Does /qa/ like Zootopia?
>>492723
movie itself was awwrite, maybe a 6/10
then it was turned into a furry shitfest.
so no.
fuck off
>>492738
What's wrong with being a furry?
>>492749
being attracted to animals fucking each other.
Furry Friday is dead and now furries spam their shit all over /b/ on ever fucking thread.
they're the abomination amongst Anonymous.
>>492753
WE ARE LEGION RIGHT /BR/O XD
>>492749
Yiff in hell furgag.
>>492755
>>492758
"Furgag"...?
>>492758
>furgag
fail
still waiting for that bluray release to watch it
is there a date yet?
>>492770
Usually 3, 6, 9 or even a year aafter it stopped airing.
6 months is a good bet, however.
No It's cancerous furry garbage.
>>492749
I hope that was a rhetoric question, because if it wasn't you should kill yourself.
>>492774
It was a srs qstn.
>>492753
Furry has nothing to do with actual animals, you're thinking of bestiality.
>>492749
Everything.
Might as well kill yourself while you're at it.
>>492793
>Furry has nothing to do with actual animals
>But we want to fuck something that looks like an animal
You're contradicting yourself.
Conclusion: /qa/ likes Zootopia.
Also furries.
>>492749
Nobody is going to give an answer to this question besides "kill yourself" or "you know why" because nobody knows the actual answer. Furry hate has just been ingrained in 4chan culture for years for basically no reason other than people finding it hilarious and creating an easy target to gang up on.
Furries who harm actual animals are about as common as video game players who shoot up schools. For most people it's just a fetish, and not for real animals anyways!
>>492801
>Furry hate has just been ingrained in 4chan culture for years for basically no reason other than people finding it hilarious and creating an easy target to gang up on
Didn't it come straight from SA?
>>492798
I'd come up with an analogy as a counterpoint for this but you'd just use some other stupid fallacy to show that you're "right".
>>492803
Yes, basically. It lived on past that transition and proliferated because moot supported it.
>>492803
FYAD and a subforum on The Finer Arts in particular.
>>492803
>Didn't it come straight from SA?
No it came from common sense.
>>492809
:^)
>>492782
lol
>>492809
>2016
>still getting mad at people liking cartoon animals
>>492897
never forgive
>>492897
Aren't furries the people who dress up in animal costumes and fuck each other while wearing them?
>>492897
Good
>>492904
a google search will tell you that fursuiters are more niche than one thinks. additionally that same google search will probably tell you that people who actually have sex in fursuits are far more niche, especially in the fact that anyone who tries having sex in an extra ten pounds of fabric and a massive foam helmet head are probably gonna suffer dehydration and pass out.
>>492912
I'm thinking that people to fap to drawings of animals are also pretty niche. Also, what makes then different to mlpfags? A pony is still a non human beast.
>>492912
You wouldn't pass out from that unless your like a burnvic or something. Otherwise people would be able to breed in those equatorial countries with their 40+ degrees celcius days and 3000% humidity, surrounded by salt water and jungle muslims.
>>492904
This is a great example of how misinformed most people are about furries.
"Furry" is a very general term. Being a "furry" just means you have an interest in anthropomorphic(this word is important) animals.
Furry doesn't imply you're sexually attracted to anthropomorphic animals, let alone real animals. It doesn't mean you dress up in a fursuit, let alone have sex while wearing one. It just means you think animals with human-like traits are neat.
So many people seem to hate furry media and people who like it because they equate furry to bestiality/zoophilia. These things are not the same. Being/liking furry doesn't even have any sexual implications!
Also, most people who like furry media don't identify as "furries". It's similar in nature to Wapanese/weeaboo in that it's become somewhat derogatory and is only embraced ironically.
>>492801
Also, why was this image deleted? It was SFW and an example of (arguably good) Japanese furry art. I won't start a fight over that, though.
>>492923
I hate furfags because they're autistic faggots who can't keep their shit fetish to themselves.
>>492935
Nice generalization!
A vocal minority != the entire body.
>>492935
Great argument.
>Being a "furry" just means you have an interest in anthropomorphic(this word is important) animals.
but that's really weird!
sexual or not, that's just a really weird thing just to be generally interested in!
>>492961
Humans have been interested in anthropomorphic animals since prehistory. Maybe some people might see it as weird, but it's certainly not harmful or dangerous to the point where it deserves to be cast under a negative light.
>>492952
Great reply
>>492935
consider the possibility that maybe when this happens to you you're in a place where there's an abundance of furries or people think it's okay to talk about it.
>>492935
this is true
>>492961
liking literally anything can be weird to someone. Liking anime can easily be construed as weird to some for various reasons.
>>492935
I'm glad someone came to that conclusion.
Though the only type of 'furry' art I'd accept is Lackadaisy. Too good of an artwork to hate, but not enough to make me fetish talking animal drawings.
>>492935
How does that differ from any other sexual orientation on here? Lolifags, shotafags, and assfags are just as annoying.
Holy shit how I hate assfags. They always have to crash into tits threads spouting some nonsense about how the front emulates the back and spam ass shit. You NEVER see the reverse happen.
>>493047
Actually I have
>>492770
More like FurRay LOL
>>492749
Absolutely nothing, just another fetish everyone hates for some reason
>>493560
Lol.
>>492723
They should hang out at the Lone Digger club
>>492897
It's good to see that morals are still being upheld.
>>493047
How is loli, shota and ass a sexual orientation?
