Mods, why the hell are you all so fucking useless? You're spam filtering the "r" site again, but you're still letting shit like "really makes you think" and "how can white boys even compete" through and not removing the abundant porn spam on /pol/? Jesus Christ almighty you're a bunch of insufferable faggots who couldn't run a site to save your cheetos-stained lives.
/pol/ is regarded the way you might regard a messy child. They're throwing their shit around the room and screaming, so the parent just closes the door and lets them live in the squalor. It's not like "the gubmint" is going to come and take this hypothetical child away for the conditions the parents are letting it live in. They have made their bed, and are told to live in it.
You don't like shitposts on /pol/? Complaining won't work, the staff would tell you to stop going there. They don't want you to go there.
>it's yet another an assfractured /pol/ish intellectual pretending his hugbox is anything more than a designated shitting board episode
>>551408
What is your point? /b/ is also a big board. It is also garbage. What did you mean to say?
>>551418
Yeah and something should be done about it.
>>551419
About /b/ or /pol/? Because they're both shit, and trying to fix them would cause people to cry for them to be fixed. The obvious answer, like people asking fir Captcha to be removed all being told to buy a Pass, is to just not go there.
>>551439
Blue boards are by far the worst boards on this site. Period.
You know what happened, historically, when /pol/ gets moderation?
>CENSORSHIP! THIS IS CENSORSHIP!
>JIDF is controlling /pol/!
>moot is a cuck sjw cuck supercuck omegacuck sjw stop deleting my "is ___ white?" threads or I'm going to 8gag
/pol/ wanted a moderation-free memefest and that's what it is today.
>>551448
>Blocking actual spam is bad
>Blocking the word of another website isn't censorship
Stop being an insufferable faggot.
>>551450
Shut up. Anon there has a point. That's all you idiots are going to do when ANY form of moderation is brought upon you. Go suck a fat one.
1. Enable the robot on /pol/
2. Delete /r9k/
>>551467
Robot should be enabled on all boards, especially /tv/
>>551381
I'd just like to see the basic old rules enforced more often than never.
>>551482
Not a bad idea.
>>551483
Those rules aren't even that old. And they've never been adequately enforced.
>>551483
literally safe space: the board
reddit is filtered?
>>551487
They were enforced more often than currently, now it seems like only 1/100 rule-breaking shitpost threads actually get attention by a mod.
>>551489
literally brain-damage; the post
Inb4 I was only pretending
>>551493
Just ignore him, if his post can't even connect with reality then it isn't worth responding to.
>>551494
>things that trigger my are spam
not so different from the SJWs you look for under your bed every night :^)
>>551491
That sucks, but to be expected when a board seeks infamy and public recognition, much to the chagrin of every other board that wants the rest of the world to leave us the fuck alone.
>>551494
>After gaymercancer
True, it was better before, but even by the standards of 2014 /pol/ could be considered to be now in a constant state of being raided. If you lurking '14 or even '12 took one look at the board today, you'd have said it was being raided, now we live with it.
>>551497
Just stop responding to it, all it wants are your (you)s and has nothing to offer but shit.
>>551496
>literal spam is not spam
How is "How can white boys even compete" with an image if interracial porn on a board where such things are literally against the rules not spam? Why should board rules not be enforced? I think it's time to start spamming the everliving shit out of /lit/ with cuck porn. You seem to like it so much.
>>551500
I'm pretty positive the mods are anti-/pol/ and I'm beginning to believe the memes that the administration has always been sjws.
>>551501
You cucks talk about black men more than any other board. How are poignant questions about the intersection of masculinity and race not related to /pol/?
Just admit that you're throwing a tantrum because you can't cope with the fact that white women prefer black men to permavirginal NEETs like you, and you'd rather not have to experience such traumatic thoughts. It's more about your fee fees than the quality of the board.
>>551503
Posting porn on /pol/ is against board rules.
>>551503
>You cucks talk about black men more than any other board
In convinced it's a small group tasked with keeping race-based threads on page 1, none of them are anything approaching productive or even entertaining, serving no purpose other than being untitled generals for shitposting.
>>551505
>In convinced it's a small group tasked with keeping race-based threads on page 1
It always has been. And it's these same jewish cunts who post on /qa/ day and night demanding /pol/ be deleted. And if they can't get it deleted, they're going to shit it up as much as possible.
>>551507
>And if they can't get it deleted, they're going to shit it up as much as possible
It's all one long sustained "REEEEEE", isn't it?
>>551507
>jewish cunts
wew lad
That's no way to talk about your senpai's favourite bulls
>>551511
I don't like Trump. He's a moron. Try again.
>>551521
>I don't like
Not an argument
>We need to take proper care of the containment boards!
kek.
>>551527
You're right. We should just delete the blue containment boards instead. They are of no value whatsoever.
only classy scholars can upvote this redpilled artwork
>>551515
>It's literally every other board on this site.
4chan caters to the lowest common demoniator of internet asshole. It has a decent method of encouraging discussion but it's constantly abused by the scumbags. And it will stay like forever because the people who use this site live by board culture and not rules that should be globally enforced. The people hate rules or the concept of a parent scolding them for being bad so instead they self-moderate to protect board culture, not website quality.
>>551668
Things go down the shitter because the moderators are not consistent.
I get banned on a regular basis for reporting rule-breaking content as illegal, simply because the mods and janitors wouldn't give a shit otherwise.
4chan was never particularly great, but the current situation is a new low. Just in the past two months I've seen three threads with child pornography get archived.
It's fucking amazing.
I honestly do not understand the mods.
>>551688
>I honestly do not understand the mods.
What's even worse is that they keeping getting new ones. Either the turnover rate is phenomenal or we have a fuck load of mods not doing shit on a regular basis.
Y'all niggas posting in a concern troll thread. /pol/lacks just report and hide all the bestiality threads. But I guess given Mook's benign support of 'interesting' /pol/ you butt hurt faggots have to change your strategy and masquerade as triggered /pol/lacks since the real deal don't give a shit. We've buried every attempt to take down our board.
>>551688
It is difficult to believe that the mods are warning people who report explicit 3D child pornography instead of deleting it. That's only not only stupid, but could get 4chan shut down and hiro sent to prison.
>>551703
I've never been warned for reporting cp.
Rather, I just report everything as illegal and the mods clear my report queue along with the cp reports.
I encourage everyone to report rule-breaking shit as illegal, because mods SHOULD care.
>>551708
This is like calling 911 on your coffee being cold because it should be hot.
The only thing you're going to do is get your whole ISP banned from reporting things.
>>551708
Well you're no longer allowed to say reddit anymore again, so they obviously care about something. Just not the right thing.
>>551710
I've had this very same conversation before.
Your analogy would work if calling 911 did anything at all.
>>551718
Yeah, I was in it. You were retarded then and you're still retarded now.
>Your analogy would work if calling 911 did anything at all.
It gets you sent to prison when you abuse the law enforcement system for trivial shit.
The illegal report system is not something that is there so that fuckwits like you can cry about sad frogs and ponies. It's essentially an extension of the actual, IRL law enforcement system. You undermined it and got banned; why this would surprise anyone with a functioning brain is beyond me.
>>551720
whatever
I'll stop once the mods get their shit together.
>>551381
>mods rn
>>551728
>gets told on every point
>"whatever"
Incredible.
>>551734
Pretty much.
I don't really care nor do I want to argue.
>It's the largest board on the site.
>It's shit.
Has it ever occurred to you that MAYBE you might just be in the minority opinion?
>>551720
Actually.
Here, point in case.
"Trivial" shit, right?
>>551845
The same swede spams scat, gore, cp, etc...
And his posts stay up for hours or get archived. Abusing the report system is justified.
>>551459
No, he doesn't. It just fits into your worldview so you clap like a retarded seal in approval. Threads with pornographic images in the OP are against the board rules. Mods and janitors should enforce that fucking rule.
>>551381
MAKE /POL/ GREAT AGAIN
>>551398
As much as you seem to ignore it, /pol/ has rules and one of them is
>No pornographic images unrelated to politics
These spammers break the rules
It would literally ruin /pol/, the real question is how we're supposed to live with seeing "reply or x will happen" and then having to choose between x happening and being banned
>>551381
>>mods suck
Really makes you think
>>551845
>>551846
This we also have an Aussie and Kiwi who post Blacked with_
>makes you think
>/pol/ BTFO
>How can White men compete?
How is this shit political.
Also there's a strong chance it's a raid.
>>551448
>ISIS WANTS YOU TO DELETE KEK PORN!
>>551418
/b/ is dead. Nice try /lit/fag
The moderation on 4chan has clearly become infiltrated by plebbit/srs/sjw/tumblr
They are allowing threads that are against board rules on /pol/, as per the sticky, and deleting politically relevant threads.
Hiro, we need some intervention. Our board is nearly unusable.
All we ask is that the rules as per the sticky be enforced. It is becoming obvious that the mods are making /pol/ intentionally shitty because they can't censor us the way they want. It would become too obvious, so they flood us with cancer.
>>551858
They keep deleting threads that call them on their bullshit, but allow inter-racial porn which is against the rules
Mods on /pol/ are absolutely useless.
Fighting spam should be the first priority anywhere anyhow.
Enough is a enough. If something isn't done we will infect every board on this site.
>>551865
Sounds fun, I can shitpost, I quite enjoy feminists fighting for equal pay whilst I out earn them taking a shit anyway.
>>551863
THEY DON'T RESPOND TO REPORTS, BUT THEY DELETE THREADS THAT ARE POLITICAL
THIS IS CENSORSHIP OF /POL/ IN A VERY DIRECT SENSE
THE MODS ARE SJWS
SOMETHING MUST CHANGE
>>551865
THIS
>>551856
I don't really care about /pol/ per se
I just want better, more consistent moderation.
Here's a list of spamthreads on /pol/ right now:
>>>/pol/>>76067831
>>>/pol/>>76065193
>>>/pol/>>76067992
>>>/pol/>>76056356
>>>/pol/>>76067114
>>>/pol/>>76066924
>>>/pol/>>76066651
>>>/pol/>>76068073
And there's even more, I just can't be bothered to list them all.
Fucking hell mods, I report threads like these daily. This is a coordinated effort and can be dealt with as such. Do your fucking job and get them off.
>>551872
>Literally all of them are gone
>>551873
no
he just doesn't know how to link
>>551872
COPY THE URL FROM THE ADDRESS BAR
>>551459
>Shut up
not an argument
>>551873
>>551874
Summarised here:
>>>/pol/76068833
>>551871
This.
don't get rid of a board's culture, but get rid of those who break the rules
>>551879
>they're literally all political topics
I'm not seeing what's wrong here
>>551882
HOLY FUCK A REAL 4CHAN MOD
HOW DID YOU GET YOUR JOB AS A MOD
TELL ME PLS
>>551882
OF COURSE YOU DON'T YOU LEFTIST TUMOR
>>551881
Just curious but
why is /pol/ an orange board?
>>551885
>LEFTIST
So it IS political?
>>551886
Because there's a fair amount of insulting other races on it, and it probably won't look good on a work computer.
>>551404
>>551398
>Thinking we aren't the only uncucked board on the site
>Being content with limitation on your speech
>Posting on boards that are also found on reddit with twice the quality just so you can tell you fellow "over 18 "friends"" how edgy you are for posting on /a/ or /tg/
>Thinking your board is anywhere near as relevant as /pol/
Top lel. If we took our memes elsewhere you'd be nothing. You'd be on another reddit.
>>551862
To be fair my protest thread asked the mods to delete it too. There is way too much porn and we have reported it like mad.
>>551398
There's shitposting and there's blatantly posting porn on non-porn boards.
Maybe just ban Canada and Australia from /pol/, that would pretty much take care of all problems in one go.
>>551398
This isn't about that, you stupid fucking faggot. This is about blatant rules violations being completely ignored. Every fucking day there is interracial cuckold porn spammed on /pol/. The threads are sometimes deleted, very slowly. I never see the posters getting banned despite no pornography being a rule on /pol/.
>>551459
>>551448
Distinct lack of arguments here.
>>551503
We also talk about white nationalism more than any other board. I don't understand how bringing up a topic for discussion that typically isn't sexually based is evidence for anything as for the sexual preferance of the board.
>>551893
This
>>551892
>what are proxies
I bet you also vote for Sanders and think jews are the best, or maybe you even are one yourself?
>>551887
You and I both know what you cancerous outsiders are doing here.
This was the original intent of the cuckening as intended by moot
There is obviously a dedicated group that is spamming cancer and nudity, is 'x' white, etc threads all day long. They post the same thread over and over and over.
The autism is incomprehensible to me.
>>551398
>people not from /pol/ go on /pol/
>cause problems
>blame /pol/ for the problems
nice logic retard
>>551511
Every businessman of any note will need to deal with kikes. That isn't racism, it's a fact. He is against Jewish interests tot eh extreme, so I don't see how this relationship means anyhting.
>>551900
/pol/ isn't reserved solely for right wing politics, even if they are right
Plenty of 'spam and cancer' on /pol/ is simply individuals independently shitposting single topics
>>551900
It is a coordinated effort. They use the same images, same messages, same bumping strategies and same timeframe to do these posts. You can easily tell them apart from random people who just happen to come to /pol/ by chance. Those threads tend to get 0 replies and disappear quickly, while the spam-threads gets lots of fake discussion bumps to them to lure naive people into thinking it has a serious discussion going on, yet these things have been discussed to death already and disproven as lies several times a day for the past few years.
Thread theme.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_4yHhX4SBI
>>551903
>/pol/ isn't reserved solely for right wing politics, even if they are right
Did I ever even imply that?
We are sick of the porn. These are the rules as per the sticky:
>This board is for the discussion of news, world events, political issues, and other related topics.
>Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:
>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.
>The variety of threads allowed here are very flexible and we believe in freedom of speech, but we expect a high level of discourse befitting of the board. Attempts to disrupt the board will not be tolerated, nor will calls to disrupt other boards and sites.
Now tell me, where does inter-racial porn fit into that?
>>551668
I disagree. T Here is no middle ground between stromfront and Tumblr anywhere else. I believe that all of the anime related boards appeal to the lowest common denominator, as with most of the others, including, and especially /int/. I do not, however, believe that /pol/ does the same. The only thing /pol/ shares with the rest of 4chan is a URL and a stolen format. /pol/ appeals to people who want real political discussion, natsoc who aren't edgy faggots, classical but not moronic racists, as well as the rest of the riffraff.
