So....tell me again why is it you can't just go gay and fuck guys?
Because it doesn't work that way for everyone.
>>24062519
because vice is a meme news site now
So that means no one is strictly gay either
>>24062543
But the article CLEARLY states straight people don't exist and human sexuality is fluid.
>>24062519
why does vice remove all their videos on youtube after like 1 minute after uploading them?
Isn't VICE funded by some jew in the same league as George Soros
>>24062581
Yeah, but maybe most of the population is still 95% straight. Maybe Johnny Straightguy could get a hardon if he met the perfect man who pushed all his buttons in just the right way. But that's much less likely to happen than him just sticking to women.
If this is true, why do gays always complain that that's just how they were born?
>>24062519
>a guy fucking a guy has a biological function
It's a ( virtually untreatable ) mental condition paraded by these people to compete in the progressive ranking ladder.
>>24062615
But that doesn't mean he's straight, senpai. Just means he hasn't found a tempting enough dick.
Try sucking some dicks and see what happens.
>>24062660
>mental condition
says dr community college dropout
kill yourself
>>24062519
I legitimately tried to be gay since I couldnt into girs. Starting talking to this one gay dude I knew who always had a crush on me. It was really weird and he used to send me dick pics on snapchat and I was repulsed by seeing another mans penis but I thought I would eventually get over it. I remember once we were hanging out and he tried to hug me from the back and i remember his chin brushed against my shoulder and once i felt that sandpaper from his shaved chin I realized that I was not gay and could never be. I ghosted him after that, felt bad because the dude taught me a lot about /fa/ and was really cool but i didnt want to continue leading him on because I'm not a stupid girl
>>24062727
damn thats an aggressive response, are you insecure?
Not that guy just interesting how mad you got over the internet
>>24062624
Because they need a excuse for their behavior
>>24062727
KEK
KEKEK
KEKEKEK
>>24062576
It's true. I'm gay but I can get off to femdom if it's done right. Not my go-to though.
>because human sexual triggers are ambiguous, we're going to say that sex isn't gendered and nobody's straight
>even though biologically healthy males are specifically attracted to female primary sexual attributes over male ones
Gender is
O
V
E
R
STR8 PEOPLE DON'T REAL
>>24062519
I'm not gay nor do i wants dicks /thread moving on
>>24062576
I haven't even read the article and i know they're arbitrarily going to say that all people are a little gay, so either gay or bi, but if you tried telling them everyone being bi, even the gay people makes more sense, they'd rage at you
>>24062519
Holy shit, all those republicans and priests were right, being gay is a choice!
>>24062519
Because that article is bullshit?
>2015
>still believing all people choose their sexually
>>24062519
By this logic homosexuality is a lie as well?
>human sexuality is fluid
proof that gays literally CHOOSE to be gay, and thus deserve every humiliation/stoneing/punishment because it is subhuman to choose to be gay.
>>24062519
I could suck a guys dick if he was qt enough. The thought of anal, male or female is repulsive though
>>24062948
Why is it subhuman?
>>24062967
it is degenerous, it isn't the way humans are meant to live
>>24062989
>degenerate
Memes aren't arguments, if you can explain how it's subhuman, or explain how it's degenerate and how that qualifies as subhuman, go ahead.
>isn't the way humans are meant to live
According to who?
>>24062519
Because there's no such thing as gay. Sexuality is fluid, labels like gay, straight, bi aren't compatible with this constant state of flux.
>>24063022
according to god, according to evolution.
procreational organs aren't meant for sodomy
as you know animals sodomize, they are beneath humans (intellectually, morally etc.), this is why I used the term sub-human.
Animals sodomize because of their lack of understanding
>>24062956
ifktb
>>24063094
Yeah, but let's be real, we're never going to stop using those labels since they're practical. Even if we can detect slight signs of arousal in straight men when exposed to gay porn, or slight signs of arousal in gay men when exposed to straight porn, it's not going to significantly alter their behavior in a way that would require us to restructure our labels.
>>24062948
>proof that they choose
No? It's proof that sexuality is fluid and not pinned down to just one thing, it doesn't imply conscious choice.
>>24063125
If fluidity is true, there is a choice that can be made, resulting in the refutal of the arument of "I was born this way".
