>>>/pol/73470057
>HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED
classic /pol/sters
>I only come to /pol/ now
yeesh
>>524939
>yeesh
Yikes
>can't post a dumb inoffensive meme
Come on, this is ridiculous. /v/ is modded by some hardcore SJWs it seems.
>>524952
>the rules which have existed for years ACTUALLY GET ENFORCED
>"OH NO SJWS GOD SAVE US"
Why the fuck is this even on /pol/? The thread has nothing to do with politics. If it makes it to the archives without being deleted, /pol/ has shit moderation.
They're 100% right. Modern 4chan is shit, and /v/ has at least 1 or 2 SocJus/feminist mods who get butthurt by anything and everything.
/pol/ is what most closely resembles the old "anything goes" 4chan and even that is going to shit because of newfags and retards like OP who shit up the board.
>>524959
Kill yourself SJW.
>>524983
>retards like OP
Indeed, the OP of the linked thread is quite the retard.
>>524987
No, the OP of this shit thread getting butthurt that boards actually discuss things that are going on on their site.
Fuck off to tumblr.
>>524939
Hello tumblr.
>>524989
Sounds like you're the butthurt OP of the linked thread. Grow up, 4chan isn't your safe space.
>>524948
>yikes
jinkies
>>524991
>tumblr
zoinks
>>524983
Pre gamergate /pol/ was the closest. Now it's just a plethora of spam, /int/ and softcore/cuck porn.
>>524992
>4chan isn't your safe space.
Then why are you fine with random memes like "OY VEY" getting banned? That's a pretty "safe spacey" mentality isn't it?
Why are you literally making a thread on /qa/ to delete criticism of what is going on the site?
>Grow up
Hi tumblr.
>>524926
They're in the wrong, 4chan is changing as a site and they need to realize the 4chan of 2007 cannot exist in a world where there is so much media and political attention on it (/pol/ is one of the forefronts of the alt-right movement that is widening the entire political spectrum in the west, leading to more nationalist and small-government parties emerging across the US and EU).
You are also wrong by demeaning their feelings.
>>525000
Shitposting is against the rules.
>>525000
Why are YOU whining that the site isn't catering directly to you? Don't just parrot the same shit back, retard. It doesn't work.
>>525000
/pol/ is your safespace to make fun of the boogeyman. Outside of /pol/ there may be repercussions for being degenerate.
>>525000
Cry more memeshitter.
>Then why are you fine with random memes like "OY VEY" getting banned?
Shitposting is shitposting and /pol/tards deserve to be poked as much as possible till they get the point that their retardation was never actually welcome here and they belong on reddit more than 4chan.
>>524983
>/pol/ is what most closely resembles the old "anything goes" 4chan
No it's not. Old 4chan was much more diverse and varied in opinions, and if this was old 4chan you would have shitloads of people making memes about how actually retarded most trump supporters are, not having him treated like a sacred cow, and some actual, mean spirited discussion from both sides. No, false flagging as reddit or tumblr as bait doesn't count.
>>525013
>degenerate
Why are people using this word in earnest these days? Are you a teenager/young adult, or something? I've noticed that a lot of young Americans of that generation have this retarded puritanical streak running through them.
MUH 4CHAN
>>524926
newfag normies like you ruined this place, congratule yourself for making internet into another feminist safespace you retard.
>>525018
To trigger the /pol/
>>525006
>saying "OY VEY" on /v/ somehow has anything to do with this
>/pol/, a board where literally any kind of political thought is allowed which is what led to what you're talking about in the first place, has anything to do with a phrase being banned on other boards (even though it isn't on /pol/ or other boards, rightly so)
>being this delusional about the impact of a random anonymous board and how they really care about "small government"
wew lad
>>525011
None of it is "shitposting", tumblr. if "shitposting" which is ultimately meaningless, was banned, 95% of the content on 4chan (past and present) would be banned, especially on shit boards like /v/ which is almost nothing but that.
>>525012
>It doesn't work.
But it does, because it truly reflects your hypocrisy.
You say the site isn't a safe space, yet you want it to be a safe space for you. You whine if a mod deletes something you post, but if they delete something you don't like it's all good and it's "shitposting" and "/pol/" and other meaningless labels.
Every criticism you make toward people applies to you, because it's purely a product of bias.
>>525013
It's not even me, nor is it a boogeyman, it's just a random phrase that goes on every board, like calling people faggots and niggers. Unless he starts going on tirades about Jewish conspiracies to derail threads, it's not a matter of politics.
>Shitposting is shitposting
Again, meaningless phrase. 95% of 4chan is "shitposting", whether there's a political elements to it or not.
>welcome here and they belong on reddit
That's you buddy.
>>525016
Kill yourself you lying faggot. There's plenty of you faggots crying about /pol/ and Trump and on every board, including on /pol/, and hiding behind the excuse of "false-flagging" is just the only way you can justify how cancerous you are.
Keep claiming oldfag status to justify your bias. None of what you said has anything to do with posting 2 words on a board.
>>525027
>None of it is "shitposting", tumblr. if "shitposting" which is ultimately meaningless, was banned, 95% of the content on 4chan (past and present) would be banned, especially on shit boards like /v/ which is almost nothing but that.
>ultimately meaningless
WEW
E
W
>>525027
This is ironic shitposting right?
I linked this thread in the /pol/ thread, so if the posts start getting particularly stupid, you know why.
Why is /pol/ always so self-oblivious and feigns ignorance?
>>525027
>You whine if a mod deletes something you post,
Just like you're doing?
>>524984
>WAAAAAH THEY'RE POSTING THINGS I DON'T LIKE
>>525027
tl;dr
>>525031
>no counter-argument
Good job tumblr.
>>525037
I don't, I'm not the one who made the thread retard.
>>525035
Why does SRS/tumblr always use the "/pol/" boogeyman?
>>525042
Are you quoting yourself? Because that's exactly the reasoning that would go behind agreeing to ban the guy in that thread for posting two words.
>>525048
Yes you are, faggot.
So do /pol/ocks know they are the most easily butthurt users?
>>525048
>Why does SRS/tumblr always use the "/pol/" boogeyman?
