>>>/co/82633062
>>>/co/82649302
>>>/co/82646273
>>>/co/82646436
>>>/co/82636888
>>>/co/82635247
>>>/co/82649040
>>>/co/82644533
>>>/co/82645506
>>>/co/82590362
>>>/co/82647956
>>>/co/82648121
>>>/co/82637611
>>>/co/82644775
>>>/co/82647473
>>>/co/82647105
>>>/co/82641650
>>>/co/82647281
>>>/co/82647430
Why are so many MCU threads allowed on /co/, but DC threads getting deleted?
Why does criticizing Marvel result in a ban, but criticizing DC is permitted? Should both not be allowed equally?
>>526640
>equally
welcome to 4chan. the mods are obviously marvelfags, and since being a mod isnt an actual job, theres no accountability. so they can fag it up all they want.
>>526648
>the mods are obviously marvelfags
That's true, but wouldn't you think that Hiro would prevent mods from blatantly shitting up the boards they moderate?
I mean, there are expectations for doing a job even if you're not being paid, right? If you volunteer at an orphanage and rape all the orphans you wouldn't think they'd let you come back.
>>526652
>If you volunteer at an orphanage and rape all the orphans
that is nowhere near the same as being a faggot on the internet, but ok.
>>526640
>whhaaa! /co/ won't stop talking about how much BvSs sucked
>stop talking about DC!
>whhaaa! /co/ won't stop talking about Marvel
>start talking about DC!
>>526652
Why else would you work at an orphanage?
>>526657
Live action shit shouldn't be on /co/ in the first place
>>526657
BvS was a huge success commercially, I don't know where anyone is getting the idea that it sucked. You know the critics shat on Watchmen too and that movie was amazing. I don't see 4chan trying to claim THAT was bad.