Mods, instead of banning threads, why don't you have a default hide list?
Dickhead posts his 100000th shitty thread, instead of just making him ban evade, just put the thread on the list of "shitty threads" that are hidden by default.
That way the shitposter is not immediately kicked out of his thread and forced to post another.
Most hardcore shitposters are professionals, they'd figure out it pretty soon. And there's nothing stopping them from opening their threads in a private window to see if it's hidden or not.
>>518413
That's effectively a shadowban, and is not only trivial to get around, but will start all the assblasted ledditfags on yet another crusade.
I see what you're getting at, but if it was easy to implement, it would have been done by now.
>>518413
Hiding posts do nothing when shitposters end up flooding entire boards
just kidding.
>so assmad he literally cannot stop refreshing the thread
kek
>>518438
>forgot
He applied an autodeleter under any poster who uses "Alphonse".
>>518440
about fucking time.
>>518421
Not necessarily. Only if you try to hide the fact that the thread is on the default hide list from the OP.
But I don't see much advantage to OP's approach over simply moving the thread to /trash/.