This is literally a thread about a thread on /pol/
>no counter-argument
Good job /pol/
>>525051
No, they think they're just triggering SJW tumblr when they get baited or can't deal with the bants. You will notice, at some point during bants, the /pol/ will devolve into
>tumblr
>sjw
and provide no argument or attempt to redirect their argument to one of their favorite scapegoats.
i want the fucking election to be over already /pol/ is super cancerous right now
>>525053
>This is literally a thread about a thread on /pol/
Here's a shocker, a lot of people on 4chan use several boards. And if they get banned for politics, they'll bring that up on /qa/ (which is filled with redditors like you who will agree with the ban, so there's no point), or on the board about politics you blithering retard.
/pol/ is just a "boogeyman" for anyone says anything politically incorrect on 4chan. The more you know.
>>525055
>and provide no argument or attempt to redirect their argument to one of their favorite scapegoats.
Yet you couldn't counter any of my arguments.
>>525059
What arguments did you make, and why am I even obligated to address all of the arguments you make? I'm not going to bother with this "I didn't post that" bullshit either.
>>525055
>and provide no argument or attempt to redirect their argument to one of their favorite scapegoats.
Don't you see the irony? You do the exact same thing by constantly deflecting to "/pol/" and not providing any argument.
>>525015
0/10 shit post must be a Fucking leaf
>>525064
>it's the rugby faggot
This explains it all.
>>525059
>Here's a shocker, a lot of people on 4chan use several boards. And if they get banned for politics, they'll bring that up on /qa/
No, he got banned from posting on /v/, posted it on /pol/, and OP linked the thread on /pol/ here on /qa/.
>(which is filled with redditors like you who will agree with the ban, so there's no point)
>>525055
>or on the board about politics you blithering retard.
He got banned for OY VEY, not for politics. I wonder why he would post on /pol/ if he didn't frequently post on /pol/, didn't want to be coddled and comforted by /pol/, or associate OY VEY with /pol/. It is a mystery.
>/pol/ being oblivious as always
Thank you for proving the point about being oblivious and feigning ignorance.
>>525048
yeah this is def. shitposting
>>525064
that's the joke!
>>525062
See: >>525027
Look at the responses to that post.
>WEW
>This is ironic shitposting right?
>Just like you're doing?
>tl;dr
Truly riveting debates on this here board.
>why am I even obligated to address all of the arguments you make
You aren't but you shouldn't complain about other people "providing no argument" if you can't do it yourself. You blame "/pol/" for the same thing but you're guilty of exactly that, why should "they" be obligated to address your arguments if you can't do it yourself? And don't be surprised when people see how there's no substance to your position, and only bias.
>>525064
Why does /pol/ always expect a double standard, then gets upset when someone sinks down to your level?
>>525075
YES! Successful troll.
>>525075
You are acting triggered, /pol/.
You responded to >>525055, correct? Which was in response to >>525051. Neither of these posts linked to your arguments in >>525027.
So what reasonable expectation do you have to expect either or those anonymous posters to respond to your arguments against other anons?
>>525016
I really, really disagree with this post. It's quite literally wrong in every respect.
>>525072
>and OP linked the thread on /pol/ here on /qa/.
Probably because /pol/ is faster, and /qa/ is a shitty slow board that's infested with redditors and not even listed on the main site.
>>>>525055
Again, same argument can be used against you while you keep screaming about /pol/.
>He got banned for OY VEY, not for politics.
If it wasn't a matter of politics, they would ban all sorts of other memespouting and low-quality posting on /v/ which is what most of the board consists of, but they don't.
>I wonder why he would post on /pol/ if he didn't frequently post on /pol/
As I said, most people on 4chan use several boards. If they want to talk about politics, they can do it on the board about politics. Almost nobody complains about people using /co/ or /a/, or /b/ memes on other boards.
>>525080
hes used to posting in a forum with ids for each poster and doesnt understand how fully anonymous posting works
>>524959
>DA RULZZZ
Fuck off, if it was like that, 90% of the threads on this site should be deleted.
>>525087
>Probably because /pol/ is faster, and /qa/ is a shitty slow board that's infested with redditors and not even listed on the main site.
You are asserting OP is the person that got banned? How would you know this, and what lead you to this conclusion? If I am misunderstanding you, please clarify.
>Again, same argument can be used against you while you keep screaming about /pol/
>screaming
Are you going to start calling me shrillary or something next? As long as we're clear that when you resort to tumblr, reddit, sjw, or whatever buzzword it means
>i have no argument and i lost
>If it wasn't a matter of politics, they would ban all sorts of other memespouting and low-quality posting on /v/ which is what most of the board consists of, but they don't.
So now you are admitting that meme has something to do with /pol/? I may be mixing you up with someone, but are you trying to have it both ways? OY VEY is just casual 4chan racism, and OY VEY is definitely /pol/.
>If they want to talk about politics, they can do it on the board about politics.
Do you actually believe this? I'm genuinely curious. I have no conclusive argument either way if it is true are not, and can only offer the possibility that it isn't true.
>Almost nobody complains about people using /co/ or /a/, or /b/ memes on other boards.
People used to hate /b/ memes when they were current, just like they get annoyed by frogposting. Tell me when the last time you saw a current /b/ meme? Most /b/ memes are so old they've diffused into the rest of 4chan by now, by my approximation.
You're also being dishonest, you know as well as I do, smug animes are an extremely controversial topic, and frequently discussed here on /qa/.
>>525092
/b/ is the no rules lulz board.
>>525013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilCmywMin8I
>>525074
[merely pretending intensifies]
>>525105
Why does /pol/ do this all the time?
>>525116
>how dare you call me out on my bullshit!
>gets triggered
wew lad
>>525098
>You are asserting OP is the person that got banned?
I'm saying the guy who made the /pol/ thread would rather go to /pol/ than /qa/, which is understandable if you look at how shitty /qa/ is.
>As long as we're clear that when you resort to tumblr, reddit, sjw, or whatever buzzword it means
You still can't argue with the fact that you're guilty of the exact same "tactics" you blame "/pol/" for using. They (or most of 4chan) call you tumblr, reddit, a SJW because you definitely sound like one, you call them "/pol/", "alt-right", and literally tell them they belong on reddit and other buzzwords. Hypocrisy, bias, double standards, that's all it comes down to.
