why are the mods on /v/ so harsh? is it a board about video games or fuckin bio enginering with atom bombs
>>542744
>BLACK LIVES MATTER
>HE DINDU NOTHING
>>542744
>All images
Checkmate frogposter
It was one of the boards with one of the most vibrant cultures so jewt had to put a stop to it. All the former best boards have the worst mods
>>542787
dumb frogposters don't know how to read
we really really need to delete /pol/
>>542744
Pepe isn't vidya. sorry.
Also, Pepe is an Anthro so he's a violation of rule 3.
>>542744
>frogposting
You deserved it. Now fuck off.
If you were a mod for a place like /v/, you'd find any excuse to cull idiots off of the abnormally massive and largely horrible population. Now wait out your goddamn ban or reset your router like everyone else.
>>542860
report for avoiding bans
Cancerous frogposting aside, that post was just plain terrible. Learn to contribute better content and you won't get banned.
>>542822
Nice false flag, /pol/
>>542744
I'm glad.
I was the one that reported you too.
Stay away from /v/ until you lurked enough to make quality posts.
>>542930
I haven't been banned since I left /v/ over a year ago, since I'm not a dumb frogposter.
You, on the other hand, just announced your report.
>>543041
reported anyway for avoiding bans
If it was a post in a thread, that's a little ridiculous. If that was how you opened a thread you made, you deserved it.
>>542744
PFFFT, HAHAHAHAHAHA! KILL YOURSELF, DUMB FROGPOSTER!
>>542744
>frogposter gets banhammered
The mods are doing the work of the saints. Keep it up.
>>543084
You'd be surprised
>>543084
>getting triggered by an image
Mods appealing to autistic faggots like you is the reason why 4chan has been shit for so long.
Thanks for being what is wrong with this site, sperg.
>>543099
You're welcome.
>>543089
This is just another example of cancer
>>543103
consider suicide you faggot for trying to act less trash of human on a anonymous pedohile website
/v/ mods hand out 3-day bans like candy. One time I went to the 4chan bans page, and it was just like two-thirds bans on /v/, all three days.
I surmise three days is the perfect length for them, it's as long as they can give someone without allowing them to challenge their bullshit via appeal.
>>543089
Racism is against the rules.
>>543148
>it's as long as they can give someone without allowing them to challenge their bullshit via appeal.
You say that as if most idiots on /v/ don't deserve it.
>>543099
It's not the image that triggers anyone. It's the cancerous overuse. Go to 9gag/reddit/buzzfeed/tumblr/facebook if you want to spam your cancer.
>>543148
>I surmise three days is the perfect length for them, it's as long as they can give someone without allowing them to challenge their bullshit via appeal.
Yes, mods have always done this with their bans. It allows them to ban people with no consequences. I always wonder why nobody brings this up when complaining about the system.