>>551907
There are actual rules for /pol/, though.
And one of those rules EXPLICITLY STATES NO PORN.
SO WHY WAS THERE INTERRACIAL KEKOLD PORN ON PAGE 1 THIS MORNING??
As a paying 4chan pass user, I've about had it with this shit.
>>551698
desu it would be nice for /pol/ to have it's own moderation.
>>551910
>I've about had it with this shit.
Many us have.
Don't worry, we won't give up until Hiro hears our pleas
>>551913
As if he would give a shit though. I think his happy that our meme power has been cut in half.
On that point though, look at the shear power we have even with this cancer. Imagine if everything thread was a constructive one.
>>551910
Just check this thread now:
>>>/pol/76068833
It's grown from one thread to many. It's someone's JOB to keep at least one racemixing/interracial thread alive on /pol/ at any given time.
>>551911
It's obvious for white, intelligent people. Once you stray away from being white it becomes not as obvious to tell anymore. Hiroshima Nagasaki is a nice pawn for the jews. He's naive and easily manipulated. /pol/ is being kept for subversiveness as it's now being used to try to make white people racemix and not have white children.
>>551913
As long as there are jews it's going to continue. It's a sad fact of life.
>>551915
>As long as there are jews it's going to continue.
Then the solution is obvious. One day... We can dream.
>>551914
> Imagine if everything thread was a constructive one.
Well, by what measure though?
I would be happy with a reduction of the porn threads and even just responses by the mods for reports about threads that are against the rules.
When every thread is forced to be 'constructive' you get echo chambers like crip chan /pol/
A certain amount of freedom and chaos is necessary, but we are being spammed to death with porn and cancer
pic related
>>551917
There is only one solution, and that is us or them. There is no coexistence.
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>>551918
By constructive I mean concentrated memes in threads made by people who care about (or at least genuinely enjoy) /pol/ and it's antics. High octane meme magic not wasted on spam threads which make up a decent chunk of the board. No force or structure needed. In it';s purest form /pol would become unstoppable, using memetics to spread the message far wider than it otherwise could have. It would be fucking glorious.
Queers and other chucklefucks from offsite know our meme magic is too great so they are trying to disrupt discussion as usual a lot of these fags post HERE whining for /pol/ to be deleted because they get triggered so hard from being wrong about everything.
>This thread
>>551381
Can you just make /pol/ an unlisted board
>>551925
>This thread
>>551926
What would that mean/entail?
>>551860
Try to screenshot examples of good threads being deleted
>>551929
I will stay vigilant in the future
This is my new crusade
>>551928
keeps some randoms out
>>551932
If /pol/ is so stupid and dumb why spend so much effort in trying to silence discussion or spend so much effort in trying to get the board deleted or spend so much effort arguing in favour of obvious rule breaking??
These people are truly fucked in the head.
I've noticed a lot more spam and obvious shit posting on /pol/ since the board became an important division for Trump support and influence.
I believe that Correct The Record and-or Soros are behind the attempts to destabilize the board, as a means of weakening the Trump campaign and promoting Hillary.
If there is any consolation, it is the fact that they have been unable (thus far) to buy their way into attaining mod powers.
>>551935
>These people are truly fucked in the head.
It's the arrogance and smuggery of their rhetoric that really makes me rage.
You can just smell their little smirk through the screen.
Also, the doublethink and false equivalences are just outrageous.
I am constantly amazed at the intellectual dishonesty of these people, as if no one will ever notice it.
Lmao so one of the interracial threads was finally deleted but the others are still up?
The fuck is going on?
>>551381
Top kek, I thought /pol/ was a free speech zone where all ideas were welcome?
What's that? You only want mods to censor memes that shatter your delicate world view?
How come I don't see you crying about the "poo in loo" or "pay debnts" memes?
>>551941
Because there aren't 8 new POO IN LOO threads every hour. It shits up the board.
>>551938
It's truly a grinding, maddening injustice. There is no morality in the universe if people so sociopathic and malign are allowed breath.
Hopefully this sense of injustice is what will allow us to fight should it come to it.
>>551941
Those aren't porn.
I wish they would just like remove the flags of countries, it's really just ruined a lot of conversation on /pol/
Like I feel sorry for Indians who genuinely want to have a conversation, instead they just get flooded with "LE POO IN A LOO"
Or my as a British guy, say one thing and you get a whole load of "Le epic muslim joke xD"
I mean its just bizarre why flags were introduced. It was the first nail in the coffin.
>>551941
>How come I don't see you crying about the "poo in loo" or "pay debnts" memes?
WE AREN'T COMPLAINING ABOUT MEMES YOU FUCKING RETARD
WE ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT CONSTANT SLIDING AND SPAM LIKE PIC RELATED
BAN THE FAGGOT SPAMMING THIS SHIT
>>551941
The people that make those threads are the same disruptive assholes that make BBC threads. It's designed to draw attention away from the legitimate political threads in the hopes they slide with little contribution.
>I thought /pol/ was a free speech zone where all ideas were welcome?
It's a free speech zone when it comes to following the board rules.
>>551941
Our worldview isn't delicate, we, especially the natsoc, question ourselves everyday. It isn't fun suppressing your beliefs everywhere you go, it is much more fun to have opinions others can stomach.
Our worldview forces us to absorb all criticism and objection, and yet still we remain. I assure you that if it weren't for the ignorance of leftists, our worldview would be the most steadfast. Not that there is only one worldview.
We have what is essentially a rigid constitution on the front page of the board. If bans are allocated by people who give a damn about the site, and that follow that constitution, it will be fine, and we can go back to healthy and heated discussion with s teaming serving on evasive and all powerful memes.
>>551951
I reported them a while ago.
>>551381
Wow it really makes u think huh..
>>551950
Sorry, but you are collateral damage. A great majority of Indian and British posters are utter shit.
If you get into a more serious thread, however, you will be judged on your pinon.
And if you think you have it tough, guess what my flag is.
>>551960
Opinion*
I would also like to add that the ability to stop Canadian posters is simply to valuable. They are literally never good.
>>551941
Fuck off you degenerate SRS faggot. If someone made an entire thread title poo in loo we would report it.
The fact is no one makes those threads. It is just a small group of Jew/SJW/pro-Clinton shills that are making a concerted effort destabilize /pol/.
>>551951
>sliding
nice meme, there's no real proof of le paid shills paid to "slide threads" like you paranoid /pol/esmokers think
/pol/ is an active board because it attracts redditors from /r/4chan and /r/the_donald, and thus lots of topics are going to be posted per hour.
your so-called "slide threads" are really just your fellow /pol/tards trolling the fuck out of you because the only people who browse /pol/ regularly are NEET losers who get a kick out of collecting (You)s
also, caps lock means you're mad as fuck and triggered. you're a typical /pol/cuck upset that someone called out your inconsistencies.
/pol/cucks are literally crying that the sanctity of their safe space is being violated, top kek.
>>551950
They were added because of the
>I AM A MUSLIM/JEW/X/Y/Z POSTER
>[Relevant shitpost]
Which leads to accusations of being from certain countries.
Funnily I remember seeing one Israeli reminisce about false flagging as a muslim once
>>551960
Inb4 a FUCKING LEAF
>Majority of Indian & British posters are utter shit
I'm British and this is pretty much it. Even in the Brit threads, many are anti-gun, anti-free speech or generally anti-freedom, and though I'm a traditionalist/fascist, that's some real piss opinions.
>>551668
>4chan caters
Post discarded. Lurk more.
>>551963
>It is just a small group of Jew/SJW/pro-Clinton shills that are making a concerted effort destabilize /pol/.
I can claim things with 0 proof as well. Like the fact that the entirety of /pol/ is overrun with Trump campaign interns paid to shill.
>>551958
>>551381
>>551381
>>551381
>>551381
>>>/r/edit
>>>/trash/
>>>/facebook/
Thread theme.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_4yHhX4SBI
>>551964
>Hahhahahha their rules are being violated!
>GOOD!!!!
>LE TROLLED!
>THE WORD REDDIT WAS CENSORED?!
>HAHAHAHA TROLED U
>>551969
>/pol/ is overrun with Trump campaign interns paid to shill.
Except taking one look at the catalog completely dismisses this claim.
Fine let's make these exact bait threads in every other board and see how long those ones stay up for.
>>551964
Look at this retard we know certain leddit groups spend their time shitting up /pol/ that's been established over and over
>my safe space is being attacked!
>i can't ignore things that upset me!
funny how /pol/tards can't take their own advice lmao
/pol/tards always advise people to use the 'hide post' function when they spam other boards with their epic anti-SJW and happymerchant.jpg memes.
Why can't they do it now? Do they really think they're special snowflakes or something?
>>551964
>there's no real proof of le paid shills paid to "slide threads" like you paranoid /pol/esmokers think
DID I EVER SAY THAT THEY WERE PAID SHILLS?
SLIDING IS A FACT OF IMAGEBOARDS, ESPECIALLY 4CHAN WHICH HAS A SMALL CATALOG, COMBINED WITH ONE BUMP PER IP.
WE DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT SAFE SPACES
WE WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS AND HAVE A THREAD THAT LASTS MORE THAN 3 MINUTES BEFORE IT DISAPPEARS YOU LEFTIST FUCKING ASSHOLE
AND YES I'M FUCKING MAD
>>551971
/pol/ is a containment board buddy, nobody cares if the rules of /pol/ get violated because /pol/ is a cesspool.
>>551975
>WE WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS AND HAVE A THREAD THAT LASTS MORE THAN 3 MINUTES BEFORE IT DISAPPEARS YOU LEFTIST FUCKING ASSHOLE
TRANSLATION: I want a safe space echo chamber where I can discuss politics with like-minded people and I can call anyone who disagrees with me a paid hillary shill/shitposter/spammer!
>>551967
>Inb4 a FUCKING LEAF
Nah m80
All memes aside, the based brits that start the Brexit threads are nice. Threads like that, if you can push past all of the cancerous $0.02/per post shills, are what a good moderation team will support.
I think you should be able to keep your national flag or pick one of the old ones, like the natsoc or EU one, to stop based brits, poos, leafs, and the Australian masterrace from being shit on.
Well, my thread on /pol/ aimed at discussing the current situation ended up sliding with only one response. I'm calling it quits on that board. I know a common /pol/ saying is "the ride never ends", well for me it has. I'm done with it. I'll find somewhere else to discuss current events and political news.
t. An Aussie Nat Soc.
>INB4 flag
>>551974
Show us examples of multiple thread spamming that is any way near as prevalent as what's happening now... Oh rite u can't
>>551978
You dont really get how containment boards work, do you? Go try to post anything both off-topic and pornographic in /vp/ or /mlp/ and you'll be deleted in less than 10 minutes.
>>551981
>TRANSLATION: I want a safe space echo chamber where I can discuss politics with like-minded people and I can call anyone who disagrees with me a paid hillary shill/shitposter/spammer!
YOU PLEBBIT FUCKING INVADERS ARE CLEARLY INCAPABLE OF READING COMPREHENSION
JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN'T WIN A SINGLE ARGUMENT AGAINST US, DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE WANT A 'ECHO CHAMBER' LIKE EVERY OTHER WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET
IT MEANS WE DON'T WANT CANCER AND SPAMMING YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE
>>551988
Show me examples of le JIDF spamming/forum sliding on /pol/ with definitive proof that it's the JIDF/Hillary campaign/SJW boogeyman and not just some fellow /pol/tard trolling you for kicks.
/pol/tards are probably the dumbest people on this website, they're worse than /v/irgins at this point.
>>551981
Yes. But we already have that, and we just want to not have people making threads about interracial cuckold porn on the same board. Its not that hard to understand.
>>551969
You dumb fuck. This is not a difficult concept to comprehend.
When you have regular and repeated shill threads, posted at similar times by the same flag, on the board that serves as the cultural and memetic cog in the Trump campaign, then there is sufficient evidence to suggest that nefarious actors are at work.
Correct The Record was given millions to pursue an online intiative aimed at supporting Hillary. You don't think they are going to go straight to where Trump's core online support is, and try and destabilise and disrupt it?
Of course you don't because you're the type of faggot that is looking forward to seeing that bitch in charge. Go fuck yourself.
>>551981
No, we specifically want threads in which people from all walks of life and of all political opinions can come and debate. He mentions leftists because
1) they are almost always trolling or "pretending to be retarded"
2) Commies openly reject objectivity and instead use postmodernism.
Even if the left was kicked out, we would still have lolspergtarians, natsoc, Anarcho-Capitalists, anti-trump conservatives, and tones of other different groups.
/pol/ will not ever become an echo chamber. If everyone kicked everyone else out that had different views to them, it would just two-three people left.
Lurk more faggot.
>>551994
Completely missing the point on purpose again, show me an example of spamming like what is happening on /pol/ now.
>>551991
>win a single argument
There's no such thing as real debates and real dicsussion on /pol/, just faggots like you who get really mad at words on the internet and proceed to post carl the cuck or attack the person's flag instead of responding civilly and logically.
Again, getting your echo chamber to agree with you is not "winning an argument".
This entire thread is /pol/ complaining about the sanctity of its safe space instead of using the "hide thread" function like they advise others to do.
/pol/ really is full of bizarro world SJWs, they want to censor any opinion that makes them uncomfortable.
>>551996
>When you have regular and repeated shill threads, posted at similar times by the same flag, on the board that serves as the cultural and memetic cog in the Trump campaign, then there is sufficient evidence to suggest that nefarious actors are at work.
I agree. Ban estis and their devilish toothbrushes.
Who gives a fuck about the flag. If I wanted to spend the time getting a dozen proxies to spam shitthreads on /pol/ I'd probably use a Canadian flag too.
>>551981
>TRANSLATION: I want a safe space echo chamber where I can discuss politics with like-minded people and I can call anyone who disagrees with me a paid hillary shill/shitposter/spammer!
Translation: I am a fucking faggot who can't even read and can't understand why /pol/ doesn't want people breaking the rules when it's a political board
Here's your (you) by the way.
>>551994
>t. /a/ poster
No evidence of that. It's mostly just a meme. Naturally someone using a recycled argument for Hillary raises some eyebrows, especially when they forget IDs and shit like that, but no one is saying with full seriousness that there are paid shills.
We are literally the smartest, actually. We don't just pull Jewish conspiracy out of our ass. We find shit. We are forced to be inquisitive about the world around us.