>OY VEY is just casual 4chan racism, and OY VEY is like calling you a niggerfaggot, it's all 4chan. Whether it comes from /b/, /pol/, /a/ or any other board.
>Do you actually believe this?
Are you fucking retarded, you cock-gobbling idiots? People come to 4chan, it's the website they like, they do it to talk about their interests, whether it's politics, or anime, or television, or video games. The idea that /pol/ or /b/ or other boards should stick on their board is so that other boards don't get mired in constant political discussion and become the /pol/ 2.0 or /b/ 2.0, not so you don't get triggered by the occasional meme.
>Most /b/ memes are so old they've diffused into the rest of 4chan by now, by my approximation.
The same can be said about "/pol/" memes you retard, which is what you're complaining about.
>People used to hate /b/ memes when they were current
And they weren't banned because of that.
>smug animes are an extremely controversial topic, and frequently discussed here on /qa/.
And I'd argue they shouldn't be banned unless they're used by avatarfags and dedicated trolls either.
>>525102
I wonder who could be behind this post.
>>525121
It was me Anonymous!
>>525102
heh I actually saw that post in real time
>>525127
Nice counter-argument, faggot.
>>525127
>He doesn't know how to use the intensifies meme
>Gets mad when he gets called out on bullshit
>Tries deflection
wew
>>525120
>I'm saying the guy who made the /pol/ thread would rather go to /pol/ than /qa/, which is understandable if you look at how shitty /qa/ is.
Explain why he would post on /pol/?
>You still can't argue with the fact that you're guilty of the exact same "tactics" you blame "/pol/" for using.
Why should such tactics be reserved for the sole use of /pol/? Isn't that a double standard?
>They (or most of 4chan) call you tumblr, reddit, a SJW because you definitely sound like one, you call them "/pol/", "alt-right", and literally tell them they belong on reddit and other buzzwords. Hypocrisy, bias, double standards, that's all it comes down to.
So basically, yes, you want to assert your use of the argument carries weight but the other way around doesn't.
>OY VEY is just casual 4chan racism, and OY VEY is like calling you a niggerfaggot, it's all 4chan. Whether it comes from /b/, /pol/, /a/ or any other board.
You seem to be wanting to have it both ways. It's both related, and unrelated to /pol/
>People come to 4chan, it's the website they like, they do it to talk about their interests, whether it's politics, or anime, or television, or video games.
That's not really what you implied.
>The same can be said about "/pol/" memes you retard, which is what you're complaining about.
You seem upset and projecting quite a bit. I'm addressing your arguments as you specifically requested. Please don't misunderstand. The simple fact is most of these old /b/ memes still in circulation are considerably older, and they came from an era when /b/ was at the heart of 4chan. Most people on other boards don't consider /pol/ to be central to 4chan even if /pol/ is much larger than their own board, and the memes are newer.
>And they weren't banned because of that.
Actually, they were. People used to get bans for posting /b/ image macros outside of /b/.
>>525130
so what if i suck dick in my freetime loser
it's not like you get any action on the regular if at all
>>525133
cont.
>And I'd argue they shouldn't be banned unless they're used by avatarfags and dedicated trolls either.
I do believe this is called moving the goalposts or something
>>>Almost nobody complains about people using /co/ or /a/, or /b/ memes on other boards.
>>525048
>Thread literally came from /pol/
>muh /pol/ boogeyman
Sure thing senpai
>>525147
Stop that, you know /pol/ isn't capable of logic and reason! You're a bully. A bully!!
>>525135
>Almost nobody complains about people using /co/ or /a/, or /b/ memes on other boards.
People bitch about it all the time.
>>525100
/b always has a lot of bans on the bans page
>>525153
Yes, mods aren't restricted to rules either.
>>525147
>Thread from /pol/ got linked by an anon that hates /pol/
>This means he lurks /pol/ for things to complain about
>Complains of /pol/ boogeyman
wew
jesus you redditors have really infested this place. I hope the government shuts down 4chan for some dumb reason like "is used for CP" just to spite you cuckolds.
>>525151
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmBPairFRo0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIpkdusnIkE
>>525157
Is the difference between /pol/ and SJWs is that SJWs have enough courage to shitpost in real life, and cowardly /pol/ will only shitpost anonymously on 4chan?
>>525155
>Linked to the thread on /pol/
>This thread is also linked in /pol/
>get mad when people assume some posters here are from /pol/
Also slightly unrelated
>Not posting on /pol/ to laugh at the posters and shitpost
>>525156
It's going to be something extremely ironic that you will find annoying.
>>525133
>Explain why he would post on /pol/?
I already did you illiterate retard.
Because he was banned for politics, /qa/ is shit and hidden, 4chan users use multiple boards. He could've done it on /b/ as well, but then you would call him a /b/tard.
>Why should such tactics be reserved for the sole use of /pol/?
They shouldn't be but you have no ground to complain about it if you do the exact same thing as them. At least /pol/ is part of 4chan. Reddit and tumblr are completely different sites.
>It's both related, and unrelated to /pol/
And as I said, the fact that you can find some vague relation doesn't make it ban-worthy. The whole point of keeping boards off other boards is to avoid turning a board about something into a board about something else altogether. That doesn't mean you should ban any anime reaction image on /co/, or any vague reference to film or cartoons on other boards.
>The simple fact is most of these old /b/ memes still in circulation are considerably older
Irrelevant, happy merchant and OY VEY are also quite old.
>Most people on other boards don't consider /pol/ to be central to 4chan
You don't have to consider it central to acknowledge that it's part of it, just like every other board.
>People used to get bans for posting /b/ image macros outside of /b/.
Never saw it happen. /b/ used to raid other boards, but I never saw any meme or something that might've come from /b/ (almost everything did at some point) being outright banned.
>I do believe this is called moving the goalposts or something
How? Avatarfagging is retarded, barely anyone complains about the actual memes from those boards or consider them ban-worthy as opposed to /pol/'s.
>>525147
Anons use multiple boards dumbass, it's like you retards can't comprehend that.
>>525151
You go tumblr grrl! Keep propping up barely substantial posts that vaguely agree with you to show how united you are against the /pol/ boogeyman!
>>525133
>Explain why he would post on /pol/?
