So as you remember Hiro, you made a thread on /v/ talking about what kind of things you want us to be allowed or banned from /v/. We have collected the ideas from the massive thread and are posting them here, because the mods on /v/ are constantly deleting the suggestion threads nonstop.
Allow Sound WebM's
Ban Console War Threads: For example, shitposting threads that involve Xbox vs Playstation that involve nothing but shitposting
Ban E-Celeb threads: These are nothing but blatant advertisements for other Youtube and Twitch channels and they go against the rules of the site.
Thread ID's: A majority of /v/ was for this. This is much like what /pol/ has
Allow Censorship Talks: You seemed to be in agreement that we should be allowed to talk about what we want to talk about, and talk about video game censorship was a major issue brought up. You need to tell the mods to stop deleting those threads and allow them to be posted.
These were the majority of ideas brought up in that /v/ sticky that people mostly agreed on. We now want your opinion on all of these ideas and tell us what you think of them and where you want to go from here with this.
>>557630
Hiroyuki probably doesn't give a shit and got scared off by his failure of a sticky thread.
I wouldn't be surprised if he never brings up the topic again.
Anyway...
There were other suggestions from that thread, like giving flags to every poster, separating /v/ in a multitude of ways (such as Japanese and Western video games), disabling phone posters from posting, and that is about it. I would say most of these are stupid except the phone posting. I am surprised you didn't include it since it was generally liked in the thread.
>>>/v/340366735
Here is Hiro's thread for anyone interested. If that doesn't work somehow, here is the link.
> >>>/v/340366735
Friendly reminder: don't make threads on /v/ about this, because the mods WILL ban you.
>>557636
The mods banning people means they were not happy at all about Hiro siding with us over the mods.
He wanted us to make a list on what was talked about in the thread. Tweet at him and let him know
>>557666
He is a far too busy man to be having to deal with this stuff himself.
I believe that he just needs to find himself better workers (mods, janitors) that actually agree upon his views.
We need a purge.
>>557668
Yup. The mods have an agenda and don't do their job. I'm pretty sure most of those people making suggestions could moderate better.
I sure can since I know all the obvious b8s/pastas and shitposters by heart but I don't apply since I won't be on 4chan for a good chunk of time in a few months.
You really need the tenacity and enjoy blowing shitposters the fuck out to do this job. Shitposters get angry when you start targeting them and start switching ips and spamming more stuff which as a mod would be fun to delete over and over knowing it infuriates them.
Basically you need mods as autistic as the shitposters that get a rise out of deleting shitposts.
That thread was terrible and all the suggestions were terrible
Replacing the mods is all you need to do for v.
>>557630
>Thread ID's: A majority of /v/ was for this
How on earth do you prove a claim like this? Also terrible idea. IDs never help shit. Cripplechan uses them, can I make that comparison and have it never brought up again?
>>557666
>He wanted us to make a list on what was talked about in the thread.
GL with that
>>557699
I feel the same myself, but the only thing I can do is become a janitor.
>Yup. The mods have an agenda and don't do their job. I'm pretty sure most of those people making suggestions could moderate better.
This is 100% true. Why does Hiro not do anything about it? Is he worried that it would somehow "change" what 4chan is all about? This is the issue with getting an outside leader as they always fear their changes will be wrong.
The thing that grinds my gears is seeing actual video game threads getting DELETED. Why in the love of fuck would a mod or janitor delete a video game thread on /v/? And before you blow me off or say "it was off topic" or something else I can assure you that there are actual threads I have seen that were completely following the rules and not going off topic and yet they were removed. And no, they weren't bait threads, either. If you have browsed /v/ for a while then you know what I mean.
I believe the community is at fault, too, but you can't get anything fixed if the ones in power are either incompetent, corrupted or overall retarded.
>>557713
>Thread ID's: A majority of /v/ was for this
>How on earth do you prove a claim like this? Also terrible idea. IDs never help shit. Cripplechan uses them, can I make that comparison and have it never brought up again?
The majority of /v/ that was in that thread were for it. I for one would be, too, if it helped even a smidgen of the mess that /v/ is today.
The thread was linked here, just read it again.