>>551997
>2) Commies openly reject objectivity and instead use postmodernism.
>calling a literal materialist ideology dating back to 19th century "postmodernist"
This is your brain on /pol/
Consider killing yourself lad
>>551996
>When you have regular and repeated shill threads, posted at similar times by the same flag, on the board that serves as the cultural and memetic cog in the Trump campaign, then there is sufficient evidence to suggest that nefarious actors are at work.
That does not logically follow. It could just be the same troll who gets a laugh out of paranoid fags like you claiming LE JIDF IS MAKING MY SHIT THREADS GET 0 REPLIES :(((((((((
The mods aren't working today. Spam bullshit threads by rolling the alphabet.
>>551981
Not an argument
>>552001
There is some of time you just don't want to admit it for some reason, probably because you're so assblasted that you are wrong about things.
Where is the censorship?? We don't want SPAM AND SLIDE THREADS that are exactly the same every time.
>>552005
>We are literally the smartest, actually.
LOL /pol/ is one of the largest boards, no way it's one of the smartest.
>We are forced to be inquisitive about the world around us.
my fucking sides, you sit all day on the politics section of an anime imageboard, you aren't 'forced' to do anything. cringeworthy neckbeard faggots holy shit
>>552003
Recent. Proving his point.
>>552001
>False equivalencies, misrepresentation
>Muh just as bad as SJWs
>B-BUT THEY HAVE FUN, MAKE JOKES AND BANTER!
Not an argument
>>552001
>/pol/ really is full of bizarro world SJWs, they want to censor any opinion that makes them uncomfortable.
SPAMMING PORN AND IRRELEVANT TOPICS IS NOT A FUCKING 'OPINION' YOU CRETIN IT'S PURE CANCER AND AGAINST THE RULES.
/POL/ HAS NEVER BEEN A ECHO CHAMBER. WE HAVE ALL MANNER OF PHILOSOPHIES, IT'S JUST YOU DELICATE LITTLE SJW TYPES THAT GET YOUR FEELINGS BLOWN OUT BY OUR EDGE.
>>552007
Even the most gargantuan neckbeard could not do this for the amount of hours required 7 days a week.
>shills will literally defend porn being posted when it's against the rules
>>552006
I'm telling you, they call themselves postmodernist and reject objectivity. This is their words, not mine. I'll forgive you for being dumbfounded, but yeah, it happened. A lack of objectivity is the only thing that allows them to justify their beliefs. It is essentially a defense mechanism for communists.
>>552014
Who's to say the "how can whiteboys even compete" posts aren't jokes and banter?
This 'not an argument' shit is fedora as fuck btw senpai. This isn't debate club faggot.
>>552016
You're the guy spamming the cuck porn aren't you?
>>552020
You're calling them postmodernists, and that's because you have no clue what that word even fucking means you retarded little stormfaggot.
>>552015
/pol/ is most definitely an echo chamber these days. The fact that you are so upset and automatically assume I'm a leftist (I'm not at all) because I called you out for your faggotry proves it's an echo chamber.
>>552016
He is assblasted, because like we have been experiencing for months, our opposition is too dumb to come up with a good argument.
>>552011
I bet you are a /lit/ faggot. Angry at the world because your shitty English major gives you fuck all employment options in the real world.
/pol/ is unequivocally the most intelligent of all boards. The reason being that it is the only board that encourages diverse and conflicting opinions.
That doesn't happen when you get faggot shitposters trying to derail the board for their own interests.
>>552021
Everyone with a working brain
>>552022
I wish I was. It's hilarious how much it makes /pol/tards and stormniggers upset.
>>552016
>this faggot is assblasted:
no, I actually just forgot to take off the cruise control
and I'm a little annoyed
>>552024
... They were calling themselves postmodernists. As is customary for anyone that isn't a cunt, I was charitable and assumed they had considered nuance that I hadn't. It's besides the fucking point. We aren't arguing for a safespace, and getting rid of leftists would only increase the level of discourse. Reasonable people are ONLY found int he right wing.
>>552030
cool
>>552027
>/pol/ is unequivocally the most intelligent of all boards.
my fucking sides
It's one of the largest boards, so no way is it the most intelligent. Of course, being a /pol/tard, you don't understand what I mean by that.
Not from /lit/ btw.
>The reason being that it is the only board that encourages diverse and conflicting opinions.
TOP KEK
>>552030
What I we spammed the same shit in every other section of the site
>>552025
You are an idiot. It is anything but an echo chamber. People argue about widely differing views all the time. You are simply wrong.
And you standard of proof is year 7 science tier.
>>552025
>/pol/ is most definitely an echo chamber these days
An echo chamber of BBC, trap and other /b/ tier shit.
>>552032
>We aren't arguing for a safespace, and getting rid of leftists would only increase the level of discourse.
Says the guy calling communism "postmodernist". The level of discourse will always be shit as long as you and your retarded /pol/ friends are present.
>>552035
>I don't understand what a standard distribution is!
>>552031
>rules 39 and 40
>CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL
>EVEN WITH CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL HAVE TO STEER
>>552030
Why even bother being an asshole? Why are you mad at us? Why not engage in proper discourse with us?
>inb4 no lol u goys are not worth my time
Even an attempt at rational discourse is worth more time than whatever it is your are doing. I plea to you, give it another chance.
>>552032
>We aren't arguing for a safespace
>getting rid of leftists would only increase the level of discourse
>Reasonable people are ONLY found int he right wing.
this has to be a false flag to make /pol/ look like retards, lmao.
>>552039
Not an argument
>>552044
>hahaha /pol/ argues in good faith i swear!
Fuck off /pol/esmoker
>>552035
>/pol/ must represent a broad intelligence bellcurve because it has lots of people
By that logic Mensa is full of morons because it is the worlds largest high IQ society.
>>552041
I told you, they called themselves that, and I was being charitable, as anyone looking for a reasonable discussion is. You, however, are not being charitable, and aren't looking to contribute anything to the discussion.
>>552048
And you do?
>>552035
If one board has 1000 academics and the other has 50 /lit/ faggots, is the board less intelligent because it is larger?
No, it isn't you fucking waste of oxygen.
>>552048
Don't see you arguing in good faith either, all yer doing is calling them "/pol/tards" over and over again 2bh
>>552036
Please do, maybe mods will finally do something about the /pol/ problem if you do that. I'm itching for a final solution to you vermin.
>>552045
Not an argument.
>>552048
I am telling you that I argue in good faith. Don't make sweeping generalizations. /pol/ isn't one person and if it was, its constant conflict from different sides is evidence that it is interested in contructive arugment.
Give ME the benefit of the doubt, like anyone interested in discussion HAS to. I am not /pol/, I am a person currently typing with a keyboard, posting on /qa/.
Also, not an argument.
>>552037
>. It is anything but an echo chamber.
The only reason they consistently use this term to incorrectly describe us on /pol/ is because they can't stand the fact that white nationalism and the (((alt-right))) is becoming more and more popular.
They can't STAND it
>>552053
Yes, because /pol/ is definitely comparable to a board full of academics
top kek /pol/cucks really are delusional
>>552063
It was an analogy that is perfectly valid. It was simply mean't to discredit your assertion that quantity decreases quality.
>>552062
>dey make fun of us cuz dey is scared!
lel
We got the asslicking thread deleted.
>>552066
/pol/ is full of neet faggots and losers whose crowning achievement is being "born white", not at all comparable to a board full of accomplished academics
kill yourself bud
>>552069
>/pol/ is full of neet faggots and losers whose crowning achievement is being "born white"
Proof?
>>552045
>this has to be a false flag to make /pol/ look like retards, lmao.
While I would personally love to see every leftist suddenly disappear off the face of the earth, extirpating them from /pol/ is not actually our point here
We simply want porn threads and cancer like '/POL/ BTFO' to be axed.
We get banned for so much as mentioning the scourge of blacks and jews in other boards.
We aren't going to give up. We've been here for almost a decade.
>>552064
One last comment then I'm out.
>>552063
Mocking /pol/ only evinces the breadth of your ignorance. I used to have mutiple tabs open - discussions a range of opinions, from the application of NatSoc to modern society to the influence of Habermas in the formation of the EU. Hell, I've even improved my knowledge of the holocaust in debating those who deny its existence. This sophistication of discussion is unmatched on any board. This is why I am fighting for the mods to do their fucking jobs and ensure that shill and shitposting threads are removed.
You don't understand this because you are not as intellectually attuned and curious as I.
I pity you.
>>552070
I read it on an infograph, that's proof enough on /pol/ that the holocaust didn't happen so it's proof enough here.
>>552069
What about the large amount of countries with a generally non-white populace posting there?
Mods please permaban the cuck posters from Australia, 9/10 times they're actually Australian proxies which should be permabanned anyway.
Furthermore, please respond to reports. /pol/ isn't that bad and you know it, it doesn't deserve the systematic cuckspam from /lgbt/.
>>552057
>I'm itching for a final solution to you vermin.
>final solution
>to the /pol/ problem
We are the board of peace, and I don't appreciate your off-color allusion to the holocaust, which was a horrible time in history, you evil thought-stormtrooper.
>>552073
>You don't understand this because you are not as intellectually attuned and curious as I. I pity you.
>>552068
>>552062
>>552070
>>552071
>>552073
>>552073
BAIL.
This is an obvious troll thread now. If someone is going to see it, then it has already been scene. We need to get the fuck out. It really is sad. I can't fathom the kind of people that sit behind these keyboard. I have etended an invitation to civil discourse, and they have declines., I have showed them their flaws, and they have ignored.
Before you post again, ask yourself; is there anything you can do to change the mind of an imp?
I truely believe your time will be better spent making quality posts on /pol/ with other open minded individuals. You are doing yourselves and our community a disservice by letting this place keep you.
Calling to all /pol/acks, leave this thread.
>>552082
>If someone is going to see it, then it has already been scene
More proof that /pol/tards are illiterate morons. kek
>>552082
See you on /pol/.
Let this thread demonstrate to all those who are lurking which board is committed to civilised and intellectually engaging discussion.
>>552085
Can you dimwitted little pea-brains even make any kind of argument that isn't based on an ad hominem or full of invective?
>>552092
Insulting retards isn't an "ad hominem". Read a book, dumbshit.
>>552082
>Calling to all /pol/acks, leave this thread.
not until I have spoken to Hiro himself
We need a concerted effort to achieve our goals in this matter
>>552092
/pol/tards really need to learn what 'ad hominem' is before bandying the term around like some pretentious middle-schooler.
PRO-TIP: Calling you an illiterate retard because of your confusion of homophones isn't ad hominem
>>552093
:^)
Thank god me using a swatiska and a trip prevented me to face an arguement!
>>552097
Is it ad hominem if I call you a crusty turbovirgin?
>>552100
No, but it's pretty ironic coming from someone who browses /pol/ and defends its honour on a hidden Q&A section of an anime imageboard
>>552100
No. It's an ad hominem if you say.
>You're a crusty turbovirgin and therefore wrong.
It's just an insult if.
>Wow you're wrong, you must be a crusty turbovirgin.
>>552086
/tg/fag lurking, here. I've never been much interested in your board, but holy hell this is a real shitshow.
Hope you guys manage to kick out these idiots.
>>552105
Thank you for encouraging your fellow /pol/tards to stay in their containment zone. You've done a good service here.
>>551398
>it's a contrarian SRS /qa/ redditor whines about /pol/ episode
>>551893
Every day you complete niggers spam every other board with your chest-thumping, Trump-fellating, white supremacist garbage. You reap what you sow, you filthy animal. The reason this website is so categorically shit the last five+ years is blatantly because of /pol/ and the miasmic toxin you shitters brew. Don't talk to anyone else about site rules. You only want them enforced when it's convenient for your polemics.
>>552107
There is no debate here to any other purpose. It's not ad hominem, we're just telling you fuck right off to your containment board. The insults are part of that package.
Of course, /pol/tards are so thick that they think there is a discussion here and their term 'ad hominem' has any weight.
Hang on, let me try.
Reddit.
I need a Hiro, I'm holding out for a Hiro
'Til the end of the night
He's gotta be strong
And he's gotta be fast
And he's gotta be fresh from the fight
>>552110
Well said. I've been here a long time and /pol/ is honestly more cancerous to this site than chanology was.
>>552116
Thread theme? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGcsIdGOuZY
>>552111
>There is no debate here to any other purpose.
>Of course, /pol/tards are so thick that they think there is a discussion here and their term 'ad hominem' has any weight.
Well, it is quite obvious that there can not be any debate when you're outright preventing it by screaming "get back to you Containment Chamber". If only you weren't discussing right in this moment…
>It's not ad hominem, we're just telling you fuck right off to your containment board. The insults are part of that package.
Do you really have no self awareness?
>>552118
Same dude here. I didn't realize how perfect this song is to the situation.
>>552094
>>552097
>/pol/tards really need to learn what 'ad hominem' is before bandying the term around like some pretentious middle-schooler.
Right. Because this thread is completely devoid of ad hominems.
>>552069
>/pol/ is full of neet faggots
>>552004
>Translation: I am a fucking faggot who can't even read
>>551503
>you can't cope with the fact that white women prefer black men
etc
>Abusive ad hominem usually involves attacking the traits of an opponent as a means to invalidate their argument(s). Equating someone's character with the soundness of their argument is a logical fallacy.
Holy shit, sure is fucking reddit in here.
So I get b& for checking dubs on /Po/, but people spamming porn and retarded shill threads on /pol/ get away with it?
Mods confirmed Reddits desu
Come on lads
>>552121
It's not ad hominem you stupid faggot. Ad hominems take the form "you're a faggot so your central point is wrong." Most of those are just insults that are presented in addition to another point.
If you can't handle being insulted and name-called perhaps you don't belong on 4chan.
Perhaps the /pol/tards who cry about ad hominem constantly should find a website with stricter moderation so their feelings aren't hurt?
>>551978
Containment boards don't work if you fill their containment with shit
>>552130
The point of containment board is that they're filled with shit. That's why it needs to be contained.
>>552130
Exactly. Whatever was contained inside would spill out to the other boards.
Well, this really sounds like a redditor's plan to shit up all the site.
/pol/ must stand.
> obvious srs plebbitors shitting up /pol/
> obvious srs plebbitors false-flagging as /pol/ on other boards
> obvious srs plebbitors undercover in /qa/
I would bet money on the fact that 90% of you are crusty turbovirgins. Ad hominem intended.
