>"trial board" gets added
>no one cares, becomes one of the lowest traffic boards
>stays there despite doing nothing but consuming bandwidth
Why do moot and g00k do this?
>>517724
As long as it has ANY traffic, it is a success. They only call it a trial board in an attempt to stop whiny threads like this but apparently it doesn't work.
>>517724
"trial boards" are a meme
everybody knows these boards exist only because hiro/the mods want them to exist, if not they would be gone by now because they have no reason to exist
Because the mods and Hiro are fucking stupid. I would not be surprised if they made a board defending extreme shitty liberal ideologies. Oh wait /co/ exists.
>doing nothing but consuming bandwidth
do you pay for the bandwidth? if not, why do you care?
>whining about boards you don't even go to
Why do people here do this?
>>517724
>still mad about >>>/qst/
Literally the only people who are mad about >>>/qst/ are the 12 year olds who thought that they were "trolling" the posters on /tg/ who rightfully stated that quests don't belong on /tg/. There is absolutely no real reason to be mad about getting your own board. Get over it you child.
>>517724
If something Isn't used how can it consume bandwidth?
Why are you so salty about boards being made for people to talk about topics? Are you mentally ill?
>>518088
Remider that people are still posting quests on /tg/ even though there's a Quest board
>>518100
And hilariously there's not been an iota of quality increase on /tg/ itself. The "elf slave wat do" threads simply last longer.
/tg/ is what needs to go.
>>518110
I don't get what you're saying.
Are you trying to say that since the questfags haven't left /tg/ and that /tg/ has not improved, that that somehow proves that questfags are good?
If anything it proves that we should actually enforce the usage of /qst/
>>518110
Calm your anal ravagement, questfag
>>518113
I don't think you should be lobbying for anything if you can't parse a basic English sentence
>>518110
How are people supposed to improve /tg/ if there's still a bunch of quests clogging the catalog?
>>518115
>Quests are still being posted on /tg/
>/tg/ has not improved
gee i wonder why
>>518110
Oh wow. So this is the endgame of questfags. They want /tg/ deleted, so for all these years they've been shitting it up with quests. Then when a quest board is created, they make their move and start posting shit threads on /tg/ in an attempt to kill off /tg/ for good.
>>518117
>Premise: Quests are not on /tg/
Debatable, but let's follow the logic
>Implicit: Removing quests would improve /tg/
>Implicit: Removing quests would slow down /tg/
>Premise: Other shitposting is still on /tg/, and stays longer because of less traffic
>Conclusion: Removing quests did not improve the board.
It might not be valid, but it's sound.
>>518119
But quests were l i t e r a l l y not removed. They are still there.
Are all questfags this dense?
>>518118
No, it's worse than that. They want /tg/ to become /qst/, but for all the /tg/ users to still use it. The only reason they think they deserve to be on /tg/ is because they think that people who use /tg/ will accidentally click on a quest thread and use it.
They are completely devoid of logic.
>>518130
Read the post. I shouldn't have to explain to you babby-tier deduction or the difference between sound and valid
>>518176
are you just doubling down on your retardation or do you legitimately think you've made a point
>>517724
>one of the lowest traffic boards
>consuming bandwidth
meme
>>518220
A little of A, a little of B.
>>518220
I didn't make the point. I just think you're stupid for being able to parse basic deductive reasoning. The reasoning is sound, but as was pointed out - not valid.
>>517724
>low traffic
>consuming bandwidth
If consuming bandwidth is a problem than deleting /a/, /b/, /v/ and /pol/ would solve everything.
>board that I don't care about is created
>instead of ignoring it and moving on I go to /qa/ and shitpost about it
But dude, you're consuming precious bandwidth. Please delete your post, save Hiro's money.
