75% of /x/

>>569767
There's something tragically funny about wading through mountains of garbage (and occasionally contributing to the pile) on a quest to find diamonds of quality.

It's like Stockholm Syndrome mixed with crack cocaine.

Whenever I make a thread that even remotely breaks a rule on /tv/I get banned within ten minutes. Yet /tv/ is constantly inundated with shit posts. Are there really that many shitposters out there constantly changing their up?

>>569788
mods just love you, you're special

>>569788
you're posting at the wrong time of day

File: lono7.png (501 KB, 425x444) Image search: [Google]

501 KB, 425x444

/qa/

>>569767
>>>/news/ is a comfy mix of /pol/ and /k/ blowhards combined with some pseudointellectuals from /lit/, /sci/, etc and banterfags from boards like /tv/ and /r9k/.

Unfortunately /pol/ writes most of the headlines because they are always outraged over something and easily fall prey to unscrupulous click bait merchants peddling sensationalism. Even worse than that is /tv/ celebrity tabloid news.

>>569833
Why was that board even made? There an actual demand for it?

And yes it is surprisingly decent.

literally [s4s], its genius.

>>569788
Why do you think there are at least 20 image.jpg threads at any given time?

The amount of shitpost on that board is insanely hilarious, sometimes i just start seeing one stupid shit after another and i start laughing non-stop.

This new Dumbledore shit is too much for my sides.

>>569911
Yeah, I do sometimes find it funny when I go to /tv/, and dozens of threads are just BLACKED. One or two annoy me, but a whole bunch is just so ridiculous that it makes me smile.

Still, it's ruining the board. I'd rather see all shitposts or all serious posts.

>>569911
I laughed for hours this week when there was a simultaneous raid of HOWEVER and EL JUSTO.

I decided to sit back and watched the board implode while half of it cried in desperation.