>>552128
There isn't another point. You have repeatedly reflected our arguments by dismissing them as garbage from /pol/tards, hence making a judgement on their validity based on our character, or our perceived character, and hence it's adhom.
Fuck you are good at baiting. 10/10
>$0.02 added to your account
>>552128
>Most of those are just insults that are presented in addition to another point.
No they fucking aren't. They are literally saying that the reason we deserve getting flooded with retarded amounts of off-topic and generally cancerous spam is because we are 'neet faggots and losers' or even that we are 'cucks who can't cope with the fact that white women prefer black men'.
You idiots always use the same ad hominems against us and I'm sick of it.
You self-important pseudo-intellectual moron.
>>552139
I was here with good intentions.
>>552133
Then don't fill it with other useless shit. The porn and spam of manufactured copy/paste b8 threads is not fucking needed.
Keep that shit to /trash/, /b/ and assorted porn boards, it's breaking the fucking rules.
>>552141
That's a sound argument though
>>552141
Let's see how he dodges this one...
>>552128
>It's not ad hominem you stupid faggot. Ad hominems take the form "you're a faggot so your central point is wrong." Most of those are just insults that are presented in addition to another point.
Nope. I'll explain an Ad Hominem to you
First someone makes an arguement (see OP post)
Then someone assumes that OP, in this case, is a virgin/neckbeard/stormfag
Therefore his arguement is invalid
>If you can't handle being insulted and name-called perhaps you don't belong on 4chan.
You're just being defensive. You argue that /pol/ is unable to discuss properly, yet you say that /pol/ users don't belong on /pol/ because you are unable to discuss properly?
>Perhaps the /pol/tards who cry about ad hominem constantly should find a website with stricter moderation so their feelings aren't hurt?
Perhaps you should get off the complaining and whining board then.
>>552143
Oldfag here. I've been here since /pol/ was far left.
I'm just sick of it. No one has the fortitude or respect for /pol/ than I do. I know that the attention it is given is a product of true fear others have of it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHzU-9iozmo
>>552141
>posts on /pol/
>thinks /pol/ is a place for earnest good-faith political discussion
>thinks /pol/ is SRS BSNS
>thinks /pol/ isn't a containment board for shitposting and trolling virgin stormniggers
>has the gall to call anybody else pseudo-intellectual
TOP
KEK
/pol/ is a shit board and any spam is probably of higher quality than the "discussion" that was going on in the first place.
>>552146
No, it isn't. The argument is that he rules should be enforced, which can be argued from multiple perspectives. The completely baseless and cartoonish depiction of your opponents to discredit it seems like adhom to me.
>>552140
> good at baiting
Haha, what? The clown literally just finished grade 9 and their teacher has probably gone over ad hominem and funny "facts" about how people "misuse" the term for an easy class before summer, when in real life for all intensive purposes, it's used correctly.
>>552150
Your new is showing
>>552150
Not an argument, we just want our very basic rules to be enforced, faggot.
>>552153
>for all intensive purposes,
kek, your average /pol/tard everyone
Honestly /pol/tards don't deserve a quality board. Spamming shit on /pol/ should be encouraged, in fact.
>>552155
Good for you. I'm laughing at you because you only want rules enforced when people make you upset, otherwise you shitpost on every other board on the website.
>b-but they posted niggercock on my safe space! h-help, my echo chamber is being attacked by SJW paid shills!!!!
>>552156
>mfw the enemy is attacking each other
>>552157
>/pol/tards don't deserve a quality board
You don't get to make that decision, newfag
>>552156
get baited, kiddo
>>552150
If you lurked more you'd have caught the serious threads that aren't drowned by bullshit people like you force on us.
Good political discussion is what drove the commies out. I've never felt what it was like to be a vegetable until I encountered the site in that state. I'd become almost too versed in commie bullshit after that.
>>552151
>The red-handed attempt to push my argument aside with an attack
>Nuh u jus don't understand adhom maaang
>>552158
Except that's a lie we don't spam other boards and you won't even give us simple examples
>>552153
>all intensive purposes, it's used correctly.
You are right, but in an objective sense. He has been using adhom, without doubt.
>>552161
Why would I lurk a containment board? Why would I shift through an ocean of shit like /pol/ to find a few gems?
>Good political discussion is what drove the commies out.
top kek, and you say /pol/ isn't an echo chamber
>>552158
>Wanting to get /b/-tier threads and porn deleted is getting "upset over other viewpoints"
Fuck off SRS.
>>552158
They're literally breaking the rulesyou idiot.
Breaking
The
Rules
They are B R E A K I N G the rules
do you understand you huge reddit faggot?
breaking
The rules
BRE
AKI
NG
THE
RUL
ES
>>552166
protip: /b/ tier threads belong on /pol/ because it is a containment board for newfag redditors who came here because of le epic donald trump memes
And yes, there are a lot of upset /pol/tards in this thread right now who get triggered when someone has a different viewpoint.
>>552163
> this is what lit majors unironically believe when someone ez baits them
Almost makes the crippling poverty and a life of burger-flipping worth it, because at the end of the day you knew some useless facts about using "ad hominem" attacks.
>>552165
>leftwing opinions rightly shit on and exposed
Omg such echo chamber let's cry on /qa/ even though Hiro will never remove it
>>552165
Everyone but the commies stayed. The political debate between different factions never stopped, hence it never became, and never will become an echo chamber.
Those gems are basically the whole site, that's why. And if you aren't a moron it isn't hard ot find them. If you are worth the $0.02 then you can pull the strings enough to actually turn them around as well.
Where else can you get uncensored political discussion? Those gems are why you should be on my side with this. If you truly believe they are gems, then we should be allies.
In my opinion, they contained diamonds from a rough. That's besides the point though. Just my opinion.
>>552167
>crying about the rules
>getting this upset because someone broke the rules oh no :(
I think you are the one who belongs on reddit, /pol/tard
>>552173
What? You aren't even structuring your adhom anymore.
>it isn't adhom because it doesn't adhere to a linear easily digested format that my JIDF sponsored education could afford to teach me.
>>552169
/Pol/ is for news and politics interracial cuck porn is for the many porn boards in the site are you some sort of invalid?
>>552174
>Where else can you get uncensored political discussion?
>he says as he cries to the mods on /qa/, begging for them to delete "shill threads" and "slide threads" that upset his delicate temperment
>>552175
Why, because we want rules to be followed? You are basically calling libertarians statistis because they don't believe in murder here.
>>552175
spotted the numale redditor
How would you like it if R/cuckoldry was slammed with nationalist propaganda? Exactly, you would want them banned for breaking the rules
It's the exact same thing here.jesus you must really hate /pol/?
Are you afraid of our intolerant and racist opinions Mr reddit?
kek neck yourself numale
>>552158
>you shitpost on every other board on the website.
I've demonstrated intensive, malevolent spamming via screenshots of the catalog of /pol/ ITT
Now, if you want to prove your point, show me screenshots of a concerted effort to shitpost or derail any other board.
Or shut the fuck up you outsider.
And another thing, just because someone used the word 'nigger' doesn't mean they were from /pol/
You might not know this, but racism has always been a part of 4chan. mootykins even wordfiltered the terms 'nigger' and 'faggot' on /b/ around 2009 because he's a sjw like you and gets butthurt really easily.
People are racist, and being anon brings that out.
4chan is not your personal snuggle bubble, if you want that shit you can go just about anywhere else on the internet, but you don't do that because your type is like cult of Jesuits or Muslims. You will never rest until everyone is either silenced or just like you.
Now die in a fire
>>552178
Not shill threads, spam that breaks the rule.
>JIDF education
>>552178
Your just being facetious now cuckboy
>>552180
If /pol/tards care so much about strict moderation and 100% enforcement of the rules all the time, maybe reddit is a better website for you to spread your "redpill" ideas.
4chan has always been pretty lax on rules, especially on red boards, except for blatantly illegal content.
>>552182
They know they are wrong but are just being le epic trollz because they don't give a shit what happens to ANY board on 4chan
>>552182
If moot were the SJW you think he is he would have deleted /pol/ a long time ago, instead of creating a staging ground for the internet's human trash to invade the rest of 4chan. Either that or he's just a retard.
>this entire fucking board
>still arsepained after hiro blew you the fuck out
>>552169
>>>/pol/40489590
>/b/ tier threads belong on /pol/
...oh hang on, that's not what it says, is it???
>Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted
WOW! WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT!
>>552189
>/pol/tards projecting again because they feel guilty about browsing reddit
hello /pol/, here to collect some dank screencaps to post to /r/4chan?
>>552185
Explain how constant cuckporn threads with no replies that are against the rules legitimate in any way? You can't because you aren't even a 4chan user just some cuck who wants to shit up the whole site because "le mean raciss r evil"
>>552185
The board has been compromised with meaningless and pornographic spam. This is simply a plea to the moderation to prevent this from happening. That's it. Lax to the point of letting violations destroy boards is retarded and defeats the purpose of having rules.
/pol/ would work best under rigid rules. Plenty of us a fucking natsoc, we are keen for it, as long as it's minimal impact on the ideal functioning of the board.
>>552190
You realize that was posted because everybody's impression was that /b/-tier threads belong on /pol/ right?
lady doth protests too much, etc.
/pol/ is a containment board, just deal with it.
>>552189
hiro is even newer than the rest of you miserable newfaggots, knows nothing about 4chan history, and is an easily misled retard who couldn't give two shits what happens to 4chan as long as it rakes in the ad impressions.
>>552194
That isn't the point you are just being a faggot
>>552187
>stormniggers and other alt-right off-site invaders
I bet you don't even know what /pol/ was called before it was /pol/
>>552188
>If moot were the SJW you think he is he would have deleted /pol/ a long time ago,
And again, you obviously don't know the history of /pol/
FUCKING NEWFAGS GET OUT
Is that butthurt commie cucknadian shitskin/kike still spamming /qa/ about /pol/. Haven't been here in a while
>>552193
>The board has been compromised with meaningless and pornographic spam
There's nothing of value to compromise kek. Just 10 pages of Trump-fellating and 'le librul degeneracy' memeing.
If /pol/ was spammed 24/7 with porn, nothing of value would be lost.
>>552169
>protip: /b/ tier threads belong on /pol/ because it is a containment board for newfag redditors who came here because of le epic donald trump memes
lol who are you trying to convince, redditor?
>>552199
Oh it's the queer that pretends to be an oldfag again
>>552194
It's a board with rules and standards. Deal with it. If you are putting your meaningless platitudes above what the moderators themselves created then you aren't all together are you matey?
Ultimately only good can come from moderation. The more /pol/ sucks the more of us will migrate elsewhere, and I know you faggots are terrified.
>>552199
>I bet you don't even know what /pol/ was called before it was /pol/
It didn't exist. /pol/ is not /new/, and never will be. It's made mostly of retarded shits who learned about 4chan's history from the rest of the ex-Redditors who moved into /pol/ en masse when they were kicked out of their old home.
>And again, you obviously don't know the history of /pol/
So why is /pol/ around today, you retard?
>>552194
>gets BTFO by a quote that directly and undeniably contradicts his point
>lady doth protests too much
can't make this shit up.
>>552202
>posts screencaps from reddit
>this means that somehow I'm the redditor
/pol/tard logic, everybody.
>>552201
Nice "trolling" you subhuman nigger. Everyone is so mad rite now xD xD
>>552201
Nobody cares about you're incorrect opinion cuck
>>552205
>The more /pol/ sucks the more of us will migrate elsewhere, and I know you faggots are terrified.
There is nothing more I would love to see in this world.
>>552207
>It's made mostly of retarded shits who learned about 4chan's history from the rest of the ex-Redditors who moved into /pol/ en masse
source? reddit is and always has been a liberal hugbox, dominated by the sort of limp college spergs who unironically use terms like toxic and reactionary
there's a reason this site has moved to the left in the last 5 years, it's because teenage liberal shitposters from reddit have flooded various boards trying to make this site into their safe space. 5 years ago if I said nigger in a thread I wouldn't get 5 frothing libtards telling me to go back to /pol/.
>>552214
You are cringy af
>>552211
/pol/tards can't even come up with original memes, they can only edit the bantz that comes out about them
pic related, the original
>>552201
So basically, even your strawman is just as productive and worthwhile as literally ever other board on 4chan? Name one that is above the simple discussion of a "common" interest?
The fact is, the diverse topics of discussion are great. Libertarian vs natsoc, libertarian vs conservative, conservative vs natsoc, current evens, current events in respect to those things, Syria general, natsoc general, generals of the previously mentioned non general topics, the list goes on. Live coverage of debates and certain livestreams is nice as well. I personally enjoy the /qanda/ threads.
Ultimately our board has far more depth and range of discussion than any other board on the site, and if the spam and shit was gone, it would be perfection laced with memes.
And even then, it's still against the rules, and shouldn't be allowed. What's wrong with asking the mods to do there jobs?
>>552216
>there's a reason this site has moved to the left in the last 5 years
LOL wanna know how I know you're new?
4chan was more libertarian originally than anything. I certainly cannot see the 4chan of 2005 or 2006 supporting a blowhard moron like Trump.
>>552219
>What's wrong with asking the mods to do there jobs?
You guys only want the rules you want enforced enforced.
If the mods tried to enforce rule three you guys would flip a screaming shit and declare war on every board.
>>552213
Then seeing us congregate wherever you lurk? I bet. If you want it, get involved in some quality discussion on /pol/.
>>552220
>4chan was more libertarian originally than anything.
So would it have taken offence at the word nigger, or called for /new/ to have been banned? Fuck off you cum guzzling left wing sap
>>552221
I disagree. I don't deal in hyperbole. Come up with a real argument.
>>552214
>I don't like the content on /pol/ so we should all spam it with cuck porn
What makes you better than them?
>>552222
You can congregate wherever the fuck you want. Preferably /b/, or some other website.
If you want to talk about papercraft in the papercraft board go right fucking ahead. Sky's the limit.
>>552225
>I disagree. I don't deal in hyperbole. Come up with a real argument.
The rule against "racism" would knock out half the board and have people crying about liberal SJW cuck mods from now until the end of /pol/.
>>552207
>So why is /pol/ around today, you retard?
I'm not sure exactly why moot brought it back with [r9k] a few years ago.
He never made his reasons clear, at least not where I saw it.
>>552207
>/pol/ is not /new/
There was a similar sentiment and userbase between the two boards. moot deleted /new/ because he hated the white nationalism. I imagine he introduced /pol/ to try to centralize the users in one place and keep them off other boards.