>>557727
>The thing that grinds my gears is seeing actual video game threads getting DELETED. Why in the love of fuck would a mod or janitor delete a video game thread on /v/? And before you blow me off or say "it was off topic" or something else I can assure you that there are actual threads I have seen that were completely following the rules and not going off topic and yet they were removed. And no, they weren't bait threads, either. If you have browsed /v/ for a while then you know what I mean.
Goes back to the bias of mods. Delete threads they dislike and then leave falseflagging/shitposts they are biased towards up. Why else is it? You post porn or some shit and it's deleted in seconds.
>>557727
>The majority of /v/ that was in that thread were for it
A majority of v in a thread is not a majority of v
But untrustable polls in that thread said the opposite. Which is the only other indicator other than anonymous posts. Which aren't very accurate
>>557746
Well what is your suggestion on how to find what the majority of /v/ thinks of IDs?
>>557713
>How on earth do you prove a claim like this? Also terrible idea. IDs never help shit. Cripplechan uses them, can I make that comparison and have it never brought up again?
2ch has used them since 1999.
>>557778
I don't think you should bother.
He believes that anything to do with IDs would automatically make us a le Ribbit clone. He even brought up 8kun. There are some people in this world that can't stand change or fixes.
>>557630
look at the hands
>>557778
Yes let's make 4chan just like 2ch. Nothing could go wrong.
4chan isn't 2chan. What's your point?
>>557786
I only bring up 8kun because of the crazy polar opinions it brings to the table. The idea being someone would be less likely or more likely to want them based on their opinion of le ebil other websites meme.
>>557746
8000 posts tells you otherwise
>>557803
4chan was based off of 2ch retard.
Again people, tweet at Hiro and tell him about this. Tweeting at him works, just keep at it
>>557809
He wanted a list of what was discussed.
>>557630
>Vivian poster thinking his opinion matters
That's hilarious.
Seriously though, the only problem I have with those ideas, is that "e-celeb" threads aren't clearly defined. I don't think it's fair how a legit topic regarding video games, that just happens to be spurred by an online personality, gets treated with the same disdain as a random let's play video, or random celeb drama.
Sometimes someone produces something worth talking about, and it would be nice if it were given a chance, instead of immediately bombarded with reports and shitposting.
Also, censorship threads are tricky, because a lot of them are attempts to form an army to target specific individuals.
What typically happens, in someone scours twitter to look for whoever is responsible for censoring their game, and then try to find way to get that person fired. It's a form of harassment. That's how the whole Alison Rapp thing spun out of control. /v/ was stirred into a blind rage and harassed her, until they finally found some dirt completely unrelated to video game, and snitched to Nintendo.
Since then, I've seen censorship threads going after some other guy, posting his twitter where he claims to work for such-and-such, and showing his SJW beliefs. They're trying to turn him into a target.
So I ask, how can the mods hope to allow censorship discussion, without fear of 4chan getting hit by another harassment lawsuit?
>>557820
The mods don't allow it because they have a clear agenda against it, even though they harm no one and haven't even enticed raids
>>557824
You're kidding right? Some threads had the overt message of "let's get this person fired". Other threads turn into that. Censorship threads, in lots of cases, turn into witchhunts.
>>557820
V used to be able to have these discussions without going all crazy. I think it's escalated because those discussions normally go
>X was censored
>then don't buy it / buy an import
>that senrs the wrong message / won't fix anything
>maybe we could fix it at the source!
It comes from, I think, internet gamers feeling helpless that theyre unable to make a dent in an industry they've put so much time into. That's being changed by such a small amount of narrow minded people. I don't support then borderline raid threads but I understand them. I wish we could just go back to flinging shit at game journos though. That's something of value lost. Those were good keks.
Google doesn't turn up anything about 4chan getting harassment lawsuits. Help a poster out?
>>557829
The only one who got fired was Allison Rapp, and she got herself fired because anons found out she was a prostitute
Oh and before you bitch, companies have every right to fire you for what you post on twitter or Facebook
>>557832
>they don't harm or raid anyone
>unless they had it coming
>>557833
Hey idiot, you don't fucking post pictures of yourself admitting you prostitute on your public twitter account. It was fair game and it was all on her
>>557832
Before the prostitution thing, /v/ snitched on her about her thesis regarding pedophilia, and international law enforcement, as well as her tweets regarding pedophilia. When they in fact couldn't find any case of her censoring their games, they kept this up.
