I'm posting this so that I may try to better understand the reason I had for a ban yesterday. Maybe some Anons here can provide some insight into it. The reason cited for the ban was breaking Global Rule 3.
This was the specific post in question: http://i.imgur.com/e6aFhAN.jpg
And this was the image in said post: http://i.imgur.com/O7hkjXi.jpg (I don't want to risk another ban by making it the image for this thread of course)
Now I can already expect the response that it was a ban for posting anthromorphic (furry), but here's where the question really comes into play. Please refer to the thread where this image was posted.
>>>/vg/141547809
The image itself was just rule 63 of Asriel, a character from the game. The very same game whose general I was posting in. Even the OP of the thread is this character, and it came out unscathed. There are literally dozens of other images that could be constituted as furry in this thread, and a half dozen or so of the very same character I was posting (the rule 63 version).
So what component of this specifically broke Global Rule 3 that these other posts did not? The post wasn't off-topic, as there wasn't really a topic in place to begin with. It wasn't a troll, flame, catch-phrase or macro image, or any other part of GR3. It was a R63 image of a game character, and there were plenty of other images of the very same character R63, so it wasn't that. The only other images in this thread that were deleted were literally porn, and at worst this could only possibly be described as lewd. It's not even the lewdest thing that remains in the thread either. What singled this post out as needing to be banned while all of the others remained to be archived?
>>526115
People like you are the reason the fandom has a bad image. Well and /v/tards being so easiyl triggered and riled up.
>>526117
Please explain - I'm just trying to see the reasoning for the ban. There were plenty of other posts which could have easily fallen under the same rule. What set mine apart?
>>526119
It looks more suggestive than the OP.
It's also entirely possible that it's the only post that got reported.
>>526124
It doesn't really seem to me like it's much more suggestive than a couple of other pictures that are still in the thread.
You bring up a fair point regarding reporting. I imagine other posts were reported too, but if mine was reported more it would bring it to the attention of a janitor. Do their tools only show the post in question? I would hope that they also briefly look over thread in question for context.
Your post was a shitty. You deserve to be banned if you can't contribute.
>>526137
The post I replied to wasn't much different text wise. The only difference was the picture, and there were plenty of other posts in the thread with similar pictures.
>>526139
If you posted in a general you earned it, it killed /v/ along with GG
>>526115
>banned for general trash
Fucking good. Now mods need to ban the rest of your scum and force you faggots off the fucking site for good.
>>526189
It's on /vg/, I don't really see what the issue is. I avoid generals on /v/ as well.
Do you think this is /q/, buddy?
How does it feel being a straight up newfag?
>>526209
I know there are no mods or janitors here. Hence I why I specifically asked for opinions for Anons.
>>526198
What the desu did you just fucking desu about me, you little desu? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my desu in the Navy Desus, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret desus on Al-Desu, and I have over 300 confirmed desus. I am trained in desu warfare and I’m the top desu in the entire US armed desu. You are nothing to me but just another desu. I will desu you the fuck out with desu the likes of which has never been seen before on this desu, mark my fucking desu. You think you can get away with saying that desu to me over the desu? Think again, desu. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of desu across the USA and your desu is being traced right now so you better prepare for the spam, maggot. The spam that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your desu. You’re fucking desu, kid. I can be desu, desu, and I can desu you in over desu ways, and that’s just with my bare desu. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed desu, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Desu and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable desu off the face of the desu, you little desu. If only you could have known what unholy desu your little “desu” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking desu. But you desu, you desu, and now you’re desu, you goddamn desu. I will shit desu all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking desu,kiddo
>>526134
they didn't need to look for context - it violated a rule.
>>526307
Literally dozens of other posts violated the same rule though.