But this doesn't matter.
What does matter is that we are not leaving 4chan. So the staff can either clean up our board from the porn and off-topic threads, or we will bring our board culture to other boards.
>>552218
>HOW DARE YOU PARODY A MEME
>YOU HAVE TRIGGERED MY AUTISM
>>552224
No, and I've called /pol/tards stormniggers several times. I don't give a fuck if you say nigger, but when you're a retard whose brain has been infected by /pol/ infographics it's pretty obvious and most people will rightfully tell you to fuck off back to your containment board. /pol/cucks stick out like a sore thumb.
>>>/pol/
>>552223
We are here because we want the mods to enforce the rules, cockmongler.
>>552218
this is hilarious coming from what is almost certainly a left wing kike. /pol/ is responsible for a lot of good content produced in the last few years
>>552229
>There was a similar sentiment and userbase between the two boards.
Whoop de fucking do, there's a similar sentiment between /b/ and /v/ but they're still not the same thing.
>or we will bring our board culture to other boards.
/pol/ already leaks like a sieve. It would actually be preferable if it did so loudly instead of silently, so that the rest of 4chan could see you for what you are.
>>552233
Again, like the other anon mentioned, if the rule 3 was enforced /pol/ would cry up a storm about 'le censorship SJW kike leftist mods'
>>552223
Fucking hell, they take their role pretty seriously mate. Try saying nigger on /tg/. The whole "jobs" thing is a meme created around them being so autistic and taking it as seriously as a job. If you weren't a newfag you would know.
I'm posting here and in /pol/ at the same time.
>>552228
There would need to be an exception then wouldn't there? Like with /b/. But again, I don't deal in your shitty hyperbole, I'm not petty enough.
>>552235
>his is hilarious coming from what is almost certainly a left wing kike
I bet 100% that you were one of the massive faggots crying about ad hominem earlier.
>>552231
>WAAAAAH MOMMY THERE'S SOMEONE WITH RIGHT WING OPINIONS ON 4CHAN WAAAAAH
get a fucking grip you liberal cuckold
>/pol/cucks stick out like a sore thumb.
why is this bad? anything that triggers effeminate basement dwelling kikes like you should be actively encouraged
>>552231
>Thinking anyone respectable uses an uncited info-graph as anything but a post in passing to illustrate a position.
Lurk more you stupid fucking faggot
>inb6 not lurking a containment board
if you don't know anything about it then stop talking about it.
>>552238
>There would need to be an exception then wouldn't there?
No, the kind of scum that would bait themselves into violating rule eight should be banned, and then permabanned after they evade. The board only exists at all because the moderators have been allowing you to break the rules since time immemorial.
>>552237
>/pol/ would cry up a storm
No, faggots on /pol/ used to getting their way and being able to spam constantly, THEY would cry up a storm while pretending to be /pol/.
I am so absolutely sick of faggots who think they understand the board despite fearing and hating it with an irrational fervor.
>>552237
We are talking about the stickied /pol/ rules here, faggot.
I've been banned for GETs before anyway.
>>552240
4chan is not your right-wing hugbox.
>>552236
If they saw us for what we were they would hope in. What we are, without the spamming faggots, is a group of reasonable, humerus, and intelligent people, no matter how many platitudes and insults you will use to express how much you disagree.
>>552231
>but when you're a retard whose brain has been infected by /pol/ infographics it's pretty obvious and most people will rightfully tell you to fuck off back to your containment board.
Identify which beliefs you think are /pol/ exclusive please.
Hatred of niggers? Nope.
Hatred of muslims? Nope.
Hatred of mass migration? Nope.
Support for Trump? Nope.
Hatred of SJWs? Nope.
Which one of these opinions do you think is so outlandish that /pol/ should be deleted or designated a containment board
>>552247
>What we are, without the spamming faggots, is a group of reasonable, humerus, and intelligent people, no matter how many platitudes and insults you will use to express how much you disagree.
You're /b/, if /b/ was full of people who thought they were legitimate geniuses instead of being vaguely aware that their entire community is retarded.
>>552247
>the people who spam and spout memes aren't real /pol/tards!
>le no true /pol/tard xDD
kek, there's people who actually take the politics section of an anime imageboard this seriously
i bet you're actually voting for trump too LOL
>>552245
Good thing it's no one's hugbox, but as usual it's only libtards who want to turn it into one
That's what you get for letting /v/ cancer feel like they're welcome on your board
>>552194
This post is the actual dumbest thing itt, I checked to make sure.
>>552242
Alright then, we have a fundamental and probably ideological difference in opinion. If you were willing to discuss it properly, we could have ourselves an interesting debate. You know, the main reason I post on /pol/.
>inb4 good threads don't exist
Show me the link from the beginning of /pol/ to now with archives, containing no good threads.
>Thinking bans mean shit
jej
>>552250
Because some of you fucks were pretending to worship the rules and treated non-enforcement like a crime against humanity when we all know you guys don't give a flying fuck about the actual rules. You only want what is convenient for yourself as posters.
>>552251
of course I am
>>552248
/pol/ has already been designated a containment board since moot created it, lel
/pol/tards don't even know their own history, unsurprising since half of the people defending it as a 'legitimate discussion free speech zone' are probably reddit exiles from /r/coontown or wherever.
>>552251
not an argument
>>552249
I've never received in depth politcal discussion on /b/ so I disagree. More baseless assertions.
>>552256
>Thinking bans mean shit
The only thing that they really need to do is make it clear that none of you are welcome anywhere on 4chan. Even mods who agree with you are required to keep banning evaders. It's the "rules", you know, that thing that you guys keep insisting be enforced.
>Show me the link from the beginning of /pol/ to now with archives, containing no good threads.
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
>>552262
>not an argument
go back to /pol/
>>552260
Why can't you identify a single belief held by /pol/ that is exclusive to /pol/ and not shared by a large proportion of the demographic that browse this site?
>>552257
Are you some sort of imbecile? Cuck porn spam that slides actual threads is indefensible. We don't break other rules except the racism rule that has never been enforced and shouldn't exist.
you faggots keep whining about /pol/ shit on other boards but give us no examples because it rarely happens.
>>552260
We define our board, not moot. If you think moot's opinion mattered at all then you can fuck right off. That cunt is dried up and dead with congealed cum in his mouth. He was such a weak shit that we, simple users, drove him out.
>>552264
Why? triggering genuinely autistic left wingers like you is 10x more fun
>>552252
>as usual it's only libtards who want to turn it into one
This.
They can't seem to understand why we aren't shut down,hunted down and murdered for our wrongthink and audacity to not have rabid hatred for the white race
They are so used to their echochambers that they seem to honestly think that anywhere that does not kowtow to their worldview is, itself, an echochamber.
The funniest part is that they obviously have never even been to /pol/, because if they have, they would know we fight each other tooth and nail over everything.
Christians vs pagans, us vs Jews, libertarians vs natsoc, etc etc
>>552264
definitely not an argument.
>>552260
Nobody gives a shit what that faggot thought years ago
>>552265
>Why can't you identify a single belief held by /pol/ that is exclusive to /pol/
- The belief that all people who don't like /pol/ are SJW reddit cucks
- The belief that /pol/ represents "old 4chan"
- The belief that /pol/ isn't mostly made of ex-reddit users fleeing from their old home
>>552264
This isn't an argument either.
>>552272
Nobody gives a shit if your garbage board becomes ever-so-slightly more garbage.
>>552273
1) This simply isn't true. Baseless.
2) Never heard this argument.
3) No evidence of this. Sure there are a few, but not a majority.
>>552276
>2) Never heard this argument.
Is this your first time in /qa/? Ever?
>>552274
Are you beginning to notice a trend of argumentlessness?
>>552275
Except everyone who uses it who also happen to outnumber you're faggot brigade overwhelmingly.
>>552279
Good thing 4chan is a democracy where a gigantic tidal wave of faggots can vote to edit the rules.
>>552277
Since Hiro destroyed you, yeah.
>>552279
>everyone who uses it
These are people who like to swim in garbage, so we don't really take their opinions seriously.
>>552280
The rules already exist, they just aren't being enforced, retard.
>>552277
It's usually /qa/ cucks that pretend to be oldfags and cry about how great 4chan used to be even though it was never the holy grail of the Internet to begin with.
This is a goofy site where we can post anonymously about anything and if we want to make fun of kikes and niggers no oversensitive faggots will stop us.
>>552282
Depends, are they the problem we are talking about, or actual /pol/acks? Even the dumbest /pol/ack is a god compared to you parasites on other boards. You say we are the containment board when in reality we are the nucleus. You leech off of us.
>>552284
And you don't want them enforced, so what's the deal? You guys whine that you guys need an "exception" to rule three, so I'll counter that you guys need an exception to rule ten. Eat shit.
>>552273
>- The belief that /pol/ isn't mostly made of ex-reddit users fleeing from their old home
you've made this claim a few times, is there any evidence for it at all, given reddit is overwhelmingly a liberal cesspit full of teenagers and democrat-voting college students? Wouldn't 4chan's exposure to reddit cause this site to go in the opposite direction?
And why have you given me three points about /pol/'s relationship with the rest of the site? That's not what i asked for. I want some beliefs widely held by /pol/ that you won't find held by a significant portion of the US electorate. Just give me three. It shouldn't be that hard
>>552286
Oh look, it's the "4chan is for shitposting" meme. Straight out of /r/4chan.
>>552284
Are you upset that the rules aren't being enforced like they were on reddit?
It's funny that /pol/ thinks anyone who dislikes them is reddit but then cries for the rules to be enforced just as stringently.
4chan is not your carefully curated subreddit, your board being spammed with garbage is barely noticeable.
>>552288
So spamming shit is acceptable on every board now according to your moronic logic
>>552276
>1) This simply isn't true. Baseless.
Also something reiterated by countless /pol/ emissaries who think they're fighting Reddit wherever they go.
>3) No evidence of this. Sure there are a few, but not a majority.
So why exactly did the population of /pol/ quadruple in two years? Which 4chan board was responsible for this migration?
>you've made this claim a few times, is there any evidence for it at all, given reddit is overwhelmingly a liberal cesspit full of teenagers and democrat-voting college students?
It is, now that Reddit has emptied the trash. It had to flow somewhere.
>>552289
/r/4chan is full of /pol/ screencaps
That's more than enough proof for me that /pol/ is the most reddit board on the entire website.
>>552290
How did you get that from my post? You are mentally ill
>>552292
Other boards follow the rules. The rules can be enforced there.
/pol/ thinks the rules are things you wipe your ass with. It's entirely reasonable that the rules wouldn't be enforced there.
>>552293
>It is, now that Reddit has emptied the trash
it's flowed here, full of retards like you who unironically think racism has never had a place on 4chan
>>552293
Reddit are diametrically opposed to us. And these "emissaries don't repent shit.
I think a lot of our new base came from /b/, or the general public. In my personal life at least, in Australia, /pol/ is a spontaneous thing. They post on 4chan to be edgy, be it on a board that caters to their personal interests or something like /b/. Then, they stumble across /pol/. Sometimes it clicks, sometimes they believe it is satire. Eventually, after a while, they are locked in.
>>552294
>/r/4chan is full of /pol/ screencaps
How many? what proportion? Is this surprising when /pol/ is the second most popular board on the site?
>So why exactly did the population of /pol/ quadruple in two years?
How many people do you think moved from /r/coontown? Why do you think they weren't already on /pol/?
>>552287
>no true /pol/tard xD
it's funny how you fags complain about le epic logical fallacies and then post trash like this
>>552296
So does /pol/ what rules are you talking about ? my personal main board is /vr/ and I have not violated the rules once, spamming cuck porn isn't acceptable by anyone's standards unless they have a personal interest in stifling discussion.
Fixing the /pol/ problem is easy
1. Post a thread bragging to the mods that you're going to spam "really makes you think" threads to the point where the board becomes unusable and that the mods can't do shit about it. Enourage others to join you.
2. Commence spamposting
3. Mods don't ban you, everyone leaves except spamposters, board shuts down
Or
3. Mods have to delete EVERY really makes you think thread and ban the poster.
>>552303
He's probably talking about rules 3's "no racism", which has only ever been enforced on /lit/.
>>552294
>That's more than enough proof for me that /pol/ is the most reddit board on the entire website.
Well, any self-respecting /pol/ster would never even go to that shit site. I never do. The fact that you know this indicates that you are a plebbitor.
And you have it backwards, like every leftist faggot does. Reddit does not have a presence on /pol/ (at least until recently because of r/theDonald). But /pol/ has a presence on plebbit.
>>552295
>You are mentally ill
I have a feeling this is the same group of /srs/ psychopaths that have rabidly been trying to get /pol/ deleted on /qa/ since Hiro took over.
It is some kind of weaponized autism
>>552297
>it's flowed here, full of retards like you who unironically think racism has never had a place on 4chan
Did anyone say that? No, they didn't, you projecting little internet crusading fuckwit.
>>552298
>Reddit are diametrically opposed to us.
Go war on /r/The_Donald or something. They worship you guys so it should be easy enough to ask them to cut for Trump or something. Reddit hosts subcommunities with different cultures. It hosts less than it used to, after several select ones were banned and the people all came here.
>I think a lot of our new base came from /b/, or the general public. In my personal life at least, in Australia, /pol/ is a spontaneous thing. They post on 4chan to be edgy, be it on a board that caters to their personal interests or something like /b/. Then, they stumble across /pol/. Sometimes it clicks, sometimes they believe it is satire. Eventually, after a while, they are locked in.
Wow, that's almost plausible. I find it hard to believe that anyone would find 4chan before they found Reddit, given that Reddit is super popular, fucking everywhere, integrated well with prominent industry figures and generally has 10x the users that 4chan does... but you never know.
>>552299
>The emperors new arguments
Maybe if you guys didn't act like a bunch of whiny hypocritical entitled shits people wouldn't point it out.
>>552302
If the invade and don't want to be part of the culture are they part of /pol/? I think logical fallacies are too nuanced for the like of anyone outside of /pol/
>>552307
>no true /pol/tard would visit reddit
top kek, you're a joke
for all the whining you did earlier about "libruls using ad hominems by calling me a virgin!" you sure do use a lot of logical fallacies.
>>552305
That's what /pol/ is, like it or not. This isn't up for debate. I can say anything I want there. And I'm not new. I was there when the commies were driven out. I was there for the obamarama. I was there when the God emperor began his conquest. I've got my aces nigga.