And then just the other day, I literally saw a thread that was trying to get some other localizer fired because he's a "SJW". They're witchhunts pure and simple. You are not to turn 4chan into your personal army. Even if 4chan's targeting proves unsuccessful at getting someone fired, the fact that they trying is harassment.
>>557835
You were the one who claimed that "they harm no one and haven't even enticed raids."
I guess prostitutes and idiots don't count as people anymore.
>>557831
>V
Really?? You're the type posting on /qa/?
Moot talks about the lawsuits in his final Q&A stream. That's all I'm going to tell you. All 8 hours are interesting.
>>557836
>her thesis regarding pedophilia
I'm not the only one who found 4chan disliking a woman who likes lolis weird as fuck right?
Also this Anon has a point. I'd like it if we could have threads on these folks and the issues there in, but how can we do that without them becoming mod recruitment threads?
>>557840
>THIS POSTER DOESNT TYPE A LETTER HOW I LIKE
Man I know I'm ocd but at least I'm not on that level of autism.
I'm totally not going through this whole stream to find them. Step it up nonnsource providing anon. The only lawsuits I can remember didn't involve v. I'm not going to be surprised if GG and it's nonsense some how got one too, but I remember reading about the fappening one on board, never about any other ones.
>>557841
>I'm not the only one who found 4chan disliking a woman who likes lolis weird as fuck right?
They threw aside reason, and started attacking based on their emotions. B-b-but they're not social justice warriors or anything!(Or so they would say)
To be fair, her thesis and comments on twitter are both incredibly creepy. She does make comments about reevaluating the sexual agency of minors on film. She's incredibly sketchy. If she were a man, I think everyone would assume he were a pedo. But since she's a woman, everyone gives her the benefit of the doubt.
>>557836
She wrote a paper about how there's nothing wrong with Pedophilia, and then she tweeted about it. You deserve to be fired for that. An employer can and will find this information. That's just how the real world works now. You don't like it? Delete your accounts
You're also forgetting how several people said to ban /pol/ and all /pol/ related content.
I even suggested banning all politics to /pol/.
>>557820
First off, the views of anonymous people on a Japanese-inspired image board does not reflect the owners or mods.
Second, /v/ was not responsible for Alison Rapp getting terminated from Nintendo. It was mostly other sites that are involved with GamerGate. Besides, are you trying to defend a sex-worker who worked at children's company? Her actions were illegal and inappropriate for the line of work she was in.
Third, the mods aren't there to decide what is right or wrong. That is for Hiroyuki and the community. The mods are meant to enforce the rules, not make them. Even Hiro stated that. You can not say otherwise.
Anyway, GamerGate has as much reason to be on /v/ as anything else that is posted.
It's corruption that is keeping it and many other things away. I guess you are the one that likes to hide that actual video game content gets removed from /v/? The mods are the issue here.
>>557839
Jesus christ I knew 4chan was getting bad, but you just proved it. She worked for a family friendly company. Do you want someone who's admitted to working as a prostitute, and still is, being your PR head? What message does that send to kids and families?
>>557850
Then that's why you keep posting the suggestions we know were agreed upon in that thread. Hiro needs to get in here soon so he can go over all of it. The info was collected, now Hiro just needs to review everything and set it in stone
>>557847
The fact you said attack and not fapping/worshipping is what concerns me to be honest senpoi. How did that even happen.
>>557845
>Man I know I'm ocd but at least I'm not on that level of autism.
It's not just a letter. It's a name. If your name was Mike, and I called you Mick, then clearly I don't know you very well.
Lurk more. moot talks directly about the lawsuits(as much as he's legally allowed). All it costs you, is also hearing about some really cool shit regarding the site. The point about the lawsuits isn't necessarily about any lawsuit /v/ has directly caused. It's about getting lawsuits in general.
