Nobody understands their arbitrary rules anymore. it's as if they change their minds on what is allowed and what isn't hourly and a single word can set off a week long ban.
threads that are off topic aren't deleted but individual posts are. communication is poor, because as soon a a mod actually bothers to explain what is and isn't allowed, a post with topic that was just allowed will be deleted and given another ban.
basically the authority on /co/ have turned into a gang of megalomaniacs.
if someone higher on the chain of authority would just look into who is currently in charge of /co/ please figure out why cartoons that are still running are sent to /trash/ and why there is an obvious bias towards superhero comics over cartoons.
Bump for agreement.
>>577255
I agree. What mods should be doing is purging tumblr from /co/.
The use of 4chan is a privilege, not a right. The 4chan moderation team reserves the right to revoke access and remove content for any reason without notice.
>>578071
That's just a cheap copout so mods can be free from blame or responsibility.
>>578096
Exactly.
>>577255
Moderation on /co/ is tyrannic.
>>577255
bumb 'cause yeah, something has to be done. The board is going down too fast.
>>577255
They only keep tge tgreads that they like up, hence zootopia shitposting.
>>579019
Why exactly do you think they shouldn't be allowed to do that though?
I was banned the other day for /pol/shit merely because I said that Hillary Clinton belongs in jail, however anti-Trump posts were left untouched.
The /co/ mods and janitors are absolutely fucking deplorable.They have made /co/ the absolute worst board to post on.
>>577255
/co/ is a hugbox now, the userbase has deteriorated and the mods are as exactly as you said. 4chan moderation has been completely fucked since moot put his cronies in power. Hiro doesn't give a fuck obviously.
>>579153
Anyone who says /co/ is a hugbox is a fool. Probably some kind of /pol/ack who is actually looking for hugbox and is unable to handle dissenting opinion.
>>579160
I'm not talking about politics you retarded conclusion-jumping faggot. I'm talking about not being able to criticize media you don't like because one of the mods does and mods deleting threads for media they don't like.
>>579160
>everything I don't like is /pol/
I've been banned for posting censored/cropped porn, there used to even be one janitor who deleted Paheal links.
As I've always understood Global 3, there has to be visible breasts/genitals for it to count as a NSFW image.
>>578071
What makes moderators qualified to pass judgement like this? they have shown that on /co/ specifically that they abuse this right to ban and revoke this access to someone they simply disagree with.
>>579028
Moderation isn't a fucking club house for picking out whoever they think is "uncool"
it's a responsibility to maintain order for following the rules. If they make up some rules between each other they should contact someone else verify if that's ok.
because being banned for saying "I think x is better than y and here's why" is the last thing that should happen.
What makes you think that is in anyway acceptable.
There deleting anything even slightly political regardless of the content of the thread they never comunicate with there user base.
You can have a 300 post long thread full of interesting discussion and a mod will come along and delete it for no good reason.
There fucking terrible
>>580052
I agree with you. but it's spelled "they're"
"They are deleting anything"