This very thread is a perfect example
Do you see all this shitposting? Only a few are discussing this in a civil way.
>So basically, yes, you want to assert your use of the argument carries weight but the other way around doesn't.
>Why should such tactics be reserved for the sole use of /pol/? Isn't that a double standard?
That isn't at all what he said. He said that both parties use those tactics, not that only one party is "allowed" to use them
>You seem to be wanting to have it both ways. It's both related, and unrelated to /pol/
I don't agree with this. For all we know this meme was created while a soccer match was going on, would it still be /pol/-related then?
>That's not really what you implied.
Show to me that that wasn't what he was implying, because I don't see how he wasn't implying that.
>You seem upset and projecting quite a bit. I'm addressing your arguments as you specifically requested. Please don't misunderstand. The simple fact is most of these old /b/ memes still in circulation are considerably older, and they came from an era when /b/ was at the heart of 4chan. Most people on other boards don't consider /pol/ to be central to 4chan even if /pol/ is much larger than their own board, and the memes are newer.
It doesn't matter where memes come from, nor how old they are. Either ban all memes that aren't part of the board's culture, or don't ban them at all.
>Actually, they were. People used to get bans for posting /b/ image macros outside of /b/.
Do you have evidence to prove your claim?
>I do believe this is called moving the goalposts or something
How is this moving goalposts?
He said that nobody complains about them, not that using these memes should be a bannable offense.
>>525159
this post made my day
i'm gonna sleep now thanks
>>525162
>Anons use multiple boards dumbass, it's like you retards can't comprehend that.
So? a /pol/fag not using /pol/ memes and lingo is okay, a /pol/fag who does is not
>>525159
>HURR DURR le both sides of the same coin
You're a queer you know that? No one gave a shit before you triggered cucklords infested this site.
Stay triggered nigger.
>>525155
>>boogeyman
>implies it does not exist
>>thread on /pol/
>implies it does exist
Hmmm....
>>525167
No, you completely misunderstand. I'm saying SJWs are better than you, not that you're the same, you are inferior /pol/, unless you want to start posting some youtubes of Trump rallies doing similar things.
>>525167
a coin has 3 sides pleb
>>525168
>Start thread on /pol/
>Wait for them to respond
>link thread
Hmmm...
>>525169
I understand you're a faggot.
/pol/ doesn't shitpost in real life, because that's what fucking retards do.
>Le Trump
Stay Triggered cuckie.
>>525160
see>>525172
Also
>Not posting on /pol/ to laugh at the posters and shitpost
Just admit to doing what linked post said
>>525166
>/pol/fag not using /pol/ memes and lingo is okay, a /pol/fag who does is not
No, they're both fine faggot. As long as they don't use the board solely to talk about politics, it's all fine.
And "Oy vey" isn't even a /pol/ meme, it's been used on 4chan for way longer than that, and it's been used outside of 4chan for WAY longer than that.
That's why you redditors look so retarded when you use the /pol/ boogeyman. I remember "Oy vey" being used on CBS way back when by one of the hosts, just as a joke, let alone its actual legitimate use.
>I'm saying SJWs are better than you
That's because you are you Reddit faggot.
>>525162
>Because he was banned for politics
So OY VEY is politics, specifically /pol/, and not 4chan general racism
>He could've done it on /b/ as well, but then you would call him a /b/tard.
Yes, and that would be a completely valid assertion?
>They shouldn't be but you have no ground to complain about it if you do the exact same thing as them.
But /pol/ has grounds because
>At least /pol/ is part of 4chan.
So basically you're saying yes to the fact that you expect a double standard.
>Reddit and tumblr are completely different sites.
>>525055
>And as I said, the fact that you can find some vague relation doesn't make it ban-worthy.
I never said it was banworthy. That is a straw man. The topic of this thread, as stated in the OP is.
>HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED
>The whole point of keeping boards off other boards is to avoid turning a board about something into a board about something else altogether.
Both a citation is needed, as well as a logical connection to an relevant argument.
>That doesn't mean you should ban any anime reaction image on /co/, or any vague reference to film or cartoons on other boards.
I think we already established this is moving the goalposts.
>Irrelevant, happy merchant and OY VEY are also quite old.
But not old enough apparently. But apparently, you are the sole arbitrator of when something is old enough.
>You don't have to consider it central to acknowledge that it's part of it, just like every other board.
/b/ had a legitimacy on 4chan that /pol/ doesn't. It's as simple as that.
>Never saw it happen. /b/ used to raid other boards, but I never saw any meme or something that might've come from /b/ (almost everything did at some point) being outright banned.
Please don't try to bait me into calling you a newfag.
>How?
This is you feigning ignorance. It has already been shown that you moved the goalposts or abandoned your original assertion
>>525175
>That's because you are you Reddit faggot.
That is, "you are one".
>SJWs are actually better than anti-SJWs!
>SJWs are better than /pol/!
>SJWs are as bad as anti-SJWs!
All phrases almost solely used by SJWs.
>>525159
>muh false attribution fallacy
>muh appeal to hypocrisy fallacy
wew pot calling the kettle black post
>>525162
>Avatarfagging is retarded, barely anyone complains about the actual memes from those boards or consider them ban-worthy as opposed to /pol/'s.
>>>>>>Almost nobody complains about people using /co/ or /a/, or /b/ memes on other boards.
Please don't make me go copy the logical fallacy chart and crop out true scottsman and moving the goalposts. This is going to keep being brought up unless you abandon the argument, or directly address it.
>>525159
>this triggers the /pol/
>>525174
So you claiming this is a false flag?
>>525175
>As long as they don't use the board solely to talk about politics
They do this all the time with their post baiting with surprise surprise /pol/ memes and lingo. It shift the thread to what they wanna talk about
Ov vey as a meme within 4chan singularly belongs to /pol/. idc how it is used outside of 4chan
>implying i go to reddit
Bitch please, I browse /pol/ too
>>525173
>he admits it's shitposting
And all anon had to do was compare you to SJWs.
>>525175
>THIS IS COMPLETELY NOT /POL/
>posts it on /pol/ anyways
Delicious tears are delicious.
