This is just a quick request.
Could you please ban the anime shitposters in Trump General.
a handful of autists from >>>/a/ have hijacked the threads, and now they are extremely low quality.
Thank you for your time.
This is an ANIME imageboard so ANIME is allowed EVERYWHERE.
>>485751
just stop fucking spamming it.
it's called "off-topic posting".
I don't go to Trump General to see nothing but pictures of cartoon girls being lewd, in the same way that I won't go to /a/ in hopes of seeing discussion about Trump's campaign for president.
>>485752
If you want discussion without anime I suggest this website called Reddit. :^)
>>485754
It's not even discussion WITH anime. It's anime WITHOUT discussion. That's the entire problem.
I just don't know why you anime faggots feel entitled to the whole site. Post anime wherever you want, but isn't it fair to keep the off-topic spam contained to /a/?
>>485742
>>485742
>>485742
>>485751
No it's not.
>>485768
>>485742
remove frog posters as well :^))
>>485742
>/pol/ complaining about other boards posting stuff on /pol/
That's real ironic when /pol/ keeps spreading their shit to literally every board.
>>485742
gr8 b8 m8
>>485757
Nope, we'll do whatever we want and there's nothing you can do about it.
>>485754
Why are you posting a video game character then?
>>485788
They're not smart enough to understand irony.
>>485860
>hurrdurr /pol/ is dumb and underage
Can we get some originality going here, please? Is that too much to ask?
>>485846
OK, keep being a manchild
and don't cry when you get banned
As far as I know, pornography isn't allowed on /pol/. If the anime image is nsfw, report it. If it's safe, deal with it. After all, it falls under "muh free speech" that you faggots love so much.
>>485742
>Trump general
>giving a shit about anime
>getting triggered by anime
>not posting it to keep Reddit faggots like you out
>>485863
Just because you have catty responses about originality doesn't make what he said untrue, faggot. Just because you guys are the right-wing Tumblr of 4chan doesn't give you carte blanche to be faggots without being criticized for it.
I think people are forgetting this is a lighthearted social site with a focus on Japanese media. /pol/ should take it easy.
>>485751
Nope. Anime is off topic on most boards.
I remember someone getting banned for posting anime on /pol/ a few months ago. He came here to /qa/ to complain and was banned again. Very funny!
>>485888
That's awfully prejudicial of you, Anon. I ought to be offended if I cared what Anonymous internet posters from other boards thought.
>>485920
/a/ forgets that the other boards were created because people who came to 4chan didn't want to discuss anime all day, but they still think they've the power to lord over the other boards because of their seniority. They think they're right solely on the basis that "4chan WAS created" for anime discussion.
>>485922
It's funny because I'm from /pol/ too, so you're not talking to someone who's from "another board." I find it highly ironic that a fellow /pol/ user is whining about prejudice, irony or not.
If you don't care about what others think, go back to the hugbox people like you turned /pol/ into and stay there.
>>485925
It's you who has prejudged here, Anon, not me. I was merely asking if we could move beyond "hurrdurr /pol/ sure is dumb", which as you know if you are really from /pol/, is as juvenile as it is ridiculous. I would love to debate some legitimate meta-criticism of the state of /pol/ if you wish to move beyond the usual pejoratives which are already endlessly spouted ad-nauseum by the anti-/pol/ faction on here on /qa/.
>>485933
It's juvenile, but not invalid simply because you say so.
Nice True Scotsman though. You may as well have said "If you disagree with me, you're not from /pol/."
Stop ruining /pol/ with this rhetoric that SJWs employ.
>>485936
No its invalid because it's a sub-/b/tard-tier opinion. "/pol/ is dumb." Really? I didn't know 10000 people had exactly the same opinions on things with 100% agreement. It's funny how I've never seen a true circlejerk like that on /pol/ after going there every day for the last 3 3/4 years of its existence but surely you're not lying, right?
>>485942
>"/pol/ is dumb."
That's not what was said. Nice strawman though.
Yes, you're looking for validity and facts alright.
>>485947
>They're not smart enough to understand irony.
Sorry for paraphrasing your hyperbolic bullshit.
>>485957
Which doesn't equate to
>hurrdurr /pol/ is dumb and underage
as you put it.
It was a good criticism of /pol/'s current climate that's been prevalent since late 2014, but it's nice to know that the guy who was vying for "debate" earlier just moments ago doesn't even know who he's talking to and can't take criticism of his precious board.
Protip: I'm not the guy who said that, just the guy who told you that criticism can be stupid, but valid. Which in this case it is. /pol/ is full of ironic contradictions that they, in their modern collective, don't understand or acknowledge because it goes against their narrative.
>>485959
Protip: It wasn't good criticism.
>>485964
Protip: Saying it isn't good doesn't make it so.
It wasn't complete with explanations of why he said what he said, but it wasn't bad.
Cry more.
>>485758
I hope that's real and if so, good on him.