>>557851
>he mods are meant to enforce the rules, not make them. Even Hiro stated that. You can not say otherwise.
Except half the time sadly the mods delete things they don't personally like. Look at /co/ and /tv/ for instance. They are perfect examples of mod corruption. As much as I would kill for mod transparency, as was revealed in the IRC logs though, the mods are vehemently against it
>>557849
>She wrote a paper about how there's nothing wrong with Pedophilia, and then she tweeted about it.
The paper didn't advocate pedophilia.(directly) But regardless, her stance on pedophilia have zero to do with video games and censorship. Calling it to Nintendo's attention is baseless and petty. Even if the employer has every right to fire her over it, it still doesn't justify why these things are being discussed on /v/. And it doesn't justify /v/ using her information as a weapon against her.
>>557853
>Jesus christ I knew 4chan was getting bad, but you just proved it.
What I am calling you out on is the fact that you are a lying faggot, not that Allison Rapp is god's gift to video game PR management. You said that "/v/ doesn't harm, dox, or raid anyone." This is demonstrably false.
What you should have said is that "/v/ doesn't harm, dox, or raid anyone who doesn't deserve it." See, then we wouldn't have this problem. It must take you effort to be this retarded.
Just FYI
Allison Rapp would not have been fired if she hadn't been a literal prostitute sex worker on the side of her Nintendo career.
This is fact.
The main discussion derailed so lets get back to talking more about the general topic please? Most of the discussion about her is just repeating.
>>557865
It only keeps repeating itself because you insist that /v/ does not dox or raid anyone one hand, while simultaneously defending a dox/raid campaign with the other.
It doesn't take a genius to see the inconsistency here.
>>557858
I stay away from /tv/ and do not frequent /co/ but I am aware of the intense corruption on those boards.
I know of the corruption of the mods and that is why I am talking about it.
More people need to and I am actually surprised we haven't been axed yet since we are talking about it here. We can't even talk about it on /v/ because it gets automatically archived or completely banned, even though Hiro himself wanted us to find the solution. We are left in the dark now and want answers, but no one is giving us any.
Hiro needs to purge a lot of the mods and rework his structure.
>>557849
>>557851
>>557853
These feel like satirical shit posts. Or like, SJWs who've taken up Anon mantels to fool/falseflag and ruin my 4chins.
Like what the fuck?
>>557857
Do you think/read/say/ "Slash V Slash" or just "v"? Stop being a faggot.
Your earlier point involved lawsuits, and the point of discussion here is v, so I don't know what you're getting at. Clearly v is in the clear.
>>557870
>Do you think/read/say/ "Slash V Slash" or just "v"? Stop being a faggot.
You're typing, you fucking toolbox. V is just as wrong as vee.
Your entire post reads like a satirical shitpost.
>>557851
>First off, the views of anonymous people on a Japanese-inspired image board does not reflect the owners or mods.
ok, that's an easy enough concept to grasp. I think that really goes without saying. But I suppose you're stating it to set up an argument?
>Second, /v/ was not responsible for Alison Rapp getting terminated from Nintendo.
They absolutely played a part. I SAW it with my own eyes. /v/ attempting to rally people against her.
>Besides, are you trying to defend a sex-worker who worked at children's company? Her actions were illegal and inappropriate for the line of work she was in.
I'm not morally opposed to sex work. However, Nintendo, is free to terminate their employees for any reason within the bounds of the law. However again, Nintendo's statement said plainly that they fired her for holding a second job, NOT due to the nature of her second job.
>Third, the mods aren't there to decide what is right or wrong. That is for Hiroyuki and the community. The mods are meant to enforce the rules, not make them. Even Hiro stated that. You can not say otherwise.
That's true to a certain extent. 4chan has hard rules that protect the site, even though people have wanted it for a long time. When Hiro as asked about a loli/shota board, he said he needed to know if the laws would allow it. Well... there's no loli/shota board. So that shows you that even community demand can't completely control the rules.
When you are hit with a lawsuit, in order to protect yourself, you need to lawyer up. Why? Because you can be sued at any time for any reason, by anyone. You need to represent yourself(bad idea) or buy representation. If 4chan is getting hit by lawsuits, then that means spending money. And if 4chan is harassing people, then that will make people want to sue.
