ban "/pol/ BTFO" threads from /pol/
also add it to the sticky
ban frog images with heavy jpeg compression
/pol/ isn't your hugbox.
>>518527
>I don't browse /pol/
they are nothing but ironic bait threads to generate responses
if anything, they only support the hug-box mentality by strawmaning and pretending to be the opposing side
>>518524
"Daily reminder that..." threads need to go as well, it'd be nice if the sticky was enforced at fucking all. A couple years ago you might see one /b/-tier thread roll past and get deleted by observant mods, but now the entire board is essentially old /b/ + some politics and /trumpgen/. Is there more than one mod for the entire board? I report dozens of purposeful garbage-threads daily, it hardly ever seems to help.
>>518530
This.
>>518524
I always got the impression that retards who couldn't debate properly (on FB) would take the image, post it on /pol/ and bait people into debunking the argument, then the OP would copy-paste the argument back on FB. I've seen 2-3 instances of something similar happening.
The thing is that /pol/ is sadly full of mongoloids who only parrot arguments, so their users have to periodically run back to /pol/ so they can know what to say.
>>518530
Oh wow bait threads to ruin discussion. I am sure /pol/ has never done to itself or any other boards
>>518675
it wasn't that bad 1.5 years ago
I wish to make end to it, that's why I made this thread
>ban threads that don't support my fragile world view! Now excuse me I need to make another thread about how blacks are subhuman on /k/ and /sci/
What did he mean by this?
>>518682
see >>518530
they don't provide challenging viewpoints, they don't promote discussion, they encourage "circlejerking" they are mostly screen-caps of blatantly dump posts, comments, or news articles from sites like reddit or facebook etc.
they are meant to ridicule the other side and reinforce one's viewpoints simply by jerking off his ego and sense of superiority
those are the very threads are giving courage to the idiots you hate so much to make those threads on /k/ or /sci/ you hate so much
>>518682
They don't constitute any argument or decent discussion point. I've seen threads where actual socialists/communists debate and I'm perfectly fine with it, but these threads are just pointless shitposting/sliding.
>>518695
Posting examples for you anon.
>>>/pol/72839533
>>>/pol/72848691
>>>/pol/72842221
>>>/pol/72841355
>>>/pol/72835743
>>>/pol/72818705
>>>/pol/72804339
>>>/pol/72803938
>>>/pol/72811607
>>518675
With election year at hand /pol/ is getting filled up with shills and newfags who only show up for elections.
Should get better by the end of the year, but until then we're fugged.
>>518524
>wahh mommy sjws are bullying me in my hugbox
/pol/ is just /b/ so regard it as such.
Zimmerman Trial was fun, don't get me wrong, but it began a new era for /pol/.
>>518862
I'm not going to say remember when /b/ was good, but /pol/ is not /b/.
>/pol/ literally derails and makes b8 threads on eveyr board
>when other board complains /pol/ says go back to your hugbox
>/pol/ is triggered when it happens to them
P O T T E R Y
>>519703
>implying wer're not fighting the same scum here
>>518695
>they don't provide challenging viewpoints, they don't promote discussion
I can't remember the last time /pol/ did either of these themselves, and I can't remember the last time /pol/ welcomed/tolerated these kinds posts and gave it their time of the day instead of their usual "kill yourself outta here beta cuck sjw nigger" treatment. /pol/ is the one that encourages the '/pol/ BTFO' kinds of posts. You bought this onto yourselves.
>>518524
>Lets make /pol/ even more rulecucked
just go back to SomethingAwful
>>518524
I agree
twitter posts should be banned on every board
>>519765
>I waste my time debating retards, look how stupid the entire board is
any larger community has always their portion of idiots, if you waste your time with them, frankly you're no better than them
>>519765
I'm sorry /pol/ is doesn't accept your progressive liberal opinions, nevertheless there is still plenty of serious discussion on wide range of topics going on
the amount of shitposting is getting worse tho
>>518524
>frogpost
>sticky
how about no?
>>519796
>nevertheless there is still plenty of serious discussion on wide range of topics going on
Ahahahahaha. This never happen even before the Trump meme happened. Face it, it has always been a shitposting galore
>>519796
>nevertheless there is still plenty of serious discussion on wide range of topics
There really isn't.
>>520351
shitposting is only getting worse since the trump meme,
since neo/pol/ started to make colonies on Reddit and /r/thedonald and brought even more redditors who think 4chan is a meme-machine
seriously check that subreddit all they do is spam /pol/ memes
I've even encountered it on other boards, people randomly shouting /pol/ memes completely out of context for no reason whatsover
>>520430
except there is, take off your bias glasses and go check again
>>520545
You keep saying there are, how about you link some what you deem as serious discussion?
>>520560
lazy cunt
>>>/pol/73034095
>>520586
lmao, that's what you call a serious fucking discussion? As expected of the standards of /pol/. Off yourself.
>>520603
ebin1 :DDDDD