I can't wait until your tiny brain fails to comprehend nuance yet again and think s this is hypocrisy.
>>552305
>4chan is intended as some 'radical free speech zone'
Riddle me this newfag.
What is the significance of this image in context to 'free speech' and old 4chan?
>>552301
>How many people do you think moved from /r/coontown?
It had 15,000 users who needed to find a new home. You tell me.
>>552307
of course it is. If you looked at the reddit accounts of the sperg spamming this board and frothing and foaming about /pol/, the most popular would be
/r/shitredditsays
/r/circlebroke
/r/subredditdrama
/r/badX
these are the sorts of spergs who came here in 2012, most likely have twitters supporting feminism in video games, bernie/hillary stickers on their laptops, and unironically throw around terms like white privilege, institutional racism and reactionary
>>552309
Most of /r/The_Donald is probably us. The ones that aren't are probably indifferent to race relations. You are right though, we did get a hell of a lot of reddit, but my guess seems more likely as a main cause for the influx.
>>552317
>Most of /r/The_Donald is probably us.
>literally admitting to be a redditor
Delete /pol/
>>552309
>It hosts less than it used to, after several select ones were banned and the people all came here.
source? why weren't they here already? I used to browse /r/coontown and /r/niggers, subs with about 1k regular users at most, and I can tell you 90% of the sub was already on 4chan and used those subreddits as bases to piss off the overwhelming left wing majority on reddit
>>552315
no it didn't. Most of the regular users there were from the chans you retard, in fact they had backup subreddits called /r/polistan etc. The main guy, chuckspears, was a regular on /new/ before reddit. Almost all of the content there was from 4chan.
Christ you are thick
>>552311
>you're a joke
I'm not joking. I never go to reddit. I admit that /pol/ is getting flooded with newfags from reddit, but again, you seem to have things backwards.
Oldfag /pol/sters don't use plebbit.
I seriously think you need to see a shrink. You are clearly mentally ill or on drugs.
>>552313
>>552313
>>552305
>>552305
TELL ME WHY WE CALL THEM BREADS YOU FUCKING NEWFAG
>>552311
It isn't a no true scottsman. They are from /pol/, no question, but we are in every right to not consider them /pol/acks. The fallacy begins when you are making a fully declarative statement, excluding members from your nonexclusive group. Who the individual considers to be with them is 100% exclusive, participation on an image board is not.
>>552324
>we didn't come from reddit, w-we b-browsed 4chan before w-we used reddit I swear!
the damage control from /pol/tards is unreal lmao
PROTIP: The reason 4chan hates reddit isn't because it's "full of liberal retards" like newfags on /pol/ like to think
>>552320
He is representing himself as he is on /pol/. /pol/ is not one set of interests.
>>552323
like most of the users of those places we came from here and 4ch(zero)n originally, used it to troll pledditors especially around the time of the trayvon martin case
I love how you've got it absolutely backwards kek
>>552327
>we are in every right to not consider them /pol/ack
>The fallacy begins when you are making a fully declarative statement, excluding members from your nonexclusive group.
>Who the individual considers to be with them is 100% exclusive, participation on an image board is not.
You contradict yourself twice in three sentences. lmao. holy shit I think posting on /pol/ long enough gives you brain damage.
>>552324
>The main guy, chuckspears, was a regular on /new/ before reddit. Almost all of the content there was from 4chan.
Christ, you guys really are the fucking trash of 4chan. You know, there was a time when Reddit was public enemy #1 because the users there harvested material from 4chan and used it for self-aggrandizement. And when you came back from your recruitment drive you brought ten thousand Redditors-converted-to-4chan-users with you. Fucking amazing.
>>552330
>He is representing himself as he is on /pol/. /pol/ is not one set of interests.
/pol/ is made almost entirely of people like him.
/pol/ also has radical SJW feminists, but they represent an insignificant proportion of the board.
>>552327
I don't consider you a real /pol/ack and I consider myself a real /pol/ack, therefore you are not a real /pol/ack.
>>552325
HAHAHAHAHAHA
THIS ISN'T GOING TO BE IN KNOW YOUR MEME YOU FUCKING NEWFAG
WHY DID SOME PEOPLE POST BREAD ON OLD /b/?????
>>552334
Learn to comprehend words an nuance you autistic little faggot.
We have every right not to consider them /pol/ack (an endearing and fluid term)
A person that has made a post on /pol/ might not be considered a /pol/ack, and considering the terms is fluid, that's fair.
Because the defintion or context in which someone should be called a /pol/ack is varied, it may as well be up to individual discretion.
Hence excluding once from your personal definition of /pol/ack, be it someone who follows the ideal culture, or just a poster, is not a not true scottsman, as the excluded person may not fit the criterion.
If I wasn't dealing with autists, I wouldn't need to explain this.
>That Muslim isn't a catholic priest? NO TRUE CATHOLIC PREIST
>>552332
>ou brought ten thousand Redditors-converted-to-4chan-users with you.
So first you attempt to mock /pol/ for its infographs and apparent sheer idiocy that anyone could see through, then you claim that we successfully recruited thousands of left wing college students and brought them back to 4chan. do you realise how utterly desperate you sound?
you're attempting to draw some kind of connection between /pol/'s userbase and reddit's when they are diametric opposites, and use enclaves like /r/niggers and /r/coontown that were derided across the site as evidence
>>552344
>then you claim that we successfully recruited thousands of left wing college students
Iie, senpai, you found the disaffected users of Reddit who were mad that they were surrounded by left-wing college students, advertised them the promised land, and brought them to 4chan with you. They're still Redditors, and they're still shit, and so are you.
>>552338
>/pol/ is made almost entirely of people like him.
I disagree fundamentally. Disagreement characterized the average /pol/ thread. The difference between how a natsoc and a libertarian would conduct themselves should be massive.
>>552340
I'm not that guy, but I have been here since not too long after the start of /pol/ (as it currently is) and I have no idea why breed was a meme. I just ignored it.
>>552340
EVER HEAR, TOASTING IN AN EPIC BREAD?
DO YOU KNOW WHY THEY USED PICTURES OF BREAD?
plz no ban
>>552343
>Because the defintion or context in which someone should be called a /pol/ack is varied, it may as well be up to individual discretion.
See >>552339
It's an anonymous imageboard you fucking redditor, nobody gives a shit about your in-group definition of a "real /pol/tard"
The damage control from you using 'no true scotsman' as an argument is hilarious.
>>552344
I am the dude that has been arguing on your side this whole time. Not sure why you replied to me.
As much as it hurts, I'm going to use a name to avoid this happening.
>>552346
> you found the disaffected users of Reddit who were mad that they were surrounded by left-wing college students,
oh man, we did? But wait a second, if they were so disaffected why were they there in the first place? Why didn't they just go to 4chan already? I don't ever remember telling someone about my secret internet hideout
>>552350
I agree with that post you linked. You definition of /pol/ack might not include me. There isn't a united definition. You are strawmaning me.
>>552351
Looks like I quoted the wrong post friend
>>552348
>I have no idea why breed was a meme. I just ignored it.
probably a good idea
>>552353
The post I linked is meant to be a fallacious argument.
If someone browses /pol/ and considers themselves a /pol/tard, then for all intents and purposes they are a /pol/tard.
There isn't a membership criterion and saying 'no true /pol/ack would browse reddit' is just No True Scotsman deflecting from the fact that /pol/ has a large population of redditors.
>>552352
Because they were part of the new, activism-addicted, "politically active" cocksucking internet generation that gravitates towards the new and shiny, and found that their first stop on the internet, Reddit, did not deliver the environment they would have liked. Or maybe they used Reddit to discuss their hobbies, before deciding that they didn't like the prevailing political atmosphere. Who knows? Ask your Reddit friends, maybe they'll tell you.
>>552348
The average /pol/ thread is characterized by people of various kinds agreeing that liberalism is ruining society over and over again.
>>552357
Yes, we have a lot of redditors. I am only arguing that they aren't a majority.
>>552358
>The average /pol/ thread is characterized by people of various kinds agreeing that liberalism is ruining society over and over again.
The average /pol/ thread is closer to bait and spam.
And this simply isn't the case. The variety of topics to far too broad for this to be true. And even if this was the case, the daily reminder of one of the defining factors of our generation ins't a problem.
>>552305
CMON MR 2005 OLDFAG
THE BREAD.
WHY DID THEY POST IT?
>>552311
>you sure do use a lot of logical fallacies.
And our disdain for plebbit runs deep on this website. In stead of saying, 'no true /pol/ster' I should have said 'no true oldfag' would use plebbit. But you sperged out on /pol/ like the retard you are.
I have another little question for you, dipshit. What was the arch-nemesis of 4chan before plebbit?
The spamming has begun again, they raid for free.
>>552367
>And even if this was the case, the daily reminder of one of the defining factors of our generation ins't a problem.
I am not arguing that they are wrong, per se. I am arguing that >>552348 is wrong when he claims that there isn't an overarching, closely unified set of political positions that characterize the majority of /pol/, who spend most of their time agreeing with each other about certain things, such as liberalism ruining everything. There is a unified front.
The unified front becomes even more apparent when /pol/ leaks out of other boards and attempts to assert its dominance over the rest of 4chan by claiming the entire opposition consists of reddit SJW nu-male beta-cucks, as multiple people have done so in this thread.
>>552369
pic related
>>552371
>The unified front becomes even more apparent when /pol/ leaks out of other boards and attempts to assert its dominance over the rest of 4chan by claiming the entire opposition consists of reddit SJW nu-male beta-cucks, as multiple people have done so in this thread.
Who else would have a problem with the positions of /pol/? Only newfags and leftists.
You fuckin no-bread-knowing newfag
>>552373
I could not have illustrated my point better if I tried.
>>552368
>he thinks memes he looks up on ED proves he isn't a newfag from reddit
hello /pol/
>>552373
>Who else would have a problem with the positions of /pol/? Only newfags and leftists.
Or people who don't like having threads about video games or movies spammed by proselytizing /pol/niggers screaming incessantly about LE SJW KEK BETA NU-MALE REBBITORS
>>552377
I've seen you spam that image a few times, I can assure you it doesn't have the effect or influence you think it does
>>552382
>s-stop posting that picture, it doesn't c-convince anybody
kek, /pol/ going full damage control
>>552376
Then what was the purpose of posting bread?
Tell me
I don't think they would publish the truth on ED
>>552374
>I could not have illustrated my point better if I tried.
What point is that, you fucking retard? Certainly not the part where you said, 'majority of /pol/, who spend the most of their time agreeing with one another''; this is patently not correct. We fight over all kinds of shit, constantly.
But if we agree on one thing, it's that 'progressives' are pure cancer. But you can't even say we all feel that way, we have progressives come in all the time and spout their bullshit, but we crush them one way or another.
Maybe you don't see what's going on. Maybe you fail to notice the crushing oppression of the Left, in education, media and on the internet. We only have a couple places where we can express our views, freely. 4/pol/ is one of those places, and many of us have been here for many years. We're going to fight anyone who tries to take it from us. The last faggot who tried was the owner and founder of this website, and we won.
We will fight and fight again.
And we will come to dominate more than anonymous imageboards.
>>552377
>LE SJW KEK BETA NU-MALE REBBITORS
Again, how do you know it was /pol/? Maybe that sentiment was being expressed by another old /b/tard? That was my original board. I just moved to /pol/ because /b/ got taken over by newfags
>>552387
more proof that /pol/ is the new /b/ and deserves every ounce of spam it gets
ITT: /pol/ getting utterly BTFO
>>552393
Haha no its the complete opposite, faggots getting btfo left right and centre
>>552395
>faggots getting btfo left right and centre
Yeah, that's what he said: /pol/ getting btfo
>>552377
And another thing about the false equivalence when comparing 'stormfaggots' and furries: Furries never really posted their shit in every thread on /b/. They kept it to their own threads.
Again, you newfag got it backwards. It was people you hated the furfags that would go in their threads and harrass them.
Kinda like you assholes do to us on /pol/. You don't seek rational discourse with us. You just troll us and fuck up our board with bullshit.
You are the persecutors, and it's because you can't stand anyone with a different opinion to yourself.
You have become the real fascists
>>552387
>What point is that, you fucking retard?
If you follow the conversation, it's that there are certain arguments you see that are made exclusively by /pol/acks which you can see coming a mile off, and that most /pol/acks are pretty much copies of yourself in terms of their attitude vis a vis the rest of 4chan.
>We fight over all kinds of shit, constantly.
The socialists fought among themselves and shot each other all the time but they still made a united front.
>The last faggot who tried was the owner and founder of this website, and we won.
It is true, you did win. But only because that last faggot who tried was a fucking coward who would not stand up for the site he created, content to let retards and newfags proliferate and destroy existing communities.
>>552394
That has no relevance to the conversation because nobody tells me to "go back to /pol/" all I see is queers crying on qa about a problem that doesn't exist because they get triggered by memes
>>552397
Furries never belonged on 4chan, just like /pol/ doesn't belong here either.
Thanks for arguing my point for me, faggot
>You have become the real fascists
BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Cry more faggot, nobody wants you here except other /pol/tards.
>>552396
You are mentally ill and have no reading comprehension as you're little brigade has been told so hard it's backed into a corner and forced to be "le funny trollz u mad?"
>>552403
>you're little brigade
:^)
typical /pol/tard
in b4 i was just pretending to be retarded ecks dee
>>552402
Nobody wants you here because all you do is complain, stop loudly proclaiming you are an oldfag because nobody believes you.
>>552404
why would i go to /pol/ when my presence here is triggering weak little poofs like you?
>>552397
You say it's a false equivalence, but then you go on to say you're exactly like the furries in that
>you just come onto our board to fersecute us!
/pol/ really is stupid huh?
>>552404
Not an argument
>>552405
But we haven't been retarded.
You have.
Your entire argument has been 'I DON"T LIKE YOU SO THE RULES DONT APPLY TO YOUR BOARD'
YOURE A FUCKING FASCIST LIKE EVERY OTHER LEFTIST
AND THIS IS WHY THERE IS GOING TO BE VIOLENCE SOON
>>552410
>Spamming rule breaking and /b/-tier shit outside of /trash/ and /b/ is "persecuting"
False equivalence, fuck off cockmongler.