Now, all of that is besides the point that 4chan does have a rule against raids/invasions. Which censorship threads often turn into. So they are actually enforcing the rules.
>>557855
I think the septum ring ruined her image. If she only avoided the septum, then /v/ would waifu her her crazy ass. But the septum piercing makes her looks like a disgusting SJW.
>>557866
I am not the only person posting here you know...
All of 4chan does a lot of raids and dox attacks, who can deny this? The GamerGate attacks are more from other sites and forums since they removed from /v/. Obviously people still frequent all the sites and forums so attacks can be labeled originating from many places, but the majority of the work is not done on /v/ anymore (in reference to GG).
>>557875
>All of 4chan
You have to be taking the piss.
In the interests of fairness to anyone from /v/ who's not retarded, I'm going to stop responding to you.
>>557870
It sounds like you are the one that is here just to fuck up this thread.
Why are you still on about that guys way of saying /v/? Who gives a fuck.
Please contribute or don't post...
>>557870
>Do you think/read/say/ "Slash V Slash" or just "v"? Stop being a faggot.
I was taught in school that names don't have to adhere to spelling conventions. That's why we have names like "Shawn", "Shaun", and "Sean".
It's spelled /v/. That's just how it is.
>Your earlier point involved lawsuits, and the point of discussion here is v, so I don't know what you're getting at. Clearly v is in the clear.
The point was that 4chan has received lawsuits in the past for supposed harassment. If censorship threads continue to harass people, then they will inevitably cause another lawsuit.
>>557877
When I said all of 4chan, I meant all of the boards.
Sorry if that was the wrong way to put it. Of course not every single individual doesn't partake in these actions. Only an idiot would think that.
Anyway, all the boards do some kind of shenanigans outside of this site, like rigging of polls, harassing individuals or companies, dox, etc.
>>557879
Well in that case I'm going to go ahead and save myself two digits, and continue bugging your autism.
That's only an inevitability if the threads in questions have similar content that the ones before that triggered the lawsuits. Actually it still doesn't prove that, just sets the table for that sides of your opinion.
>wanting to discuss shit with dirty redditors
Jesus no, why would anyone support talking about GamerGate?
>>557872
It's not anyone's problem except the owner of this site if lawsuits are handed to them. That is the problem with anonymous image boards.
If they wish to limit what users say, so be it, but they should not expect it to go smoothly because of the nature of faceless posters and the overall lack of enforcement of rules (or rules that actually state what they want).
About what you said on Rapp, I don't want to bring her up any more but it sex work is illegal in most parts of North America. If you believe that Nintendo didn't fire her based on this line of work then you must be a little daft. They used the excuse of a second job just so they could save some face that they had hired a sex worker. Officially mentioning this can be extremely damaging to their name.
/v/ was only responsible in the fact that they were posting what others were doing in the movement. Most of the board didn't even know what was happening and the threads were deleted fairly quick save a few. Sure, there are people that frequent many sites besides 4chan so you can argue that they took part, but most of /v/ did not. So you can't really call it a movement originating or working from /v/.
>>557883
>Well in that case I'm going to go ahead and save myself two digits, and continue bugging your autism.
I would expect nothing less out of someone like you. Too proud to correct a simple mistake. A newfag who thinks his opinion matters enough to talk on /qa/ about rules.
>That's only an inevitability if the threads in questions have similar content that the ones before that triggered the lawsuits.
Well yes, it does have similar content. The content usually goes like this.
>"Guys, this person is hurting our community with their evil SJW agenda! Let's figure out how to do something bad to them, so they go away!"
And then they proceed to form a small force to try and ruin the person.
> Actually it still doesn't prove that, just sets the table for that sides of your opinion.
It's not just my opinion. People are trying to use 4chan as their personal army to attack someone, which is against the rules.
>>557884
>implying that /v/ isn't already filled with people who browse ribbit
Always have to bring up le leddit site, don't you? Some people are beyond saving...talk about something constructive instead.
>>557887
I was wondering how long it'd take for you to call me a newfag.
