Why can't all boards have Webms with sound?

What use would they be on boards like /ck/ or /qa/ OP? But the main reason is because moot didn't want people posting webms with audio spelling out CP sites or some shit.

>>519210

I thought it was because Moot could not afford the bandwidth. Also I thought everyone /b/ used sink or spoon reflections to get away with that. Or so I hear.

>>519199
Clearly you haven't been here long enough to remember the days of people discovering how to embed + autoplay SANIC HEGEHOG and having a 1/20 chance of having your ears destroyed upon opening a thread.

Enter the URL: www.strawpoll.me, but replace the Ls with i's.

There, you will have your answer.

>>519522
>>519565

That's some /b/-tier shit. Mods can easily ban anyone for it and it sounds like a petty excuse more than anything else.

>>519627
Mods have enough to not deal with without this faggotry. I for one hope it never happens. I get enough shit blasted at me generally on the internet, last thing I need is more blasting here.

>>519627
And faggots can evade, and do it again, and evade again etc. Fuck webms with sound. We are why we can't have nice things.

>>519199
>>519210
>>519215
Lurk more.

http://blog.4chan.org/post/81896300203/webm-support-on-4chan
>We decided to disallow WebM files with sound for a few reasons, but mainly because it’s our intention to provide the site with better animated images, and not true video support. To that end, we only accept WebM files with one video stream and no audio streams, that are shorter than 120 seconds long, no larger than 2048x2048 pixels, and less than 3 MB in size.

>>519656
why even bother if you're going to limit it so much and not go all the way?
kind of pathetic

>>519681
just post youtube links

File: I don't know how to use an imageboard.png (131KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

131KB, 640x480px

You seem to be on an imageboard, no videoboard.
Bring back textboards.

>>519522
i am orgasim