Can you remove everything that isn't the two girls from there? I hope you can do it, /r/!
>>14661957
+1, tho if the retarded guy in background was changed to a generic faceless/handsome dude that wouldn't be too bad either
if both of the men were removed, without the women's butts being pushed up against anything, it would kinda look weird.
gl with your request
>>14662013
Well, what you said could be also nice, but I also don't like the background, a solid colored one would be nicer..
Bump.
>>14662020
>>14662067
so no dudes and simple, solid-color background? sounds simple enough
how come you want this specific image so much?
anyway here you go a higher-res version of it
>>14662020
larger/higher-res version of this one too cuz y not
>>14662067
and this one too cuz y not
>>14662183
>>14662186
>>14662192
Thank you for the hi-res pics, about the reasons, I really like it but the dude in the right ruins the thing for most.
>>14662252
ye ye, i figured what you disliked about it, just was curious what you liked about it so much :D
the other ones you uploaded have better art imo, both style and quality, with >>14662186 being best overall
this latest one is good even tho i don't like the gangbang thing, tho the real issue for me is the x-ray
anyway, higher-res version, enjoy
>>14662322
I have to admit you made a wonderful work on that last pic even if you didn't like it, really, it looks really another picture.
>>14662337
i actually found a larger version, then managed to further scale it up
using the one you posted, i managed to improve it as well, but, not as much
glad you like it
===
this latest, tho... fucking hngg... best one yet
improved it by a bit