>>525187
>He post seriously
>ON 4chan
Kill yourself
>>525190
kys
y
s
>>525191
Dumb nigger
>>525186
Then report the fucking guy who is shifting the thread
He gets banned, his post removed and maybe the thread will revert to what it was before
>>525162
>They shouldn't be but you have no ground to complain about it if you do the exact same thing as them. At least /pol/ is part of 4chan. Reddit and tumblr are completely different sites.
>/pol/ literally can not handle the idea of anons having other opinions on 4chan that aren't /pol/ and wants to turn 4chan into a giant safe space where they can blame reddit for all their problems
>>525195
Mods are sleeping.
>>525195
I am sure reporting shitposters would have stopped the shitfest in /tv/ when TFA was revealed
pffft
>He gets banned, his post removed and maybe the thread will revert to what it was before
And then he whines about it on /pol/, and then someone links it to /qa/, and then everyone pretends or claims the /pol/ boogeyman?
>>525177
>not 4chan general racism
Yes it is you dumb cunt. It's not even racism, in fact it's not even antisemitism, it would be like saying IMPOSSIBRU.
>Yes, and that would be a completely valid assertion?
No, it would just be you trying to compartmentalize 4chan users so you can dismiss them because they post on the appropriate board, like you do with /pol/ and your other boogeymen. Anons post on multiple boards.
>But /pol/ has grounds because
4chan has grounds because it's part of the site, reddit and tumblr don't.
You were the one who brought the complaint of "/pol/" using "Reddit" and "tumblr as scapegoats, so you're the one who has to justify it in the first place.
>>>>525055
You keep also deflecting to /pol/, so this point doesn't work.
>That is a straw man.
You're agreeing with the decision to ban it, trying to legitimize it.
>I think we already established this is moving the goalposts.
No it's not, it's the exact same thing. /co/ material doesn't need to be banned unless half the board becomes about talking about comics & cartoons, neither does any other board's "supposed" material (except MLP).
>But not old enough apparently.
You're not backing up your case with anything, just playing the oldfag card to try to lend your arguments more legitimacy.
>/b/ had a legitimacy on 4chan that /pol/ doesn't.
[citation needed]
Oh wait, you're just basing it on your personal preferences and trying to frame them as universal even though there's a rule to keep /b/ outside of other boards (Rule 3) while there's none for "/pol/".
>Please don't try to bait me into calling you a newfag.
Still no substance, no argument, and posing as an oldfag because you have no identity here so you have to hopelessly try to create one to prop up your own opinions.
>This is you feigning ignorance.
More like you trying to find some logical fallacy that doesn't exist.
>>525182
>Please don't make me go copy the logical fallacy chart
I said "almost nobody", not "nobody". And avatarfagging is different from using memes from other boards you fucking idiot (not that OY VEY is even that, as I've explained multiple times).
>>525186
>Ov vey as a meme within 4chan singularly belongs to /pol/. idc how it is used outside of 4chan
No it doesn't redditfag. See the image here: >>525162
/pol/ didn't exist at that point, and it's a phrase that has been used outside of 4chan and on 4chan on and off forever.
>Bitch please, I browse /pol/ too
You're a fucking redditor if you seriously think like this, kill yourself.
>They do this all the time with their post baiting with surprise surprise /pol/ memes and lingo
Thinly-veiled politics threads exist, but using two words doesn't fit that at all. You're braindead m8.
>>525207
>/pol/ didn't exist at that point, and it's a phrase that has been used outside of 4chan and on 4chan on and off forever.
And right now it used mostly in /pol/. So what is your point?
>You're a fucking redditor if you seriously think like this, kill yourself.
>no true /pol/fag
>>525201
The person who was banned in the original thread, wasn't trying to shift the thread.
And if mods don't do their jobs, what use are they? Might as well have no mods then.
>>525210
>The person who was banned in the original thread, wasn't trying to shift the thread.
using Ov Vey directly implies someone having an agenda and Jewish. It was trying to shift the thread by baiting a response
>>525202
>Yes it is you dumb cunt. It's not even racism, in fact it's not even antisemitism, it would be like saying IMPOSSIBRU.
So you're trying to have it both ways.
>No, it would just be you trying to compartmentalize 4chan users so you can dismiss them because they post on the appropriate board, like you do with /pol/ and your other boogeymen. Anons post on multiple boards.
It does not make the assertion false, however much you may disagree with it being a problem.
>4chan has grounds because it's part of the site
Lots of things are part of the site
>You were the one who brought the complaint of "/pol/" using "Reddit" and "tumblr as scapegoats, so you're the one who has to justify it in the first place.
This is /pol/ feigning ignorance once again.
>reddit and tumblr don't.
>>525055
>You keep also deflecting to /pol/, so this point doesn't work.
>>525055 is the response you get when you say reddit and tumblr.
>You're agreeing with the decision to ban it, trying to legitimize it.
No, I'm addressing your arguments because you asked me to, since you thought it was unfair that your arguments weren't being directly addressed.
>No it's not, it's the exact same thing. /co/ material doesn't need to be banned unless half the board becomes about talking about comics & cartoons, neither does any other board's "supposed" material (except MLP).
Yes it is, because this wasn't the argument you started with. You can keep denying it, but it doesn't help your argument.
>You're not backing up your case with anything, just playing the oldfag card to try to lend your arguments more legitimacy.
Do I need to count how many times you tried to play the "/pol/ is 4chan, you are reddit and not 4chan" card for legitimacy? There's a reason why #3 specifically bans image macros among other things, but you can keep playing dumb if you'd like.
>>525209
>And right now it used mostly in /pol/. So what is your point?
No it's not.
https://desustorage.org/_/search/boards/a.aco.an.c.co.d.fit.gif.his.int.k.m.mlp.q.r9k.tg.trash.vr.wsg/text/%22oy%20vey%22/
The only reason you think it's "only used in /pol/" is because buttmad babbies like you keep crying about /pol/ every time you see something that triggers you because you want other boards to be safe space.
You only give more credibility to the idea that /pol/ is a lot more like 4chanesque than redditfags when you make arguments like this.
>>no true /pol/fag
>if I keep pretending I'm from /pol/ to concern troll, maybe they'll give more weight to my idea when I criticize the "/pol/" boogeyman
Pitiful.