Are the actual lawsuits in question derived from threads about SJWraiding or from celebrities or anti-cp folk?
When I said it was your opinion, I meant that the threads inevitably leading to lawsuits was an opinion. Someone is almost always trying to person army 4chan.
>>557885
>It's not anyone's problem except the owner of this site if lawsuits are handed to them. That is the problem with anonymous image boards.
The owner of the site chooses to manage the issue by silencing trouble makers.
>If they wish to limit what users say, so be it, but they should not expect it to go smoothly
Whether it goes smoothly isn't a large concern. So much as the issue is subdued, the owner can reasonably mitigate the site getting into trouble.
>If you believe that Nintendo didn't fire her based on this line of work then you must be a little daft.
Yeah, i was feigning ignorance a little bit there. I do believe she was fired for having an illegal job. However, I fell the need to reiterate that I'm not morally opposed to sex work, I think it should be legalized, and I don't think her sex work should be used as an excuse to fire her, when the real reason was a misguided vendetta toward someone wrongly accused of censorship.
>So you can't really call it a movement originating or working from /v/.
Do you think the person being harassed is going to make the distinction between the origins of the movement? What they're going to see, is a bunch of retards spewing 4chan memes, And threads from /v/ calling for her head.
Again, prior to her actual firing, /v/ was a part of an extensive agenda to get her fired. Even before the pedophilia thing. /v/ was fishing for dirt, just like everyone else. They share the blame.
>>557889
>>implying that /v/ isn't already filled with people who browse ribbit
Are you fucking saying that's a good thing? Reddit Raus.
>>557893
>I was wondering how long it'd take for you to call me a newfag.
If you play in mud, then you have to expect to be called a pig.
>Are the actual lawsuits in question derived from threads about SJWraiding or from celebrities or anti-cp folk?
All that, and more, is answered in Moot's final Q&A
>I meant that the threads inevitably leading to lawsuits was an opinion.
I see. Well, it's admittedly something you can't predict 100%. But you can look at the signs and make a reasonable estimate. If you let a group of people act as a movement against individuals, with the intent to ruin their job and well-being, then you have to expect that someone is going to throw a lawsuit around. Maybe it's not Alison. Maybe it's the next guy the censorship attacks? Or the guy after that?
Why even take those gambles though? When mods can see anons being recruited into a force, then they just nip it in the bud.
>>557905
>All that, and more, is answered in Moot's final Q&A
I just looked through it and I can't find anything other than the mention of the one from the fappening. That was the only one.
Where or when is it, exactly?
>When mods can see anons being recruited into a force, then they just nip it in the bud.
Do they even do that much though? Look at Rapp.
>>557912
>Where or when is it, exactly?
I don't recall exactly. Maybe search around the fappening talk.
>Do they even do that much though? Look at Rapp.
They do what they can. That's why OP is complaining about censorship threads getting deleted now.
>>557918
I did, I haven't found mention of any lawsuits. Just the one related to the fappening.
That can't be much if they let her get fired.
>>557921
Enforcing moderation against illegal content gives the site plausible deniability. It's the same reason why this site doesn't get hit when morons post CP. The site can say "we took measure to get rid of the illegal content".
The Q&A is 8 hours, so I can't give you an exact time. I'm certain more is in there somewhere. I have to go.
>>557929
Discussion about games being censored for various reasons is not equal to raiding.
Maybe you should lurk more?
Those complaining about Rapp should know by now that she let that information become public by herself. It was public domain, and she did all this to herself.
She should never have listed that she was an escort on her personal twitter account that she also used for work. I don't care what you're stance on it is, companies do not want that kind of attention drawn to them, its a liability.
Welcome to the workforce newfags, this is how it is now. If your employer looks at your Twitter or Facebook and notices you were talking shit about them, admitting you escort, or admitting your views about race, you can and will be fired.
>>557964
Everything you said is true, but it's blind to the actual matter at hand. Everything you said does not speak to the following ideas
1. Does discussing Alison's escorting have ANYTHING to do with video games?
2. Does reporting her escorting to Nintendo have anything to do with censorship?
3. Does reporting her thesis to Nintendo have anything to do with censorship?
4. Is calling a unified movement against her helping the cause for less censorship?
5. Is calling a unified movement against her against 4chan's rules?
6. Does a unified movement against her cause collateral insults, threats, and trolls?(harassment)
All this talk about Nintendo having the right to fire her, is a big fat "DUH", only distracting you from the real matters.
