Was it ever explained why the bump limit went from 300 to 310?
>>584629
Why do you require an explanation?
>>584651
I don't require one, I simply asked for one. Would you say you require an answer to your question?
>>584629
Perphaps testing it to see if anything breaks?
>>584629
I have no good reason to believe that it was ever 300 and not 310. Kinda like the Berenstain Bears. I could have just been remembering wrong.
>>584629
10 feet taller
>dude good troll that was epic
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
**i was troled!**
when you read this post, copy this post to a new thread or else you will be **troled!!**
watch out for the tricks and trolls!!
>>584820
this makes sense
>>584629
bump limit