Why not just ban reaction images entirely?
People only get mad at them anyway
>>590383
What?
>>590383
You can argue that "reaction images" fall under the heading of "image macro," considering the etymology of the term, and as such ARE against the rules.
But nobody follows the rules anyway, if they're "having fun." Not the users nor the mods. So, even if it were expanded and explained with new wording, it would not be enforced.
>>590383
dumb frogposter
>>590414
>But nobody follows the rules anyway, if they're "having fun." Not the users nor the mods. So, even if it were expanded and explained with new wording, it would not be enforced.
That really hurts.
>>590383
Why not just ban dumb frogs?
>>590483
I think realistically the backlash might be too much
>>590491
not really, most people would celebrate the purge of reddit
>>590512
Dumb reddit poster.
>>590383
Reaction images seem to be a magnet for faggots
Some people can't express themselves without le wacky cartoon face. Avatarfagging is explicitly against the rules because it's annoying and precocious. Reaction images are in the same vein. Just because you don't use the same character twice in a row doesn't mean you aren't a faggot.
This thread screams reddit. They're all trying so hard to make this place like it, thats why the quality has been dipping down year after year. its disgusting.
