/l/ needs to be a honeypot board that outs pedophiles.
>>521553
le nosebleed bitch
>>521553
Only if we get a /cp/ board for dedicated Type Moon discussion.
Outing what? Thought "crimes"? That's called paranoia.
>>521553
>4chan is a website for moral crusading
Get the fuck outta here.
>>521562
>4chan isn't a website for moral crusading
What's up summerfag
>>521561
>looking for virtual child pornography on the internet
>thought crimes
Uhh...
>>521570
>>521645
>>521654
>drawings are criminal
Spotted the Muslim.
US law only criminalizes such content if it's deemed to be "obscene", which varies with each state. You conveniently forget >>>/global/rules/1 and that you can legally post loli on /b/ as per >>>/global/rules/3.
Go impose your Sharia somewhere else, like up your rectum.
The mental gymnastics lolicons are able to do to justify their mental illness are astonishing
>>521917
Mental illnesses, by definition, have to harm someone else. So your prerogative falls apart because drawings can't be harmed, by definition.
Your argument is the same one used by Satan worshippers AKA Muslims against drawings of their false prophet.
>>521919
>look at child porn
>decide to abuse a child
>show the child that adults having sex with children are normal by showing her my lolicon pictures
this has happened before.
who /mlp/ here
>>521959
No, it hasn't. You are making up a case in order to appeal to emotion.
>it's a "normalfags want to change the site to pander to themselves" thread
>>521983
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/18/world/asia/japan-manga-anime-pornography/
>Shihoko Fujiwara runs Lighthouse, a nonprofit for exploited children. She told CNN she once worked on a case where a predator used a cartoon to convince a child that sex abuse was normal. "So the pedophiles might bring the animation and say 'this is how you practice with adults,'" she said.
Grooming children isn't anything new by the way. It used to be much more prevalent in the US which is why we have such strict CP and child abuse laws.
>>521553
that's what /b/ is for
>>521986
Then let's ban knives because they can be used to kill people instead of being an aiding tool for eating food.
The argument makes no sense. Literally anything, even words, can be used to harm someone else. That doesn't make it a valid reason to ban things.
You also seem to ignore that sexual crimes against children in Japan decreased significantly in the past 50 years so the argument for banning drawings once again doesn't hold water.
>>521996
the knife still has a primary purpose that doesn't involve harming other humans.
what is the purpose of virtual child pornography other than a way for cowardly pedophiles to skirt anti cp laws?
>>522074
To fap to drawings? Hell, most people on /e/, /h/, or /d/ dislike 3dpd.
Google actually hired someone who created a lolikon-board. Isn't that a bit odd?
>>522074
>what is the purpose of virtual child pornography other than a way for cowardly pedophiles to skirt anti cp laws?
That's some astounding mental gymnastics you got there. Violating a child's honor and dignity by harming him or her would be the cowardly thing to do.
Drawings are not living entities, thus not people. Your inability to separate reality from fantasy is the truly concerning thing here.
>>522077
This.
>>522078
4chan wasn't created as a lolicon board.
>>522083
he means moot added a lolicon board to the site -- not that the whole site is lolicon
>>521561
Fuck off pedo. That excuse didnt work in past threads and it wont work now. And it wont work in court. Or against the big bull wholl slit your filthy throat in prison.
>>522083
>Drawings are not living entities, thus not people.
Why don't you tell that to the pedos? The first time /l/ was created the board was flooded with real cp.
>>522110
You're just like a Muslim looking at a drawing of Muhammad. Nice job at being a retard and having no comprehension of the law.
>>522114
Yes, so was the rest of 4chan due to lack of moderation. That has nothing to do with drawings.
And what guarantees you that CP isn't posted in places that are completely unrelated? That's why you have rules and people in charge of enforcing those rules, to prevent that from happening.
For example, there used to be a Pole on /int/ who spammed CP. The board isn't even related to pornography but it still happened.
