>>540181
Eh, if we made /vj/, PC games could just go on /v/ proper, because most western games are PC games.

>>540192

4chan is big. We still have the 10 boards from when we started. As the user base expands, we need more boards to handle them all. pc gaming is big enough to support its own board.

"Just put it all in /v/" is NOT the answer.

Retarded idea.

>>540208

Retro games are niche and have their own board.

PC Gaming is way more popular and deserves their own board.

>>>/vg/
No need to make another board.

>>540220

/vg/ is a shitty board that should have never been made.

>>540181
I think there should be a /pc/ general board where games would be okay. It would fix a lot that is wrong with /g/ as well as /v/.

>>540200
Did you even read the post, dipshit? The point is that we need /vj/ first. THEN we'll see if we also need a PC board. Take it one step at a time.

>>540217
The /vr/ split was retarded then, this idea just as retarded now.

Stop splitting /v/. 4chan is not a videogaming website; there shouldn't be 5 or more boards dedicated to it. We get it, "videogame culture" is not homogenous. You gaylords need to sort out your differences or get the mods to ban discussion of "videogame culture" and instead talk about the goddamn video games.

>>540396
>4chan is not a videogaming website
According to whom?

>>540387
/vj/ would be shit.

>>540534
You're shit.

>>540396
>Stop splitting /v/.

When boards get big they get split. You really expect a thousand people to have threads on a 10 page board?

>>540181

>lets make a new general board for games so we can phase out the general board for games that we have already

>>541377

The point is that generals were needed on /v/ since it was so fast and big, so they made a Generals board. The entire point of generals vanishes when yo have a board where you can talk about pc gaming. 3/4 at least of the Generals are pc games.

pc gaming wouldn't have generals.

/pcg/ already exists, its called /v/

>>541384

So PC games get a board, what about the console games being posted on /vg/?
Do they just go to /v/ instead?

A lot of those threads would still be posted constantly and would still exist the same way they did on /vg/.

>>541396

/vg/ would still exist. The plan would be to slowly phase it out over a few years. /pcg/ would just be step one.

>>541403

If /vg/ still existed then people would just keep making the generals there.

This place doesnt need more boards, really.
Splintering kills communities and turns everyone into circlejerking faggots, just look at Reddit.

>>541406

So you want to preserve /vg/, because if we get rid of it, we might have circle jerks?

Do you have any sense of perspective? /vg/ is the biggest hive of circle jerking ever.

>>540181
You can't end console wars by splitting the community. /dsg/ and /bbg/ are proof of this. /v/ has been split enough times and this doesn't need to happen.