>>525212
>using Ov Vey directly implies someone having an agenda and Jewish. It was trying to shift the thread by baiting a response
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>525215
thats really why /pol/ exists is cause faggots cried hard enough
>>525202
>Oh wait, you're just basing it on your personal preferences
Again, you can keep playing dumb here. Nobody in good faith would say that /b/ was not central to 4chan at one point.
>trying to frame them as universal even though there's a rule to keep /b/ outside of other boards (Rule 3) while there's none for "/pol/".
There's two reasons. The first reason is that /b/ was indeed central to 4chan, so they had to make specific rules banning certain kinds of /b/tardism from leaking, before /pol/ even existed as a board. The second reason is global rules were meant to apply to every board at the time they were written, except /b/ because /b/ was the no rules board. That is not that those are the topic of /b/, but those rules banning things don't apply to /b/, because /b/ was meant to be the no rules board. Since the global rules have been written, several boards have been introduced that also were not meant for the global rules to apply. You seem very intent of baiting me to call you new.
>Still no substance, no argument, and posing as an oldfag because you have no identity here so you have to hopelessly try to create one to prop up your own opinions.
I'm not using it as an argument. You seem seem absolutely intent on showing off how new you are. The reason why I call it bait, is because predictably you want to shift the argument to being called new instead of defending your positions.
>More like you trying to find some logical fallacy that doesn't exist.
I've already posted the original argument and the argument you've backpedaled to multiple times. Conveniently, it's in a single post here so I don't have to keep pasting it. >>525182
>>525159
You find irl shitposting admirable and courageous?
Says more about you than anything
I bet you think /r9k/ and /b/ are alpha by your logic
>>525212
>using Ov Vey directly implies someone having an agenda and Jewish. It was trying to shift the thread by baiting a response
No it doesn't, you idiot.
Most people use oy vey to reply to shilling, or greed. It doesn't necessarily mean they have an agenda against the Jewish. And how is baiting for replies trying to shift the thread?
In all the time that I have been on this site, not once have I seen a thread shift from a single post (unless the thread was already offtopic) The most I have seen happening is that a few people reply to it and then lose interest.
>>525207
>I said "almost nobody", not "nobody".
You know as well as I do people want anime posters banned from their boards all the time. You are being disingenuous.
>And avatarfagging is different from using memes from other boards you fucking idiot
>true scottsman
I like how despite there being a number of different reasons that post could've been deleted, including being a dumb, off-topic shitpost, almost everyone in this thread automatically assumed it was because the mod was offended by it.
Who's triggered now, tumblrinas?
>>525222
>You find irl shitposting admirable and courageous?
Courageous? Yes. Admirable? No. Easy bait? Double yes.
>>525177
>oy vey
>politics
>racist
>4chan racism
>now people give a shit about """racism""" on 4chan
>islam
>race
schlomo, you dropped this...
>>525186
>so you claiming its false flag?
>admits to shitposting on /pol/ because he hates /pol/ and starting threads for lulz
Well, your own post incriminates you
>>525225
>almost everyone in this thread automatically assumed it was because the mod was offended by it.
But that's /pol/ when he was whining on /pol/ about it, claiming /v/ was literally tumblr because he got banned for global 3.
>>525215
>that link showing posts trying to shift the thread
Proving my point senpai.
>Claim I come from reddit
>Nah senpai I post on /pol/ too
>hurdur concern troll
This is getting desperate
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Ov vey!
>>525226
So by your logic you must think that /b/ tard that murdered his girlfriend and post the pictures courageous, yes?
>>525227
Who are you quoting? People only give a shit about racism on 4chan now because it's not just used casually, there's being trying to push an actual agenda. This is why we can't have nice things.
>>525212
>It was trying to shift the thread by baiting a response
only a butthurt jew would get triggered over oy veying
>>525232
>courageous
>not deterred by danger or pain
He's calling you a cowardly niggerbaby.
>>525231
Shit wrong pic
>>525228
I am not OP
>>525223
>It doesn't necessarily mean they have an agenda against the Jewish. And how is baiting for replies trying to shift the thread?
Usually the reply would change the topic of discussion to whatever the /pol/fags. It is a gradual process.
>The most I have seen happening is that a few people reply to it and then lose interest.
Seen it happen all the time. Wanna talk about Black Panther in /tv/? Good luck
>>525233
What board is "who are you quoting?" From?
No question dodging or avoiding
I want to see if you know what board that's from
>>525214
>So you're trying to have it both ways.
No I'm not trying to have it both ways. I'm saying it's a 4chan meme, and also occasionally used outside of 4chan, that's it. It's also used on /pol/, just like people call each other niggers on 4chan and are also likely to do it on /pol/.
>It does not make the assertion false
Yes it does, because you're just trying to brand a poster to dismiss their opinions, even though anyone here can post on any single board on the site at any point, that doesn't mean they're representatives of it.
>Lots of things are part of the site
Like /pol/, and /b/, and /a/, and not reddit or tumblr. Thanks for acknowledging that.
>>>>525055
>if I keep quoting the same post even though it's been debunked dozens of times, maybe I'll win!
>>>525055 is the response you get when you say reddit and tumblr.
And >>525202 is the response you get when yoy say "/pol/" and "alt-right" and "problematic" and your other buzzwords you dumb cunt.
Also I love your breakdown, you can barely hide the fact that you're a tumblredditor anymore.
>No, I'm addressing your arguments
Are you autistic? No you're not, you're agreeing with the ideas of the ban because you're a pampered pussy, thats the whole point of the thread.
>"/pol/ is 4chan, you are reddit and not 4chan"
I didn't say that, I said /pol/ is PART of 4chan, reddit and tumblr are not. And certain memes and ideas like "Oy Vey" or "WE WUZ WHATEVER" are not exclusive to /pol/ regardless of how much you want them to be.
>There's a reason why #3 specifically bans image macros among other things
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING YOU OBTUSE CUNT
>>525240
/jp/, because /jp/ thought greentext stories were cancer.
t. 4chan expert
>>525246
Good to many people use it without knowing where it came from
>>525245
>not deterred by danger or pain
Do you understand how a definition works? Killing his girlfriend? Probably not courageous. Posting pics on 4chan, probably a mix of being a complete retard and some courage.
