortunately, I do not.
>>24148622
>love
Not at all
>sex
Fuck yes, absolutely.
>>24152599
Why is the file 404d ?
>>24153146
yeah that wasn't me in the pic.
i've been told i'm pretty cute, but i don't want to live in murica sorry
>>24148622
Plenty of faggots right here bud
>>24152973
you actually don't know what a percentage of a percentage means.
