Can anyone link to specific threads as an example of "/pol/ leakage" on their board?
Rules:
>has to be from before this post was made
>have to prove it was /pol/ and not native shitposters
>>551574
Who are you quoting?
>>551574
retard phonefaggot eat shit and die
didn't read your post because you can't afford a computer
>>551581
Dumb lowercaseposter
>>551583
lowercase is my favorite genre of hipster bullshit
it goes " "
>>551574
Why is it such a problem that /pol/ leaks? No harm from it, if anything it makes other boards better.
>>551585
Dumb lowercaseposter
>>551592
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJlKoRlLKo0
>>551596
Why can't nerds listen to normal music
>>551586
dumb imgur poster
>>551610
Everyone who isn't autistic and gay is on reddit, you dumb cuckold
>>551610
But I edited the picture myself
>>551596
Dumb lowercaseposter
Mods rightfully delete any and all /pol/ shitposting threads after a while, so finding something that fits OP's criteria is difficult. Besides, even if someone does post proof, he'll still find some way to discredit it or claim that the poster is a shill.
Basically, OP thinks he's being clever, but in reality he just looks like a sore loser.
>>551665
Sounds like you are the sore loser here.
>prove this thing you say for me as i never see it
>nuh uh man you cant just prove it and even if we did ur just goin to ignore it as such i am right because i say i am
>>551665
>i have the no proof
>>551596
Hey is this that lowercase music from that watchmojo video
>>551586
Pic related.
>>551665
>Mods rightfully delete any and all shitposting threads
kek no.
>>551574
>have to prove it was /pol/ and not native shitposters
Pfft, OP is gonna just go into full denial mode and claim the other person is a shill
/a/ here, barely see it
>>551816
>people make their thread on wrong board by mistake
>/pol/ shitposting
Sounds like a desperate attempt to grasp at straws.
>>551822
How the fuck do people confuse /v/ from /pol/? Seems like you are grasping at straws
>>551822
By mistake? 29 times?
And you never specified that it had to be deliberate. You asked for an example of /pol/ leakage on another board, from before your post was made, and that it was clearly posters from /pol/. Seeing as you would HAVE to be on /pol/ to make a Trump General from OP, well, there you go, I gave you 29 examples. Not to mention /v/ and /pol/ aren't exactly close to each other on the board list.
Sounds like a desperate attempt to move the goalposts.
>>551824
Leakage implies content spills over into other boards that aren't on topic deliberately.
If I post some tank model I intended to put up in a buyfag thread on /a/ on /pol/, does that mean tank merchandise discussion is "leaking" into /pol/? No. You're intentionally removing meaning and context on how the term is used.
All of those instances are weeks apart. Some of the iimages are even reused. Clearly whoever that anon that takes over Trump OPs is a /v/ browser who mistakenly creates the thread there while he's switching between tabs.
Regardless, you should kill yourself if a mistaken thread with less than 20 replies once a month triggers you so much.
>>551574
All the ban screenshots in
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/73470057/
>>551574
Can you find any evidence of Reddit leakage on your board?
You must prove that it's not native shitposters or false flaggers.
>>551848
>All of those instances are weeks apart. Some of the iimages are even reused. Clearly whoever that anon that takes over Trump OPs is a /v/ browser who mistakenly creates the thread there while he's switching between tabs.
https://boards.fireden.net/v/thread/331291893
https://boards.fireden.net/v/thread/331291975
Two Trump generals, on /v/, identical subjects, one made literally two minutes after the other. You'd have to be the biggest idiot on the planet to not see that was intentional.
>Leakage implies content spills over into other boards that aren't on topic deliberately. If I post some tank model I intended to put up in a buyfag thread on /a/ on /pol/, does that mean tank merchandise discussion is "leaking" into /pol/? No. You're intentionally removing meaning and context on how the term is used.
"content spills over into other boards that aren't on topic deliberately?" What? As for the second part, see above, it was clearly intentional.
>Regardless, you should kill yourself if a mistaken thread with less than 20 replies once a month triggers you so much.
You think I give a shit what happens to /v/? You asked for an example. I gave you an example. And now you wave it away by saying I should kill myself for being so triggered. What sort of backwards fucking pageantry is that?
>>551852
>can you provide evidence of Reddit leakage?
No, but I can show evidence of /pol/ leakage onto gayrobot.
>r/the_donald
>>551574
Any time someone is unironically angry at a joke without even realizing it's a joke on any board, that's /pol/ leaking.
>>551574
http://boards.4chan.org/m/thread/14307999/why-is-there-a-texas-colony#bottom
This whole thread. It's not just /pol/ that's at fault though, it's every moron who responds to political crap.
>>551574
It rarely happens I'm not sure why people on here complain about it so much, I think they are just nuts.
>>553266
Because /pol/ reacts to it. They take themselves very seriously.
