>They don’t know how to be happy just on their own.
How does the accuracy of this statement differ for the two genders?
I doubt r9k can reach any consensus.
>>23287213
How high are you man?
>>23287213
I say that you can be happy on your own.
But if it's not a choice you make, but rather one that's made for you, then you're just a failure.
>>23287213
I'm guessing the senior is the girl who no longer gives a fuck?
I imagine, like most things, that it depends on the person.
>>23289335
my thoughts exactly
>>23289410
Probably. Although I think there's more societal pressures on women to be with a guy. Social status, weddings, biological clock ect.
>>23289410
/thread
Some freshman guys are outcasts and wouldn't attend the party
Some senior guys would want to bang freshman girls at party
Varies from anon to anon
The man's happiness is: I will. The woman's happiness is: He will.
'Behold, now the world has become perfect!' -- thus thinks every woman when she obeys with all her love.
And woman has to obey and find a depth for her surface. Woman's nature is surface, a changeable, stormy film upon shallow waters.
But man's nature is deep, its torrent roars in subterranean caves: woman senses its power but does not comprehend it.
>>23289335
Not so much that she doesn't give a fuck. It's that she knows she'll just be taking her clothes off and getting fucked so why get dressed up.
>>23289496
Again, it depends how much the particular woman cares about those things.
>>23289539
>But man's nature is deep, its torrent roars in subterranean caves: woman senses its power but does not comprehend it.
>mfw