>>525233
It's hilarious how people how there's actually people getting triggered over the "oy vey" meme, it would be pure coincidence if these people were jews themeselves, and more hilarious is that such innofensive meme that just want to insert the typical merchant greed on someone's post mostly humorously is looked upon as a bannable offense like if i'm violating any kind of law or if the impact of the phrase itself is that big, seriously dude, as the OP implies that that /pol/ user was whinning over his ban so are you trying to defend on how "oy vey" is some big deal.
>>525250
Do you not understand what>>525226
And >>525159 is?
Admits irl shitposting is courageous
Complains when /b/ tard that killed his girlfriend is thrown out there
Proper definition of courageous means nothing
You said irl shitposting is courageous
Meaning you also find the murderer courageous by you own logic from your own post
Question deflecting wont help
>>525241
>No I'm not trying to have it both ways. I'm saying it's a 4chan meme, and also occasionally used outside of 4chan, that's it. It's also used on /pol/, just like people call each other niggers on 4chan and are also likely to do it on /pol/.
Then how is this related to /pol/?
>Yes it does, because you're just trying to brand a poster to dismiss their opinions, even though anyone here can post on any single board on the site at any point, that doesn't mean they're representatives of it.
No it doesn't. Not everyone on 4chan posts on every board. If someone posts on /v/ and /pol/, then they are from /v/ and /pol/, but not lets say, /s4s/.
>Like /pol/, and /b/, and /a/, and not reddit or tumblr. Thanks for acknowledging that.
>>525055
>if I keep quoting the same post even though it's been debunked dozens of times, maybe I'll win!
As far as I'm concerned I've already established a counter argument which you refuse to address.
>if i keep denying it and claiming it was debunked without debunking it, maybe I'll win!
>And >>525202 is the response you get when yoy say "/pol/" and "alt-right" and "problematic" and your other buzzwords you dumb cunt.
Please link the posts, besides this one, where I say "alt-right" or "problematic"
And yes, of course I've said /pol/, so have you.
>Also I love your breakdown, you can barely hide the fact that you're a tumblredditor anymore.
>>525055
>Are you autistic?
Ice burn.
>No you're not, you're agreeing with the ideas of the ban because you're a pampered pussy, thats the whole point of the thread.
No, the point of the thread is to criticize /pol/ because
>HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED
Re-read the OP
>I didn't say that, I said /pol/ is PART of 4chan, reddit and tumblr are not.
Combined with implicit or explicit accusations of me coming from tumblr or reddit.
>And certain memes and ideas like "Oy Vey" or "WE WUZ WHATEVER" are not exclusive to /pol/ regardless of how much you want them to be.
This is called projecting.
Reminder that /pol/ and replying to /pol/shit is far worse than coloured horse ever were.
Include /pol/ and anti/pol/ shit, EVERYTHING POLITICAL, into global rule 15 already if you actually care about this sites community, Hiro and mods.
>>525241
>WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING YOU OBTUSE CUNT
Can you really not follow your own set of arguments? I'm not here to argue for you. If you want to play dumb, that's your loss.
>26 posters
>142 replies
Good shitposting thread
>>525256
>Complains when /b/ tard that killed his girlfriend is thrown out there
That was you. I don't see him complaining about it.
>>525252
>pure coincidence
oy veyy
>>525252
His point was that mods can no longer distinguish when it is just being used casually, or used to derail a thread into pushing an off-topic agenda.
>>525265
my man, i would understand if it was something like "how X can even compete" but "oy vey" is mostly used to give an adjetive to someone's post, mods are newfags.
>>525269
You are the one that brought up the murder, you're going to need better quoting skills than that if you want to claim
>Complains when /b/ tard that killed his girlfriend is thrown out there
>>525270
MODS = FAGS is nothing new. You would know this if you weren't a [TRIGGER WARNING] ***fag (don't want to trigger people who get upset by ***fag). But yes, people who started using casual racism to shift topics is the reason we can't have nice things anymore.
>>525265
"Oy vey" is never used to derail a thread into pushing an off-topic agenda retard.
And you and any mod who seriously thinks like this are seriously fucking retarded if you believe this.
>Wow you really have shit taste in film faggot.
>IS THIS POSTER TRYING TO DERAIL THE THREAD TO PUSH A HOMOPHOBIC AGENDA AGAINST THE EMANCIPATION OF GAYS IN WESTERN SOCIETY
KILL YOURSELF OR GO BACK TO REBBIT
If you're offended by something politically incorrect, whether it's serious or not, you shouldn't fucking be here.
>>525276
once again:
>oy vey
>casual racism
>racism
>jews
>race
schlomo, please you're getting out of arguments. If you're triggered over this, i'm sorry, no safe spaces here buddy.
>>525278
>IT IS NOT AND YOU ARE SILLY FOR THINKING THAT! SILLY POSTER!: the post
>>525272
He got brought up because he irl shitposted
How hard is that to grasp?
Expect to be called out on your bullshit when you say you find irl shitposting courageous and someone who irl shitposted gets brought up
No amount of mental gymnastics will help you
But pls continue to defend it
>>525278
>If you're offended
I'm not offended. I'm giving an explanation. Casual racism and political incorrectness was perfectly acceptable on /v/ before it started derailing shit into antiSJW and gamergate shit. Now their mods are trigger happy, especially since they can't be online 24/7 to babysit the board. Do you lack any capacity to use your brain, and anything that doesn't make sense to you or you don't like is reddit?
>>525282
>Complains when /b/ tard that killed his girlfriend is thrown out there
Show me where. Grasping at straws there.
>Expect to be called out on your bullshit when you say you find irl shitposting courageous and someone who irl shitposted gets brought up
SJWs doing SJW things (and people at Trump rallies) are both courageous and retarded. /pol/ shit posting anonymously is cowardly and retarded. You seem to feel the need to shift this argument so you can "win" it.
>>525283
at this point i'm unsure who started this endless cycle of trigger and being triggered.
>>525279
Are you even trying at this point?
>>524959
Alright, looks like /pol/ has decent moderation after all.
>>525290
how is "oy vey" racist?
