Why don't threads start autosaging when they reach image limit?
You are currently reading a thread in /qa/ - Question & Answer
We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.
Why don't threads start autosaging when they reach image limit?
I wonder that. Whichever limits is reached first, right?
>>565418
Because you can bet that autistic anons will spam images in threads they don't like so that they die earlier.
>>565426
The problem with that ascertation is they already do that. Threads are effectively over when the image-limit is reached, and with regards to GENERALS between 3 or 5 people scrambled to make the next one, right after the image-limit is reached.
>>565433
>Threads are effectively over when the image-limit is reached
I don't think that applies to all boards, or even most of them. Discussion doesn't just dry-up because it can't be accompanied by reaction images.
If it's a problem that plagues a community that you're part of, just make an agreement to move onto the next thread once the image-limit is reached, as opposed to waiting for bump-limit or page 10.
As I understand it, the posters of certain /c/ and /e/ threads do this with great efficiency, is it so hard for others?
>>565418
This should be the case for image sharing boards, like the porn boards and /gif/, /wsg/, Etc.
