People born in setember 12 2001 can post here in 3 years?
>>539300
Without getting banned, yes. Obviously they're already here though.
>>539303
the answer is nothing
>>539313
Pretty much
>>539296
What happens 2 years after that when people who weren't born when 4chan first opened in 2003 can post?
>>539320
Well we could make a rule where anyone born after the 1st of October 2003 is banned from posting. 4chan was made on that day btw.
>>539296
they bump threads
They already post here. The average age of /v/'s userbase is like 15.
We're functionally at that point memory-wise and it's just symbolic. There are people who are 18 now who were 3 when 9/11 happened. They might as well have not been born since they probably sure as fuck don't remember (it or were shown it) and it's already years-past history by the time they're in kindergarten.
Like for example I was born in 87 yet don't remember the fall of the USSR or the Gulf War for shit even though I was alive for them. Actually I do remember seeing war footage clips on TV but not a lot of it. I cared much more about Legos and Ninja Turtles at the time.
A far more disturbing thought to me is 10-20 years in the future, some dipshit highschoolers today will be calling dubstep "classic" i.e "you officially can't knock it anymore because it's old and was influential".
>>539296
Hopefully they lurk more and become decent posters.
Imagine if 4chan had existed when 9/11 had happened. It would have been amazing.
in 2030 people who were born in 2012 will be posting on 4chan. and you too
>>540368
You're here forever.
They already are, you are underestimating how popular 4chan is among the normies
>>539296
Nothing changes. Most of you faggots were underage when you started coming here. 4chan was shit then, it's shit now, and it'll be shit 3 years from now.
>>539296
By then, hopefully people will have stopped using the word shill.
They already are posting here.
>>540094
Don't confuse manchildren with actual children.
Autism is a disease.
>>540174
SA reacted pretty much the same as how 4chan would have, joking about it as it was happening in real time.
They're already here :^)
>>539296
4Chan is truly dead then ;_;
>>539352
No I say after 2000
I highly doubt they're that bad...right?