>>552412
>AND THIS IS WHY THERE IS GOING TO BE VIOLENCE SOON
A post on an anonymous imageboard triggered you so hard you're going to make threats?
Jeez, /pol/ really is full of sensitive crybabies.
>>552410
>you go on to say you're exactly like the furries in that
>>you just come onto our board to fersecute us!
>/pol/ really is stupid huh?
No, you are. This is like me justifying smashing a leftists head in because it reminds of a pumpkin, and boy, I sure do love smashing pumpkins.
>>552413
You say you're not like the furfags, but then you go on to draw direct comparisons between /pol/ and furfags
>You guys went into furfag threads and made fun of them and spammed gore!!
>Just like you go into our board to troll us with cuckporn and spam! WAAAAH
and you say it's a false equivalence? Learn what those fancy-sounding words mean before you start throwing them around.
>>552412
>YOURE A FUCKING FASCIST LIKE EVERY OTHER LEFTIST
What's wrong with that? Doesn't /pol/ think that fascism is the ideal form of government?
/qa/ offsite queers always get ultimately buttblasted and resort to pathetic trolling attempts every time they don't realise we have been dealing with this sorts of tactics for years already and it always fails just like their personal lives.
>>552419
Ebin, are you going to continue with your false equivalence? They are breaking the rules by posting that shit on /pol/ and they shouldn't fucking do it yet the mods don't.
Furfags are on fucking /b/ where nothing matters nor anything close to resembling "intelligent discussion" happens are completely fucking vulnerable by choice, they have no rules against that shit there, if they want to cry about it so much then they can go to /qa/ and whine until they get a board of their own so they can take their cancer there.
Are you going to continue your trolling attempt or are you going to offer something new?
>>552421
says the faggot with 4MB conspiracy theory infographs saved to his harddrive. Yeah, I bet you're the paragon of success, kek.
>>552420
Not all of us, its one of the things we discuss on /pol/ which is a board for talking about news and politics when it isn't being spammed by cuck porn you are welcome to join of you wish :)
Also in case the SRS shills are going to continue their retardation: There are actual bait thread all over the place, there was a leaf on /int/ that was legit making bait cancer and fishing for replies with "X is degenerate" threads, i decided to fuck his shit for being a faggot and he got assblasted, just enforce the god damn rules and you could filter out more of the cancer.
>>552425
Epic meme my friend xDDddd
>>552423
>keeps spamming 'le false equivalence' when he was the one who compared /pol/ being spammed to fursecution
>trying to pretend like he didn't originally compare himself to furfags
keep digging lmao
>>552425
Guaranteed to be more than you, its a pretty safe gamble to make with leftists because they are often depressed losers.
>>552430
>Post "false equivalence" twice
>Spam
also
>Compare /pol/ to fersecution
I haven't mentioned furries in this entire thread besides the previous post.
>>552377
They don't represent me. Don't let the vocal lot that run around fucking with people be too much of an influence on your perspective. Stand by what I have said, being the person you have responded to twice in that post, and I believe you are subject to confirmation bias, in that your experience with /pol/ is in the form of people shitposting on your board, which is a pass time for only the most zealous.
Don't think that you can't have a civilized debate on /pol/.Don't think you can't have a civilized debate with me.
>>552431
>browsing /pol/ makes me a winner
lel
>>552402
Good thing we make up a massive portion of the cite, moron. Majority rules.
>>552419
typical leftist twisting language around and changing meanings when you see it fit to do so.
/pol/ was compared to furries. on the false premise that furries spammed their shit everywhere. I pointed out that, in fact, they did not.
However, /b/tards who hated them DID spam furry threads with gore, just like you faggots spam cuck porn in /pol/.
So while the comparison may be valid, your initial comparison was wrong. You fucking retard
>>552420
>What's wrong with that?
HAVE YOU NOT READ ANY OF THIS THREAD?
NOT EVERY /POL/STER IS A FASCIST
I, for example, am a ethno-centric technocrat.
And the point is that we are talking about the silencing tactics you assholes constantly engage in, everywhere.
You pretend to be anti-fascist, but you are more 'fascist' than we are.
We actually respect free speech.
You dimwits want to stop it.
>>552420
/POL/ ISN'T ONE PERSON
FOR FUCK SAKE
>>552438
>/pol/ was compared to furries. on the false premise that furries spammed their shit everywhere. I pointed out that, in fact, they did not.
top kek, /pol/ trying to revise history again as usual.
>/pol/ wuz a good board, we dont spam other boars, we didn du nuffin
>>552437
4chan isn't a democracy.
So we all agree that spamming is a waste of time and the guys that frequent /qa/ are dumb faggots that even fucking Hiro can see right through for the pathetic losers that they are.
>>552440
>Crossboarding with some /pol/ack posting off-topic every now and again in a thread is "spamming"
>Compared to confirmed baiting for replies and shit that slides actual threads off the boards in the process and rule breaking threads
>>552436
This is the best strawman image I have ever scene.
>>552438
>Technocrat
Come on, there has already been enough memes in this thread. Hitler wouldn't have been a leader in a technocratic society. Plus commie apologetics is required to justify the immorality of technocracy. Government should be by the people, otherwise what's the point?
>>552441
For the sake of ad revenue it may as well be.
>>552442
Isn't it already established that a lot of them are from SRS?
Whenever i go into /v/ and other blue boards they don't get so gigantically assblasted about anything /pol/ that might come up.
>>552444
>le strawman
nope, it's 100% reflective of actual /pol/ positions
Why do /pol/cucks get so upset when you point out how dumb their board is?
>>552440
We don't spam other boards that's a thing spread on /qa/ by the morons that post here and make all those shitty memes
>>552446
Hiro has already stated he doesn't care about ad revenue, only what makes 4chan interesting.
Reddit-tier political activism and Trump fellating isn't interesting.
>>552447
>a lot of them are from SRS
keep telling yourself that faggot, keep believing that actual 4channers don't find you insufferable
in b4 more circlejerking with your faggot /pol/nigger buddies
>>552447
Pretty much but there are some frequent posters mixed in too, some also frequent s4s that are underage
>>552452
Yes, I'm sure that reality TV stars who spout oversimplified mantras like "build wall" are interesting to people with double digit IQs. It's expected that you find that kind of thing fresh and exciting, you browse /pol/ after all.
>>552444
>Government should be by the people, otherwise what's the point?
This is actually the point of a pure technocracy, that the elements of civilization should be managed in an empirical manner by experts in related fields. I.E. biologists manage agriculture, physicists and engineers manage various infrastructures, etc. This is for the people, but not by the people.
'Democracy' is obviously a failure in that cost-efficiency is held above design efficiency due to scarcity having value, and morons get elected to positions of power.
I think that experts should be compelled to serve the people, out of duty.
But this is a good side conversation, because it's a perfect example of how /pol/acks never agree on anything
>>552449
/pol/ isn't one person. It is a strawman simplifying our arguments as if they are all cohesive and coexisting. This isn't even a paradoy of the natsoc people. We are self inclined to form the perfect ideology. We accept all new information and try to work it in. Why defend and ideology when you know it's wrong? /pol/ wants to be right. We want to be correct about everything. It is an ever shifting cycle of ideology and though. The constantly evolving social web of philosophy. It isn't efficient or necessarily functional, but you simply can't attack it as a whole without building a shitty strawman. If you take issue with natsoc, which it seems you do judging by the picture, debate me on it. We don't like baseless bullshit, and have spent years fighting it. We are utterly immune.
>>552458
>We want to be correct about everything
lmao you are cringe as fuck
>>552456
>Literally just watches the meme videos made by reddit
>no idea what Trump actually stands for
Lurk you left leaning parasite.
>>552457
I agree that matters of empiricism should be done by empiricists, however a true leader should be selected by the people, because who knows who can lead the people other than the people?
>>552456
>I'm sure that reality TV stars who spout oversimplified mantras like "build wall" are interesting to people with double digit IQs
More adhom.
I'm sure that a wizzened old crook like Shillary is interesting to you because she just exploits and lies to her constituency out of pure avarice and malevolence like you lie and try to steal power from men just because they are white and had ancestors that conquered the fucking world.
Good thing she's so anti-racist, like you.
Oh wait, here is a picture of her in the 70's
>>552464
>I've visited many boards here and i've lurked a lot too for the last 5 years.
This is what your average /pol/tard means when he says "oldfag"
>>552467
>he thinks i'm a leftist
oh man the binary thinking from the 95-IQ /pol/tards is hilarious
Keep reaching, kek.
>>552468
Not an argument, SRS.
>>552471
But you don't deny that you came here after 2010 and you browse /pol/ regularly?
>>552470
Nope you are super clever epic troll XD keep meming brother lollz
>>552463
Not an argument.
This capcha tho.
>Please select all the images with street signs
>shows the left rear light of a care from a birds eye view
>>552468
It's the guy who pretends to be an oldfag again lol
>>552465
>who knows who can lead the people other than the people?
I would say that most people are too stupid to even know what their best interests are. Most people in the west seem to obsessed with comfort and power over other people, therefore, they will elect whomever provides those 2 things to them.
We, as a species, need not a single leader, but a consortium of leaders that are equipped with objectivity and intelligence in direct, converse ratios to the general public, if we are ever to survive as a species.
>>552470
>the binary thinking from the 95-IQ /pol/tards is hilarious
Keep insulting my intelligence, you fucking tool.
It's not helping you
>Make thread
>Go to bed
>Wake up
> >500 posts
The fuck??
>>552472
I have lurked the internet since way before goybook and other normie cancer, i've browsed 4chan since 2006 but i mostly held myself to a few separate boards.
I'm referring to the "now" here, with /pol/ getting increasingly popular.
You still have not represented an argument for not enforcing the "No /b/-tier shit and cancer" rules but keep searching.
It's funny because for all their impotent trump-worshipping rage, I've yet to see a /pol/tard who can accurately ascertain my political position based on my insulting of them.
It's almost as if it's not just leftists who can't stand neo-/pol/!
>>552477
>It's the guy who pretends to be an oldfag again lol
No, that was me, and no one has been able to tell me why bread was posted on /b/
>>552482
You are probably likely some somebody who supports Bernie or a Libertarian candidate or your are "neutral" for the sake of being neutral, you are also an anti-feminist and anti-theist.
Doesn't matter anyway, you are just Anonymous to me.
>>552478
You make a good argument. As an end game, technocracy, under a rigid constitution with effective checks and balances, might well be the way to go. It sits along with communism and anarchy capitalism and the end of the line, final stage Utopian society the way I see it.
To get us to that stage, however, I think national socialism is necessary, at least until we arrive at traditionalism, and from that platform to empiricism.
>>552481
I don't need an argument when it's obvious that the current mods don't really give a fuck if your board is littered with /b/-tier posts.
Their silence is evidence enough that they're complicit in keeping /pol/ as a containment board for pseudo-activist faggots who won't shut the fuck up about SJWs.
If anyone complains about rampant shitposting and cancer in /pol/, the natural response is "how can you tell?"
>>552488
We don't even talk about SJW's that much. We aren't Sargon of Akkad you fucking idiot. You've probably never browsed have you?
At least someone is talking about these issues that will probably end up fucking with you, assuming you are a white man. Useless fucking idiot.
>>552488
Yes, you need an argument.
You have probably not went to /pol/ for a long amount of time because you cannot tell serious discussion from /b/-tier cancer and slide threads.
>>552493
>we don't even talk about SJW's much on /pol/
>>552486
>might well be the way to go. It sits along with communism and anarchy capitalism and the end of the line, final stage Utopian society the way I see it.
I believe that we need it even sooner, as it would be the most effective system with which to throw off the shackles of (((Goldstein's))) fiat currency system which he enslaves us all.
In a pure technocracy, energy is used as 'currency'. There could be many interpretations of how to use energy as 'currency', and maybe the way that Technocracy Inc envisions it wouldn't be the best way.....I sort think that some kind of 'capitalism 2.0' would be the catalyst to a true post-scarcity society.
That and getting rid of various undesirables. You know what I'm saying here
>>552447
/v/ is a garbage heap.
>>552495
And there goes the post.
>>552502
Take your autist circlejerk to >>>/9gag/ and >>>/reddit/
How the fuck did this get so many comments?
OP called for backup because mean ol' /qa/ was bullying him, didn't he?
>>552505
it's just shitflinging at this point.
SRS are also deleting their posts out of seething hatred.
Are you angry that some people may not agree with you?
Are you angry you can't have your "delete /pol/" circlejerk?
>>552502
We're getting a sample of the high-quality, intelligent, next-level posting that /pol/ is capable of.
I can feel myself wanting to browse the board already.
>>552496
We more talk about far left people that are beyond that.
>>552500
Yeah, I get what you iz sayin. I just don't think it can be effectively implemented without stability beforehand. The people need to become nationalistic and proud, moved to put the nation above themselves. The people need to be strong for the country to be strong. Total reforms and a stable starting point will be built on bones.
Who would decide on social issues in this system? Who would motivate the people into action? These are not matters of empiricism, so who is qualified? Would this be the place for a leader selected by the people to rule them?
>>552509
>I can feel myself wanting to browse the board already.
Don't lie nigga, you've browsed it for years lmao
>>551856
Why are the names always redacted in these?
>This we also have an Aussie and Kiwi who post Blacked
Daily Reminder: Australia is lousy with jews.
>>551865
This. Starting with /lit/.
>>551879
>>551882
This. Don't flag actual discussion as spam. Just the shit that's porn, "Really makes you think", "/pol/ BTFO" and all the other stupid bait shit that's posted (typically by an australian) and then OP never replies again in thread.
>>552511
I was being sarcastic.
>>552513
Gee who would have thought??????
>>552502
>Debate on politics
>Necessitating disagreement
>Circlejerk
>Buzzwords
>Buzzwords
Buzzwords
>>552514
only the finest minds of our generation
>>552515
>debate on politics
>implying that's a debate
Those two faggots are literally patting eachother on the back for having "such great ideas about technocracy and the future of national socialism"
>>552519
If only people weren't so dumb and selfish, and everybody listened to smart and selfless heroes, society would be so much better.
Why can't everyone see how obvious this is?
>>552512
>typically by an Australian
When an Australian shitposts, everyone has a good time. Our problem is leafs, spics, brits, brazilians, and the odd NZ poster.
>>552510
>The people need to become nationalistic and proud, moved to put the nation above themselves. The people need to be strong for the country to be strong. Total reforms and a stable starting point will be built on bones.
