Gawker just filed for bankruptcy. Threads about this are getting deleted on /v/.
Why can't we have threads about this?
Because "Gawker Files for Bankruptcy" is not a video game.
>>558380
Kotaku is a video game website, they are going under too
>>558382
"Kotaku Going Under" is not a video game. The topic is indeed marginally related to video games, but it is not a video game.
Because you niggers never check the catalog and spam the board like a bunch of teenagers.
>>558385
Yeah, I've noticed that "hot" subject matter makes people more likely to make a new thread out of excitement before checking (particularly if it's hot enough to suggest a full bump-limit thread). Happens on other boards too, probably just human nature.
>>558383
By that same extension, why not ban all e3 discussion? It's not a video game, it's a conference that covers video games. The topic is indeed marginally related to video games, but it is not a video game.
And if we follow that exactly, what is /v/ even for? /vg/ is for new and current games, /vr/ is for old games. Therefore /v/ serves no purpose.
>>558385
How about we make a sticky?
>>558375
>mfw
>>558385
Except mods don't even leave one thread alive.
not vidya
>>558404
E3 has more to do with video games because video games are the subject matter
Kotaku going under doesn't have much to do with video games because the subject is just 'this company is dying"
>>558375
Because you're having 80 threads on not video games.
Keep it to one or two fucking threads and i'm sure nobody would notice or care.
>>558380
but umaru dva, high noon and thick posting is completely vidya right?
>>558375
Because gaming journalism, regardless of which side you're on, is not video game related.
There are multiple threads about this on /pol/, what's wrong with discussing it there?
>>558404
Silly argument. E3 is an event for the release of upcoming video games. A Gawker topic involves actual courtrooms and lawyers. You're either trolling or more likely just not thinking it through.
>>558483
That makes no sense.
>>558418
A sticky would be great then.
Contain the redditors/8Gaggers to one thread.
Mod is too lazy though.
>>558489
Better to ban every thread so there are now redditors or 8gaggers
>>558488
now you're getting it.
What is there to discuss besides "WE DID IT REDDIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"?
>>558383
Fuck off retard.
/v/ has successfully talking about video gaming related websites for years.
>>558385
Go back to IRC.
You and everyone else here knows that the threads where being deleted almost straight away and they were being reposted because it is video game related and mods had no leg to stand on by deleting them.
The only anons on /v/ who wouldn't want to at least pop in and have a laugh at this are the newfaggots who haven't been on /v/ prior to gamergate happening.
>>558470
Kotaku is the most discussed video game news website on /v/ in the past decade.
>>558502
>What is there to discuss
Laughing and joking about the whole thing.
/v/ has been waiting for gawker and it's gaming media brands to go under forever.
I fail to see how this is not /v/ related yet writing a birthday card for Gabe Newel or Kojima is somehow deserving of a sticky.
>>558385
OPs thread doesn't belong, but there is nothing wrong with 50 threads for something. This is 4chan not a traditional forum. Fuck off with your general cancer.