>>525284
>show me where
All your own post and how defensive you are
>grasping at straws
Oh, the irony
You admitted that irl shitposting is courageous
When someone who irl shitposted gets brought up (the /b/ murderer) you back pedal and attack the poster for bringing him up when by your logic he irl shitposted
>you seem to feel the need to shift this argument so you can "win" it
What did I say about mental gymnastics?
You got called out on your bullshit and attempting to save face
Not my problem you say you find irl shitposting courageous and get mad when an example of irl shitposting is brought up
>>524959
I'm guessing it was because it was a poster who was a regular on /pol/ and felt that that was his safespace to complain about SJW mods and tumblr taking over 4chan. Just a guess.
>>525283
Your explanation is shit, because it's not accurate (there have been anal mods for way longer than that), it's not exclusive to /v/, and only a redditor would use that as a good justification. Also you seriously sound like a self-serious redditor.
Any redditor can come here and claim that anything politically incorrect will "derail into pushing an agenda" to justify mods turning boards into hugboxes, that's not an adequate reason retard.
>>525296
t. SJW
>>525300
>getting mad at the fedora meme
>>>/r/atheism
>>525295
>All your own post and how defensive you are
That's some nice projecting, but unless you can actually point out where I complained, your argument doesn't hold much weight.
>You admitted that irl shitposting is courageous
Yes it is. Use a dictionary.
>When someone who irl shitposted gets brought up (the /b/ murderer) you back pedal and attack the poster for bringing him up when by your logic he irl shitposted
You're going to need to provide quotes. I don't think you understand the essence of shitposting anything, which is based largely on linguistic and memetic communication.
>You got called out on your bullshit and attempting to save face
But I never got offended by murder. It was said he was courageous for posting pictures, using the dictionary, that seems reasonable enough.
>Not my problem you say you find irl shitposting courageous and get mad when an example of irl shitposting is brought up
This is really pathetic at this point, and you seem to have some sort of fantasy of a tumblirina lanwhale redfaced in rage or something.
Trump rallies = courageous + retarded
SJWs = courageous + retarded
Murdering a defenseless woman = cowardly + retarded
Posting evidence that will land you in jail = courageous + retarded
Shitposting on /pol/ = cowardly + retarded
>>525301
That link doesn't go anywhere, idiot.
>>525298
What is that picture supposed to prove?
Are you denying gamergate was a thing?
>>525306
These are the same people who deny the Holocaust.
>>525303
Not even that guy, but reading your posts is painful. There's barely any substance to it, and I can almost smell the sweaty landwhale behind it, it's exhausting.
>>525299
Oh no you found me. I'm sorry /pol/, I didn't mean to trigger you and insult you with micro-aggression.
>>525308
And there is absolutely ZERO substance to your post. Try again.
>>525307
on side note, it's always interesting to debate about the holocaust, how many jews do you believe died in the holocaust? just curious.
>>525310
There is some substance. Apparently he has fantasies about sweaty landwhales that per-occupies his mind at all times, and they just get him so hot and bothered he can't stop posting.
>>525309
It's sad that SJWs are so parasitic and uncreative that all they can do is repeat what is said of them against other people.
>t-trigger
>m-microaggression
>s-safe space!
You realize that your movement uses all of these concepts unironically right?
>>525313
>your movement
Yes, we get it, /pol/ unironically thinks anyone that doesn't agree with them can't be anything than a SJW. Sad.
>>525303
>That's some nice projecting, but unless you can actually point out where I complained, your argument doesn't hold much weight.
Not projecting if you can see it with your own eyes now is it?
>>525245
>>525256
>>525269
Just a few that started all this pretty defensive if you ask me
>Yes it is. Use a dictionary.
So you admit that the murderer is courageous
Glad we agree
>But I never got offended by murder. It was said he was courageous for posting pictures, using the dictionary, that seems reasonable enough
There's that back peddling agian
>This is really pathetic at this point, and you seem to have some sort of fantasy of a tumblirina lanwhale redfaced in rage or something.
You're right you are pathetic
>Gets upset and uses question begging epithet when called out on his bullshit
>Makes a little chart with no meaning behind it out of assfluster
Anon you're embarrassing yourself
>>525303
Anon I look at both your post and you are wrong
The way you go in circles to defend your actions is sad to be honest
>>525314
Sorry SRS, not all of us are dumb.
"Use their own tactics against them" is pretty much your motto because you can't come up with anything original.
>>525304
>newfag doesn't know how to meme
wew lurk moar faggot
>>525317
I don't even know what SRS is.
>>525321
But I never complained about the murderer. I complained about you complaining that I complained about the murderer when I did no such thing.
>>525322
Oh right I forgot. SRS doesn't know what SRS is.
>>525323
By the Definition of courageous you used
"not deterred by danger or pain"
Admits irl shitposting is courageous
irl shitposing /b/ anon is by definion couragous according to you
How hard is it to connect the dots?
And that's how we got to where we are at
So a recap
>you say irl shitposting is courageous
>I bring up irl shitposting /b/ murderer
>you give me the definition of courageous
>i tell you, you said you found irl shitposting courageous
>You backpedal and use mental gymnastics
>accuse me of complaining about /b/ irl shitposting anon
>the only reason he was brought up was becuse he irl shitposted and you said that irl shitposting is courageous
>Get defensive and say I'm mad for bringing him up
>Show you your own post
>More backpedaling along with strawman
>you still can't grasp the that you said you found irl shitposting courageous and get mad an example is brought up
>demand iI show you
>show you your own post
Do you get it now anon?
>>525322
When are you landwhales gonna leave this board anyway?
>>525326
I almost forgot
You're also samefagging, too
>>525326
You seem confused anon.
>>525335
I wish you only shat up /pol/ with your bullshit, but you don't.
>>525328
>implying /pol/ doesnt do it too
>>525190
*jeers in your general direction*
>>525422
/pol/ is more on a defensive position actually. They don't even bother to discuss how to improve the situation in their countries, they instead focus on discussing how to fix the damage that has been done. They're the one under constant attacks, they're the one losing territory when it comes to muh ideology war
>>525102
I can't even imagine how uneducated you'd have to be to think that looks like a heart.
Shit, son, you deserve to get laughed at for being so stupid.
poop
>>526918
upvoted
>>526918
downvoted
>>525006
>alt-right
can't wait for this meme to end desu
>>526918
reblogged
