Will someone xray these sluts

File: image.jpg (65KB, 480x639px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

65KB, 480x639px

And her

File: image.jpg (111KB, 491x724px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

111KB, 491x724px

And

File: image.jpg (57KB, 403x730px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

57KB, 403x730px

Or

File: image.jpg (67KB, 384x676px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

67KB, 384x676px

And her

Worst fucking quailty ever shits not gonna work if u have a 640 x 800 pic fuckin noob

File: image.jpg (62KB, 627x442px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

62KB, 627x442px

And

File: Untitled-1.png (269KB, 495x649px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

269KB, 495x649px

>>13941605

File: image.jpg (66KB, 386x627px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

66KB, 386x627px

Heres another

>>13941605
Most of the these clothes are too thick and block much of the infrared that would have been picked up by the CMOS sensor. Thus when we try x-ray them, there is too much noise to decipher the signal to a usable degree.

Protip: Find thinner clothes faggot.

File: image.jpg (26KB, 333x355px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

26KB, 333x355px

Another

File: image.jpg (62KB, 399x581px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

62KB, 399x581px

Her

File: image.jpg (78KB, 423x611px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

78KB, 423x611px

This one

File: image.jpg (86KB, 800x598px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

86KB, 800x598px

.

File: image.jpg (175KB, 782x1822px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

175KB, 782x1822px

.

If you want xrays then find better pics.
Generally high quality with one thin layer covering, not a tank and bra underneath.
Otherwise youll only get fake rays