I agree with the first part, as a truly Technocratic society would have to be highly nationalistic.
But I think that it's critical that we utilize the existing infrastructure as much as possible.
There exists in North America right now an infrastructure that could be utilized to create post-scarcity.
All that is required is to depose the assholes who exploit the system to their advantage and replace them with people who are motivated by the advancement of their people and nation, and not the type of lust for power that you see in assholes like Trump or Hillary or Soros. This is why they should be selected against their will and driven by duty to lead in their prospective fields.
>>552519
I'm feeling out his position first. I think it is a viable end game, and he thinks it must be hurried.I am a national socialist, and he is a technocrat.
I'd consider myself a romantic, and he considers himself an empiricist.
This is real debate, you fucking child. It isn't caps and insults. Two reasonable people are bound to find lots of common ground.
>>552521
Because they are stupid and ignorant sheep-people, doomed to be swept away and forgotten, remembered only as dim brutes when intelligent people such as ourselves rule the world.
Let us stop and pity their primitive existences, busy as they are with pretty trifles, not knowing that they stand on the precipice of a new world.
>>552521
Agreed, we have the best minds we could gather on the politics section of a Cambodian Fly-Fishing BBS
If only those fucking SJW libcuck kikes would listen to our ideas about society, then we could move forward and finally make progress.
>>551899
This is the same bullshit argument that was used against IDs by Australians. Most proxies are blocked by 4chan already.
>>551903
>/pol/ isn't reserved solely for right wing politics
Noone is claiming it is. But you know that.
>Plenty of 'spam and cancer' on /pol/ is simply individuals independently shitposting single topics
And plenty of spam and cancer on /pol/ ARE FUCKING SPAM AND CANCER.
>>551904
Don't forget that the shitposting always begins in earnest around 9 AM Israeli time. Not even joking.
>>551907
I think every new IP should be directed to the sticky first and have to agree to it before proceeding to the board. That way if you use the same IP and just post, you're good except for one time, but if you're proxying up and just being cancer and getting banned thirty times a day, you're going to have to go through this every time.
>natsoc
The /pol/ NatSoc thing is mostly a myth that I really, really wish were true. Most of /pol/ are rabid capitalists.
>>551910
Don't pay for 4chan. And write the administration a letter telling them you're not and why you're not.
>>551912
It would.
>>552522
Nah mate, you're fucking cancer and always have been. Leafs are just far worse.
>>552529
I think most of /pol/ is capitalists if they can't find a way to go into natsoc really easily.
Most of them like total free speech and what it gives but want more nationalism in the whole thing at least. There are no "major" misunderstandings and they wouldn't have many problems adopting natsoc if it were an option.
>>552523
I simply don't see how selecting people against their will can make anything good happen. A nationalist by necessity loves his country. If the country abuses him, the nationalist dies, and we are left with a radical reformist. The people must be moved emotional. Romanticism and passion surely are not ignored as if they have no real effect in this hypothetical technocracy correct?
People are made into nationlists. You aren't born one. This is the main allure of fascism. It is the people forming together. Rather than being flimsy and weak, they form a fist.
Ethnic and social cleansing is a necessity, but under what criterion shall come members be killed? Secondly, what society would allow this? Without the idea of racial unity, what can come of it? People are emotional, and they will respond to a romantic. This is why fascism could lead into a technocratic society. It is important, however, to keep the people enchanted. If the people aren't happy to serve you, then why would you make them?
>>552531
Australians are the master race in every objective sense. Some redpills are just too hard to swallow.
>>552510
>Who would decide on social issues in this system?
The Technate, the consortium of experts. Of course, I would like to retain the highest degree of personal liberty possible. I'm not exactly sure how that would work out.
>Who would motivate the people into action?
Who, or what? As for the former, I would say that the personal heroes of individual people would be a motivating factor. And as for the latter, I imagine a world in which competition is worshiped on a Hellenic level. That personal greatness and contribution to society would be the highest aim, as opposed to the mindless self-indulgence you find in this society.
>These are not matters of empiricism, so who is qualified?
Whomever is excellent and accomplished in their prospective fields.
>Would this be the place for a leader selected by the people to rule them?
I think that anytime a single ruler gains anything approaching absolute power he becomes absolutely corrupted. But there should, I think, be various checks and balances that ensure that the right official makes the decisions in a certain area, and that they have checks and balances to their power.
I am not an expert in this political philosophy, if you can call it that, but it does interest me.
I'm mostly content to think of myself as a white nationalist with technocratic/post-scarcity ideals.
>>551918
You morons keep casting far too wide of a net. Not everything you disagree with is cancer or spam. In that image, the porn is, the ">Germans >Germ" is, the hotpockets thing is totally justified at this point, as is the spam report thread, the country's greatest achievement belongs on /int/, not /pol/, and that's it.
>>551924
The issue is we NEED prevention, rather than cleanup. These retarded raiding faggot shitspammers need to be spam blocked before they can even post. It wouldn't take long. Add a few words to the spam filter. The mods sure have no problem adding reddit to it in some esoteric combination (I'm not exactly sure what triggers it at this point). BLOCK SHITPOSTS BEFORE THEY GET POSTED. MAKE REPORTING IRRELEVANT.
>>551929
Actually threads are deleted from /pol/ every day for no obvious good reason. /pol/ threads are deleted regularly just because someone disagreed with them and reported them, not because they break board rules.
>>551932
We already know they are. /q/ and /qa/ have always been filled with the same jewish sluts who are running the shitspam campaigns.
>>551935
Because they literally believe that free speech is wrong and bad.
>>552538
Yeah. Not offence but I can tell you haven't really expanded on it much. Not tacking a jab though. Most of my shit has been set out for me by based Htilerfu.
The things I'd change are the social issues thing., I don't think anyone can be "qualified" to lead people. There is a charisma to it. I don't see why this technocratic government can't have a head. Of course the empiricists would do their jobs unimpeded, but the leader would decide in what direction social evolution should head.
That sense of pride and competition would be absolutely perfect in both fascist and technocratic respects. It will simply create better individuals. Better fighters, better scientists, better leaders.
All in all it seems theoretically feasible if not for the lack of polished details.
>>552533
No. Most of /pol/ are RAGING capitalists who loathe socialism, then claim Hitler was a corporatocrat.
>they wouldn't have many problems adopting natsoc if it were an option.
Yes they would, because the cancerous anglosphere has been propagandized to since WWII to hate Socialism. They just keep trying to warp history to make Hitler and the Nazis raging American capitalist christian theocrats like their backwater Bible Belt selves, when they absolutely were not. The actual Nazis vehemently disagreed with the untermenschen flood of modern WNs on many important issues, such as socialized medicine and environmentalism.
>>552536
No, Australia is a convict island full of jews. The number of kikes who post from Australia is truly phenomenal. I'd say it's more than any other country. Even America can't compete with it.
>>552535
>Romanticism and passion surely are not ignored as if they have no real effect in this hypothetical technocracy correct?
I think that it's important to maintain our humanity, and this is one thing that could be endangered by a science-based society. This is where the humanities come in. I believe that art is just as important as science, and in a truly advanced civilization both will have equal value.
>I simply don't see how selecting people against their will can make anything good happen
I think that it's a good idea in the sense of: do you really trust people who wish to hold power? I don't. I believe that in an ideal society individuals of high accomplishment will feel a duty to their nation, and instead of competing for power, they are awarded it by some kind of council. They would be compelled to serve out of duty.
>People are made into nationlists. You aren't born one.
I think that loyalty to your nation is as natural as loyalty to your family. A nation is just an extension of your family anyway. It is important, if you desire health, to form something like a single unit, a fist, as you said.
> Without the idea of racial unity, what can come of it?
I agree with this, and I think that the discord caused by 'multiculturalism' is a major barrier to unity. People love to hate each other, and will find any excuse to do so. It's easier to do that along ethnic lines.
I don't think that anyone is really happy being subjected to violent subhuman savages. But that is, perhaps the point of what we are experiencing in the West. And it's what we must reverse if we don't want to slide back into the dark ages.
>>552546
>The number of kikes who post from Australia is truly phenomenal
Canadian subversion intensifies. I've never legitimately scene a full on shill form Australia. Where is the fun in shilling? No one would hire us anyway, we are only good at chaos magic, not Hillary's reptilian sorcery.
Funny how our convict island managed to brew the master race though. It's like when you mix cherry tomatoes with white mushrooms, fry them in their own juice, and add salt, and you get something 1000000 times better than the components combined. British small time criminal+harsh and rugged climate+laid back and pragmatic culture+big fucking spooders= master race. It's just math mate.
>>552539
>You morons keep casting far too wide of a net.
I think that we're just asking for the porn and the obvious bait/troll cancer threads to be removed. Mostly just the porn and the /POL/ BTFO type cancer.
>>551937
>If there is any consolation, it is the fact that they have been unable (thus far) to buy their way into attaining mod powers.
With how lazy and worthless the mods are, they don't really have to.
In fact, the changes that it would take to put in place are so simple and so effective, I would bet real money that Hiro is actually getting paid to allow /pol/ to remain a cesspool of no moderation whatsoever, including enforcing board rules.
>>551941
>Hurr I thought /pol/ was a shitflining free-for-all with no rules or moderation that I could raid 24/7
>Problem, Naziboos?
BOARD. RULES. FAGGOT.
>>551950
Flags are necessary because Australia and Canada still exist. Sorry.
>>551960
Like this guy said, collateral damage, but necessary.
>>551964
You are the proof, retardcunt.
>>552556
It's really fucking late right now so I'm going to head of to bed after washing this namefag off.
I do feel like I owe some counter points however.
Art, especially cultural art, must be preserved. Without it an other creative pleasures I don't think we can be fully happy.
It's true that people who want power are more likely to always want more, but they are also the charismatic leaders a nation needs. Once the country is woken up by one such leader, however, people can be selected in the manner you described. Joining a scientific field that might have you selected by the technocracy could be institutionalized in a way similar to the military, in that your subservience is agreed upon. Volunteerism is always good, until it's not.
If you a born in a nation that is cruel to it's people, you will likely be brought up to hate, or at least disagree with it. I doubt you could truly love it. Sure, you might support it, but what say you when you witness greener pastures? Is a better life worth throwing away ties to a cruel and tyrannical country? Depends on the person I guess.
Nothing wrong with that last point. You don't have to be a member of a right wing death squad to want savages out of your country. Plus technocracy and natsoc alike seek to breed good stock.
>>551967
>Funnily I remember seeing one Israeli reminisce about false flagging as a muslim once
Noone used to believe muslim false flagging on /pol/. Only nu/pol/ is so stupid it believes whatever it's told.
>>551969
It probably is. Paid shills have always been an actual component of /pol/.
>>551972
This is blatant falsehood. At any given time there are like 30+ Trump threads.
>>551973
>Fine let's make these exact bait threads in every other board and see how long those ones stay up for.
It's about to happen. If the other boards don't stop their bullshit, they're about to feel what it's really like to be spammed. Starting with /lit/.
>>551981
You're the whiny bitches complaining that there is a site with free speech on the internet and the whole world hasn't become your own marxist safe space, you ugly cunt.
>>551978
Blue boards are the containment boards. Nothing of value happens in them. They're full of more bile and shitposting than any yellow board.
>nobody cares if the rules of /pol/ get violated because /pol/ is a cesspool.
You're about to. Because after /lit/, leftwing reddit subs are going to be targeted. And you know damn well we're much bigger than you.
>>551981
See above.
>>552110
I don't browse a single other board. Most of the people on this site are insufferable faggots, like yourself. I get information about news and politics from /pol/, and it has the best shitposting, banter, and memes. That you think my not wanting to see perverse porno on a board where no porno is allowed is proof of your bias and lack of objectivity, and, perhaps even your lack of sound mind.
Yeah I've been banned a few times. Short bans that I accepted and tried to not make the same mistake again.
You seem very sensitive to this and it's pretty weird.
>>552574
>You're about to. Because after /lit/, leftwing reddit subs are going to be targeted. And you know damn well we're much bigger than you.
Excellent. Go back to the website where you came from and wage your shitty little war over there. If we're lucky, the raiding would give 4chan an excuse to delete /pol/ once and for all. Only good things can come from this.
>>552671
You do realise deleting /pol/ will do more harm than good, right? They don't just up and disappear.
>>552694
They'd stuck around and shit up the board for a month or twelve, but eventually they would find a new place to live, get bored of shitting up 4chan, and the term "4chan" itself would just become one more entry in a long list of places where they used to post before being thrown out.
>>551381
>reddit is spam filtered
>there are direct links to reddit on a dozen board OPs
really makes you think
>>552574
Did /lit/ call you a pleb or something
>>552720
It does, doesn't it?
>>552720
>there are direct links to reddit on a dozen board
>>552713
>They'd stuck around and shit up the board for a month or twelve, but eventually they would find a new place to live, get bored of shitting up 4chan, and the term "4chan" itself would just become one more entry in a long list of places where they used to post before being thrown out.
You're not going to get rid of us, you autistic newfag plebbiter.
Moot tried. Even Imkamphy and other faggots over at crip chan tried to get rid of some of us there. It doesn't work. No matter what you try to do, we just keep on redpilling normies and getting stronger.
You really should just stop posting, because you have been completely destroyed in this thread and humiliated beyond recovery.
>>552713
You just don't get it. We don't disappear. We replicate. The world is getting too fucked and far too many people are noticing. We're showing them why and giving them ideas about what to do about it. We're providing a very in-demand service. You're not. People are seriously tired of marxism being shoved down their throats and most Whites are at or approaching jew and negro fatigue.
>>552720
I don't know why but it seems semi-random. I just got spam blocked yesterday for mentioning reddit, but I tried to mention reddit again and didn't get blocked. I'm not sure how it works or if it's off and on randomly or what.
>>552725
No, they're just one of the most leftwing boards on the site and one of the boards that bitch about /pol/ the most. They have a hair trigger for anyone mentioning anything true and scream "GO BACK TO /POL/!!" if anyone so much as mentions they disagree with turning 3 year olds into trannies.
>>551511
Well then I guess I know who's spamming these threads on pol now eh?
>>551860
They problem is these tumblcucks don't even know they're doing it. Civilization has moved so far left that any alternative viewpoint is indistinguishable from spam to them. It's the same shit that's happening on Facebook.
>>>/pol/76190714
>>553284
cry harder
>>553303
Die in greater numbers.
>>553308
Why fo you support White genocide?
