>make thread about mods on various boards
>Nothing happens, they hit the bump limit and fall off
>meanwhile /a/ mods banning and deleting all posts and threads related to them
Has there ever been such blatant abuse?
>>520230
because /a/ is one of the few places with mods that browse the boards. Most other boards, mods only come around when something is reported. Those threads would probably get deleted if reported, especially if they're negative in nature or the usual baseless complaints that are posted.
It's in the fucking rules that you can't complain about the site's moderation. You only get away with it because non-/a/ mods are nice enough to not enforce it most of the time.
>>520236
Referring the being on /qa/ though.
And it's obvious it's the /a/ mods because they're exclusively targeting /a/ posts.
It would be one thing if mods banned all occurrences.
It's another when they enter a thread specifically about complaining about /co/ mods, completely ignore the entire thread, and delete the 5 posts about an /a/ mod breaking moderation rules and asking how to report it.
>>520255
Except as I said. If they were truly following the rules they'd ban all occurrences and not wad through an entire thread to find where they're mentioned.
This is not a case of following rules, it's a case of 1 mod obsessively deleting all posts calling him out on his blatant rule breaking.
If the mod cared about the rules he'd of deleted the entire thread.
>>520259
True but mods outside of /a/ are rarely here.
>>520263
But that doesn't mean an /a/ mod gets to come in and pick and choose which posts he deems are bannable despite the content being identical.
>>520264
Your best shot is to submit moderation feedback.
https://4chan.org/feedback
How do you know it's actually a mod though and not some drama queen deleting his own posts to give the impression of persecution?
That kind of shit used to happen all the time a couple years ago, to the degree they made it so people are not allowed to delete their own threads anymore so that they can't false flag.
>>520275
The ability to delete threads or lack thereof differs between boards.
>>520275
Because.
1. The thread I'm talking about is on autosage.
2. Posts were delete hours after they were made which is longer than the post deletion limit
3. The bans page was filled with the bans.
4. The threads were screen shot and archived with the mod talking and how he doesn't follow the rules of moderation.
>mods are such pussies that they can't handle criticism
>>520627
Spamming threads isn't constructive criticism.
Also, as per >>>/global/rules :
>Remember: The use of 4chan is a privilege, not a right. The 4chan moderation team reserves the right to revoke access and remove content for any reason without notice.
Check your privilege :^)
>>520230
>being this new
You can get away with meta threads on /a/ as long as you make them at the right times.
>>520726
Those still get deleted eventually, just way later than they would at any other time.
>>520230
/a/ mods are fucking pathetic. they ban everyone who criticise them and then publicly ban a shitposter so anons can spam MODS=GODS and stroke their ego
>>520763
See
>>>/GoFuckYourself/
>>520769
>being this upset
>>520770
>defending blatant mod abuse
Someone bought the mods = gods meme too hard.