>>557975
I'll disagree on the last point. I don't want to live in a world where reporting on publicly available information about someone who put the information out themselves counts as harassment because someone else may get the idea to troll them from it. They're responsible for their own actions, not me.
I agree on everything else though. It was all gay e-drama shit.
/v/ is a mess
>>557978
I don't know exactly where I fall on that last point either. I don't think it's fair to lump everyone together with trolls and threat makers(who are also likely trolls). But at the same time, what does that distinction matter to the person who's getting harassed? They suffer regardless. And for what? Because some people think they did something they didn't do, completely unrelated to the thing they're trying to them you for? They might have some trouble seeing the wood for the trees.
Let's take all the trolls out of the equation. At best, reporting her was a dick move.
Ok where the fuck is Hiroyuki at?
Seriously enough about Rapp, lets get back on topic here about the rules with /v/
>>557699
I was convinced /v/ mods have an agenda weeks ago
>mods allow thick posting
>instabanned for posting petite/ qt vidya girls thread
>Mods allow 15 overwatch threads
>janitors instaflag nonoverwatch threads
Why though
>>558012
Thick posting has kind of been a tradition on /v/ for the most part
>>558014
>tradition
The fuck
U start posting yesterday or something? Thick posting started sometime around last year or 2014
>>558023
Thick posting usually happens on Thursdays, its always been this way
>>558027
Show me a link to the thread.
>>557993
It doesn't really matter if reporting her was a dick move, because in the end it was her own choices that lead to her downfall by violating clear rules laid out for her by Nintendo. I don't like the idea of fucking her over because of her thesis she wrote in college. No one should be blacklisted for having an opinion, however terrible that opinion is. However, when you are given a contract, you are the one who is responsible for not breaking that contract. In the case of Rapp, this would be her second job.
Also, common sense dictates that you shouldn't advocate cp and shit on twitter while working for a child oriented company. Show some self preservation.
Where are you Hiro?
>>557630
Fuck off /pol/fag.
Still no Hiro in sight
Post IDs are stupid as shit. You can easily get around them. The only thing that will do is make samefagging harder to spot, not easier.
>>558224
/pol/lack here. this is all /v/'s cancer, not /pol/.
>>557630
Threads like this where one user tries to talk for the entire board are why hiro doesn't take this place seriously
>>558594
They are the same shit.
>>558599
These were legit the ideas most supported in the /v/ thread. Most people were in agreement of it if you were in there. Hiro wanted a collection of the ideas and here they are. I just don't get why he's not responding to it
>>557727
>Why does Hiro not do anything about it?
He doesn't fucking care.
At long as the site keeps bringing in shitloads of posters, that's all that matters.
>>557803
>Yes let's make 4chan just like 2ch. Nothing could go wrong.
It would make it a better experience for every anon who wasn't a complete fucking retard.
It would also never happen as most anons want to use their homeboards for image dumping and textboards means less anons and less anons means less revenue.
>>557832
Fuck I wish you moralfags would die already.
make /v/ into /^/
You can only post about outside games
>>558599
You dumbass, the OP posted what everyone was for, it's not his own views.
You are the kind of person that makes 4chan an embarrassment.
>>558224
This is how /v/ always looks like...
>>557764
What /v/ wants is fucking irrelevant. You aren't supposed to be screaming 'do this', this isn't a democracy. Hiro should only be doing things based on his own judgements after seeing the pros and cons. There is no pros to IDs, it doesn't stop samefagging, which is the only purpose of it. It does, however, have a heap of negatives that make it a stupid idea to add.
>>557778
4chan isn't 2ch. We are two completely different sites at this point and the very way our communities act with our sites are completely different. What every other site does is fucking irrelevant to 4chan.
>>558224
>2 boogeymen in one post
Absolutely deluded.
Do you ever stop shitposting?
>>557746
>v
Stop fucking posting.