This also implies that they should take full responsibility for their actions (think of the filthy shit gays do for attention)
>>24063121
Au contraire. The labels pretty much only enforce the status quo; having fixed rigid labels makes us also act and treat our own sexualities as if they're fixed or rigid. When they're not. The sooner we get passed the idea of using those labels in that way, the better for everyone. Sexual freedom for everyone.
>>24063188
Fluidity doesn't imply that you're in control of the direction of the flow, merely that there is a flow. Nobody is born straight or gay etc, but that doesn't mean they've chosen to have attractions for the same sex.
Every attention whore should take responsibility for their actions, regardless of sexuality
>>24062581
That means gay people aren't really gay but also possibly straight.
>>24063284
attraction is not chosen indeed, but the actions of a person based on this attraction is a choice. With action I mean: Go gay or go straight
And this is a choice
>>24063338
I don't get what you're saying, at all.
>>24063379
try reading it again, plug in "go gay or go straight" in the place of "actions"
>>24063284
So how are you proposing people describe their sexuality? Do they have to give a sentence describing their behaviors and inclinations since we're doing away with the simplistic labels?
>>24063425
I can read, but I don't know what youre trying to convey with that string of words.
>>24063429
Talk about what you're attracted to, but don't limit it to only one thing. Having one word to describe the plethora of sexual activity that's available to a person is frankly ridiculous.
I'm gonna suck a straight married guy's cock today. Any advice?
>>24063470
I am saying: being gay is a choice
I'd rather be a hikky with my waifu tbqh.
>>24063533
But we already discussed this...
A) Gay doesnt exist
B) Having fluidity doesn't imply a choice
Its a choice whether someone acts on their attractions sure, but that doesn't mean they choose.
>>24063188
>>24063470
Kek get the fuck out
This whole business of "sexual conversations" is cringe tier
I want to preserve the excitement of the taboo
>>24063470
That's never going to happen. We use overly simplistic, poorly fitting labels in every aspect of life. Look at race - white? black? seriously? Is that supposed to capture the complexity of my heritage? Even the letters of the alphabet are categorized with an imperfect system (vowels, consonants, but what about the letter y?).
>>24063571
Having fluidity DIRECTLY implies choice. It means that you are not solely attracted to one gender or the other, indicating you could pursue either one.
>>24063571
Well you did a shitty job of discussing it.
If sexuality is fluid, "gay" as we know it is a singular social construct out of several of which one can identify to be, and is very much a choice.
>>24062519
I've had the opinion that most people are born closer to bisexuality than 100% straight or 100% gay for years and people have thought me an idiot for it.
>>24063571
Yes we already discussed this
A) Gay does exist: one can choose to do gay things
B) It does, see below
>Its a choice whether someone acts on their attractions sure, but that doesn't mean they choose.
contradictory.
Plus: humans don't have to blindly follow their impulses, which makes us different from animals. they indeed have a choice.
>>24062519
>sexuality is a choice
Back to lynching faggots it is then.
>>24063682
It's not that they're born bisexual etc, it's that the sexual part of the brain is so primitive that nearly anything can be associated with sexual desire. Of course one of the most common associations is with men, who happen to resemble the human female more than anything else does.
>>24063507
I let you in on a secret. He not straight
>>24063633
They literally state that it is not be a choice. It can just be a fluid, biological thing that changes over a lifetime. Plz read, robot.
>>24063775
Well he's never done it before and he's married to a woman, he's just curious
>>24063806
They contradict logic then, even if it changes the choice still exists
>>24063811
He's gay anon or bi but not straight
>>24062519
>this proves fags can be straight
HA, they shot themselves in the foot.
>>24062956
This
But for me vaginal sex is kinda repulsive though, shit
>>24063806
They could have just asked me, I became a faggot, maybe because I have varicocele from elementary school? But my left ball stayed up til I got some injections so, yeah
>>24063284
>The sooner we get passed the idea of using those labels in that way, the better for everyone.
Why does this bother me so much? I believe that in the near future all people will exibit bisexual behavior but thinking about it makes me sad. Bisexuality makes me upset. I equate it to decadence of society and I don't know why.
