American site owned by a nip. We're safe for the time being.
Yuros gonna yuro

I agree ban Europeans to protect them from 4chan.

>>551104
Fuck off you piece of shit.

>>551104
Look at all of them white women, why are they the most easily triggered group of people on the internet

The whole world is honestly batshit insane.

Not only is crap like this actually just very childish, but if my time on 4chan (older 4chan, modern one is full of crybabies that can't ignore anything) has shown me anything, it's that you don't get past things by making rules for them or starting witch hunts. You get past them by ignoring them, anything else just validates its power.

>You will not post any of the following outside of /b/: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases, macro image replies, indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?"), anthropomorphic ("furry") or grotesque ("guro") images, post number GETs ("dubs"), or loli/shota pornography.
>racism

Thank you, come again.

4chan doesn't need to, because it doesn't have a registered company or brand in Europe. Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc. do in order to service the local language versions of their sites. If they don't comply with these EU regulations, they stand to lose a lot of money in funds.

>>551241
in fines* not funds
Goddamn I need to pay more attention

>>551241
For now at least. Google and Facebook are already more powerful than a few of the members of the EU.
I'm not saying this is a good thing, of course.

Fucking no, go back to tumblr, nigger.

>>551219
This is the famous "I don't have a real reason to ban you" rule.

>>551104
as a robot I am inclined to say I don't give a shit if roasties get offended, if words on a screen hurt you that bad you need to look at yourself and your own insecurities.

terrible choice of image op

>>551104

4chan isnt a social network.

>>551104
It's called hate speech because people who use the term hate speech.