>>522110
Lolicon isn't illegal where I am
So stay mad indenial lolicon lover
>>521913
Don't you have some kids to diddle
>>522223
No because doing that is wrong.
>>522077
That's because the US and Europe have very clear laws that outlaw the act of sexualizing little girls. When Japan banned child porn, the pedophiles moved on to underage idols who dress up in risque clothing and pose sexually.
>>522287
>When Japan banned child porn, the pedophiles moved on to underage idols who dress up in risque clothing and pose sexually.
Junior idols were already a thing before CP was criminalized.
Also, it's ironic how you complain about sexualization of little girls when society does it every day by dressing them in skimpy clothes as early as possible and allowing degenerate shows like Toddlers and Tiaras or letting their children be raped by the child molesters in Hollywood just so that they can have roles in shitty films.
Using 2D as a scapegoat is what cowards looking for feel-good "solutions" to problems they don't want to really address and solve do.
>>521984
>butthurt pedo spams normalfag buzzword after getting told
>>522292
But that's the point. Society is giving Muslims the free pass even though they are actually child rapists.
Just recently, a 7-year-old girl in Germany was brutally raped by 5 Muslim savages and the media tried to cover up details once again since mentioning the origin of the sick fucks would be "racist", "xenophobic", or "Islamophobic".
>>522296
funny how white people always bring up instances of muslim rape when they go to 3rd world asian countries and use their socioeconomic leverage to have sex with literal children.
whites have a much darker history of rape than muslims.
whites used female slaves as sex slaves during the ~300 years of slavery. marines deployed in vietnam routinely raped and murdered vietnamese women and children (my lai being the most famous case). most sex slave trafficking is from foreign countries to the us.
but keep believing in the muslim rape myth if it makes you feel good.
>>522300
>funny how white people always bring up instances of muslim rape when they go to 3rd world asian countries and use their socioeconomic leverage to have sex with literal children.
Every society has its rotten apples. The difference is that Muslim rape is allowed and promoted by Islamic law.
>whites have a much darker history of rape than muslims.
Now you're just making shit up.
>whites used female slaves as sex slaves during the ~300 years of slavery
And we were the only ones who put an end to it, though not completely. We were also the only group to not eradicate every minority on Earth whereas Muslims would do that without second thought. Asians, etc., had they tried to conquer the world like Whites did, they would've exterminated every single minority.
>but keep believing in the muslim rape myth if it makes you feel good
It's not a myth when it has always been part of Islam during its 1400 years of existence. Muhammad himself was a serial rapist and child rapist.
Adding /l/ would be as stupid as adding a /porn/ board. Yeah right you all saw how well /aco/ turned out.
The only sensible thing worth doing would be removing the rule banning loli from the porn boards, which in addition to making sense would also remind normalfags that they aren't welcome in here.
>>522304
>Asians, etc., had they tried to conquer the world like Whites did, they would've exterminated every single minority.
yes, because only whites are capable of empathy. your opinions totally aren't colored by the resentment of blacks muslims and asians due to the history of white imperialism, oppression, and colonization.
>>522355
>because only whites are capable of empathy
Your statement, not mine.
>white imperialism, oppression, and colonization.
There is nothing wrong with any of this. Literally everyone else would have wanted to do the same thing.
>>522362
>literally everyone else would have done the same thing
Native Americans were perfectly fine with what they had. Japan was perfectly content with isolation. Africans had no problem living off of their lush savannahs. Native Australians didn't have to deal with any land disputes. China didn't have any massive drug abuse problems.
Guess who ruined all 5 of the above?
>>522372
>Guess who ruined all 5 of the above?
Themselves. Using Whites as a scapegoat doesn't cut it.
>Native Americans
Ah, the same ones who exterminated the Europeans living there thousands of years ago, amirite guise?
>>522372
They did themselves
Are you THAT autistic?
So what do the moonrubes say
