>>513598
>problem on /jp/
You're a fucking idiot that doesn't even know how it works. You don't deserve it.

You probably made some mediocre thread there and got super assblasted when everybody did what they were supposed to and not bumped it when they weren't contributing to the board.

/jp/ is the only board that used it properly.

>>513985
Yeah 40% of the posts being saged is exactly what it was intended for.

>>513598
I'd really like to know what you're implying when you say "It was only a problem on /jp/". What exactly was /jp/ doing that you found so problematic?

>>514081
Fine it was just used too much but not a problem.

Visible sage was useful on faster boards since you could sage shitty threads and cause chain reactions of people saging. It was also a fun and classic tool despite some faggots using it as an insult. Thanks moot.

>>514124
You're worse than the usual /v/ faggotry, and your kind is the reason it got removed in the first place.

>>514139
>no fun allowed
I never even used it as an insult. You denying it doesn't change the fact that sage is useless shit if it isn't visible.

>>514152
That's far from a fact. Visible sage takes advantage of stupid people. Invisible sage means you can sage intelligently.

>>514154
>sage intelligently
while making no difference other than patting yourself on the back for nothing

>>513598
Just write something else